Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84086
  • *Latest: Harper77

  • *Total Posts: 895481
  • *Total Topics: 15752
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 15
  • *Total: 17

Author Topic: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity  (Read 17167 times)

Offline chessnyt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
    • My YouTube Channel
Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« on: March 01, 2013, 06:58:58 AM »
@Everyone:         
 Below are some links that deal with this technology and a thesis to provide insight into that which the standard model can not presently explain:       Here's a link to the thread that deals with the thesis.http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2322.msg3973.html#msg3973 Here are the specific youtube links.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnVcXAY6MSM&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdoxrF9ipI4
The Higgs Boson - hidden in plain sight
part 1 of 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB39T_OY1_Q
The Higgs Boson - hidden in plain sight
part 2 of 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaVRwBlI2LA&feature=youtu.be
The Higgs Boson - hidden in plain sight
part 3 of 3

And this one as a supplement to the other three.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnVcXAY6MSM&feature=youtu.be  Enjoy,  Chess

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2013, 11:36:49 AM »
RM certainly has a way with words. 


Is it safe to say that they don't make 'em like that anymore?


TS





Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2013, 05:42:28 AM »
We can only hope.

What a joke. Ainslie's "thesis" not only does not make any testable predictions that aren't covered by standard physics, it makes no quantitative predictions at all. In fact it doesn't even correspond to how things actually _are_, much less make any useful predictions about how new arrangements of things would behave.  She had never heard of the Higgs boson before last year, and now she pretends to have found it in "pain sight" in her "thesis".  Go ahead and watch the videos...... it is nearly an hour of your life that you will never regain.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2013, 05:42:28 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2013, 06:34:22 AM »
Hey Chess

Do you believe what is being shown in those videos?

Mags

Offline TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2013, 07:02:05 AM »


RM has a pretty good head on her shoulders.  It seems clear that she's working with others on her ideas.


I think TK don't like her because his cluelessness is threatened by her.


After all, we are ALL pretty clueless....relatively speaking.


TS

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2013, 07:02:05 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2013, 06:08:59 AM »

RM has a pretty good head on her shoulders.  It seems clear that she's working with others on her ideas.


I think TK don't like her because his cluelessness is threatened by her.


After all, we are ALL pretty clueless....relatively speaking.


TS

Think so? Here are just a few of the ridiculous things Ainslie has said recently:

"Per", as in "miles per hour" or "Joules per second" NEVER indicates division.
There is no such thing as Inductive Reactance.
In South Africa, the Solstice (or is it the Equinox) comes in July.
One Watt is one Joule, the terms are interchangeable.
One Joule is one Watt per Second.
"0.8" and "one-eighth" are the same quantity, and 800 microFarads is more than one-third of a Farad.
80 + 20 = 104.
Water can exist as a liquid in South Africa in an open container at 104 degrees C.
Took water to boil... but really, the water wasn't actually boiling... there were tiny bubbles.
A Function Generator cannot pass current between its "probe" and its "terminal" output leads.
Her batteries do not discharge.
TK and MrSean2k have hacked into her computers several times.
TK is someone called "Brian Little" (or Bryan).

And there are many many more statements and claims like this, from RM's "good head on her shoulders". I can provide images of the actual posts concerned if you are interested.

You think I'm "clueless" and "threatened by her"? Well, she has threatened me, several times, that's provable. But as far as me being "clueless".... support your claims with citations. You cannot.

Offline TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2013, 07:35:45 AM »



Perhaps, when and if you are her age, TK, you may understand.  If you are there already, then please forgive my impetuous assumption.  As for dialogue, I do recommend one sift through the quotes of some Nobel winners of years past.  You'll find some Real Winners.  Some of the greatest 'discoveries' have filtered to us through minds very much like Rosemary's.  I am unfamiliar with the former interactions between yourself and her and cannot comment.  For many, familiarity breeds contempt.  For others, it may foster empathy and greater understanding.  One's faculties need hardly be complete in order to completely change any given course of science.  Or else we're all in a world of trouble. 


Bad choice of words, for that is exactly what we're in.


TS








Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2013, 07:35:45 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1034
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2013, 08:31:46 PM »
    :o    The minute I saw the name of Ainsley, I knew that TK would be all over it. They have a long history.
And by jove, TK didn't let me down. This has been such a show. For what its worth, TK I am in awwwwww.
It's been so much fun watching the back and forth between.

thayu

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2013, 02:34:01 PM »
Ainslie is now crowing about Mark Dansie talking to her, and arranging for someone to "replicate" her circuit (which one? Remember.... FIVE different schematics have been claimed for the circuit she is using.) She continues to lie about the performance of her device and the tests that have actually been performed.

Don't forget..... the ENTIRE substance of her overunity claim is contained within calculations and reasoning like this:

Quote
NOW.  Let's look at your 'self-runner' demands.  We have never recharged those batteries - with one exception.  Two caught fire and BOTH were fully recharged.  We've had those batteries since January 2010.  We've been running them since August 2010.  I've now FINALLY checked their rated capacities.  They're 40 ampere hours each.  We've used 6 of them continually since that time.  According to this rating they are each able, theoretically to dissipate 12 volts x 40 amps x 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 1 hour x 6 batteries.  That gives a work potential - a total potential output of 10 368 000 JOULES.

According to what has been carefully established it takes 4.18 Joules to raise 1 gram of water by 1 degree centigrade.  We've taken a little under 900 grams of water to 82 degrees centigrade.  We ran that test for 90 minutes.  Then we upped the frequency and took that water up a further 20 degrees to 104.  We ran that part of the test for 10 minutes.  Ambient was at 16.  Joules = 1 watt per second.  So.  Do the math.  4.18 x 900 grams x (82 - 16) 66 degrees C = 248 292 joules per second x 90 minutes of the test period = 22 342 280 joules.  Then ADD the last 10 minutes where the water was taken to boil and now you have 4.18 x 900 grams x (104 - 16) 88 degrees C = 331 156 joules per second x 10 minutes = 3 310 560 Joules.  Then add those two values 22 342 280 + 3 310 560 = 25.6 Million Joules.  All 5 batteries maximum potential output - available for work - is 10.3 Million Joules. In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating.  And that was just one test.  Now.  Over the 10 month period that those batteries have been running at various outputs - which, when added to the output on just this one test - then I think its safe to say that the evidence is conclusive.  Those batteries have outperformed. They are still at OVER 12 volts EACH.  They are all of them still FULLY CHARGED.

Yes, please do DO THE MATH. Work through the problem and find her errors and faulty reasoning.... and use the right numbers in the first place: don't forget.... the batteries she used were actually 60 A-H capacity, not 40. And she NEVER MEASURED the temperature of the water itself, and the water "wasn't actually boiling.... there were tiny bubbles". And on and on. When the problem is worked correctly..... is the conclusion affected at all? Yet Ainslie has NEVER made the correct calculation nor revised the conclusion based on the 'math' shown above.



Here's my prediction: Neither Mark Dansie, nor his colleagues, nor Ainslie's "ACADEMICS", will find anything other than what has ALREADY BEEN FOUND, by me, by .99, and by everyone else who has built and tested her circuit and her claims.

And, eventually, these newcomers will find out what we old-timers already have seen: anyone who tries to argue with or educate Ainslie will wind up being the brunt of her insults, threats, disrespect and calumny. This pattern has repeated itself over and over, for at least 12 years, through many web forums and blogs.

I would LOVE to see Mark Dansie, his electronic consultants, and Rosemary Ainslie and her "academics" fully "engaged" in testing her claims about her circuit. It will be like watching re-runs of old Sesame Street episodes -- except that the children will be speaking made-up languages and can't understand the adults and Grover at all.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2013, 02:34:01 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5236
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2013, 04:43:11 PM »
Well i made it to 2m40s in part one,then i just wanted to reach into the monitor and slap her face-what is with the banging on the table and swinging arm's?

No such thing as inductive reactance?
And here i was thinking that it was used to describe resistance in an inductor when being supplied with an AC current (X)-so as not to confuse it with dc resistance within an inductor.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2013, 02:38:42 PM »
Note the continuing series of lies and misrepresentations that continue to come from Ainslie. Note the impatience, the attitude, the badgering.

Note particularly how she misrepresents and lies about my work, about FuzzyTomcat's work, about her "publications", about the "contactable" names she drops. Just try to contact any of those people and agencies about Ainslie! Note how she FAILS to mention Professor Khan, the person who allowed her recent experimentation to happen at the University, and someone who IS indeed contactable.

Note especially that she lies when she says that I did not do comparative battery drawdown tests.... which I did in fact do and even made and posted time-lapse videos thereof, side-by-side DimBulb tests, more and better tests than ANY Ainslie has ever shown. Note how she misrepresents the major objections to her "work". Note how she does not mention at all the many discrepancies (like the 5 different schematics claimed to have been used for the same experiment, or the tremendous math errors upon which her claims are based, or the indications of failed mosfets in her data.) Note that she claims "publications" when the only real publication she has managed is the decade-old Quantum Magazine article describing a completely different experiment -- and note that she doesn't mention the 5 rejections (and no acceptances) of her submissions to real journals. And note also that she STILL makes the absurd assertion that I am someone called Brian (or Bryan) Little.

It is hilarious how she snipes at Stefan and this forum...... when there have been only four people posting on her forum blog in the past month -- two administrators (chessnyt and Ainslie herself) and two new members.

The statement about the Negative Wattage measurement "flying in the face of standard prediction" is particularly laughable, since it has been duplicated -- and fully explained -- in standard simulation software, something that would be impossible if it were something that did not conform to "standard predictions" of electronic circuit behaviour. Of course, for the logic-challenged and deliberately ignorant Ainslie, something is so if she says it is so, and nobody can convince her otherwise. Even the existence of Altoid -- the pocket Negative Wattage measurement-generator designed by .99 using STANDARD PREDICTIONS of electronic circuit behaviour, and built and demonstrated by me, using either battery or capacitor only -- is beyond her comprehension.




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2013, 02:38:42 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1869
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #11 on: April 08, 2013, 04:38:53 AM »
Well i made it to 2m40s in part one,then i just wanted to reach into the monitor and slap her face-what is with the banging on the table and swinging arm's?

No such thing as inductive reactance?
And here i was thinking that it was used to describe resistance in an inductor when being supplied with an AC current (X)-so as not to confuse it with dc resistance within an inductor.
Yeah,  THAT.   In quotes  "Inductive Reactance"  in Google yields 180,000 hits with tutorials on it, definitions of it, units its measured in (Ohms) and numerous explanations of it from universities etc.   
So what do you mean TK by there is no such thing as inductive reactance.   That's pretty mainstream stuff - not some off the wall theory you are opposing.   BTW I could care less about the RA thing just explain why you think there is no IR. 

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #12 on: April 08, 2013, 06:01:50 AM »
You are mistaken.

It is RA that said there is no such thing as Inductive Reactance.

I guess if you had read along more carefully, you may have already realized that.

Offline fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #13 on: April 08, 2013, 11:59:23 AM »
entropy prevention:

Reactance is  the terminus for the imaginary part of a complex impedance.
It might be inductive or capacitive - which doesn´t mean that there has to be a cap or a coil inside.

A typical commercial function generator has a dc coupled output stage and can source&sink AC+DC curent - even at output voltage "0".
It generates a functional waveform with constant impedance - (thats essential different to a "pulsed dc" signal with alternating source impedance)

It´s all about casting the first stone - and I think we should apply "in good faith" if people describe proper things using fuzzy language.


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Solid State Switching Devices and Over Unity
« Reply #14 on: April 08, 2013, 01:36:16 PM »
From the horse's mouth, or rather Ainslie's keyboard:

 

OneLink