New theories about free energy systems > Understanding OverUnity

what would you do with your free energy device ?

<< < (2/3) > >>

hoptoad:
There must be some unique characteristics to your motor's configuration. The/those unique characteristics which make the motor run the way it does can be identified, and a patent applied for, which covers those unique characteristics without having to refer to O/U at all. A simple statement/s that your motor with its unique characteristics will deliver torque at a higher efficiency, compared to other motors is all that is required in your claim. You don't have to mention O/U or self charging or anything which raises the prospect of unwanted attention from the patent office.

For example, you may do a torque test and discover that in terms of torque, your motor uses less energy to produce that torque, than a comparable motor of a different design. It is not the patent examiners job to analyse your patent application for errors in data that you've provided, or to check the voracity of the truth of the data that you've submitted. It is only their task to analyse the device for workability within conservative physics parameters, and whether your claims (unique design) are already covered in another patent.

So you could claim that your device outputs 95% of its (100%) input as torque, and you could provide less than truthful data showing this, and you would not raise any eyebrows. Your patent would be granted if the device was considered workable and operated within the confines of conservative physics, and the unique characteristics of your device as outlined by you, were indeed considered unique by the examiner.

An example of this sort of patent application are the patents of Robert Adam's pulsed motor generator, which claim unique design characteristics leading to increased efficiency, but make no mention at all of O/U capability. In fact, the first patent by Robert Adams was not for a motor/generator, but for his unique star shaped mechanical switch which he used to control the pulsing. Just for the record - Robert Adams motor generators are not O/U, but do incorporate some unique design features.

Cheers

wideyed_tutank:
Contact the folks at TED or make your own public demos. 


When making your own demos make sure you have a secondary battery that appears to be connected to something so that skeptics will have something to talk about; that should give you more time to test and refine your product in the court of public opinion.

Newton II:

--- Quote from: innovator on February 05, 2013, 11:23:39 PM ---
 i have no need or desire to lie to you or fool you in any way whatsoever


--- End quote ---


You are definitely trying o fool us.   If not provide atleast basic principle of working without disclosing complete details.

Madeo:
There are two things you can do with your machine:


1.  You can be like Don Smith, Tariel Kapanadze, or Steven Marks by going for the money. However, the elites will have your device buried so nobody will ever see or hear from it again. If you're lucky,  you'd live a very comfortable life while you watch the rest of the world slowly burn to oblivion. Your children and their children will inherit a world that will be half way dead from the heavily polluted water, air, and food. Humanity in the future will surely live a short bitter life.


2. Or,  You can be like Tesla by sharing your knowledge to the rest of the world. Your contribution would help build a future that is truly free and bountiful. It won't make you rich, but what money can't buy, instead, will give you plenty of fresh food, fresh water, fresh air, and a healthy life. Your children and their children will be happy and proud to have a father/grandfather/ancestor to have given them a world that cultivates their inherent abilities. Tesla knew that if he was able to give the world free energy, it would give birth to a new generation of brilliant scientists, artists, philosophers, and strong leaders that the world has never seen before in history. Poverty and fear is a prison that shackles the mind in a constant state of ignorance and Tesla understands this very well.


Obviously, you have a very important decision to make. Your choice can help steer the direction of our society one way or the other. It's up to you what kind of a future you want.  It's like voting for a president. One vote may not seem a lot, but it does help promote one candidate over the other. It's unfortunate that we ended up with Obama, but that's a whole different issue altogether.


Personally, I'd choose option number 2. Unfortunately, I haven't figured out how to build a free energy machine in the 5 years that i've been studying and lingering here in the free energy community, but the subject continues to fascinate me. I must say, I have a great deal of respect for John Bedini, Peter Lindemann, Eric Dollard, Tom Bearden, and Joseph newman for trying to teach us about the hidden possibilities of electricity, sometimes at a cost of personal sacrifice. I don't care what people say about these guys, but to me and people like me, we will always regard them as heroes. Our descendants will admire them for their courage and wisdom just as we admire Tesla today. I regret that Don Smith, T.K., and Steven Marks chose option 1. They are brilliant men, but ultimately greed got the better of them. I have lost respect for them ages ago. They remind me of Marconi.

Bob Smith:
Hello Inno
I'd be very surprised if your post hasn't already caused you to be approached with a good offer that might include cash for your further research in return for a non-disclosure agreement.
 
If you want to get your product out there to share, I'd suggest having as many open forums as possible to release it from - groups such as this and others, yahoo work groups, YouTube, Vimeo etc. I would probably even get friends to post it on various bulletin boards, Facebook and any other venue from which it can be rapidly spread.  More than likely, someone will quickly try to pick it up to patent a variation on it, but they'd do that even if it were patented.
 
The technology is slowly being understood by more and more people. Your discovery is encouraging to the rest of us.
Bob

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page