Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 897181
  • *Total Topics: 15807
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 13
  • *Total: 13

Author Topic: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions  (Read 371732 times)

Offline argona369

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #570 on: May 23, 2008, 08:59:18 PM »
Though the original device in this thread is probably fake.
The concept seems hopeful.

In the spirit of Tesla (his mass of infinitely small size) and Testatika (you can see that in the Testatika that their cylinders
have a slight coating of graphite (reflective metallic coating))

here's one good example, (thank's steve, good site)
http://rimstar.org/sdenergy/testa/misc/TESTA4.JPG

What about a dielectric rod or a cylinder rubbed with a pencil or graphite powder?

?It is now presumed that tiny fragments of graphene sheets are produced (along with quantities of other debris) whenever graphite is abraded?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene

high voltage/ high resistance of course.

Cliff,

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline mdmiller

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #571 on: May 23, 2008, 09:07:29 PM »
possibly this is the same Eric d'Hoker, now at UCLA ??
http://personnel.physics.ucla.edu/directory/faculty/index.php?f_name=dhoker

originally schooled in France, PhD from Princeton

according to F Vallee site, the carbon rod synergistics test as pictured was " was selected for
the first generator synergistic due to Belgian Eric d' Hoker. "

Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 586
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #572 on: May 23, 2008, 09:55:52 PM »
One idea - why not try to put carbon rod in such configuration: It won't take much experimental time, but maybe can show something of importance. I just have a suspicion that magnetic field amplification is most powerful along carbon rod's discharge axis, not perpedicular: the reason for that is that if magnetic monopoles are appearing along the axis together with discharge flow their summary field will create a kind of arrow along the axis. Maybe worth trying, but of course I may be mistaken.

Mechanical rotation may also be useful when dealing with emerging magnetic monopoles: this way you can give a statistical direction to current they may induce. For example, a carbon rod discharger mounted in the center and along the axis of a rotor. Just thinking out loud...

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #572 on: May 23, 2008, 09:55:52 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 586
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #573 on: May 23, 2008, 10:41:02 PM »
We must see past the illusions of effect and examine cause and there we will find only electrostatic forces, maybe what Moray refered to as cold plasma.
Gaseous aether with electrostatic fields being represented as ionized clouds (cold plasma) of this aether is something very close to what I 'see' myself. However, since I'm pretty much IT-geared, I perceive it as a 3D scalar matrix with each element of this matrix equal to amount of "ionization" in a given position in space. Then you can define any "ionization" clouds, and define laws of transformation of these clouds.

Offline tak22

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #574 on: May 23, 2008, 11:11:16 PM »
Part of a translated commentary by Charlie Renegade, whoever he is  ???

.........
The theory of Synerg?tique developed by Professor Valley offers another means by a simple experience: - Pick up a piece of pure graphite (pencil extra dry 4H, kernel stack coal, etc.). A small amount is enough (10 grams), you will understand later. -- Attach an electrode at each end of the stick of graphite. -- Surround the stick of a coil of copper as to create an electromagnet. This will give you the transformer primary to a new genre. -- Put this little montage at the centre of a winding torus to be secondary to the processor.

Before going further, to summarize: You must have a stick with a graphite electrode at each end, surrounded by a winding, all located in the centre of a winding torus. Make you a GBF (low-frequency generator) and a phase shifter and connect them so that you get two sources sine (50 Hz is sufficient) out of step one over the other (the angle phase shift Not ;-). Connect a source directly onto the stick of carbon and other source out of sync on the terminals of the first coil (the one that surrounds directly carbon). Carbon is thus simultaneously excited by an electric field and a variable magnetic field varies with the same frequency but d?phas?. By playing on the phase angle, Professor Valley affirms that finding the right angle, the electron of the carbon atom enter into resonance, is destabilized and falls on the core, thus turning carbon 12 in bore12 much energy radiation ? (beta). The radiation is recovered by the winding torique which turns it into electricity.

The experiment was made in Belgium by physicist Eric D'ocker (or D'Hoker or even D'Hocker), which claims to have obtained secondary 4x more energy than it would have sent the primary. Myth or Reality? Where does the energy thus created? The professor said that referring Valley Energy and amplified in the primary (carbon + winding) it is possible to amplify the power of the current maximum of 8 kW per gram of carbon. Any replacement of carbon by another material is ineffective (no amplification). It is therefore possible, from a small electrical pulse to start, get an electric current self-powered and self-amplified from a single stick of carbon? Professor Ren?-Louis Valley states, Professor Eric D'ocker confirmed.
......

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #574 on: May 23, 2008, 11:11:16 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 586
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #575 on: May 23, 2008, 11:21:55 PM »
Carbon is thus simultaneously excited by an electric field and a variable magnetic field varies with the same frequency but d?phas?.
It's interesting since such arrangement suggests that electromagnet that surrounds carbon rod is purposedly stops current in the carbon rod. It's much different and much more energy efficient (less heat) than discharge, but I wonder if dynamically it's the same as creating graphite powder unrest - meaning that in such conditions graphite crystallites slap each other like mad not knowing where to align (resulting in heat and probably magnetic monopoles) - carbon rod thus turns into a resistor. I guess induced current and carbon rod current should be matched to be roughly equal so that summary current is zero. 90 degree phase difference is to be expected due to law of magnetic induction: induction current is 90 deg ahead of voltage used in inductor, so voltage should be further shifted by 90 deg in inductor to produce counteracting current in carbon rod.

Worth checking out if discharges lead to nowhere.

Offline argona369

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #576 on: May 24, 2008, 12:07:32 AM »
Though the original device in this thread is probably fake.
The concept seems hopeful.

In the spirit of Tesla (his mass of infinitely small size) and Testatika (you can see that in the Testatika that their cylinders
have a slight coating of graphite (reflective metallic coating))

here's one good example, (thank's steve, good site)
http://rimstar.org/sdenergy/testa/misc/TESTA4.JPG

What about a dielectric rod or a cylinder rubbed with a pencil or graphite powder?

?It is now presumed that tiny fragments of graphene sheets are produced (along with quantities of other debris) whenever graphite is abraded?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene

and another interesting property, electron mass.
gravity maybe??
"Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets"
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/23538

high voltage/ high resistance of course.

Cliff,

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #576 on: May 24, 2008, 12:07:32 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #577 on: May 24, 2008, 12:11:19 AM »
I do not think the original device is fake.  Groundloop noted wires running into the toroid and derived a hypothetical cross-section. See Thread Page 13.

Offline Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #578 on: May 24, 2008, 12:18:26 AM »
Part of a translated commentary by Charlie Renegade, whoever he is  ???
......

Do you have the original text or the URL of the French text ?

Earl

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #578 on: May 24, 2008, 12:18:26 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #579 on: May 24, 2008, 12:22:56 AM »
I do not think the original device is fake.  Groundloop noted wires running into the toroid and derived a hypothetical cross-section.

There are lots of wires running into the toroid, but I never saw any wires running into the center of the toroid.

Earl

Offline Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #580 on: May 24, 2008, 12:54:05 AM »
RE the experiment of Eric D'Hoker

1- glass should block beta rays

2- whether the glass tube has a carbon rod, or copper or silver - or a spaghetti soaked in salt water, pulses of current in this transformer primary would be transmitted to the secondary by Faraday induction.  Since he is not an experienced electrical Engineer, but a theoretical Physicist, it would have been easy for him to make a measurement error since he would have been measuring pulses and not DC.  Both Bearden and JLN made measurement errors with the MEG, so I can easily see D'Hoker incorrectly measuring pulse power.

With the possible exception of Uncle Fester, I do not see much meat on this bone.

With a capacitor on the toroid secondary tuned to the pulse repetition rate, there would be a beautiful sine wave, but no OU.  Amateur radio HAMs have been doing this for more than a 100 years.

Earl

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #580 on: May 24, 2008, 12:54:05 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline twosox

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #581 on: May 24, 2008, 01:49:35 AM »
Hi guys,

just back from my brothers wifes birthday, so i'm a bit squiffy (hic).

on my many hours of reading up on lots of stuff i keep coming across what looks like glass tubes in circuit diagrams, but in fact are quartz tubes, could this be the material used in the last diagram posted, not glass.

some observations from my setup at work today :-

i had my pickup coil next to the carbon rod, no magnetic bias, can only pulse manually, so connecting the 15v 1A dc supply to one side of the rod i got the expected 'spark' on contact, nothing new there i thought, got a nice trace on my pc scope tho. then tried the same with large magnets either side of the rod and 'ay up whats this' it arced as tho the voltage had turned into a high frequency discharge, purple coloured aswell, nice. the trace on the pc scope had nearly doubled.

just thought i'd share that cos i got slighty impressed, myth confirmed on the voltage increase through a biased carbon rod methinks.

sorry if thats a bit incoherent, but thats the trouble with mr smirnhoff :-)  ::)

Offline Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #582 on: May 24, 2008, 02:04:22 AM »
Congratulations!  Remind me I owe you a beer at the first International Overunity Conference.

Offline tishatang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #583 on: May 24, 2008, 05:03:54 AM »
Quote from Feynman:
"For this to be seriously theoretically useful, we would need a physicist from one of the trillion-dollar 'black' projects, not a public university program."

You need Stan Deyo, also referenced by Callahan.  He used to be in black ops.  Hired by Teller.  I used to listen to him on Coast to Coast when he was still in Australia.  Here is video link:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=cSEtx5C2pkQ

This video shows possibly how Steven Mark got rotating magnetic fields in the TPU?

Here is his website:

http://standeyo.com/index1.html

You might be able to email him at his site.  Maybe he would offer insights on this forum?

Tishatang

Offline Inventor81

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #584 on: May 24, 2008, 05:20:34 AM »
You don't have beta.

Anomalous results require alternative explanations.

Please reference the following links.

I am not "back".

yet.

For best educative and enlightening effect, please read these in order, and don't jump past the section to which I link until after you have traversed all the pages, as I have included the various sections in an order which provides for each section to "set up" the following sections.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_dots#Optical_properties

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-orbit_interaction

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene#Spin_Transport

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene#Electronic_transport

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Hall_effect

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shubnikov-De_Haas_effect

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene#Mechanical_properties

http://proton-21.com.ua/research_en.html

As I said, this is most likely a semiconductor-like effect. If you do not wish to know any theoretical basis for the results prior to observing them, then feel free to ignore this post. If you wish to prepare yourself for potential outcomes, feel free to pm or email me with questions.

R3cur5!>3


 

OneLink