Milehigh:  You come into this thread dismissing it .  Yet you admit you haven't read it all.
That's just damned disrespectful and dishonest.

Milehigh:  You come into this thread dismissing it .  Yet you admit you haven't read it all.
That's just damned disrespectful and dishonest.

I read the last four full pages worth of this discussion so I got the "flavour" of the discussion.

I may be hedging my bets, but still:  What's truly disrespectful and dishonest in this thread is the people with no credibility making false claims.  Especially if they expect people to invest time and money in a project that won't work.

Hello Clarence,

Thank you for offering to help. My goal is 120vac 60hz 25 amp.

The main concern I have is the soil here may not be suitable and I would like to test it.

In your opinion can we safely say that “if you sink two test rods and get .4 volts DC then the soil is good enough”? Do you think .4 volts is a good figure to use?

What total voltage should I be getting from the earth ground system all by itself?

Also how many of your rods are connected 'to ground from the system' and how many are connected 'return to system' ? I ask because I wonder if there is an optimum ratio to hold to.

If you could answer these questions for me then I would know what to shoot for and I can get started on this.

Thank you
Mack

Well since were all throwing junk together-->here is the Tesla reactor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVffZOnerUk

I am interested in this thread from the point of view of current amplification.
 ie current transformers.
If the Don Smith devices work with HV why not with HA  ie High amps.

Something that might be worth experimenting with. Take a MOT with re-wired secondary for high current (welding trafo style). Then step-up the very low voltage, very high current output, through a Tesla type transformer and charge up caps, to then pulse discharge into lamps. This is another junk yard type project, that might just shed some light on the modus-operandi of the 'its so simple you'll laugh Kapanadze box devices.

Hey,the OU bit is comeing for sure lol.
Here is the second video,and we have moved a bit of bedini in there now. We are also running on batteries,and now ready for the big loop system setup. Note how the run battery voltage has climbed,even though we are drawing power from it,and not returning any

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWPJXqUFD4o

Well... that's impressive! You've got nearly all the requirements for an electrical OU device: A maze of colored clipleads, a handful of DMMs, and of course.... batteries !!

But where are the light bulbs? Gotta have light bulbs.

Well... that's impressive! You've got nearly all the requirements for an electrical OU device: A maze of colored clipleads, a handful of DMMs, and of course.... batteries !!

But where are the light bulbs? Gotta have light bulbs.

The bulbs are comeing TK,and LED's at that
Were also moving to the B modle,and i expect a far greater output from this one.
It's sure to go OU

One more time, you are misguided Chet.  The last few pages of this thread were filled with unsubstantiated nonsense from Clarence.  When somebody talks junk, and balks when people ask him for proof, and tells people to go out and spend time and money to build it themselves, then you have all the trappings of a classic nonsense thread.  Beyond that, from what I saw, Clarence wouldn't even be able to make a convincing demo clip and generate solid data because in all likelihood he doesn't possess the knowledge or the skills to do that.

If you have no idea how to bake a cake, and you do it anyways, and then present it to people to taste it and comment, they are going to say the cake was crap.  Who is going to object if someone presents crusty goop instead of a cake and people comment and say the cake was awful?  Clarence is doing the same thing with respect to electronics.

You can put on your blinders and put your hands over your ears and hum loudly when when people with some experience in electronics say something is crap.  You are disrespecting people that have accumulated knowledge and experience and instead are supporting electronics clowns that don't even know what they are talking about in the unfounded and unreasonable faint hope that somebody is going to pull a rabbit out of their hat.

The only solution is to just let people say what they want to say.  Stop being a bouncer.  There is a difference between straight no-nonsense comments about some implausible electronics fantasy and outright mean-spirited trolling.  Myself and others have made our comments for the benefit of all reading.  Some might not like reading the comments, tough luck for them.

Where is Clarence to defend himself?  Where is Clarence to acknowledge that he has to demonstrate competence in electronics, make his case with a convincing argument, and produce data that is honest and credible and verifiable?  What about "saving the world" and "preventing millions of people from starving to death because of the advent of cheap, plentiful free energy?"

So far, the answer is that he is nowhere.  There is a decent chance that my earlier comments about his silly motivations and incompetence in electronics are 100% true.  If that is the case, then his little "magic pitch" is just a farce like I stated.

Just let people speak their minds.  If Clarence wilts and fades away, then with almost 100% certainty he was pure BS.  The net result is that yet another useless "noise maker" has disappeared.   Just look at the recent example of Chris/EMJunkie and his silly funky transformer circuit.  It quickly became apparent that Chris could not punch his way out of a wet paper bag when it came to electronics.  You should have seen him boast about his supposed knowledge and demonstrate a lot of fake arrogance.  He was exposed for the real truth about his circuit and he ran away and now he probably continues to BS from the confines of his web site.  At least on this forum he is not wasting anybody's time anymore.

MileHigh