Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 325371 times)

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1065 on: April 24, 2014, 06:09:23 PM »
Well it is a bit interesting that someone would want a test that does not involve any measuring instruments.  There are a couple of ways to interpret that.  One is that the "investors" (potential investors?) are leery of measurement error.  The other is that they have been told that Ms. Ainslie is having difficulties making measurements that support her claims.  The irony is that any demonstration involves measurements.  It is just a matter of what form the measurements take and how accurate they are.

That Ms. Ainslie doesn't know whether to put an inductor in series or in parallel based on her "thesis", is just very sad.  I can already smell the charred epoxy.


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1066 on: April 24, 2014, 08:15:26 PM »
Surely you jest. It is manifestly Ainslie herself who does not want or need any instrumental measurements to be performed.

As is typical in these matters, the "excess energy" that her circuits produce is not measurable by conventional means! It doesn't show up in excess heat, it doesn't prevent the batteries from discharging normally, it can't be measured on DMMs and it even can't be measured on properly connected oscilloscopes. But it is there, the Great Scientist Rosemary Ainslie and her court jester GMeast have proclaimed it! See the negative number in the box on the Mighty LeCroy 324! QED !

Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1067 on: April 24, 2014, 11:42:55 PM »
- the "excess energy" that her circuits produce is not measurable by conventional means!
- it can't be measured on DMMs
- it even can't be measured on properly connected oscilloscopes.


Is it just a coincidence that zipons display the exact same characteristics ?

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1068 on: April 25, 2014, 02:28:21 AM »

Is it just a coincidence that zipons display the exact same characteristics ?
Maybe it is the influence of dark government forces.

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1069 on: April 25, 2014, 04:56:07 AM »
Maybe it is the influence of dark government forces.

Do you mean our President?

Bill

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1070 on: April 25, 2014, 07:09:22 AM »
Do you mean our President?

Bill
He is but the tip of the Kenyan crack anchor baby conspiracy against pulsed circuit benefits.

Offline Tseak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1071 on: April 25, 2014, 07:48:40 AM »
Well it is a bit interesting that someone would want a test that does not involve any measuring instruments.  There are a couple of ways to interpret that.  One is that the "investors" (potential investors?) are leery of measurement error.  The other is that they have been told that Ms. Ainslie is having difficulties making measurements that support her claims.  The irony is that any demonstration involves measurements.  It is just a matter of what form the measurements take and how accurate they are.

That Ms. Ainslie doesn't know whether to put an inductor in series or in parallel based on her "thesis", is just very sad.  I can already smell the charred epoxy.

Or perhaps its is simply not true. Are there any investors? Are there editors knocking down the front door to publish this amazing phenomenon? Are there learned people itching to work on this but they can only do so once its published? mmmmm!

Added:
On second thoughts at COP >17 one doesn't really need the instruments. The power gain is so great that it would be clearly apparent by simple observation and deduction. So we await the famed draw-down tests and wait .... and wait and......... waaai.....oops I fell asleep.

Offline Tseak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1072 on: April 25, 2014, 07:56:05 AM »
He is but the tip of the Kenyan crack anchor baby conspiracy against pulsed circuit benefits.

This is happening in SA so the zippon theory gets the Mac Maharaj award for spin. This is a widely known unofficial people's award in South Africa. Maharaj is a politician (spin doctor) well known for defending the indefensible.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1073 on: April 26, 2014, 12:27:35 AM »
This is happening in SA so the zippon theory gets the Mac Maharaj award for spin. This is a widely known unofficial people's award in South Africa. Maharaj is a politician (spin doctor) well known for defending the indefensible.
I am not sure if everyone appreciates just how wonderful zipon spin is.   Zipon spin cuase currednt to flow through portions of circuits without flowing through others, and to not flow through portions of circuits even when reliable measurement methods indicate that current does flow.  here a spin, there a spin, spin, spin, spin.

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1074 on: April 26, 2014, 04:16:26 AM »
Zipon/Zip-off.

Didn't Ron Popeil come up with this?  Order now, and you will receive an additional free energy amount of 17%. (Actual results may vary.)

Bill

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1075 on: April 26, 2014, 04:58:38 AM »
Zipon/Zip-off.

Didn't Ron Popeil come up with this?  Order now, and you will receive an additional free energy amount of 17%. (Actual results may vary.)

Bill
Are you one who suffers from the tragedy of under unity?  Well, thanks to the good people at Popeil, you can now use the Zipon Expander to turn that under unity frown upside down.  Simply connect the standard MOSFET avalanche circuit to your favorite battery bank and heater, pour in the Zipon Fluid(tm), and turn on the juice.  Soon that unsightly under unity will melt away.  Watch as Ron uses the Zipon Fluid to enhance the flavor and nutritional value of his meals and cover up those unsightly bald spots.  And if your socks are torn, Zipon Fluid(tm) makes the perfect cover up.

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1076 on: April 26, 2014, 06:14:23 AM »
Are you one who suffers from the tragedy of under unity?  Well, thanks to the good people at Popeil, you can now use the Zipon Expander to turn that under unity frown upside down.  Simply connect the standard MOSFET avalanche circuit to your favorite battery bank and heater, pour in the Zipon Fluid(tm), and turn on the juice.  Soon that unsightly under unity will melt away.  Watch as Ron uses the Zipon Fluid to enhance the flavor and nutritional value of his meals and cover up those unsightly bald spots.  And if your socks are torn, Zipon Fluid(tm) makes the perfect cover up.

This advance might easily replace Spray On Hair.  (What a genius product that was)

Bill

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1077 on: April 26, 2014, 10:35:53 AM »
Unfortunately, Zipon Fluid(tm) cannot cover up loopy hypotheses, incompetent measurement set-ups, or inept self-contradictory conclusions.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1078 on: April 26, 2014, 11:20:14 AM »
This advance might easily replace Spray On Hair.  (What a genius product that was)

Bill

Do they make Spray On Feathers? Polly Parrot could use some of that.




Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1079 on: May 29, 2014, 05:02:35 AM »
TK:

You will recall how Peter Lindemann recently made a "casual" claim of over unity about some stuff he was doing years ago when discussing the Quantum Energy Generator.

Someone else too!

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/16966-cop-20-0-2000-demonstration.html#post256298

Quote
For example, with the Ainslie circuit, the best i got was a bit over COP 2.0, which is expected, but obviously not close to a COP 17.0 claim. The measurements matched what the waveform looked like. The area could actually be a bit bigger under the line (0) than over the line meaning it wasn't just a spike going back, I could get a pulse of current so waveform under the line was as big as the waveform over the line. Sometimes a bit bigger. But the big downfall on the Ainslie circuit is that the battery should NOT be charged and discharged because it screws it up. Yes, the power went back to the battery, but the back and forth caused the battery to lose capacity.
 
 We can take the regeneration and put it to a cap and feed it to the front without the battery seeing it.
 
 The results jumped substantially when I bypassed the internal freewheeling diode in the mosfet (they're usually junk) with a real high speed high quality diode. Same circuit essentially but still- battery isn't made to send and receive in an alternating fashion. I know know how to get around that but don't have time to try it yet.

Hear him roar!  The Nobel Prize too?  lol

MileHigh