Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84253
  • *Latest: januszb0

  • *Total Posts: 898093
  • *Total Topics: 15836
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 25
  • *Total: 28

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 313389 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1050 on: April 21, 2014, 05:13:17 PM »
Mark E and TK: I wonder why you two spend so much time on RA and her ramblings. Given your very high level of competence, are there not vastly more important issues you can address? As an electronics professional myself for 50 years, I realised that I had little to contribute to your posts, so I did not bother.
Similarly for Mr.Wayne's silly ZED. I did not accept his invitation because
a: I have no need/desire to spend two day listening to an explanation of HOW the ZED works, when it can not be demonstrated, and
b: There will be no practical way to rule out a hidden power source with a device that is anchored to the ground.
Just curious.

I would have dismissed and dispensed with the whole thing years ago when I first found out that her claims were bogus, but for Ainslie's continuing insults, lies and misrepresentations. She made a personal enemy of me back in the days of 2009-2010 when she started in with her insults and profound disrespect, coupled with her overweening arrogance and complete ignorance of her topic. I will continue to examine and if necessary refute each and every bogus claim, every lie, every insult that she tries to deliver, until she stops posting them.

Plus, she and her kludge qualify as "low hanging fruit"; it's an easy project requiring minimal resources and it fools my housemate into thinking I'm doing something useful.

Wayne Travis followed the same kind of pattern. I don't know if you are aware of the old "Locked" thread, where essentially the same discussion happened a few years ago, until finally Wayne flailed and bailed by asking Stefan to close the thread. He made claims without presenting evidence, he denied the validity of "standard measurement protocols" (tm Ainslie), he treated his critics with profound disrespect and his left-handed delivery of the cutting insult was just as well developed then as it was lately.

I think MarkE is just being polite, so it doesn't seem like I'm shouting into an empty room.




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1051 on: April 21, 2014, 05:17:17 PM »
Memoryman, I enjoy the great videos that TinselKoala has put out over the course of this saga.   There are some insights into how various people think, and what mental barriers they sometimes throw up.  As to Ms. Ainslie herself, she is just one of many people who make extraordinary claims without evidence.  In her case she has presented evidence that strongly refutes her own claims.

Offline memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1052 on: April 21, 2014, 06:14:42 PM »
You both know that you can't win with people like that. They will just repeat their nonsense ad infinitum (and ad nauseum).
Is it a fight worth fighting, considering that there are so many more worthy causes out there? Obviously you think so.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1052 on: April 21, 2014, 06:14:42 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1053 on: April 21, 2014, 06:50:09 PM »
You both know that you can't win with people like that. They will just repeat their nonsense ad infinitum (and ad nauseum).
Is it a fight worth fighting, considering that there are so many more worthy causes out there? Obviously you think so.
Memoryman, I gave up trying to coax Ms. Ainslie back to reality a long time ago.  It is clear that she is just going to keep barking at the moon.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1054 on: April 21, 2014, 07:56:09 PM »
Sure, and it provides much entertainment when she does.

Furthermore, if just doing it for the lulz isn't enough... the claims and the rest of the material from Rosemary Ainslie and her co-authors, especially Donovan Martin, are affronts to science. They are pseudoscientific misconduct of the most egregious kind, and if Ainslie isn't watched closely she tries to spread her BS around to new hopeful researchers as much as possible. This not only distracts people from doing good work, it winds up giving the whole "alternative energy" or "free energy/overunity" community a bad name. Imagine an actual journal reviewer encountering Ainslie's hodge-podge of garbage. Once having been exposed to her claims and her history of lies, misrepresentations and insults, that reviewer will never again be able to look at a bit of alternative research without thinking of the Ainslie debacle and choking.

Also, when people see her claims and try to repeat her work, they wind up not able to do it, because of her misrepresentations and lies. How much time did GMeast waste, for example, building the Quantum Magazine 555 timer, only to find it does not work as Ainslie claimed? And so on.

Memoryman, if you are bored by all of this, you can just ignore it. I won't be offended if you put me on your ignore list!



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1054 on: April 21, 2014, 07:56:09 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1055 on: April 21, 2014, 08:55:01 PM »
I am not bored; I did ignore this site (and still do most topics) because I think that my efforts are more effective by doing, rather than being righteous about others. I enjoy the well reasoned discussions, but the whole FE/OU debate is pointless; the believers will believe anyway.
The few people who are rational here rarely need convincing.
Keep on doing whatever gives you purpose.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1056 on: April 23, 2014, 01:55:57 AM »
Since it has been discussed a number of times, Steve and I decided to document some experiments using DMMs to measure average signal values.  I opened a new topic for the subject:

http://www.overunity.com/14562/using-dmms-to-read-average-voltages-currents/msg399060/#new

As has been discussed here before and Poynt99's videos going back four years, and TinselKoala's recent videos both show:  DMMs can faithfully measure the average value of a signal rather well.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1056 on: April 23, 2014, 01:55:57 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Tseak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1057 on: April 23, 2014, 07:53:18 AM »
Quote
Far from discouraging our editors I have been actively approached by more than one journal - to resubmit.  And I've also been approached by those academics who want to engage in this study - subject to publication.

BWAHAHAHA
Thanks Rosie for starting my day with a laugh.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1058 on: April 23, 2014, 01:21:31 PM »
The proven liar Rosemary Ainslie ( who insists on being known as Polly Plucked Parrot, for obvious reasons ) is at it again. She cannot provide any evidence for her claims, and now she is making more empty claims about "publications". This, coming from someone who thinks that posting an error-filled and fabricated manuscript to Andrea Rossi's vanity blog is "publication" !

Let her rant and rave, insult and lie. As long as she makes assertions without providing evidence, she continues to provide a mild amusement. What she cannot provide, though, is any experimental work that contradicts or refutes mine. Nor can she provide a jot or tittle of evidence that supports her "overunity" claims. All she can do is continue to lie, fabricate, insult and misrepresent.

FOUR HOURS, AINSLIE. That's all it would take for a competent person to produce a valid data set that supported your claims..... if only your claims were true. But they aren't, and each and every day that goes by without evidence is another nail in the coffin for the lying claims of Rosemary Ainslie and Donovan Martin.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1058 on: April 23, 2014, 01:21:31 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1059 on: April 23, 2014, 04:06:17 PM »
BWAHAHAHA
Thanks Rosie for starting my day with a laugh.
MAD Magazine was running short of content this month.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1060 on: April 23, 2014, 04:33:44 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1061 on: April 23, 2014, 05:07:18 PM »
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Blinded+scientific+gobbledygook/9757736/story.html


This may be relevant.
It just might be very relevant at that.  I may need to start a publication:  The Journal of Vanity Pseudoscience.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1062 on: April 23, 2014, 06:47:50 PM »
Well, the story is just as I said.

Ainslie approaches various people who haven't heard of her and her program, and she tells them the same set of lies that she always starts with.

The lapsed patent application that she calls a "patent", which plagiarizes the unclamped inductive test circuit found in every power mosfet data sheet. The alphabet agencies that she claims vetted the work a decade and a half ago without providing any actual report that can be referenced. The "publication" of the Quantum article, with its false claims and errors not mentioned. The "publication" of the two daft manuscripts with their falsified data and lies about the circuit used and its performance, again with the Steve Weir- led demonstrations and all of the other outside analyses... not mentioned.

So of course, professional scientists _who are not used to being lied to_ will take a look at the remarkable claims, thinking they have experimental support when they don't, and maybe invite Ainslie to submit a report for consideration and review. But only because she misrepresents and lies to them in the first place!

But of course no editor or reviewer will actually publish her mess, once they have a look at it.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1063 on: April 23, 2014, 06:58:59 PM »
Well, the story is just as I said.

Ainslie approaches various people who haven't heard of her and her program, and she tells them the same set of lies that she always starts with.

The lapsed patent application that she calls a "patent", which plagiarizes the unclamped inductive test circuit found in every power mosfet data sheet. The alphabet agencies that she claims vetted the work a decade and a half ago without providing any actual report that can be referenced. The "publication" of the Quantum article, with its false claims and errors not mentioned. The "publication" of the two daft manuscripts with their falsified data and lies about the circuit used and its performance, again with the Steve Weir- led demonstrations and all of the other outside analyses... not mentioned.

So of course, professional scientists _who are not used to being lied to_ will take a look at the remarkable claims, thinking they have experimental support when they don't, and maybe invite Ainslie to submit a report for consideration and review. But only because she misrepresents and lies to them in the first place!

But of course no editor or reviewer will actually publish her mess, once they have a look at it.
One of those vanity journals that the article Orbut 3000 linked might be very happy to take Ms. Ainslie's money.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #1064 on: April 24, 2014, 05:09:41 PM »
The comedy continues! Once more the goalposts are moved.

Ainslie cannot provide any experimental support for the "battery not discharging" claims of the Quantum Magazine article.

She cannot provide any experimental support for the bogus excess heat claims that occupied her fantasies since 2011.

She cannot provide any evidence of any "benefit" or show just how her bogus faulty measurements translate into any such "benefit".

And we know that it would take only four hours or less to produce valid excess heating results, if only her claims were true.

But they aren't! And Ainslie and her tiny mob of flailing sycophants know it!

So now she is talking about trying to get a light bulb to light up brighter with some unspecified variant of the mosfet circuit, than with DC.... but she can't figure out whether to put the new "winding" in parallel or series with the light bulb!

What's the matter, AINSLIE, isn't that part covered in your "Thesis"? Maybe you should read your second daft manuscript again! Check the diagrams..... maybe they'll tell you whether the light bulb needs to be in series or in parallel.


Let's review: Ainslie cannot provide ANY EXPERIMENTAL SUPPORT FOR ANY OF HER BOGUS CLAIMS.... and she knows this fully well. Not even a simple four-hour data gathering session to "prove" excess heat from the load. She cannot do it, there is no excess heat and never was, and by now Donovan Martin and the rest of the mob know this, absolutely, and cannot deny it.

So she is trying to get her mob to construct and run A DIFFERENT SET OF EXPERIMENTS altogether, with the hope that the farce will be able to continue longer.

But now she is talking about "investors". If she lies to investors about ANYTHING MATERIAL related to her claims ..... on this side of the Equator, that will get you jail time. For example..... if she presents the daft manuscripts to the inventors, she is LYING TO THEM, because the schematic(s) presented are not the ones actually used, the Figure 3 scopeshot is fabricated and the conclusions base on it are lies... and so on. So this will be an interesting chapter to watch as it unfolds.



 

OneLink