New Battery systems > Crystal batteries
Crystal Cell Research
plengo:
--- Quote from: profitis on November 02, 2014, 09:19:41 AM ---Yes its very possible to use two same electrodes in both a galvanic setup and also catalytic spillover setup.in the galvanic setup one aluminum piece is less exposed to oxidizer(air) than the other aluminum piece.in another situation one aluminum piece is attacked more quicker than the other due to porosity and surface area leading to massive eddy current hysterisis giving a galvanic potential.with nonreactive electrodes (eg.platinum) you can get spillover effect from different exposure to air or h2.spillover effect does not consume inert catalyst electrode material
--- End quote ---
Thanks for the helpful answer.
So and either case explained above I SHOULD expect either REDOX or GALVANIC result?
Fausto.
profitis:
Correct yes.either spillover current or corrosion current
Billynjamie:
Plengo this is BackRoom Labs from YouTube. I have posted here before. In about three weeks I'll be back into this scene. I plan on experimenting with sliver nitrate for the redox effect. I'm sure you have seen John Bedinis 1 amp flooded cell. At first I thought the blue was from copper sulfate after much research I found it has almost no effect. But the only other thing that would turn blue in contact with copper is silver nitrate. Although silver nitrate in contact with magnesium and small amounts of water is extremely exothermic. But when in a lot of water it seems to be ok hench JB's flooded cell. Have you given this any thought? But that's where I'm heading.
plengo:
--- Quote from: Billynjamie on January 19, 2015, 08:09:12 AM ---Plengo this is BackRoom Labs from YouTube. I have posted here before. In about three weeks I'll be back into this scene. I plan on experimenting with sliver nitrate for the redox effect. I'm sure you have seen John Bedinis 1 amp flooded cell. At first I thought the blue was from copper sulfate after much research I found it has almost no effect. But the only other thing that would turn blue in contact with copper is silver nitrate. Although silver nitrate in contact with magnesium and small amounts of water is extremely exothermic. But when in a lot of water it seems to be ok hench JB's flooded cell. Have you given this any thought? But that's where I'm heading.
--- End quote ---
Bily,
I was thinking about this "blue" thing LAST NIGHT. My cells that are working extremely well (one example is the series of graphs I presented earlier) has this "blue" color and it is NOT copper sulfate or derivatives. I know because the color is not the same, at least in my "monkey" ways.
I have been quiet for a few weeks now because I want to make sure my next data set is indeed worthy to show and validate my thoughts.
One think that I am becoming very convinced is that the cell indeed NEEDS to dry up and form a very hard rock like structure and only then it will use water as a fuel. I am getting really close to replicate it. Unfortunately it took 3 months to get this cell ready, bummer.
Please, try with your idea and share it. I think you are onto something.
Fausto.
Peter Kasaj:
ultra-battery-one kilogram weight-decades of driving-without charging Weight reduction- no engine, gearbox, no fuel, oil, just car body and el. motors .Did you know that scientist made battery (picture in middle) from uranium? And did you know that 7g of uranium is powering 3 millions of houses a day?And did you know that scientist made most powerful non nuclear energy material by pressing XeF2 by 100000 atmospheres, which is near of uranium on power basis? My idea is to replace XeF2 instead of uranium, and keep the princip how the energy is converting to electricity flow. Imagine one kilo of this battery and car is running for decades, also could be used in homes energy supply etc. Is the most powerful portable non-nuclear energy storage ever, The battery is made of Xenon difluoride (XeF2), a white crystal that’s been placed in a diamond anvil cell. Pressure is able to reach a million atmospheres and when this happens, 3D metallic networks structures are formed. The formation causes compression and stores its power as chemical energy, generating a huge amount of it. Is the most condensed form of energy storage outside of nuclear energy .We’ll see this technology used in super-oxidizing materials that can destroy chemical and biological agents, not to mention new fuels and, most obviously, an energy storage device,superconductors.I personally giving to this battery promised future or the idea which will press materials and use their energy from their deformed structures ,like personal electricity plant,its possible to regulate battery power as newly created nuclear battery in picture below,which works.Nuclear battery works like this:when high-energy beta radiation passes through the platinum and the nanoporous titanium dioxide, electron-hole pairs are produced within the titanium dioxide, creating an electron flow and a resultant electric current.The ionic solution is not easily frozen at very low temperatures and could work in a wide variety of applications including car batteries and, if packaged properly, perhaps spacecraft."radiation can be converted into electricity.So much so, that the water-based nuclear battery may well offer a viable alternative to the solar cell as a sustainable, lowpollution energy source.This principe could by transformed also for XeF2 and we can regulate that power.Comparing to uranium-Before being used to produce electricity, Uranium is extracted and then transformed into cylindrical 7g blocks, which will then be grouped together into tubes that will in turn be assembled into clusters and then installed in nuclear reactors. Uranium is the most energetic material known on earth: a 7g block of enriched uranium provides as much energy as 1 tonne of petrol or 1.5 tonnes of coal. A power station supplying a city of 3 million inhabitants only uses 3 kilos of Uranium a day.So one small battery with 7grams of XeF2 calculating with almost or i the same specification as uranium will replace one ton of petrol?50 kilos of petrol each fueling ,so it is one ton 1000/50=20 fueling times of car(around 700km per fuel tank x20 =14 000 km per one small battery(I do 14 000 km per year and I spent for fuel 1200 euro minimum a year) so if one kilo battery (1000gram /7 g= 142 years of driving)if even half energy of uranium,we can still drive 71 years,I couldnt find information how much power is truly from pressed FeX2 if is comparable to nuclear energy as scientist says than we can have product like battery as we now today almost everlasting for everyone. Safety-must be made lots of car crashes scenarios to keep passengers protected(car falling to water, burning contacts, possible battery damage etc)and how to switch battery off safely and quickly. If regulated and covered properly, safety will exceed current safety standards.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version