To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Hi there,  (Read 7707 times)

Offline mattmro

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Hi there,
« on: June 06, 2013, 05:04:24 PM »
I want to the original definition of hardware, please help me by answering it.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Hi there,
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2013, 08:02:50 PM »
Hardware is what you buy in a hardware store, silly.

In other words, without explaining what the heck you are talking about, how do you expect to get a sensible answer?

Google "Hardware Definition".

Offline Marsing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Hi there,
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2013, 11:35:13 AM »
hi all,
i am new, bad english, ( blame google translate).

maybe  mattmro mean detail hardware  for OU prize. confused about Condition/term and his own device. as I am confused too.

if there are some ou device, impossible it work for 24hour for 1 years,  some commercial product such tv dvd etc.. only guaranty for 6 month, products that developed by many people  for many years from many country.

for me, any devices indicated overunity work for more than 1 hour are amazing.   
someone who really have such device will test his device for 1 years first, if he fail during that period, he will develop again, test again.. 

finally never apply for the contest.....
maybe that why only about 30 application there.

sorry posting here, anywhere looks same
Regards, Marsing

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Hi there,
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2013, 07:11:24 AM »
If someone had a device that showed O.U. for even 1 minute, that would be a big deal...if verified and was able to be replicated.  More out than in.  That is my definition of overunity.  We have seen many hoaxes and frauds, and also, many measurement errors.  To me, the time it runs at real O.U. is not as important as the fact that it was O.U. at all.


Offline Marsing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Hi there,
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2013, 06:57:56 PM »
hi..    Pirate88179

thank for your replay,

I still have some question,
1. is the device using gravity and weight as the fuel could be included in this contest ?,   IN: using hand for one second, OUT: torque or inertia for 1 hour ( my friend imajimation out there ).
2. is any body almost win the contest?, i can not find how or where the information about any device that have been tested and how long have been in mr. Stefan Hartmann Home, 
3. and the last is most important for everyone, is the contest itself still open ? ;D

i still newbie in overunity topic, maybe 2 years,  sea of energy by moray and many other ebook from patrickkelly were so amazing, late to Know but not to late to start. some said nothing Overunity at all, its just how we think and use something.  i like that idea.

ok , i hope sombody have an answer for all