Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 513951
  • *Total Topics: 15298
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 6
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 18

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 247166 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #45 on: August 30, 2013, 09:14:29 PM »
Let us note once again that on October 6 and 8, 2009, Rosemary Ainslie, posting as "witsend", HAPPILY ENDORSED THE SAME WAVEFORMS and similar ones from FTC (Glen Lettermeier) that .99 is now showing her, and that she now refuses to acknowledge.

Why and how has this change in her attitude happened? It happened because on the 6th and 8th of October 2009 she still thought that Glen's results showed "overunity" performance.  Since she now apparently believes that they don't..... she now disavows any knowledge of the waveforms, and will self-destruct as we watch.

http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-97.html
Post # 2900 and further on.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #46 on: August 30, 2013, 10:44:11 PM »
Ains-lie expects people to replicate her claims.

But she WILL NOT TELL YOU the actual circuit she used. The only way we know the correct circuit for the 5-mosfet apparatus is because poynt99 traced it out from still frames from the March 2011 demonstration. The given schematics from Ainslie and Martin, all four of them, are lies. The schematics in the "papers" and the March 2011 demo video are lies. Only .99's schematic, the fifth one, determined after another month of lies from Ainslie, is the truth.

She WILL NOT TELL YOU the actual circuit used for the Quantum article. None of the three circuits she and her "team" Donovan Martin have presented are the same as what is in the box NOW, and the published Quantum circuit cannot do what she claims. Even the circuit in the box NOW can't make a 2.4 kHz frequency, because it was DESIGNED TO OPERATE AT THE SAME FREQUENCY RANGE that Glen Lettermeier used to make his Test shots back in 2009. But it isn't his circuit either. And the only way we know what is in the box NOW is because Steve Weir reverse-engineered it as much as possible, and revealed that it is NOTHING LIKE the claimed circuit in the Quantum article nor is it like any of the other circuits given. It uses a SINGLE variable resistor instead of TWO, it cannot vary duty cycle and frequency independently and it cannot make a 2.4 kHz frequency, and it DOESN"T EVEN HAVE THE SAME MOSFET that she has been specifying all along. Two mosfets in the box, one P-channel, and one N-channel, but absolutely NO IRFPG50 anywhere in evidence. To this day nobody knows, except maybe her and "Donny", what the circuit was that was used in the Quantum-17 article.

I can guarantee that what is in the box presented in photos on her forum NOW is not what was in the box in 2002. Numbers on chips have meaning! They are part numbers.... but there are more numbers than just the part numbers. THEY ARE DATE CODES giving the date of manufacture of the chips. If a certain part was manufactured in 2007... what is it doing in a box that was "lost" in 2002 and has just now been found? Just how did it get in there? GREMLINS ???

She WILL NOT TELL YOU what settings were used to make the data she claims. She WILL NOT TELL YOU what the scope waveforms are/were. And the reason for all this mendacity and prevarication is very simple: deniability. If you do not get "overunity" she can simply say that you are not using her circuit/waveforms/analysis etc. so you cannot claim to be actually replicating and testing HER circuit and HER parameters. Just as she is doing now with "poynty".

She wants her "replicators" to flail around and when they DO report unusual gains, she jumps on that and claims "success" . But when they DON'T report unusual gains.... it's not even the right circuit , not the right waveforms, and the replicator is too stupid to breathe, much less dare to replicate Ainslie's world-saving circuit.

And if they at first report gains, but then later retract that claim of gains.... Ainslie then retracts her previous endorsement.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #47 on: August 30, 2013, 11:00:46 PM »
Here's a little tid-bit that knowledgeable people will know how to interpret:

Quote
STMicroelectronics was formed in 1987 by the merger of semiconductor companies SGS Microelettronica (Società Generale Semiconduttori) of Italy and Thomson Semiconducteurs, the semiconductor arm of France's Thomson. At the time of the merger the company was known as SGS-THOMSON but took its current name in May 1998 following the withdrawal of Thomson SA as an owner.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STMicroelectronics

The STMicro or ST Microelectronics name and logo did not exist before May of 1998.

And here is another tidbit: STMicro puts DATE CODES on their chips, so that one can determine the date of manufacture of the chip. So do many other manufacturers like Texas Instruments, Philips, etc.

The STMicro NE555N timer chip in Ainslie's box bears the following markings, in addition to the ST logo:

 CHN
 NE555N
 K2B718

So..... DO THE MATH (tm Ainslie).

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #47 on: August 30, 2013, 11:00:46 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #48 on: August 31, 2013, 09:19:44 AM »
Well.... then.... are _these_ the Mystery Oscillations? Ainslie doesn't want to hear anything about her former collaborator FTC's oscillations... so how about the very different oscillations from her former collaborator and head cheerleader Aaron Murakami?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiSWJ4fp-k4
uploaded August 6 2009 with the text:
Quote
Contrary to skeptical mythology by false experts, the IRFPG50 is easy to get into oscillation. See diagram and more explanation at www.energeticforum.com

Well.. this "skeptical mythologist" uploaded this video on July 22, 2009.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=948GxRN1Qxo
Here I am monitoring the DRAIN pin of the mosfet, so the trace is "upside down" from Aaron's traces at the shunt and across the load, and I am operating at a frequency high enough to show only a single spindle of the oscillation bursts he demonstrates a couple of weeks LATER.

(Note the impunity with which Aaron swaps probe positions to look across the load with one channel of the Fluke-O-Scope. The one nice thing about that instrument is its isolated channel references. You can have as much as 600 V difference between the channel refs, IIRC, so you can get away with crazy things like scoping "across" the load while your other channel's reference is on the ground rail.)

But wait! Both Aaron and I are using the "wrong  mosfet" !! We are using the mosfet Ainslie _told us to use_, not the one _she actually used_. Or is it? Only the Shadow knows. But what this skeptical mythologist knows for sure is that the different mosfets behave differently in the circuit... because I have tried them both, and other types as well. By far the best performer in heating and "overunity spikes" that I tried back in 2009 was the 2sk1548, which ironically has a higher Rdss than the PG50, but is faster. And a lot cheaper.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #49 on: September 02, 2013, 04:00:44 AM »
So let me say it plainly: The "Box", Demo Kit 1, that Ainslie and Martin have claimed many times was "lost" ("You can take my word on that") after the testing reported in the Quantum article.... and which suddenly turned up in her son's shed a couple weeks ago.... and which somehow made it through 3 moves, 3 changes of address without being "found"..... Has a chip in it that was manufactured in May of 2007. 



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #49 on: September 02, 2013, 04:00:44 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8368
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #50 on: September 02, 2013, 04:10:52 AM »
So her circuit can cause time travel?  I don't remember that being mentioned in the paper.  This is incredible.  A real breakthrough of Nobel prize proportions.

Bill

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #51 on: September 02, 2013, 03:00:05 PM »
Who knows, Bill? After all, she has asserted that the Winter Solstice comes in July in South Africa. Time, like other factual data, is unimportant to Ainslie.

But check the post images below.  It is clear that their story of where the apparatus was, and which apparatus went where, is not consistent.

The "ABB" tests are referenced in the Quantum article and in a newspaper article from November 2002. So whatever apparatus was sent off to them and "never returned" happened before that article was written. The Quantum article has a photo of an apparatus in use, that, as far as can be determined, looks the same as what was "found" a couple of weeks ago. This, I maintain, is the apparatus that was in fact used in the Quantum article. She has told us it was, and for once, I believe her--- but the apparatus has been modified since then and so it could not have been "lost" as both Ainslie and Martin have claimed. Yet Ainslie and Martin both have said that this apparatus was lost. Yet.... in mid-2009 she knew that it was in her garden shed, and that it had been used again, with mods, by Donovan Martin for the IET paper submission. This is when the original 555 timer circuit, which used 2 potentiometers and etc. was replaced with the new circuit and the chip made in 2007, in order to repeat GLEN's frequency settings as he described in his Test 13 and others. The new circuit uses a single adjustment pot and operates in the frequency range (400 kHz or more) of Glen's testing, NOT the original Quantum article's specified 2.4 kHz. 

Donovan Martin replicated Glen Lettenmeier, NOT the other way around !



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #51 on: September 02, 2013, 03:00:05 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #52 on: September 02, 2013, 08:24:29 PM »
So her circuit can cause time travel?  I don't remember that being mentioned in the paper.  This is incredible.  A real breakthrough of Nobel prize proportions.

Bill


Lol
Rosemary circuit is certainly running on time travel technology, using energy from the past to power the circuit in the future, most people call it fossil fuels ;D

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8368
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #53 on: September 02, 2013, 08:44:09 PM »

Lol
Rosemary circuit is certainly running on time travel technology, using energy from the past to power the circuit in the future, most people call it fossil fuels ;D

Exactly.

I still love TK's moniker "Little Miss Mosfet".  I think that is pure genius.  I think I finally cleaned all of the beer off of my keyboard that I spit out when I read that post.  That name should go down in OUdotcom history.

I stumbled into the Rose debacle a few years ago not knowing what was what.  What I thought I observed was a bunch of smart guys beating up on a poor, sincere, sweet old lady who was doing some honest experiments.  I defended her.  Knowing what I know now, I owe all of those smart guys an apology.  This would include TK and Darren, and a few others I am sure.  It was a good lesson for me.  Things are not always as they appear.

I am sorry guys. 

Her behavior is obviously not scientific, honest, defensible, nor admirable at all.  It is one thing to believe in your circuit and to not give up on it.  Contrast and compare Rose and her efforts to Lawrence Tseung and his efforts.

Bill

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #53 on: September 02, 2013, 08:44:09 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3586
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #54 on: September 02, 2013, 09:23:01 PM »
Thanks Bill.

You and Mags eventually saw the light, and that's a good thing. I think I speak for several folks when I say we appreciate your honesty.  :)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #55 on: September 03, 2013, 08:44:25 PM »
Yes, all is good now.

@poynt99:

If you are having trouble determining the exact "settings", circuit and waveforms to use in your replication of Rosemary Ainslie's circuit and claims, I would like to direct your attention to Rosemary Ainslie's Blog, "New Light on Dark Energy", where the information you need was posted by Rosemary Ainslie on 21 December 2010.

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2010/12/finally-our-tie-paper.html

This was posted after the "falling out" with FTC, but certainly seems to include a lot of his work.

Of course.... Rosemary Ainslie apparently now disavows those waveforms and settings. Why is the manuscript still up on Rosemary Ainslie's own blog, then?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #55 on: September 03, 2013, 08:44:25 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3586
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #56 on: September 04, 2013, 01:31:08 AM »
TK

Yes, it does make one wonder, doesn't it?

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #57 on: September 04, 2013, 01:58:27 AM »
TK

Yes, it does make one wonder, doesn't it?

Not really. She has probably lost the password and can't delete it.

 ;D

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #58 on: September 04, 2013, 07:37:23 AM »
@poynt99:

Still having trouble with finding the "correct" waveforms?

Well, it turns out that FuzzyTomCat himself posted the proper waveforms over on Overunityresearch.com, back in February 2011. I'm sure you've heard of that site!

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=13.msg10736#msg10736
Reply # 112


I'll also attach FTC's scopeshot below.


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #59 on: September 04, 2013, 02:29:30 PM »
I've demonstrated that Ainslie is wrong, many many times. She rants and raves and accuses ME of being "wrong" somehow about the Quantum magazine circuit.... but cannot refute me with facts. The Quantum published circuit does what I say it does, I am not wrong NOW and I was not wrong in JUNE OF 2009 when I first pointed it out.... and nearly TWO THOUSAND forum posts, over two months, it took before AARON finally constructed it and announced that I AM RIGHT. All of this is fully documented in threads that Ainslie has forgotten about:

http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-75.html

It is amazingy laughable that Ainslie cannot even see the scopeshot that is UP RIGHT NOW on her forgotten blog.

Remember this, Ainslie?

Remember what AARON had to go through to make a circuit that even came CLOSE to your claim of 3.7 percent ON at 2.4 kHz? And he calls it a "replication?" Of course this was before you savaged him and turned him away from you with your lies, insults and disrespect.

Keep on ranting, Ainslie. I have a record of the past that refutes you, in your own words and deeds.

The circuit that is in your box NOW is not the circuit that was in your box when the Quantum article was written. This is PROVEN by the disconnected potentiometer, the higher frequency of operation of Steve Weir's schematic that CANNOT POSSIBLY give a 2.4  kHz signal, and the SMOKING GUN of the presence of a 555 chip that was manufactured in May of 2007. The circuit in the box NOW was rebuilt in early 2009 so that Donovan Martin could REPRODUCE GLEN's  WORK, so that the IET and IEEE submissions might have some data in them that Fuzzy himself didn't generate. They replicated HIS work, not the other way around !

And of course.... we have the treacherous and lying manner in which you deceived your sycophant GMEAST..... by letting him build and test a circuit with all that history without even telling him it was completely bogus. "Has anyone built it? IT DOESN'T WORK" he exclaimed... and many of us observing laughed out loud and are still laughing at that idiot troll's fumblings about.






 

OneLink