Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions  (Read 433032 times)

waterfireho

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #435 on: May 22, 2008, 06:13:30 AM »

I will get back as soon as I can function and supply details, but I feel the other Dr's did the experiment as they found here and I have not followed that close, but do know they are both capable in the EE area as well as their own.

Leaving in an hour so got to go.

Good Luck All..............

Dr Stiffler ..

Shoot me an Email when you get back and I will relay some Info I have from Juan on this that might help you .

Dave

Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #436 on: May 22, 2008, 06:20:52 AM »
@Dave

Thanks for posting those formula, they are coming in very useful as it becomes more clear there is actually something to Juan's device.  Also, what are your thoughts the carbon rod type and purity?


@DrStiffler, all

I think UncleFester's self-running original experiment is using spec grade carbon rods. They are listed below.  Perhaps this has something to do with beta production.

(http://www.tedpella.com/carbon_html/62-12.jpg)

The carbon rods are offered in either spectroscopically pure of technical grades for standard electron microscopy evaporation requirements using carbon coaters. Due to the purification process used all carbon rods we supply have a graphite structure. The purification process removes impurities at a high temperature and causes the carbon to crystallize. The graphite structure has no adverse effects on the carbon coating or the carbon coating process. The user might perceive an additional advantage: the carbon rods( graphite rods) are less brittle than the carbon rods and are easier to handle and easier to shape.


"Spec-Pure" (spectroscopically pure) grade is available for carbon rods with impurities equal or less than 2ppm (single element 1 ppm or less). Typically the impurity level is more likely 1ppm or less. This grade should be used for TEM, WDS, EBSD, Microprobe and more critical SEM/EDS applications.


Grade 1 Spec-Pure Carbon Rods


Spectroscopically pure graphite structure carbon rods with an impurity level of 2ppm or less with 1ppm as maximum level for each element. The rods are all 12" long with three nominal diameters (1/8", 3/16" and 1/4") to comply with the carbon source used in different carbon evaporators. Use for TEM, WDS, EBSD, Microprobe and more critical SEM/EDS applications."

« Last Edit: May 22, 2008, 08:26:16 AM by Feynman »

waterfireho

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #437 on: May 22, 2008, 06:49:57 AM »
 Hi Feynman

Glad the info helps  ;D hopefully we can get this thing working right.

 Juan was using the carbons from lamps, I asked him about the carbon arc welding rods and he said they should be fine, I will try to find his email on it but I think he mentioned something about being too pure but I can't say for sure until I find it.

Something else that may not be realized is the Receiving windings need to be Magnetically biased too, so they can PULL IN the Beta particles. That is another reason for the 12v dc bias, it sets up a Dipole in the carbon AND sets up the Torrid to receive the energy.

Also was told NOT to use a Spark Gap as it cuts down the duration of energy transfer from the cap bank to Carbon.

Dave

Inventor81

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #438 on: May 22, 2008, 07:28:04 AM »
Wonder what monocrystalline pharmaceutical grade Lithium Carbide would do?

Sounds like a semiconductor/quantum semiconductor effect.

Any dopant could significantly alter the response of the media.

I also doubt that anyone would go to the effort of getting spectroscopy grade carbon rods.

Gouging rods... don't seem to work?

Copper contaminant?

Who knows?

Perhaps if we bake "normal" carbon rods at high temp to drive off impurities?

If I were a blacksmith, I'd do the same thing for about half an hour on a piece of 1/4 inch round steel to even out the carbon distribution. Take it up to near forge welding temps (2700 Farenheit, white hot) and hold it for a good ten or fifteen minutes, then let her come back down over the course of an hour or so to a dull red, pull it out of the fire, then let it cool next to the forge.

Of course, my forge burns charcoal... so it would also burn your carbon rod - so no, I won't heat treat your carbon rods for you!

AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #439 on: May 22, 2008, 07:33:04 AM »
One important point that needs to be made.
A quote from Naudin's tests:

"During these VSG tests the radiations counter has shown a net increase of the radiations level when the colinear B-Field is used. It is interesting to notice that the measured radiations remain at least 10 seconds after that the short current pulse has been sent. This increase of the radiation level when the conditions are gathered shows that a nuclear reaction seems to occured."

If this isn't a Beta source then how could the energy remain for at least 10 seconds. 
I know of no other energy source that would keep a radiation detector reading for 10 seconds.
Also the radiation was only measured when the B-field was used,
if this isn't Beta then why is the B-field needed to produce it.

One last point:
This whole concept is based on a freak accident that happened at a nuclear power plant.
5 volts at 300,000 amps damaged the inside of a reactor,
and through detailed investigation it was found that beta radiation had done the damage. 
How could they have been so far out in there findings.
I would think that a nuclear power plant would have top notch test equipment on hand.
  http://pesn.com/2005/04/07/6900079_PROTELF_Proton-Electron_Fusion/ 

As far as carbon source is concerned, didn't the original unit in the 1970's us coal for the electrode?

A priceless study would be, to have an isotope that puts out a strong beta field and compare the measurements
with what we are getting from these units.  Also would be a good way to determine the best way to capture the energy.

I think we need to keep experimenting, the hard facts of what is happening will put an end to doubts.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2008, 07:58:54 AM by AbbaRue »

Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #440 on: May 22, 2008, 07:56:59 AM »
Thanks Abba.  I agree we must keep experimenting.  Maybe the beta electrons are in KeV so they don't show up on higher quality detectors.

I might add EE Commander 'Groundloop' thinks this is an EMF process.  He also suggests photo paper for definitive resolution. I guess we should all place our beta, I mean, our 'bets' now.     We can trade beers at the first International Overunity Conference.  ;D  ;)

Feynman: low-energy beta process , K-capture
Abba: must be nuclear effect, beta process
Koen: Beta capture, Protelf
R: beta Scattering, K-capture
Groundloop: powerful magnetic pulse ("EMF")
Juan: Boron-12 Beta Decay
Naudin: Boron-12 Beta Decay catalyzed by X-rays and 'spark gap'
UncleFester: Beta, K-capture, but does not care what it is as long as it powers his house.
Jon: Rotating magnetic field
Frank: Beta
aleks: Magnetic field amplification / field-free electron acceleration
zerotensor: Current-induced beta emission in magnetically-biased bulk graphite arising from cooper-pair-bisoliton recombination at graphene nanocrystal boundaries

@DrStiffler
In addition to rod crystal structure, R thinks maybe the beta electrons are KeV and are being filtered by the 'low pass' filter on your detection equipment.  In his words...

Quote
R:
It'll have a bandpass filter
essentially
low energy particles won't even make it to the detector
they'll get deflected to the fricking  wall before they get detected
i.e. turned through the magnetic field

So I guess we will see what's up here.  I think photo paper might be a better way to check than beta detectors, especially if these are low energy particles and we are also producing bursts of EMI along with beta... I guess our little beta rays just need to be more energetic than ionization potential of silver iodide or silver bromide... which is very low.   So photo paper will tell us the truth.  Is this beta or magnetic?

Mitsuo Kawasaki, Yoshihiko Tsujimura, and Hiroshi Hada
Department of Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Kyoto 606, Japan


Received 11 June 1986

Photoionization thresholds of small photolytic silver clusters (Ag2, Ag3, and Ag4) formed on silver bromide grain surfaces were evaluated from the threshold photon energy required for inducing the photobleach of the clusters. Threshold energies needed were about 1.6, 0.75, and 1.1 eV for Ag2, Ag3, and Ag4, respectively, showing an obvious even-odd oscillatory trend of the ionization threshold. The oscillation, however, seemed to be smaller than that expected for isolated metal-atom clusters, indicating the importance of interaction with the silver bromide grain surface.

« Last Edit: May 22, 2008, 11:26:18 AM by Feynman »

callanan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #441 on: May 22, 2008, 08:17:44 AM »
Hi All,

Don't have much time but I need to say some things about this very important thread, topic and device/process. So I will be brief and in point form.

- For those looking at taking the effect further, don't question the reaction and production of beta particles as this has been experimentally proven. Then, don't look at how you can capture and convert these particles to usable energy as this is well documented in the art of atomic batteries. The carbon rod by itself does a far better job of converting the beta energy and adding it to the energy used to cause the reaction in it.

- Once the reaction is initiated by the input pulse the beta energy will get reabsorbed and converted into electrical energy that is added to the input pulse which will result in a stronger magnetic field around the carbon rod than for the initial energy of the input pulse.

- The magnetic field around the carbon rod can then be tapped by a soft iron core around it which also may have a coil of wire wound around it, hence it will be a toroid coil with an iron core within. The carbon rod placed in the hole of the toroid will effectively act like a half turn winding and induce it's energy into the toroid coil and the turns ratio will by high. It will be effectively be 0.5 to the number of turns in the toriod coil. So the step up in voltage will be very high and will cause a reduction in current but the amount of current in the carbon rod including the additional beta energy will be very high and in the thousands of amps so the current power factor translation is not an issue.

- The polarising magnetic field required to initiate the reaction in the carbon rod does not need to be provided by magnets or by a seperate DC supply via a coil wound directly on or across the carbon rod. Another heavy and thick wire coil of a few turns can be wound and placed within the iron core of the toroid coil/transformer such that it is perpendicular to the toroidal windings. The magnetic field of this coil will be in parallel to the axis and length of the carbon rod.

- The toroidal transformer will now take the form of a normal short, thick winding solenoid coil (polarising coil) which is then covered with a soft iron core upon which a toroidal coil is wound (output coil). The carbon rod is then placed in the centre of the toroidal transformer and connected in series with the polarising coil. When a heavy current electrical pulse is sent through the polarising coil and carbon rod, which is in series, the strength of the polarising coil's field is increased when the beta reaction energy is added to it which further increases the beta reaction in a self feeding mode. A very high current diode can be also placed across the input such that it will keep the additional energy created in the series loop flowing back into itself. The total energy flowing through the carbon rod will then be induced into the toroid output coil via the iron core with a turns ratio of 0.5 to X, X being the number of turns in the toroid coil.

This is a simple and straight forward understanding of how and what you can do with this device. But I must say that the basic physical embodiment of such a transformer has previously been described by Stan Deyo in his books, "Cosmic Conspiracy" and "Vindicator Scrolls", and videos. In these books and videos, Stan Deyo describes that such a constructed toroidal transformer has been used in advanced magnetic propulsion systems in top secret government projects. His knowledge of this, he claims, stems from his past employment and contacts in the CIA and then later private advanced research companies he worked for.

Regards,

Os




AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #442 on: May 22, 2008, 08:19:32 AM »
An important question about firing the capacitor bank through a bank of MOSFETS:
Once the MOSFETS are turned on how do you turn them off again.
Does someone have a good schematic diagram of how the MOSFETS should be fired
to get a short pulse and then turn them off again.
I find this would be important for self running.
Don't want the output fed back through the MOSFETS.

Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #443 on: May 22, 2008, 08:46:59 AM »
@AbbaRue
I usually use MOSFET driver or build one.  You can get cheap mosfet drivers from digikey, or you can make 'em with an NPN and PNP transistor.  You gotta drive mosfet gate to current saturation otherwise it acts all funny. You can , however, try to directly drive your  say square wave into the mosfet gate, but the rise/fall time might be slow.  Connect mosfet source to ground, and connect mosfet drain to (+)...first through your load followed by a current limiting resistor then to (+).

@callanan
Fantastic info, Thanks!

Inventor81

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #444 on: May 22, 2008, 08:58:05 AM »
.5V

300A

Plasma.

These numbers do not equate to the same sort of energies in a solid conductor.

300A refers to the amount of charge circulating past a certain point in the plasma.

.5 V is likely the net kinetic energy of the plasma.

Electrons in the non equilibrium plasma would cause all sorts of effects, especially given THE STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD OF THE TORUS.

Also, the interesting thing to note is that

THE CARBON WAS THE TOROID...

Since it was the shielding of the tokamak.

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #445 on: May 22, 2008, 10:14:10 AM »
Well, fine theories. :)

Just do not forget that this effect is about micro-powder (crystallite) structure of graphite. As was noted, two things happen here: magnetic field amplification (due to short-living magnetic monopoles appearing inside the carbon rod) and free-field electron acceleration (which is more evident with static B-field than without). So, it's not exactly about fusion/fission, but of course it happens as a result of magnetic monopoles appearing.

You may try running the same device with other conducting substances that have micro-powder structure: a pack of carbon nanotube powder may do even a better job, but even a pack of fine metallic powder may work as well.

Just do not be closed to the alternative understanding through DC acoustic waves. ;) (without these, kinetics in physics is some fantasy model that does not reveal a true mechanism of action-counteraction).

AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #446 on: May 22, 2008, 10:23:12 AM »
Another way to test if this type of device puts out beta would be to use another element for a test run.
Iron 56 to Manganese 56, here are the specs for Manganese 56.
# Spin: 3+
# Half life: 2.5785 H ( 0.0078 % )
# Mode of decay: Beta to Fe-56
    * Decay energy: 3.695 MeV

 With a half life of  2.57 hours there would be no doubt of the beta if it remains radioactive for that long.


aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #447 on: May 22, 2008, 10:42:09 AM »
Another way to test if this type of device puts out beta would be to use another element for a test run.
Iron 56 to Manganese 56, here are the specs for Manganese 56.
# Spin: 3+
# Half life: 2.5785 H ( 0.0078 % )
# Mode of decay: Beta to Fe-56
    * Decay energy: 3.695 MeV

 With a half life of  2.57 hours there would be no doubt of the beta if it remains radioactive for that long.

http://www.zsw-bw.de/services/development/Development_en.html This company develops micro powders. Manganese oxide is mentioned which may be worth trying: it should be noted that planar micro particles are likely to be better than spherical ones due to larger impact area, that's why graphite is naturally good for discharge pulsing.

tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #448 on: May 22, 2008, 11:12:52 AM »
this morning , in PARIS, there was an alerte (just like in the last second war)

for a moment I think some one in france was playing with this device ...

but it seems there is no reason for this alerte !!

zerotensor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 240
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #449 on: May 22, 2008, 11:18:16 AM »
I might add EE Commander 'Groundloop' thinks this is an EMF process.  He also suggests photo paper for definitive resolution. I guess we should all place our beta, I mean, our 'bets' now.     We can trade beers at the first International Overunity Conference.  ;D  ;)

Feynman: low-energy beta process , K-capture
Abba: must be nuclear effect, beta process
Koen: Beta capture, Protelf
R: beta Scattering, K-capture
Groundloop: powerful magnetic pulse ("EMF")
Juan: Boron-12 Beta Decay
Naudin: Boron-12 Beta Decay catalyzed by X-rays and 'spark gap'
UncleFester: Beta, K-capture, but does not care what it is as long as it powers his house.
Jon: Rotating magnetic field
Frank: Beta

Dang!  Now that's gonna be a party!   I propose we hold the conference in Berlin.  (Stefan, can I sleep on your couch?)

As for the theoretical bets, since all the obvious ones are taken, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say its, "Current-induced beta emission in magnetically-biased bulk graphite arising from cooper-pair-bisoliton recombination at graphene nanocrystal boundaries" -- (or something like that....)