Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions  (Read 432955 times)

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #105 on: May 11, 2008, 07:00:49 PM »
Tao,  in my opinion it is JLN that is worthless; the only positive thing he has every done is to have banned Harti from his censored email list, which lead to the formation of OU.com.
It's interesting to hear alike thoughts. Even though I've never dealt with JLN personally, I had some "what the heck" feeling when studying JLN's works. Whether he never achieved OU or he is afraid of assasination. Anyway, there is little hope JLN's website can be used as a 'source' for FE information - much of it outdated and does not lead anywhere it seems (lack of measurements and other details). He started working on propeller flyers - such a pity for FE researcher (but maybe he wasn't one).

sulake

  • Guest
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #106 on: May 11, 2008, 07:30:27 PM »
...the photo has nothing to do with power generation from nuclear reactions:  no carbon rods, no connections, no nothing.  The photo could be part of bla bla bla...

It looks like it could be a inductance bank to compensate capacitive loads. There is perhaps four different groups of choke coils that are switched on with the contactors, depending how much capacitance there is to compensate.

Or, it could be some industrial 24V AC power source for process automation devices.

BTW, the toroidal transformer in JNL setup is not a power transformer, it is only used for measuring, to attach oscilloscope?
For useful power transformer there must be primary windings to get power out from secondary.?

Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #107 on: May 11, 2008, 08:09:56 PM »
@sulake

Great setup!  You are pretty far ahead now!    I am still waiting for my parts to show up .  (they must be using a donkey to delivery the mail).   Where'd you find that heat sink for your MOSFETs?  That thing is rad.    What power source are you using for the high side (+) drain of the MOSFETs?   Thanks.   Oh also the Americans label everything differently because we use inches, 'AWG' , pounds, to prove our strong sense of individuality , haha.  MFD is microFarad (uF).

@Earl

At this point I have no idea if that photograph is 'real' or not.   I tend to think it is, just that it was acquired secondhand and passed around.  Regardless, I don't think we need the photo to do the basic research on this theory.  Either we will be able to get these extra beta electrons or not.   If we can get them, I'm sure we'll figure out how to make it self-run via some clevers switching with IGBTs.

@Abba

You can get a 2kV , 10uF capacitor for about $50 from Information Unlimited.
http://amazing1.com/capacitors.htm
scroll down to "energy storage capacitors

@all
exciting times, heheh


AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #108 on: May 11, 2008, 09:11:25 PM »
I got 10 x 16,000 uf caps wired up for a total of 160,000 uf at 60V.
I have toroidal transformers for testing.
I only have 1/16 inch tungsten rods, need to get some thicker ones.
I also need to find a source for carbon rods.
Don't they use carbon rods for electric welding rods of some kind for cutting or something?

I do have some graphite I can cut into rods if I need to.
Wonder if graphite will work for this too?
« Last Edit: May 13, 2008, 07:32:37 AM by AbbaRue »

Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #109 on: May 11, 2008, 09:49:31 PM »
Graphite is carbon mixed with varying amounts of clay.  ;)

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #110 on: May 11, 2008, 10:14:39 PM »
Wonder if graphite will work for this too?
It's the same thing.. allotrope of carbon. From what I've read carbon rods are usually made of graphite, and it looks like the best thing for this task as graphite has layered structure, and in practice comes in separate crystal formations (I've posted a picture before) - called crystallites. (well, previously I've mistakengly used term "polycrystalline", which is related to structure containing several allotropes... I should have said carbon rods "consist of crystallites")

It's not fully related to carbon rods, but should probably give a clue on graphite structure:
(http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6673284-0-display.jpg)
(graphite sheets http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6673284.html)

this looks like a micro powder.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2008, 10:48:21 PM by aleks »

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #111 on: May 11, 2008, 10:20:10 PM »
Graphite is carbon mixed with varying amounts of clay.  ;)

Well, just only in pencils !
Graphite rods from batteries have no clay in it as far as I know.
This then conducts the current better without the clay...

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #112 on: May 11, 2008, 10:26:30 PM »
Graphite , as well as also the diamond, is just a modification of the
carbon molecules structure.

Graphite is the one, which conducts very nicely the electric current
like metals but has very nice properties as it is not consumed
by any acids or bases..

By the way, what makes brikets coal so energy efficient when
using it to heat your room is also the modification element change
from normal carbon to graphite and then to CO2.

The change from carbon to graphite puts out all the extreme heat
when a coal briket glows red hot.
Just burning carbon without the change to graphite
would not put out so much heat...

This way you can also generate yourself graphite as I have posted earlier
inside the battery threads...

Regards, Stefan.

Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #113 on: May 11, 2008, 10:33:34 PM »
@Earl

At this point I have no idea if that photograph is 'real' or not.   I tend to think it is, just that it was acquired secondhand and passed around. 

The photo is real and shows some equipment, and perhaps this was even shipped to Germany, but what is fake is claiming this is equipment harnessing carbon/boron fusion fission.  It can clearly be seen that the only thing inside each toroid is a steel fixation bolt.

Claiming that this is a 60kW fusion fission power supply shipped to a customer is bla bla bla.

Earl

sulake

  • Guest
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #114 on: May 11, 2008, 10:59:11 PM »
I also need to find a source for carbon rods.
Don't they use carbon rods for electric welding rods of some kind for cutting or something?

Good idea, those are propably sold by the same retailer than the thoriated tungsten electrodes! :)
Here is those of size 10mm diameter and 300mm length, the copper coating must be removed sence it is diamagnetic.
http://www.gys.fr/spip.php?page=produit&reference=049468&lang=uk&cat_id=451
And more the carbon, more the power? (8 kw per gram of carbon used, but not consumed)
(http://www.gys.fi/Images/hitsauskoneet/049468.jpg)

Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #115 on: May 11, 2008, 11:17:04 PM »
You are right Stefan!  I was thinking about mechanical pencils.  There is no clay in battery graphite.  I am tempted to take a battery apart now.


@Earl
Perhaps what you say is true; personally I can't tell whether or not there is carbon in the toroids. I also can see the bolt you are talking about. 

Supposing this is not carbon-fusion, what would this piece of equipment possibly be used for?  Does it have any commercial equivilents?   (GE CL04 three phase motor starters, two control boards, and ten toroids with steel fixation bolts).  I can't think of what the device in this photograph is, maybe you have some ideas of what it might be if it is not related to carbon-fusion.


@sulake
You are right, these components are both used in welding.   :D :D ;D
Also, hypothetically, the more carbon the more the power, but I think other factors will be way more important.   Factors such as discharge voltage, B-field bias, collector toroid material and proximity, etc.


original paper, professional translated to English:
http://www.nuenergy.org/pdf/electronically-activated-radioisotopic-carbon-generator.pdf

Toroids:
http://www.alphacoredirect.com/index.html?lmd=39452.612164
http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/item/TTX-7812/790950/TOROIDAL_TRANSFORMER,_7.8VAC_6.3A,_25.2VCT_2.2A_.html
http://www.cmi-ferrite.com/Products/Standard%20Cores/Large%20toroids.htm

Thoriated Tungsten:
http://www.diamondground.com/tungmaterials.html

Pure Carbon Rods:
http://www.tedpella.com/carbon_html/carbon1.htm


aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #116 on: May 11, 2008, 11:38:39 PM »
You are right, these components are both used in welding.   :D :D ;D

Sorry for unrelated comment... I knew at least two welder men who possessed "magical" abilities (namely, "out of body" life). Now after reading so much about spark gaps and OU I even think it's pretty common among welders (Tesla is among them - though his welding was happening in vacuum spark tubes mainly). This has something to do gravity. Gravity formation is about the only thing that can accelerate any "not known" body energies as gravity is believed to affect all kinds of matter. After all, "soul" can be also a gravitic force structure: a kind of mega particle with complex internal structure, a "spark". :) Body being a temple of soul does not sound like a fantasy after that...

AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #117 on: May 12, 2008, 12:29:33 AM »
I tested some soft steel wire with a magnet today at the store.
It didn't stay magnetized so it will work for core material.
This would be the real poor mans way to go for toroidal.
Just wind steel wire into a toroid core and then wrap the copper wire coils around that.
I think that is what Tesla used to use in his days, from some of his drawings I've seen.

We have a BOC welding supplies here so I will be able to get both the tungsten and carbon rods.
Also wanted to say carbon crystalizes into diamond or graphite.
I find coal and graphite on the beach here in Sarnia,  because years ago some ships went down in
the great lakes, one was loaded with graphite slabs.  And also many coal powered steamers have sunk.
So once in a while some washes up on the beach.
But the graphite welding rods look easier to use.

Checking into isotopes I seen something interesting, if the theory of transmutation holds out
Nitrogen14 would transmute into Carbon14
Carbon14 transmutes into boron14
When boron 14 transmutes back to carbon14 it gives off beta at 20 MeV.
Carbon 14 transmutes  back to Nitrogen14 giving off beta but it has a half life of over 5000 years.
So any carbon14 we produce will be around for a while.
This is what we will get if we have arcing between the rods.
Carbon 14 seems relatively harmless so this won't be a problem,
and at 20MeV it gives off almost twice the energy that Carbon12 will.
If my understanding of this is right, this is very interesting stuff.
I'm excited about getting started experimenting.

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #118 on: May 12, 2008, 04:37:48 AM »
IMHO...
The photograph offered as some kind of FE device is part of a DC motor control system. It reminds me of a stepped dynamic breaking system for elevators.

Also, I wouldn't give up on the Beta particle idea but I would drop the idea of metal cores in the toroid. If the basics are indeed to create near FTL negative particles in a magnetic field you will certainly have rotation. The most basic example is the Faraday homopolar generator. Place an toroidal coil covered chamber in a magnetic field and radiate negatively charged particles into the toroid core. Lorentz takes over.
It was good enough that the voltage generated from the rotation was used to perpetuate the heating of the betatron heater element. It should be good enough to provide DC to a load as well.

Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #119 on: May 12, 2008, 01:07:41 PM »
IMHO...
The photograph offered as some kind of FE device is part of a DC motor control system. It reminds me of a stepped dynamic breaking system for elevators.

Also, I wouldn't give up on the Beta particle idea but I would drop the idea of metal cores in the toroid. If the basics are indeed to create near FTL negative particles in a magnetic field you will certainly have rotation. The most basic example is the Faraday homopolar generator. Place an toroidal coil covered chamber in a magnetic field and radiate negatively charged particles into the toroid core. Lorentz takes over.
It was good enough that the voltage generated from the rotation was used to perpetuate the heating of the betatron heater element. It should be good enough to provide DC to a load as well.

@BEP,

not only is the photo faked, but Tesla_2006 said:
My results was get in the external toroid about 6 KW in my firsts tests and then autopowered devices at 110 VAC, 60 Hz and 220 VAC, 50 Hz , and I've published some results in a web site, but in spanish   http://econuclear.tk

which I find difficult to believe.  I would think that any beta interception or non-mechanical homopolar generator would only generate DC output, not AC.

Earl