Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 522941
  • *Total Topics: 15571
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 7
  • *Total: 10

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 273129 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #555 on: March 01, 2014, 09:02:36 AM »
Yes, that's right. I only made qualititative measurements in this video, except for the accurate determination of the DC resistances of the two CSRs by the Fluke DMM. Should accurate quantitative measurements of currents be necessary "for some reason", I would prefer to perform those on the full circuit with 5 transistors and the 1/4 ohm CSR array with a more rigorous experimental protocol.

But what is shown in this video is sufficient to put to rest the absurd assertions of the Great Scientist. Particularly interesting is the fact that robust oscillations are shown on the CSRs when the ground-isolated FG Black lead is connected on the _battery side_ of the CSR assembly. The only thing connected to the transistor side, in that case, is..... the GATE of the mosfet. And of course the only thing _ever_ connected to the Source of the mosfet is the Red FG lead.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #556 on: March 01, 2014, 09:26:53 AM »
Ms. Ainslie will definitely not be happy about these tests.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #557 on: March 01, 2014, 09:48:23 AM »
Ms. Ainslie will definitely not be happy about these tests.

She will ignore them. She has expressed her firm intention never to watch any more of my videos. Ten minutes spent watching and learning is too much for her, she would rather by far continue in her delusions, insults and mendacities.  And of course repeating the experiments for herself would really cut into her afternoon soap opera time, so that will not happen either. Plus it's hard to operate that oscilloscope and FG of hers when she is in her cups, which must be happening earlier and earlier every day, judging by her rants.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #557 on: March 01, 2014, 09:48:23 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #558 on: March 01, 2014, 09:57:06 AM »
There seems to be some problem at YouTube. The first attempt at upload hung at about 95 percent, so I'm trying again.
Sorry about that. The YT uploader is acting strangely. Perhaps they have "improved" things again. I sure wish Google would quit screwing up something that has worked fine for years.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2014, 04:04:59 PM by TinselKoala »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #559 on: March 01, 2014, 05:14:14 PM »
OK perhaps now we have a good upload.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a1plHZwmWg

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #559 on: March 01, 2014, 05:14:14 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #560 on: March 01, 2014, 06:16:55 PM »
Any one who wants to know why and how someone gets banned, several times over, from this forum should check the various threads that are still preserved here where a certain Great Scientist filled up page after page with insults and false claims and refusals to cooperate and broken promises to re-test or even to supply old data. That, plus the fact that the Great Scientist made (empty, imaginary) threats of lawsuits to just about everyone including our host Stefan, explains the repeated warnings and bannings that cause the Great Scientist to be banished to her own private hell. Several other website forum owners feel the same way. Naked Scientists: banned for repeatedly ignoring the rules and for continuing to argue facts with her better-educated and professional correspondents there. Threads preserved in their archive. Energetic Forum: at first the Great Scientist caused quite a stir there, but when even the credulous researchers there found out the truth about the claims made by the Great Scientist and started feeling her rancor and venomous attacks upon her critics... banned again she was. The editorial policy of that site is such that many of the sins of the Great Scientist, along with the critical analyses of them, have been vanished down the memory hole, but enough remains that one may get the gist of the matter.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #561 on: March 01, 2014, 09:54:10 PM »
OK perhaps now we have a good upload.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a1plHZwmWg
That was a very nice demonstration.  If you are interested in doing anymore demonstrations you can modify the set-up to remove the wire wound resistor and  flip the Kelvinish probe around.  Then insert 6" of bare wire between the battery negative and the Kelvinish probe.  Then compare the readings from the Kelvinish probe and a probe with the probe hook fixed half an inch to the right of the Kelvinish probe, and taking different readings while moving the ground clip from next to the Kelvinish probe in steps until you get to the battery negative.  The point of the demonstration would be to illustrate how Ms. Ainslie and her collaborators got the results that they did not understand during the June 29, 2013 demonstration.  Finally, when you have the ground clip at the battery, then move the probe hook from the Q1 side of the Kelvinish probe to the battery negative side of the Kelvinish probe.  You will then have shown the many secrets of the L/R high pass network.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #561 on: March 01, 2014, 09:54:10 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #562 on: March 01, 2014, 10:54:36 PM »
Thanks. Yes, that's an excellent suggestion for a further demonstration, I'll put it on the list. I usually get a burst of energy around 11 pm and work until 4 am or so, so we shall see what happens tonight.

Meanwhile, I have been trying to figure out that old Epic Instruments Wavesaver that a friend donated to the TKLab. It's tricky. Perhaps some combination of me not knowing how to operate it, and old capacitors inside it, is preventing me from getting coherent results with it. I can get it to save and display some simple waveform inputs like a square wave from the FG, but even those aren't quite right. I haven't even tried to save something as complicated as a typical Ainslie burst oscillatory set. No point in even trying, until I know what I'm doing with it and have checked the unit internally. A manual with schematic would really be helpful but this seems to be a real "orphan" instrument that nobody has heard of.


I am slightly puzzled as to why, after all these years of exposure, other researchers haven't decomposed the Ainslie experience the way we've done over the past couple of weeks.  Oh well, there it is, now that I've shown what I've shown in the last four or so vids, and now that Ainslie has emitted her response, to the main one at least.... it will be plainly evident to any person who is newly interested in Ainslie's claims just what they can expect from her.



Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #563 on: March 01, 2014, 11:00:59 PM »
Thanks. Yes, that's an excellent suggestion for a further demonstration, I'll put it on the list. I usually get a burst of energy around 11 pm and work until 4 am or so, so we shall see what happens tonight.

Meanwhile, I have been trying to figure out that old Epic Instruments Wavesaver that a friend donated to the TKLab. It's tricky. Perhaps some combination of me not knowing how to operate it, and old capacitors inside it, is preventing me from getting coherent results with it. I can get it to save and display some simple waveform inputs like a square wave from the FG, but even those aren't quite right. I haven't even tried to save something as complicated as a typical Ainslie burst oscillatory set. No point in even trying, until I know what I'm doing with it and have checked the unit internally. A manual with schematic would really be helpful but this seems to be a real "orphan" instrument that nobody has heard of.


I am slightly puzzled as to why, after all these years of exposure, other researchers haven't decomposed the Ainslie experience the way we've done over the past couple of weeks.  Oh well, there it is, now that I've shown what I've shown in the last four or so vids, and now that Ainslie has emitted her response, to the main one at least.... it will be plainly evident to any person who is newly interested in Ainslie's claims just what they can expect from her.
It takes time, materials and knowledge to deal with these sorts of claims.  Poynt99 dealt with some of them, but the message seemed to go right past Ms. Ainslie, as did the messages in your videos.  Greg has posted that he doesn't understand what it is that you were trying to show.  The book cover above has a short list of things that you have demonstrated.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #563 on: March 01, 2014, 11:00:59 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #564 on: March 01, 2014, 11:11:35 PM »
ERRATUM:
In the last video, I give the part number of the non-inductive resistor I used in the Kelvinish probe as WNER50FE, which is the part number for the 0.5 ohm resistor in that series. The actual part number for the resistor in the probe is WNE1R0FE, the one-ohm unit. Sorry about the confusion, rest assured as the DMM showed the resistor in the unit is indeed one ohm.
I'll be placing an annotation in the video to this effect right away.
Thanks again for pointing this out, MarkE.



Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #565 on: March 01, 2014, 11:21:47 PM »
ERRATUM:
In the last video, I give the part number of the non-inductive resistor I used in the Kelvinish probe as WNER50FE, which is the part number for the 0.5 ohm resistor in that series. The actual part number for the resistor in the probe is WNE1R0FE, the one-ohm unit. Sorry about the confusion, rest assured as the DMM showed the resistor in the unit is indeed one ohm.
I'll be placing an annotation in the video to this effect right away.
Thanks again for pointing this out, MarkE.


And seriously, thank you.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #565 on: March 01, 2014, 11:21:47 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #566 on: March 01, 2014, 11:36:56 PM »
It takes time, materials and knowledge to deal with these sorts of claims.  Poynt99 dealt with some of them, but the message seemed to go right past Ms. Ainslie, as did the messages in your videos.  Greg has posted that he doesn't understand what it is that you were trying to show.  The book cover above has a short list of things that you have demonstrated.

Surely Greg has read Ainslie's pseudosplanations of the circuit's functioning and the hypotheses she has put forth about what will happen when things are disconnected or connected thus and so. Is it possible that he actually _agrees_ with her about those things? If so... that does not bode well for his own research. The issue of whether or not resistors can eat themselves to provide power is one thing, but without proper circuit understanding and a respect for the REAL experimental method, he'll never find out or be able to prove it if he does.  Ainslie made some pretty dramatic predictions there in the past couple of days.... yet my Function Generator still functions, the Tek 2213a still won't display a stored waveform and the Common Gate Oscillator still applies to the Ainslie Q2 half-circuit. The other Q1 half is just a low-side mosfet switch.

So as far as I can see now, the only thing at all unusual about the Ainslie breadboard circuit is that they have the heavy heatsinks and multiple mosfets on the WRONG SIDE. If they had actually used the circuit in the second manuscript on Rossi's site, instead of the one in the first daft manuscript, they would be much better off and likely would not have suffered the mosfet failures that have plagued them.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #567 on: March 01, 2014, 11:40:45 PM »

And seriously, thank you.

You're welcome, and if you also caught the error, thanks back to you as well.

Here's the relevant datasheet if you don't already have it.


Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #568 on: March 01, 2014, 11:56:58 PM »

And seriously, thank you.
Greg, would you like to talk about your experiments in comparison to these recent experiments that TinselKoala has performed against Ms. Ainslie's claims?  Some of the things that I think are notable:

The energy gains claimed by Ms. Ainslie have ranged from 5X to 10X and more.  You have shown numbers indicating around 28% gain.  To me that is not good correlation.

TinselKoala's videos and Ms. Ainslie's own demonstrations have shown multiple flaws in Ms. Ainslie's measurements and conclusions:  Ms. Ainslie measured current as the voltage across an uncalibrated and uncompensated inductive wire for the Paper 1 Figures:  3, 6, & 7. 

Even where the oscilloscope probe was placed on the correct DC connection for current sense for parts of the June 29, and August 11 demonstrations, the readings were badly distorted by parasitic inductance.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that most if not all oscillatory current flows through Q1 during the "Q1 Off" phase have been disproven.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that oscillatory current does not flow through the Q2 source terminal during the "Q1 Off" phase have been disproven.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that oscillatory current does not flow through the Q2 gate terminal during the "Q1 Off" phase have been disproven.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that the oscillatory current is in the range of 14App has been disproven.  The actual current has been shown to be about 2App.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that her August 11 demonstration did not show battery current draw at all times that there was heater element current flow have been disproven.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that more power flows in her circuit apparatus than is drawn from the battery has been disproven.

I would like to know your comments on these points.

Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #569 on: March 02, 2014, 12:03:07 AM »
I'll post which make and model non-inductive resistors I used in all of my tests as soon as I can find the Mouser invoices. I used two values depending on what I was measuring. I used 0.1Ohm resistors for measuring lower voltage drops like for PWM power determinations and 0.05Ohm for the higher voltage drops like for the Inductive Resistor Heater Element. However, I don't use the Q-Array. My setup is much more basic, but measurement is just as rigorous and requires more than just basic measurement skills (and knowledge)... which (even though you don't believe it) I do have.


Regards,


gme   

 

OneLink