Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions  (Read 432172 times)

mikewatson

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #930 on: October 22, 2008, 01:57:17 PM »
BEP
Quote
Brown doesn't mean it is iron either. Neither does ferromagnetic response to a magnet.

I agree the brown deposit does not mean it is iron oxide, in fact tungsten gives a deposit also which is non magnetic, but what sustances are ferromagnetic which are not cobalt/iron/nickel containing or their oxides, which could be attracted by a magnet and dragged along 5 mm away? The carbon used is spectrally pure reagent quality and contains less than 2 ppm of total contaminents, the water and KCL are also reagent quality.

Mike

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #931 on: October 23, 2008, 03:41:12 AM »
I can only suggest having someone do a chemical analysis.

Do different sized particles exhibit different magnetic properties? Some ferro some para or some diamagnetic?

Is there any reaction to water or does it turn brown when contacting water?

If in water does it settle after about 20 minutes or does it create a suspended solution?

Is either electrode showing signs of 'swapped' material. Meaning, instead of pits in the W, are there spots that now have graphite? (should be impossible to tell by eye but rubbing it may work).
I'm not a chemist so I'm not a good one to ask. The only odd thing I have seen with this residue is it tends to loose color or dissolve completely when treated with common household bleach ( the smallest of particles ) and when in water the larger particles act the same as iron (to a magnet) and the stained water/small residue particle solution is paramagnetic.

Best guess from me is it may be a combination of iron and magnesium.

Any particles large enough to scrape for viewing the color and luster beneath?

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #932 on: October 23, 2008, 05:13:31 PM »
I tried to post this yesterday but it disappeared when this site went into maintenance.   

   I believe that a plasma circulates the electrons about a grouping of atomic neuclei.   Essentially a macroatom.  The electrons circulate about the neuclei cluster instead of atomically dictated orbitals.  This current then creates a magnetic tube about itself which reorganises the neuclei via the alignment of the neuclei magnetic dipole moments with the electron current.  The shell of the plasma is now highly negative and could be seperated from the protonic charge by up to lightyears away or just one plank, :P.  This electrostatic field is highly charged and able to influence matter at a great distance.  e.g. emwave energy emitted from a spark gap.   The plasma voltage is a destabilizing force in the mass it encounters.  The electron current can be inhomogenous and illicit emwave energies in very high or low frequency spectra.   These wave energies when expressed on other atomic lattices along with the highly - electrostatic charge could result in such effects as currentless electolysis of water, particle acceleration, cold fusion, themal energy from molecular resonance.  I believe that the voltages possible are limited only by the shielding of the plasma from electromagnetic stimulation which would result in it's decay. 
   I believe that when an atomic lattice is first exposed to a voltage there is a mutation of the electron orbital shell due to the inertial response of the mass difference between the electron field and the neucleus.  If this voltage is high enough and of very short duration the electron field can be totally stripped from the neuclei and a plasma formed.  Then the plasma goes to work to extract more energy from the matter it influences.  Where does the energy come from?  Whatever makes electrons run away from a negative charged field and whatever got them in motion around a neucleus to begin with.

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #933 on: October 23, 2008, 06:55:43 PM »
@Sparks,

Your last post makes me think you agree with me in that, if there is transmutation there may be more than one element resulting from the conversion process?

Since iron oxide tends to be paramagnetic the oxide may not be a result of oxidation of the generated element but a result of the conversion process and simply may be coating another ferromagnetic material that may or may not show 'red' oxidation.

I too have created my fair amount of brown slime in HHO games and from the use of many different materials. Some of it will 'run away' from a moving magnet and some will be drawn to a still magnet.

No, I've had no useful results. I could run a small Fox toy airplane motor from my last reactor but it needed much more than it put out.


sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #934 on: October 23, 2008, 11:51:00 PM »
@Bep

   
       There is an outside chance that the material isn't an element or compound at all but a solid plasma.  It could have varying responses to magnetic and electric fields depending on how it was created.   When you think about the definition of an element every element is just a miniplasma.

alexlab79

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #935 on: March 02, 2009, 02:24:57 AM »
My fist and second drawing
http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu302/alexlab79/carbonboronreactor.jpg
http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu302/alexlab79/carbonboronreactor2.jpg

The first is my first attempt to understand, standart impulsion in rod and use coil for receive power, but after i read many and many thing about discharge in carbon i have modified my plan..i will try this 2 setup soon. i will post my result..Thanks and scuse for my poor english..i speak in french. :)

Koen1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #936 on: March 02, 2009, 07:52:18 PM »
@Sparks: "macroatoms"? Are you talking about things also referred to as "atom clusters"?
Some interesting research is going on in that field...
And example: it was found that 11 aluminium atoms can cluster together to form a unit that
appears to have the chemical characteristics of a single alkaline metal atom. The clusters
formed bonds with Iodine that typically occur only for such metal atoms and typically do not
occur with aluminium at all. Similar clusters that behave like other atoms were found for
other numbers of Al atoms. unfortunately I do not recall all the exact details at the moment,
but I do recall another number of Al atoms behaved like Gallium. The tests I read about
were only conducted with aluminium atom clusters, but there are a great many elements
and it is now suspected that most can form such clusters that behave like atoms of a
totally different element.
Is that what you are talking about?

@Mike: well there are some other magnetic elements... If you've eliminated iron, cobalt
and nickel, then perhaps you have some neodymium, samarium or dysprosium in there?
And let's see... wasn't Gadolinium ferromagnetic below room temperature? I think so.

But it could be something else of course. I would even suggest that perhaps it could
be GaMnAs (GalliumManganeseArsenide) but I suppose that would dissolve...

regards,
Koen

mikewatson

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #937 on: March 03, 2009, 11:24:12 AM »
Koen, my crude analysis using aquarium reagent for iron suggests iron is present plus a number of  other undefined elements. Michio Kushi says in his book that it is best to arc a carbon rod (without water) onto carbon powder in a carbon crucible to get a good yield of iron. The iron seems to contain other elements of the same group, possibly nickel etc. Joe Champion describes a similar process in his book and the results were, I think,  professionally analysed by Bockriss at A&M university. The only way to be sure for the amateur is to get a professional analysis done, which is expensive.
Of course all this is a big no-no for current physics which requires a nuclear reactor or particle accelerator to produce such nuclear changes. If it turns out that changes like this can be produced by low energy sources then the old alchemist was right after all.
The question is what element or combination of elements could be used to get a useful energy output. For example:- the late Paul Brown's patent 4,835,433 "Apparatus for direct conversion of radioactive decay energy to electrical energy", Perhaps a similar system could be used with ordinarily non-radioactive elements such as the VSG carbon reaction although I have had no sucess with that up to now

Mike. 

mikewatson

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #938 on: March 08, 2009, 08:42:02 PM »
Apparently someone had patented the carbon arc to iron and nickel transmutation process. So it is likely that the magnetic deposit I mentioned in an earlier post is Iron  and Nickel.

Mike

Mem

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #939 on: April 21, 2010, 09:17:42 PM »
Hello, there is many single electric and electronic circuits can generate controlled nuclear reactions, totally ecology and of low costs, I've tested 3 circuits with full results

1) Discharging a condenser in a carbon rod

 When a condenser is discharged in a carbon rod acelerated electrons hit the carbon atoms in a fusion reaction creating Boron in the following reaction

                              C + e = B

 For this process is needed a fews Kilo-electronvolts (Kev) of energy powered for the condenser bank

 But that Boron atom is a inestable isotop and desintegrates in the original Carbon atom in a reversible reaction

                 B = C + e

 This reaction liberates about 13 Mev, and liberates the same electron used for the first reaction but with more energy in a way of beta radiation

 Other detail is than for each 100000 atoms is bombarded for this electrons discharge of Carbon only one go in this nuclear reaction, this is know in physics as the coefficient of effectiveness

 For a initial volume of carbon rod there is a minimal energy for start this process calculated determinated for the condenser bank  and can get that from a single battery, when this nuclear process begin, electrons in form of beta radiation can be collected for a toroidal coil arround of the carbon rod, that toroid must be in the principle polarized with a little current for align the magnetic dipoles in the carbon rod for help the process

 My results was get in the external toroid about 6 KW in my firsts tests and then autopowereds devices at 110 VAC, 60 Hz and 220 VAC, 50 Hz , and I've published some results in a web site, but in spanish   http://econuclear.tk

 This single nuclear circuit may be the used for Nikola Tesla in 1931 for power his electric car, because he use a little circuit keep in the radio box and have 2 carbon rods labeled "Here is the power"

2) A magnetic version of the before mentioned discharge device I build using the know nuclear magnetic resonance phenomena, all atoms have a nuclear precesion known as the Larmor precesion frequency, his value for a magnetic field of 0,5 Teslas is about 21 MHz, this suggest than if we create a magnetic circuit tuned to this frequency by the quantum relation E = h * f , the nucleons proton-neutron area break and there is a nuclear desintegration and energy liberation

 I test a common iron rod and place 3 coils, one for the polarization field of 0,5 Teslas, another for generate the resonance at 21 MHz and a third for get de power, in my firsts tests I get about 10 KW with the starting polarization and oscillator using less than 100 watts, and autopowered devices to 220 VAC, 50 Hz and 110 VAC, 60 Hz, I see the frequency output is the tuning difference between the resonance Larmor frequency and the external oscillator, thats say if the nuclear resonance is in 21 MHz and the oscillator was at 21,001 MHz the output power frequency is in 1 KHz , I see in this magnetic circuit there is a desintegration of the Fe atom in a isotope for a delay of time for reciver his initial state
 This method is used in medicine but not used for energy generation and too many more single than the here shown system use Uranium , this is an ecologyc device and low cost in comparation to that, I wait upload this to the before web site I mentioned


3) Discharge in gases, I've build a gas version of the carbon rod discharge version for proof an aditional phenomena only known in gases discharge, I use a common fluorescent lamp of 8 watts, a battery generator of high voltage with voltage doubler, a condenser discharge into the tube when his voltage exceed the breakdown avalanche state
 I can get from the battery about 2 watts but the tube light at full power, thats say 4 times the power of the source
 Russians work with the SGD ( Self generating discharge ) in gases for nuclear reactions of the accelerated electrons with the gas atoms

 Very single circuit , an oscillator a doubler with a discharge condenser


 All this circuits shown there is single electric and electronics circuits, of very low costs get nuclear reactions such as in the nature there is spontaneous nuclear reactions in lighting discharges, carbono 14,etc,.....


 Any question to this email I can answer    gigawattgratis@123mail.cl



 Thanks


 
YOU WICKED MAN FROM CHILI:

 JUAN, YOU TOOK MY MONEY AND NEVER SEND WHAT YOU PROMISED!!! YOU LIAR SON OF A BITCH !!! 

WARNING EVERYONE: THIS MAN IS A THIEF HE PUT HIS EMAIL ADDRESS  HERE AND HE IS LOOKING FOR VICTIMS. IF YOU SEND HIM EMAIL, HE LATER WILL ASK YOU THAT HE CAN BUILD ONE OF THESE "NUCLEAR POWERED" FREE ENERGY DEVICES, ALL IS B.S. DON'T FALL FOR IT. HE IS CON, AND THIEF. HE SHOULD BE IN JAIL FOR HIS DEEDS.

I HAVE ALL THE EMAILS THAT HE SEND ME FROM CHILI IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT.

JUAN, YOU WICKED MAN, YOU WILL PAY THE PRICE OF YOUR ILL DEEDS. I AM AFTER YOU TO EXPOSE YOU WHERE YOU GO ON WWW.   

IF EVER MEET YOU IN PERSON, YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO WALK AGAIN !!!

IceStorm

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #940 on: April 21, 2010, 09:33:43 PM »
YOU WICKED MAN FROM CHILI:

 JUAN, YOU TOOK MY MONEY AND NEVER SEND WHAT YOU PROMISED!!! YOU LIAR SON OF A BITCH !!! 

WARNING EVERYONE: THIS MAN IS A THIEF HE PUT HIS EMAIL ADDRESS  HERE AND HE IS LOOKING FOR VICTIMS. IF YOU SEND HIM EMAIL, HE LATER WILL ASK YOU THAT HE CAN BUILD ONE OF THESE "NUCLEAR POWERED" FREE ENERGY DEVICES, ALL IS B.S. DON'T FALL FOR IT. HE IS CON, AND THIEF. HE SHOULD BE IN JAIL FOR HIS DEEDS.

I HAVE ALL THE EMAILS THAT HE SEND ME FROM CHILI IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT.

JUAN, YOU WICKED MAN, YOU WILL PAY THE PRICE OF YOUR ILL DEEDS. I AM AFTER YOU TO EXPOSE YOU WHERE YOU GO ON WWW.   

IF EVER MEET YOU IN PERSON, YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO WALK AGAIN !!!

Your a couple of year late , his last login on OU is October 03, 2007, 09:39:23 AM. Forget your money if its true.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #941 on: March 23, 2012, 12:57:32 PM »
@All:

Does anyone know of a efficient way of converting Beta into useful electricity?



Eighthman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #942 on: April 18, 2013, 03:52:41 AM »
I can't remember the patent names or numbers but I think Paul Brown's patent lists previous work - and some of the articles on his inventions talk about methods to absorb beta.
 
I tried to read all 63 pages of this thread. One critical thing that seems to be completely missing?
 
Ken Shoulders work on charge clusters.  His work was confirmed by Russian scientists, independently and is utterly ignored by mainstream science.  It provides the KEY to all this discussion, as to the EMP burst and transmutation.  If you don't get the 'launch' of the cluster right, they don't work.  I would also point out that Intalek's work seems to disprove the Vallee theory, as his spark gaps have no magnetic field around them but still demonstrated overunity.
 
To the extent that charge clusters work, no radioactivity (such as thorium) is needed.  They have the power to overcome the Coulomb barrier.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #943 on: April 18, 2013, 02:48:08 PM »
Sir
Do you have any recent news on Ken Shoulders and his work?
Thx
Chet
 
 

Eighthman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Single circuits generate nuclear reactions
« Reply #944 on: April 23, 2013, 02:56:34 AM »
No recent news but his patents are very lengthy and detailed.  I recall that he claimed that the Feds wanted his patents declared secret but he published them in such a way that suppression wasn't possible.