Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 524080
  • *Total Topics: 15602
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 7
  • *Total: 8

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 275633 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #600 on: March 02, 2014, 04:42:35 PM »
Quote
The general level of his understanding about power engineering is HIGHLY suspect. The more so when he writes that V=IR.  What NONSENSE.  Where did that come from?  Isn't HE claiming to the be teacher here?  Isn't he the one who considers himself a 'better' as he puts it?  He challenges me personally to 'do the math'.  And then he proceeds to give us this?  V=IR=20 x 50 = 1000 Volts  As I said.  He needs to do better.  Less insult - more science - and I think we'd all have been interested.  But he's grown sloppy, reckless.  And worse still - he's taken us all for fools.

You are all fools Ainslie, fools that don't know where PI=3.14 comes from, fools that don't know where V=IR comes from and fools that cannot even read internet references. Do you want to know where V=IR comes from? CRACK A BOOK, you ignorant troll.

However I do not believe that there is any "we" left for you. YOU are the only person who still believes that anything you say could be correct or true.

KEEP DIGGING, ignorant troll queen. With each stupid post, each whining lying assertion you make, it becomes more and more obvious just what you really are. Donovan Martin must be either completely ignoring you, hanging you out to dry, or he is facepalming and blushing with embarrassment that he ever became associated with such a lying, ignorant troll as you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm%27s_law

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #601 on: March 02, 2014, 04:50:56 PM »
Quote
And this is for our picowatT.  A common gate amplifier requires - AT ITS LEAST - a signal to the Gate of the MOSFET.  If the Gate is FLOATING it CANNOT DETECT A SIGNAL.  It's an OPEN CIRCUIT.  What you all have to argue is that you can generate that oscillation - at the level illustrated on that Test 4 paper 1 - which Little TK has now replicated - without ANY signal applied to that Gate of Q2 while Q1 is OUT of the picture.  It is my opinion that it may prove challenging.  It's VERY easy to test.  And then you ALSO have to argue the fact that the switch still operates in both cycles.  Notwithstanding that OPEN GATE.  And you ALSO have to argue that the current flowing during that oscillation is somehow coming from the battery when the waveform is decidedly AC and it's COOKING the resistor.  You recall that the ONLY PATH that's been identified for this battery discharge - is THROUGH the function generator.  You can't deny this.  TK's done that replication.  And you'll note that the amount of current required to cook that element - to BURN IT BLACK - as our Little TK's shown - would be FAR GREATER than the function generator's probes could maintain.  By TK's own admission.

My my, PicoWatt. Didn't you pay attention when you were in Injunearing skool? Can't you see that a Common Gate Amplifier could never work? You should be grateful to Ainslie for enlightening you in this matter.

The charring on my load, to which the lying troll queen Ainslie refers, was of course produced by LONG Q1 ON times, the only way to get substantial heating from the circuit under test. Again she lies about me and my work. She cannot make a single post without making a false claim, lying about something and insulting someone.

AGAIN:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_gate

She is right about one thing, though: It is indeed VERY EASY TO TEST. Too bad she has neither the wit nor the skill to do so for herself. But others reading here certainly do, DONOVAN MARTIN certainly does, and SWeir certainly can explain to her why her emissions are so much nonsense.

Quote
And you'll note that the amount of current required to cook that element - to BURN IT BLACK - as our Little TK's shown - would be FAR GREATER than the function generator's probes could maintain.  By TK's own admission.


What an abject and transparent LIAR this troll queen is. When the Q1 is ON the FG is not involved in the current loop! NONE OF THE LOAD CURRENT, no major current,  PASSES THROUGH THE FG WHEN THE Q1 TRANSISTOR IS ON. "By my own admission".

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #602 on: March 02, 2014, 06:00:19 PM »
TK,

Surely by now you have realized the waste of time it is trying to argue with or teach her anything...

I know I have...

PW

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #602 on: March 02, 2014, 06:00:19 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #603 on: March 02, 2014, 06:56:50 PM »
TK,

Surely by now you have realized the waste of time it is trying to argue with or teach her anything...

I know I have...

PW

Of course I realize this, friend PW. I have known this ever since 2009, when she refused to believe that the 555 timer circuit that she published did not operate as she claimed it did, in spite of the evidence and very clear demonstrations that I produced at the time.

At this point it should be clear that the reason for my demonstrations is to show _other people_ that Ainslie is a liar, an ignorant fool, and that all of those claims she makes, particularly the ones concerning me and my work, are just insane delusions on her part. The past few days, with her increasingly ignorant and vitriolic posts, have just given me more opportunities to show that this is so. The more she denies the reality of the operation of the Common Gate Amplifier that makes up the Q2 half of the 5-mosfet circuit, the easier and more fun this becomes. You may note that in those last videos, I adopt the tone of a pet owner whose dog has just shat on the floor inside the house. And Ainslie, with her response, has proven herself to be even less intelligent than that dog.

Stay tuned, I have just shot another demonstration video which ONCE AGAIN demonstrates that the common gate amplifier oscillates with only the FG RED lead connected to the Source pin of the mosfet, and the Gate of the mosfet connected to the negative pole of the main battery (and of course to the BLACK FG output lead). I used only three AA batteries initially and then substituted the FG for that bias source. The video is processing and will be uploaded in an hour or so. Ainslie, if she watches it at all, will once again accuse me of fakery.... but is of course unwilling to say just HOW I could possibly fake something so simple, nor is she willing to try the simple experiments for herself -- since she KNOWS everything there is to know about mosfet behaviour already. She has actually accused me of displaying a Stored Waveform.... on the magic Tektronix 2213A hundred-dollar-garage-sale oscilloscope. It is to laugh.



Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #604 on: March 02, 2014, 07:27:25 PM »
Here's an example of an excellent Teacher actually trying to Teach the Great Scientist something that she _knows_ is false. I suppose Poynt99 may still believe that it is possible to overcome Ainslie's arrogance and her blind worship of her ignorant "thesis". It's sad, because I'm sure he has better and more rewarding things to do.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #604 on: March 02, 2014, 07:27:25 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #605 on: March 02, 2014, 07:38:34 PM »
TK,

I think the video you made with the components connected directly above the simplified schematic you drew was your clearest and most concise video describing how Q2 is turned on.  I really don't believe you can improve on that.  Although she did in the end accuse you of some kind of deception, she was at least able to follow along and visualize the connections.

She will not believe or accept how a simple common gate amplifier is turned on, yet she can somehow manage to believe that a power strip can be plugged into itself and activated with a piezo ignitor to produce free energy.

Your videos can be easily replicated by anyone willing to do so, but she would rather waste her time arguing against simple well known facts and save her replication efforts for silly power strip and piezo ignitor videos.

To be kind, something is amiss with her, and I can't help but feel a bit sorry for her.

PW

   

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #606 on: March 02, 2014, 07:53:27 PM »
Sympathy and pity are fine as far as they go. Are we also to feel sorry for poor Donovan Martin, whose name still appears on the mendacious and error-ridden daft manuscripts Ainslie has tried to foist off as "scientific papers" when they do not even meet the standards of a high-school physics report?

The time for feeling sorry for Ainslie, for "understanding" her mental problems, is long past.

Sow the wind, ROSEMARY AINSLIE, and reap the whirlwind. You are being swept away by the gale of your own ignorance, arrogance, and sheer mendacity, and you will one day account for your sins to an Authority with whom you will not be able to argue.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #606 on: March 02, 2014, 07:53:27 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #607 on: March 02, 2014, 07:58:44 PM »
PW said,
Quote
I think the video you made with the components connected directly above the simplified schematic you drew was your clearest and most concise video describing how Q2 is turned on.  I really don't believe you can improve on that.  Although she did in the end accuse you of some kind of deception, she was at least able to follow along and visualize the connections.

Was she? Then how can she claim this:

 Ainslie said,
Quote
And yet he insults his viewers with an uncluttered view of Q2 connected ONLY by its SOURCE leg - with it's gate 'floating', unattached - free as a bird.  And he INSISTS that he's switching that circuit.  Not so.  Just not possible.  I'm adding this for clarity as this is still not obvious to those dull witted trolls.  The GATE leg of Q2 was attached ONLY to the SOURCE LEG OF Q1.  WITHOUT THAT CONNECTION THEN THERE CAN BE NO SIGNAL APPLIED TO THE GATE OF Q2.  THE CIRCUIT IS OPEN. 

The Gate of the Q2 mosfet is clearly attached, as it always has been, to the circuit negative rail, through the CVR if used, and to the Black output lead of the FG.

Can we see now, AINSLIE, why it is incorrect to refer, as you always have done in your diagrams, to the output leads of the FG as "+" and "-"? Probably not, but everyone else who has ever used a FG knows that EITHER output can be at a higher _relative_  potential than the other output.

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #608 on: March 02, 2014, 08:27:48 PM »
TK,

I stand corrected...

PW

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #608 on: March 02, 2014, 08:27:48 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #609 on: March 02, 2014, 08:31:39 PM »
Lest there be any doubt about the veracity of the adjectives I apply to Ainslie:

Ignorance.
Where does PI=3.14 come from, she asks. Where does V=IR come from, she asks. How does a common gate amplifier operate? She has no clue.
etc. etc.

Arrogance.
Take a look at her recent posts. If that is not arrogance I do not know the meaning of the word, and neither does Webster or the OED.

Mendacity.
Look at the quotation I cite above. She clearly claims that I am faking a demonstration, and she clearly claims that I do not have a connection present in the demonstration, when I do.
Further examples of her outright lying abound. Look at the description of the Figure 3 scopeshot in the daft manuscripts. She lies about how the trace was obtained and she lies about its effects on the circuit and she lies about what it indicates.

Stupidity.
See Ignorance, above. See also the "calculations" upon which her overunity claim depends.

Trolling.
Just read her forum and look at the deliberate attempts to provoke, the libels and slanders she emits without any proof or documentation, the false accusations and the twisting and misrepresentation of what people have told her.

Deluded.
Look at the way she describes the operation of the circuit, the way it is portrayed in the daft manuscripts and the way she is carrying on at the moment. This is either the expression of a severely deluded individual, or a very good actor pretending to be such.

As I've said before, I can PROVE the truth of any and all pejoratives I have mentioned in dealing with ROSEMARY AINSLIE, mostly by reference to her own words and behaviours.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #610 on: March 02, 2014, 08:33:42 PM »



The newest demonstration is uploading now and should be viewable in half an hour or so.

http://youtu.be/YENIyuiEDRI

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #610 on: March 02, 2014, 08:33:42 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #611 on: March 02, 2014, 08:39:13 PM »
Sympathy and pity are fine as far as they go. Are we also to feel sorry for poor Donovan Martin, whose name still appears on the mendacious and error-ridden daft manuscripts Ainslie has tried to foist off as "scientific papers" when they do not even meet the standards of a high-school physics report?

The time for feeling sorry for Ainslie, for "understanding" her mental problems, is long past.

Sow the wind, ROSEMARY AINSLIE, and reap the whirlwind. You are being swept away by the gale of your own ignorance, arrogance, and sheer mendacity, and you will one day account for your sins to an Authority with whom you will not be able to argue.

Actually, I'd feel sorry for anyone who had to deal with her on a daily basis, or occasionally be roped in to being in close proximity to her.  That would include Donovan, who may be in the uncomfortable position of having to humor her now and then.  I don't know.

But the lucky ones can just walk away and not let her get under their skin...

Life is too short...

PW


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #612 on: March 02, 2014, 08:45:41 PM »
Actually, I'd feel sorry for anyone who had to deal with her on a daily basis, or occasionally be roped in to being in close proximity to her.  That would include Donovan, who may be in the uncomfortable position of having to humor her now and then.  I don't know.

 I do. Witness Donovan Martin lying for Ainslie:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neME1s-lEZE

Also let us not forget that the schematics that appear in every version of her daft manuscripts, bearing Donovan Martin's name as coauthor, are LIES. They do not depict the actual location used by the authors for the Black FG lead. The actual location they used for the entire set of experiments allows the FG currents to bypass the CVR entirely. They NEVER used the location depicted in the diagrams until the August 10 rehearsal for the public August 11 demonstration -- they could not have done because of the groundloop problem, and if that weren't enough I have shown images, from Ainslie herself, of every apparatus they ever used since 2009, and all of them show the Black FG lead at the common circuit ground, NOT the location depicted in the schematics.

Quote

But the lucky ones can just walk away and not let her get under their skin...

Life is too short...

PW

Or rather, Life is not long enough properly to catalog and display all of the egregious faults and failures and lies for which ROSEMARY AINSLIE is responsible.

Let us also not forget that it was SHE who chose this battlefield, it is SHE who has escalated the rhetoric, and it is SHE who brought the challenges to ME, not the other way around. She had the option to quit after the August 11 demonstration that proved the falsity of her claims and which resulted in the insincere "retraction" of the daft manuscripts. When she "retracted" her retraction.... that was her choice, to continue with promoting her false claims, lies, and arrogant insulting behaviour. Her choice. I choose to defend the TRUTH, even though it may be a Little time consuming.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #613 on: March 02, 2014, 09:03:46 PM »
The new video is viewable now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YENIyuiEDRI

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #614 on: March 02, 2014, 10:39:54 PM »
For anyone trying to replicate these experiments, especially those shown in the last video...

NOTE THIS WELL: sometimes with the low battery voltage this system will not oscillate when the bias AA stack connection is made, as you can see in this video a couple of times. When that happens, the mosfet is turned (very nearly) FULLY ON with Vgs +4.5 volts, and so conducts the full current supplied by the battery through the load as DC. This will of course heat up both the load, rapidly, and the mosfet, a bit more slowly. SO do not let yourselves be fooled by even this simple circuit: proper ground reference connections must be used, no groundloop allowed, and the circuit must be monitored to assure that you are oscillating and not just turning the mosfet on hard.

I've included this disclaimer also in the "Description" section of the video's YT page.

 

OneLink