A New Perspective on Newtonian Mechanics
>
>
>
>
>
> I’m Yalin Zhang, a physics enthusiast. During my twenty plus years of
> research and study, I found out that Newtonian Mechanics has a lot of room
> for improvement. The following statement is a detailed analysis on why the
> improvement is necessary. I’m open to comments, suggestions and criticism.
>
>
>
> I. On acceleration:
>
>
>
> In Newtonian Mechanics, acceleration is defined as the ratio between
> velocity and time, hence the acceleration formula: a=v/t. In this formula, t
> is a set value that equals to 1 second and the unit of acceleration is meter
> per second squared. Actually, acceleration is not speed, but a ratio
> parameter based on speed.
>
>
>
> The ratio itself needs no unit and the parameter acan be obtained by
> multiple means: a=v/t=v×t=v=s. The parameter a equals to the speed increased
> (v+) within unit time and it also equals to the distance moved within unit
> time.
>
>
>
> What acceleration is really about is the speed increased within one second.
> So the parameter acan indicate either velocity or displacement. In the case
> that it indicates velocity, the force acted on a moving object is being
> consumed; in the case that it indicates displacement, the force acted on the
> object is gone.
>
>
>
> The establishment of the acceleration concept is to measure the magnitude of
> force in a more scientific and logical manner. In order to fully achieve
> this goal, I think a new parameter @ must be set based on the effect of
> force.
>
>
>
> @ equals to velocity increased within unit time multiplied by time (1
> second), the result: the distance of an object moved under the influence of
> force. The parameter @ indicates the distance of an object move due to the
> force acted upon it. It also indicates the velocity increased.
>
>
>
> In numerical value, a=@=vt=s=v (t=1), the unit of parameter @ is meter when
> displacement is concerned and is meter per second when velocity is
> concerned.
>
>
>
> If a is replaced by @, the respective formulas for force, work, energy and
> momentum will be:
>
>
>
> F=m@=ms=m(s=1)=mv (t=v=1) (G=9.8m)
>
> W=FS=ms=mvt=mv(t=1) (W=Gh=9.8ms,s=h)
>
> E=1/2×mv2 (E=Gh=9.8ms,s=h)
>
> P=mv=mvt(t=1)=ms(Indicating the energy generated within 1 second)
>
>
>
>
>
> II.On force, work and energy:
>
>
>
> In my viewpoint, force itself is work or energy within unit distance. Work
> that takes the form of displacement after force is exerted is the sum of
> force. Energy that takes the form of velocity when force exertion is in
> progress is also the sum of force.
>
>
>
> An object is just a carrier of force; force is a kind of energy in its own
> right. In other words, force is just a form energy takes, in the same way as
> thermal energy and electric energy, etc. To me, the full name of force is
> mechanical energy of motion.
>
>
>
> It is necessary to introduce a new unit of force, which is temporally called
> Ya. One Ya means the amount of energy needed to move a mass of one kilogram
> for one meter at an increased speed of 1meter per second. 1Ya=1kg×1m. 1Ya
> equals to 1 Newton in numerical value.
>
>
>
> Unlike the types of energy such as gasoline that can be measured in masses,
> force is a kind of energy with no mass. In the formula F=ms, m is just a
> parameter for the magnitude of force.
>
>
>
> I believe that kinetic energy is a vector rather than a scalar in
> conventional thoughts. This is because kinetic energy has magnitude,
> direction and speed.
>
>
>
> In my opinion, Newton’s second law of motion can be modified like this: The
> magnitude of the force applied on an object is the mass of the object
> multiplied by its displacement. F=ms.
>
>
>
>
>
> III. My New Interpretation of Potential Energy:
>
>
>
> Potential energy that is due to the gravity of an object is a kind of
> inexhaustible energy because of the fact that gravity is eternal.
>
>
>
> Potential energy may transform into kinetic energy when there’s no
> corresponding resistance, while kinetic energy never transforms into
> potential energy but only into work. What kinetic energy does is to remove
> the resistance for potential energy to work, making it possible for
> potential energy to work though motion.
>
>
>
>
>
> IV. The Removal and Utilization of Resistance:
>
>
>
> According to Newton’s third law of motion, any kind of force is always
> generated in pairs, i.e. one amount of force applied, two amounts of force
> gained.
>
>
>
> Experiment 1:
>
>
>
> As shown in
> fig.1(
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2NYfOtsDBDzUVR5czd1NEpOaUk/edit?usp=sharing >
> ), an electric fan is fixed on each end of a cross. When the cross spins due
> to the recoil force of the wind from the electric fans, it will kick start
> the generator to work.
>
>
>
> Energy needed to start the electric fans E=e1: kinetic energy of the
> electric fans + e2: air resistance (approx. 1/10 of e1).
>
> Energy gained E=the recoil force of the fan wind –e1, with the recoil energy
> consumed by the generator at the same time. The kinetic energy e1 still
> exits.
>
>
>
> The magnitude of the recoil force generated by the kinetic energy of the
> fans is maintained by supplementing e2 that’s consumed by air resistance.
> After the start of the fans, once there’s e2 consumed, there’s –e1 gained.
> The amount of e2 is much less than that of –e1.
>
>
>
> The resistance against the generator does not resist the spinning of the
> fans. Thus, the resistance is successful removed. The magnitude of the
> resistance equals to the amount of the recoil energy and also to the amount
> of the kinetic energy of the fans. The resistance e2 against the fans is
> significantly less than the resistance e1 against the generator.
>
>
>
> The more fans are attached, the faster the generator will spin.
>
> Theoretically, the indefinite acceleration of the generator could be
> realized by increasing the number of fans.
>
>
>
> Experiment 2:
>
>
>
> In order to exploit energy in the best possible way, I’ve designed a hybrid
> generator driven by electric fan wind and its recoil force. As shown in
> fig.2(
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2NYfOtsDBDzeEV0bDhTWjgwMFk/edit?usp=sharing >
> ), two meshing gears are fixed on a big wheel that has a cross serving as
> its spokes. One electric fan is attached to each end of the cross. The gear
> attached to the axis of the wheel is also a fly wheel; the other one is set
> between the spokes.
>
>
>
> When the gear set between the spokes rotates due to the wind from the
> electric fan in the east, it’ll transmit the fan wind to the fly wheel at
> the axis, which will then rotate the big wheel and start the generator.
> Likewise, fan wind-driven gears can also be installed in the other three
> directions.
>
>
>
> When the fans start, the recoil force of the fan wind will turn the big
> wheel clockwise. The fan wind and its recoil force will drive the big wheel
> in the same direction thanks to the gears.
>
>
>
> The sum of the driving force: 4×2e1 approximately twenty times the energy
> consumed -- 4e2.
>
>
>
> Experiment 3:
>
>
>
> As shown in
> fig.3(
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2NYfOtsDBDzT2xfbWxsOXJMa0U/edit?usp=sharing),
> the rotor (magnate) of generator A is connected to the stator (coil) of
> generator B, and the rotor of generator B is connected to the stator of
> generator A. When the power is on, the stators and rotors of the generators
> will simultaneously rotate in opposite directions. By this means, double
> amount of energy could possibly be gained.
>
>
>
> P.S. Limited by my financial situation, the above experiments have not been
> actually carried out.