Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

MN LiveCoach

Masternodes Live Coaching

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 513410
  • *Total Topics: 15278
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 13
  • *Total: 18

Author Topic: New Tech  (Read 11016 times)

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Tech
« Reply #15 on: August 22, 2019, 03:21:31 PM »


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2019, 10:25:01 PM »
Benchmark :

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zeit.de%2F2010%2F20%2FTechnik-im-Trend-Wohncontainer
https://www.wohnwagon.at/
http://www.livingbox.it/en/info.asp

https://www.nanolivingsystem.com/

Prof. Peter Huebner "Casanova"- Modul ea.  13 sqm   3x ~ Starter family. -38 sqm        6x expanded family -78 sqm
https://www.plus-bauplanung.de/

Hundred and more international architects construction designs for the 7500 USD/32 sqm ready(-64 sqm Option)
Elemental- social construction- project :        http://www.elementalchile.cl/en/

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Tech
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2019, 10:25:01 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2019, 03:29:33 PM »
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.n-tv.de%2Fwissen%2FWie-man-Raeume-klimafreundlich-kuehlt-article21241492.html
" kids for future" + " kits for future" :
 Heat pump : heating + cooling function  = reversible thermo(- cryo)dynamic cycle
Fraunhofer- Institute efficiency study conventional heat pump : 2,5 x C.O.P. thermic/cryo units per electric unit
                                                                   " inverter"-                            3,5


              Technical and physical "Standart" for room cooling :
              actually commercial the given "Fraunhofer study"-numbers for cool air conditioning

              3400 btu ~ 1000 Wh caloric change by 400 Wh average electric power
             
             " retro- fit kit "
              waste dynamic cycle heat to electric : conventional C.O.P 2,5 to  new benchmark : 4,5   
             400 Wh - 180 Wh average heatelectric recuperation : 1000 Wh/220 Wh ~ C. O. P.  4,5

              electric motor single winding to double winding refurbish :

            400 Wh to electric 300 Wh less 180 Wh heatelectric power recuperation =

           300 Wh- 180 Wh = 120 Wh

          1000 Wh/120 Wh ~ > C.O.P. 8





             2019 "Industrial Standart"


            For new production heat pumps the minimum mandated  C.O.P. for ambient cooling : 
             from C.O.P. 8 to C.O.P. > 10 by

            low friction and power saving compressor technology :
           
           https://web.archive.org/web/20160211000054/http://www.solterrah.com/mech-clean-energy.php
           http://www.eats.ltd.uk/heating_cooling.html

           From conventional 400Wh electric average input for 1000 Wh caloric inter-change( = pumping) to :
          400 Wh to
          300 Wh double winding motor to
          255 Wh low-e compressor motor efficiency less
     -   180 Wh heat-electric recuperation :

         75 Wh net electric consume for 1000 Wh caloric/btu inter-change

         1000 Wh /75 Wh =   > C.O.P. 12,5

        C.O.P.   2,5/12,5 = 0,2 or 80% less

        = 100% Kyoto conference result and declaration : 1990- 2050 : -80% GHG emission

      q.e.d  ::)   

       

       Conventional heat pump efficieny :        400 Wh       

       with Catalan Halbach array motor :        200 Wh  ?         

      with power saving compressor :              170 Wh. ?   

       Less waste heat recuperation :             - 180 Wh. ?
       New STANDART.                                         -10 Wh ? 

       Cooling and surplus energy generation

      Instead Catalan motor refurbishable " Meta C"- technique or Dr. Imris capacitive winding or Lam Dat

     Net zero energy cooling : also possible by solar cell/Turbine assistance

   

             

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #19 on: September 02, 2019, 09:07:51 PM »
Surprising! ! The re-thinking and his decision :

https://judbarovski.livejournal.com/    his " the manifesto"
http://judbarovski.blogspot.com/2019/08/ethanol-as-fuel-its-production.html?m=1
But to be as flexible as he is :
6 lt. /100 Km conventional fuel consume  car

Stupak fuel economizer - 30% fuel consume
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=8081

Granstroi : Arakelian fuel process - 87,5% CO2
https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2690158A1/de

+ emission filter : 50% average CO2 recapture
 
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=14020
   -----------------------------------

- 95% CO2 emission and CO2 reuse

Whom 95% less emission are not enough : hybrid kit

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&q=manfred+sonntag+hybrid&oq=manfred+sonntag+hybrid&aqs=heirloom-srp..0l1

----------------

Ic- engine versus electro, CO2 related :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fedison.handelsblatt.com%2Ferklaeren%2Fvergleichsrechnung-so-viel-co2-sparen-e-autos-gegenueber-verbrennern%2F22654278.html%3Freadon%3Dy

Modified Stupak + Granstroi + emission filter ic-engine car ~ electric car + renewable electricity ( Oeko-Strom)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Tech
« Reply #19 on: September 02, 2019, 09:07:51 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #20 on: September 03, 2019, 11:04:29 AM »
Step by step conversion economy


https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fedison.handelsblatt.com%2Ferklaeren%2Fvergleichsrechnung-so-viel-co2-sparen-e-autos-gegenueber-verbrennern%2F22654278.html%3Freadon%3Dy

30 tons CO2/200000 Km Diesel /gasoil IC-engine car

14,3 ton CO2/200000 Km electric car with average electricity-mix

1,42 ton CO2/200000 Km electric car with "green electricity"

https://www.expanderenergy.com/synfuel-at-expander-energy/
           
synthetic Diesel 53,53.g CO2e/M  petroleum based Diesel 93,3 g CO2e/M

30 ton CO2 x (53,53/93,3) ~ 17,21 ton CO2/200000 Km + exhaust emission filter
and each conventional Diesel is as same clean - CO2 related -like an electric car with conventional electricity mix

Syn-Diesel/gasoil IC-engine 17,21 ton CO2/2000000 Km - 30% Stupak fuel saver :  12,05 ton CO2/2000000 Km


Granstroi Arakelian fuel process : ? g CO2e/M

Electricity for fuel : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-neutral_fuel
"Renewable and nuclear energy costs"The prices for free -surplus-electricity is sharp falling, partial the producer has to pay for electricity delivering  !
One solution process "wind - or sun- fuel" http://www.dotyenergy.com/
Fossil/nuclear electricity/green electricity :
 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.handelsblatt.com%2Funternehmen%2Fenergie%2Ferneuerbare-energien-oekostrom-anteil-steigt-im-ersten-halbjahr-2019-auf-rekordhoch%2F24494328.html%3Fticket%3DST-15801534-1vfDJfsSox4UIFTjshJb-ap6

When we give an annual 12500 Km electric car use by 10 KWh/100 Km consume we get 1250 KWh electricity production/generation need per year per car.

                                                                          For Germany :
30 Millions electric cars x 1250 KWh = 37500 Mio. KWh electricity production per year ~ 2/3 actual "green-e"

                                                                     Low-e drive car
When we give an annual 12500 Km electric car use by 2 KWh/100 Km consume we get 250 KWh electricityproduction/generation need per year per car.
                                                                       For Germany :
30 Millions electric cars x 250 KWh = 7 500 Mio. KWh electricity production per year ~ 1/7 actual " green-e"


                                                                        For the World :
 Street legal velocity max.  130/120 Km/h on high ways, common 80/50/40/30/10 Km/h city drive

Germany : average car velocity included "stop&go": 56 Km/h ( source: ADAC)

                                                           Appropriate Technology :

When we equip the low-e drive with power saving electric motors and " in situ=in e-car power plant" we do not need neither  on-/off-shore wind or-solar farming nor distribution net-grid : off-grid economy

Low-e drive 2 KWh/100 - 75% average e- power saving electric motor : 0,5 KWh/100 Km =
                                              small insitu e-plant need
There is not a physical barrier, not a technical barrier : only " habit change" = huge  ::) problem

                                               ccw/cw - view, before/after- view

Autark/autonomous living Technology on 4-wheels :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.n-tv.de%2Fauto%2FEin-kleines-Haus-auf-Raedern-article21246422.html
                                                        "mobile glamping"
« Last Edit: September 03, 2019, 02:09:35 PM by lancaIV »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #21 on: September 03, 2019, 06:08:57 PM »
https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Transport/Vehicle-abundance
vehicles per sqkm ( 2001 ! statistic numbers )
From 1-10 cars/sqkm syn-/ gas/fuel from renewable  biomass is the national solution : < 0,5% land area need

Above these numbers and density related :
nations with coast : oceanic hydrogen/ethanol; oceanic plastics to gas/fuel

nations with large forests : wood-/gas/fuel
nations with mineral deposits ( for example earth rock= granite ): synthetic mineral ( non carbon) fuel

1 sqkm = 100 ha

 1%=1 ha ~ 22500 Lt.  Bio-Synfuel a 9 KWh/Lt.

6 Lt./100 Km   Diesel/Benzin( gasoil/gasoline)  ~ 7 Lt./100 Km  Bio-Synfuel

12500 Km per car/annum a 7 Lt. /100 Km = 875 Lt. per car/annum
1 ha ~ 22500 Lt. / 875 Lt.  ~ 25 cars/ha
If Granstroi fuel crack Reformer also effective with Bio-Synfuel :25 cars x 8 ( crack-factor)  = 200 cars/ 1 ha Bio-Crack-fuel

1% national land use  if 200 cars/ sqkm density.

Nations with 20 cars/sqkm density:  1 pro/ per mille =  1/1000 land use for "car fueling".


Nations with sand deserts : Silan- Proces
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.minotech.de%2Fforschung%2Falternative-treibstoffe%2Fpeter-plichta-benzin-aus-sand%2F%3Fmobile%3D1


Something for develop and introduce to market :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Pierre+chambrin&IN=&CPC=&IC=
Special importance : Chambrins Calorie multiplier :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=ZA&NR=8203054B&KC=B&FT=D&ND=3&date=19830330&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Tech
« Reply #21 on: September 03, 2019, 06:08:57 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #22 on: September 04, 2019, 02:13:23 PM »
The industrial "solar cell lifetime" definition  by percentual power drop :

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://actamont.tuke.sk/pdf/2017/n3/4strachala.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiWrM-ukLfkAhUL6OAKHdxsDacQFjAOegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw0d86T99B8YlbTxQHO468uk

I have to correct my "Technical Standart" ( Laboratory development)  solar cells power density related :
when commercial solar panels are in the 16 Wp/ Kg range

the M.I.T. development 6 Wp/gram :

https://newatlas.com/lightest-thinnest-solar-cells-mit/42092/

now as new benchmark to notice :
https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/renewables/ultrathin-solar-cells-for-lightweight-and-flexible-applications-
the "Johannes Keppler University Linz" publicated 2015  : 120 Wp/5,2 grams ~ 23 Wp/gram =
                                                                       
                                                                             23 KWp/Kg solar cell

https://www.swiftsolar.com/  " ... can achieve unmatched power-to-weight ratios......"
https://flisom.com/  world-record for roll-to-roll productable cell foils : 20,4%
                                                                                Comparison :
A.  ptw-ratio   B. conversion efficiency     C.lifetime warranty     D.costs per gram solar cell

Market Target  to match :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=11&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19860304&CC=US&NR=4574161A&KC=A#

  1 USD/sqm production costs cell with (75%x75%=) 56,25 % efficiency tandem solar/ artificial light conversion
                                               
                                                  <       0,01USD/Wp
« Last Edit: September 04, 2019, 04:26:48 PM by lancaIV »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2019, 01:17:17 AM »
703 cm3 generator volume and ~ 5 Kg Material weight
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8847720B2/en
power output by  400 Hz  cycling:          60,7 Kva/h.              Power-to-weight ratio                   12 Kva/Kg

                             3000 Hz.            :         460,8  Kva/h.                                                                     92  Kva/Kg

                              780 KHz.          :          119,7.Mva/h.                                                                     24 Mva/Kg

The same generator with different power-to-weight ratios : ergo no Wp/€ or Wp/US$ but gram/€ or gram/US$ will be the correct value estimation for the selling price  !
                            250 US$/Kg and 3 KHz cycling ~ 92 Kva/250 US$ ~ 388 va/1 US$ ~ 1 va/  0,003 US$
                                                   and 780 KHz.        ~ 24 Mva/250 US$ ~ 96 Kva/1 US$ ~ 1 va/(1/96000) US$


100 times more powerful, but 1000 times much cheaper than traditional solar cells :
https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-ferrite-solar-cell-japan-20110920/
ferrit cell lifetime, market entry ? Wp/US$ and gram/US$ ratio  ?


https://web.archive.org/web/20120722061149/prismnet.com/~frg/
MEMS-TAR : 600 W heat electric conversion efficiency( 45%) per sqm by solar light max.
                        but up to 10 Wp/cm2 by concentrated solar light and MEMS-TAR cooling
                       1 Wp/25 cents MEMS-TAR price ~ ( 1 sqm= 10000 cm2/600Wp= ) 16,66 cm2/25 cents
                       (10 Wp/cm2  x 16,66)/25 cents ~ 166 Wp/25 cents + cooling system costs

We do not know how deep the prices for electricity 2030 will be,  but we know several previews. !

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Tech
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2019, 01:17:17 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #24 on: September 06, 2019, 03:54:32 PM »
Commercial solar panel ( from cell to Modul to panel)  : 16 Wp/ Kg by average 15% efficiency
Keppler Uni Linz "thin solar foil".                                         : 23000 Wp/Kg by  average. ? efficiency

1400 KWh natural solarlight x 0,15 (~ 200 Wp/sqm) conversion factor = 210 KWh DC electricity per year

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19900201&CC=DE&NR=3817730A1&KC=A1#
70 Watt( 80': 5,25% efficiency) - 35 electric Watt ( 2019: 25 Watt CFL or less LED) = 35 Watt per hour x 8766 =                                                                     
                                                                    306,8 KWh net DC

306,8 KWh /70 Wp ~ 4,38 KWh/Wp/a artificial light chamber/tube
210 KWh/200 Wp ~ 1,05 KWh/Wp/a commercial solar panel

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=De&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Paul+marzahn&IN=&CPC=&IC=
He (R. I. P.)  used the Bernd Koehler artificial light principle but optimized it by mirrors and multiple CFL :5x 70 Wp solar cells( 5,25% eff.) and 12 x 13 W CFL (2019 : 9 W CFL or less W LED)

650 W output by 156 W input ~ 500 W per hour x 8766 = 4383 KWh /350 Wp = 12,5 KWh/Wp

Calculation resume :
12,5 KWh/Wp divided with actual 1,05 KWh/Wp timed 23000 Wp/Kg divided by comercial 16 Wp/Kg :           material use optimizing factor and market prices deflationator : > 17000 / 1

Attention : Marzahn 5,25% cells
Newer similar patent publication has been : Menendez Baquero from Spain with
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20100615&CC=ES&NR=2341161A1&KC=A1#
  8 panels( without mirrors ) a     ( 240 Wp/1,8 sqm)/1333 Wp solar ( orbital) konstante =                                                                                           
                                                                  10% efficiency solar panel


Keppler Uni + perfect Marzahn lightelectric chamber :

25000 times better performance per gram lightelectric conversion
When they wrote about " 100 times more powerful/1000 times cheaper"
https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-ferrite-solar-cell-japan-20110920/                                 

if now as new benchmark :" 25000 times more powerful/ ? times cheaper"  ::)
From the " market price deflationator : 17000/1" something between

                                                      17/1 and 170/1 at first to 1700/1 later
                  0,01 US$ per Watt peak permanent artificial photoelectric in-house conversion  endconsumer price

                     thin foil cell lifetime ? Alvin Marks Lumilight cell : 1/2 year !

"perfect Marzahn chamber": CFL input controler
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19920714&CC=US&NR=5130608A&KC=A#
Compact Fluorescant Lamp Peak Watt-lumen/ Average Watt-lumen and the effect during photoelectric conversion. !
                     
Solar cell/thin foil converter Material " recombination time window" !                                                                                                                                 
« Last Edit: September 06, 2019, 07:19:15 PM by lancaIV »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2019, 05:53:54 PM »
Average wind-electric conversion per square meter land area ( not rotor sqm ):
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.deutschlandfunknova.de%2Fnachrichten%2Fwindkraft-wind-schafft-h%25C3%25B6chstens-einen-watt-pro-quadratmeter

                                                ONE WATT PER SQUAREMETER
                                                                       periodical


                                                                  ALTERNATIVE. ?
                                  https://patents.google.com/patent/US8847720B2/en
 1 sqm : 16 X Goldbaum generator a 100 Hz cycling ~ 15 KWh x 16 generators = 240 KWh or


                             TWO HUNDRED AND FOURTY THOUSAND WATT PER SQUAREMETER ( per stage)
               
                                                                            permanent

Goldbaum generator similar :
Adolf Zielinski ambient energy converter ( in the 80' a hint,  2019 anymore : RT superconducting coil production)


This will become the future air CO2 capture and CO2 to C( Carbon as powder: air Graphit to graphene )  and O2 dissoziation electricity source. !

Not natural free solar and/or Wind forces but artificial Synthese, "Nature mimikry"  !

Thermobaric reactors. !
Review :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.deutschlandfunknova.de%2Fnachrichten%2Fwindkraft-wind-schafft-h%25C3%25B6chstens-einen-watt-pro-quadratmeter
350 GW : Germany ~ 350000 sqkm x 1000000 sqm/sqkm x 1 Wp/sqm = 350 GW


                                       new calculation : static Goldbaum generator use,portable,low noise

                                      350000 sqkm x 1000000 sqm/sqkm x 240000 Wp/sqm = 350 GW x 240000

                                      Germany : up to 84000000 GW per hour and stage

Anymore off-shore and on-shore windtowers ( infrasonic noise  !) ; no local-foreign distribution net-work

Answer to rhetoric question :
https://www.spiegel.de/plus/wie-die-energiewende-die-grundstueckspreise-in-die-hoehe-treibt-a-ec045fa8-7ac8-43a7-9c62-38d18d8e614b

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Tech
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2019, 05:53:54 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2019, 09:58:25 PM »
Step by step conversion economy


https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fedison.handelsblatt.com%2Ferklaeren%2Fvergleichsrechnung-so-viel-co2-sparen-e-autos-gegenueber-verbrennern%2F22654278.html%3Freadon%3Dy

30 tons CO2/200000 Km Diesel /gasoil IC-engine car

14,3 ton CO2/200000 Km electric car with average electricity-mix

1,42 ton CO2/200000 Km electric car with "green electricity"

https://www.expanderenergy.com/synfuel-at-expander-energy/
           
synthetic Diesel 53,53.g CO2e/M  petroleum based Diesel 93,3 g CO2e/M

30 ton CO2 x (53,53/93,3) ~ 17,21 ton CO2/200000 Km + exhaust emission filter
and each conventional Diesel is as same clean - CO2 related -like an electric car with conventional electricity mix

Syn-Diesel/gasoil IC-engine 17,21 ton CO2/2000000 Km - 30% Stupak fuel saver :  12,05 ton CO2/2000000 Km

      --------------------------------------

Granstroi Arakelian fuel process : ? g CO2e/M
Granstroi- similar approach :

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/fuel_sunlight_co2_water_alternative_jet_fuel_469na1_en.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjdzbr9-LzkAhUYAWMBHWwbDiM4FBAWMAN6BAgIEAE&usg=AOvVaw3kVawJfPC-Rww-oXcHdCDh
         Syngas/fuel versus conventional jet-fuel : - 80% CO2/Lt. emission

  ------------------------------------------------

Electricity for fuel : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-neutral_fuel
"Renewable and nuclear energy costs"The prices for free -surplus-electricity is sharp falling, partial the producer has to pay for electricity delivering  !
One solution process "wind - or sun- fuel" http://www.dotyenergy.com/
Fossil/nuclear electricity/green electricity :
 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.handelsblatt.com%2Funternehmen%2Fenergie%2Ferneuerbare-energien-oekostrom-anteil-steigt-im-ersten-halbjahr-2019-auf-rekordhoch%2F24494328.html%3Fticket%3DST-15801534-1vfDJfsSox4UIFTjshJb-ap6

When we give an annual 12500 Km electric car use by 10 KWh/100 Km consume we get 1250 KWh electricity production/generation need per year per car.

                                                                          For Germany :
30 Millions electric cars x 1250 KWh = 37500 Mio. KWh electricity production per year ~ 2/3 actual "green-e"

                                                                     Low-e drive car
When we give an annual 12500 Km electric car use by 2 KWh/100 Km consume we get 250 KWh electricityproduction/generation need per year per car.
                                                                       For Germany :
30 Millions electric cars x 250 KWh = 7 500 Mio. KWh electricity production per year ~ 1/7 actual " green-e"


                                                                        For the World :
 Street legal velocity max.  130/120 Km/h on high ways, common 80/50/40/30/10 Km/h city drive

Germany : average car velocity included "stop&go": 56 Km/h ( source: ADAC)

                                                           Appropriate Technology :

When we equip the low-e drive with power saving electric motors and " in situ=in e-car power plant" we do not need neither  on-/off-shore wind or-solar farming nor distribution net-grid : off-grid economy

Low-e drive 2 KWh/100 - 75% average e- power saving electric motor : 0,5 KWh/100 Km =
                                              small insitu e-plant need
There is not a physical barrier, not a technical barrier : only " habit change" = huge  ::) problem

                                               ccw/cw - view, before/after- view

Autark/autonomous living Technology on 4-wheels :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.n-tv.de%2Fauto%2FEin-kleines-Haus-auf-Raedern-article21246422.html
                                                        "mobile glamping"

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #27 on: September 08, 2019, 02:16:44 PM »
Comparison :
18 sqm solar panel on tect installed
Each solar panel with 15% efficiency = 200 Wp per sqm
1400 KWh solar energy per year/sqm locality
 
1400 KWh x 15% radiant energy to DC electricity x 18 sqm panel =3780 KWh electricity gain
18 sqm x 200 Wp x 3 US$ per Wp/ Installation costs : 10800 US$( included Inverter and other conventional equipment but without batteries/e-storage)

10800 US$ by 3780 KWh gain per year 20 years amortization and 5% capital tax :

                                                                      28,57 US$cents per KWh

Calculating with 2 US$/Wp installation costs : 19 US$cents per KWh; 

with 1 US$/Wp =                                                       9,52 US$cents /KWh  ;

with 0,5 US$/Wp =                                                    4,76 US$cents/KWh

Dis-/Ad-vantage : periodically 0 Watt( winter,night)gain up to 3600 Wp gain(summer,day)

               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19900201&CC=DE&NR=3817730A1&KC=A1#
Given technical data : 70 Wattp solar 1 sqm panel and1 meter long 35 Watt Fluorescent lamp

 5,25% radiant energy to DC conversion in the 80' conventional standart
Watt-lumen ratio of fluorescent lamps in the 80' ?
70 Watt - 35 Watt = 35 Watth per hour DC electricity surplus generation x 24 h = 840 Wh gain per day
35 Wh x 8766 h per year = 306,8 KWh DC electricity

  Kilowatt- hour comparison "solar on tect" and. " inhouse solar" :
12 Koehler " light tubes" ~ 18 sqm solar 3600 Wp installation


Fluorescent lamp optimized in-/output Watt-lumen ratio
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=24&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19911001&CC=US&NR=5053933A&KC=A#
70 Wp solar panel  with "new efficient lamp" 20 W (without controler) = 50 Wh per hour surplus DC electricity
x 24 hours = 1200 Wh per day / 50 Wh x 8766 = 438,3 KWh surplus DC electricity per year
KWh gain comparison : 18 sqm solar panel / improved Koehler " light tube: : 9


Instead one meter artificial " light tube" length we construct 2 meters tubes = 2 seriell lamps tubes
So we get per 2 meters lamp tube 876,6 KWh

KWh gain comparison : 5 x 2 meter tubes gives the 18 sqm on tect installation
One and 2 meter long tubes can stand vertical from basement to tect( room average high : 2,40 meter)

Constructing 3 meter/3 x 1 meter lamps  and 4 meter/4 x 1 meter lamps also possible than f.e. vertical under room tect fixing

3 lamps tubes surplus DC electricity generation per year : 1314,9 KWh
4 lamps tubes surplus DC electricity generation per year : 1753,2 KWh

Attention : all the given numbers by 5,25% solar panel efficiency
                   and without lamp electric input controler

Paul Heinrich Marzahn with the Koehler tube invention output improvements :


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Paul+marzahn&IN=&CPC=&IC=

5 x 70Wp cells gives by amplyfing average input : 650 Wp output less 12 x 13 W CFL input

~ 500 Wh surplus Dc electricity x 8766 = 4383 KWh

1 Marzahn "artificial 24/365 photoelectric chamber" gives as much energy as 18 sqm solar panel on tect installed
                     Commercial prize " price" for 18 sqm ontect installation : 10800 Euros ( 3 Euros/Wp)



                                      Inhouse artificial 24/365 solar chamber ( green -electricity-house )

The costs for 1 Marzahn chamber with inverter : < 500 Euros by calculating with 0,5 Euro/Wp
chamber structure, mylar foil chamber wall as mirrors,12x lamps + holder, 5 x 70 Watt solar foils, inverter

 
                                    Inhouse photoelectric conversation costs per KWh :
                                                                 10 years calculation

                                                 active parts function warranty in hours :

lamps 30000 hours lifetime : 36 lamps for 10 years period : ea.1 meter lamp for 3,75 Euros

solar foil 15 years,by higher average Wattp 10 years

inverter 80000 hours lifetime



500 Euros( + 24 lamps) : +- 600 Euros x 5% capital tax annual and ten years period : 900 Euros investment
900 Euros divided by annual 8766 x 0,5 KWh = 4383 KWh and for the ten years period = 43830 KWh

                  means 2 Euro-cents per KWh generation costs. ! Actually !

Now to the " nearer reality" and calculatoric time/poweroutput/lifetime technical reality :
 when "thick cells" works their nominal Wattp by natural light 900 full-hours per 8766 years and up to 30 years this represents  900h/8766 hours = 10,2 % per year power capacity output or

30 years-x 900 hours solar cells = 3 years 8766 full-hour solar cell



So we need for the 10 years calculation period and permanent work time 3 times 350 Wp solar foils

350 Wp x 0,5 Euros/Wp = 175 Euros x 2 = 350 Euros per Marzahn chamber investment  more in the 4th and 7th year each 175 Euros  !

First calculation base 600 Euros + 350 Euros for  now physical correct base ( power x time )=
950 Euros by 5% capital tax and ten years period :

1425 Euros divided by 43830 KWh during this functional decade : 3,25 Euro-cents/KWh


With 0,4 Euros/Wp cell price : 565 Euros + 280 Euros x capital tax ~  2,9 Euro-cents / KWh


With 0,3 Euros/Wp cell price : 530 Euros + 210 Euros x capital tax ~ 2,6 Euro-cents / KWh   
                                                               !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
When we get as clean energy investors 30% investment rebatte from the estate society this let us reach :
  2,6 Euro-cents/KWh x 0,7 :

                                          2 Euro-cents net costs for each generated KWh
                                 
                                       Everywhere,day and night time and very cold or very hot ambient independent

                                                               !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

With 0,2 Euros / Wp cell price : 495 Euros + 140 Euros x capital tax  Euros ~ 2,2 Euro-cents / KWh

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=11&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19860304&CC=US&NR=4574161A&KC=A#
1984 1 US$ /sqm production costs x 2 = tandem cell and 1984 endconsumer 10 US$/ sqm ready to use to2019 endconsumer " open source condition" endprice with 15 US$/750 Wp ratio

With 0,02 Euros/Wp cell price : 432 Euros + 133 Euros( 19 x 1/2 year lifetime cells) x capital tax ~
                                                                  2 Euro- cents/KWh
                                   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With instead 5,25% with 10,5%, with 21%  ,with 45% Oscar Fellows MEMS-TAR( AC-output),with56,25% Alvin Marks cell ?
then with power saving controler ?

With-/out investment rebatte. !?

Solar cell installation can - by several nations actual law- compensate up to 70% private household electricity  consume !

For industrial electricity consume installations :

DC solar cell chamber output as

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20190207&CC=JP&NR=2019022271A&KC=A#
input :
1 sqm 1 cbm Mahrzahn chamber + Saburo couple : 650 Wp x Saburo C. O. P.  4 = 2600 Wp per hour
                                      Up to 22791 KWh per year

1 sqm 2 cbm Mahrzahn chamber + Saburo couple : 1300 Wp x Saburo C. O. P 4 = 4600 Wp per hour
                                       Up to 45583 KWh per year

1 sqm Marzahn/Saburo-couple  ~ up to 4600 sqm windgenerator land use by 1 Wp/sqm windpower efficiency

1 sqm 2 cbm Mahrzahn chamber + Inverter + AC "magneto" couple :

https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11462
1300 Wp x 0,9 x C. O. P.  19 = 11700 W per hour

up to 102500 KWh per year

1 sqm Marzahn/"magneto" couple ~
 up to 11700 sqm windgenerator Land use by 1 Wp/ sqm windpower efficiency

Bernd Koehler 5,25% cell C. O. P.  : 70 W - 35 Watt lamp = C. O. P.  2

Mahrzahn 5,25 % cell  C.O.P. ( without mirrors amplifying efficiency) 350 W - 156 Watt CFLs = C.O.P. 2,24

Mahrzahn 5,25 % cell C.O.P ( without mirrors amplyfying efficiency) 350 W - 100 Watt Imris lamps= C.O.P. 3,5

Menendez Baquero 10% cell : 1920 W - 500 Watt lamp = C.O.P. 3,84

Menendez Baquero with 5,25% cells and 500 Watt lamp = koehler tube efficiency and C. O. P. 2

Mahrzahn 5,25% cell C.O.P with mirrors amplifying efficiency 650 - 156 Watt CFLs = C.O.P.  4,16

Mahrzahn 5,25% cell C.O.P. with mirrors amplifying efficiency 650 W - 100 Watt Imris lamps = C.O.P. 6,5

Mahrzahn 10% cell C. O. P.  with mirrors amplifying efficiency 1300 Watt - 100 Watt Imris lamps = C.O.P. 13

                   
                    15% cell 2019 conventional commercial standart

                    20% cell 2022 conventional commercial standart

                    45% MEMS-TAR ( thermal-acoustic resonator with AC output)


                     56,25% Tandem cell

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



If we assume that the Keppler Uni Linz 23000 Wp/Kg solar cels has 5,25 % constant efficiency and 15 years function lifetime this means that :

350 Wp Marzahn chamber cells / 23000 Wp Keppler-cells per Kg :




                                                                 15 Grams solar cell material


                                                                  represents


                                                                 3600 Wp / ( 16 Wp/Kg) =

                         
                                                                 225 Kg on tect solar cell installation



                   
                         15 grams versus 225000 grams

                        for min. 3780 KWh active conversion/ 4383 KWh

                         power to weight ratio
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 vertical Marzahn chamber with 1 sqm area and 2 cbm volume a 1300 Wp ~
 1000 sqm Wind generator land area with 1 Wp/ sqm electricity generation
« Last Edit: September 08, 2019, 10:31:42 PM by lancaIV »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #28 on: September 09, 2019, 01:11:46 PM »
How to define technical terms. ?
1 Wp : by photoelectric conversion this is "1 sun radiation power" related
We can concentrate physical radiation  !
Winston : up to 2000x suns concentration factor

Oscar Fellows MEMS-TAR :

1 sun radiation gain per sqm and by 45% conversion efficiency : 600 Wp/sqm ~ 0,06 Wp/sqcm


 X x suns radiation gain per sqm and by 45% conversion efficiency : 100000 Wp/sqm ~ 10 Wp/sqcm

       Per weigth and sqm  optimizing  efficiency factor :  45% ~ concentrated 7500%                                                                                                   
                                                                                                  1 Wp ~ concentrated 166 Wp

Natural sun 900 hours nominal full-time/power conversion  from 8766 hours per year,artificial sun 8766 hours nominal full-time/power conversion from 8766 hours per year.

Which is the highest possible - known- Wp/sqcm conversion power  ?
As "quantum well diod " thermionic cell array :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19941018&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

10 v 7 Wattp per sqm =  10000000 Wattp per sqm = 1000 Wp per square-centimeter


  The MEMS-TAR concentrated output  represents only 1% from the theoretical physical possible power maximum !
                                            "quantum well diod" Wp/gram power-to-weight  ratio ?

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Tech
« Reply #29 on: September 09, 2019, 01:54:01 PM »
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5130608A/en
100 Watt output,  4000 pulses per second / 2 pulses per cycle = 2000 Hz = 2 KHz

https://patents.google.com/patent/US8847720B2/en
net output from 705 cbcm (~ 5,5 Kg) with 2 KHz cycling : 303 Kva/h


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=20&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20110518&CC=CN&NR=201836980U&KC=U#
   
energetic heater source : 100 Watt (  100 VA) electric input

100 VA/303000 VA ~ ( 100/303000)x 5,5 Kg ~ 1,8 gram Harold Goldbaum generator weight

 

OneLink