GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 498714
  • *Total Topics: 14782
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 19
  • *Total: 24

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 1360748 times)

Offline iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
How long would you estimate till your part G is up and running and you are making lots of power??

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
I already have the original replication part G but i have a balancing issue that plagued the replicator that shared with me. my new design is ready to be wound and will eliminate this issue but unfortunately the only CNC in my area is bogged down with work so they cant get to my new brush holder and this really pisses me off. i am trying to have it complete by the end of July as a B day present to myself. money is tight as a Filipino virgin right now but i am hopping i will meet my dead line.

hows your research into the Figuera device coming along or does it exist at all or are you just waiting for someone else to do the work for you like all the rest on this site. just curious as to your intentions as "i" actually know how the device works through my research and bench work.
everything i have described in my posts is "Physics facts" and can be replicated by everyone. ;D :-* :o

Regards,
Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
If you people only new the significance of the below equation. it is the reason why the Figuera device Inductor controller part G can operate as it does changing the magnetic field to current ratio on a steady basis. in lamen terms it means if you change in any way the loops in the circuit with the same amount of current you change the self inductance which is the opposition to current flow.
 a lot of people still think the Figuera device is Lenzless in which you would be entirely incorrect. in fact Figuera used it to his advantage and knowing any, and i mean any reduction in magnetic field will release that potential into the system which is totally foreign to even electric engineers.(imagine that)
using the reduced potential to Figuera's advantage was and is as i say "SHEAR GENIUS" to say the least when especially when people can't even get past it as a stationary object that has been to a so called college. (i am so impressed)

studying inductance would be to ones advantage to say the least and thinking outside the box for a change instead of being so closed minded. self inductance can and will change the magnetic field to current ratio if the positive brush rotates on a continuous basis. the Lenz law is the magnetic linking to the loop next to it so if you add or subtract loops you are changing this ratio which changes the opposition to current flow so as the brush rotates so does the opposition to the original current flow.
OMG ! did i state a Physics fact, imagine THAT !
Self Inductance can and will change the current flow whether you like it or not so why not use the CEMF to one's advantage. sorry uninformed,  resistors can never in your life time do that.

Marathonman.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
FARADAYS FIRST LAW:
Whenever the magnetic flux linked with a closed circuit changes, an e.m.f. is induced in the circuit. The induced e.m.f. last long as the change in magnetic flux continues.
notice Faraday's law did NOT say anything about current it just said if the magnetic flux changes and the induced EMF that opposes the original current flow will last as long as the flux changes.

FARADAYS SECOND LAW:
The magnitude of induced e.m.f. is directly proportional to time rate of change of magnetic flux linked with the circuit.
again he never said anything about current change just the time rate of magnetic flux change so by adding more loops that magnetically link to the circuit you are changing the magnetic flux in a time rate of change which is 3600 times a second for the US and 3000 times a second for everyone else.

so any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current as per Faraday's laws of induction.

add all these up and what do you get.???  you get an Inductor with a rotating brush that constantly changes the loop count that magnetically link to that side of the circuit that produces an opposition to the original current flow. as the brush rotates so does the change in magnetic field to current ratio witch is the amount of opposing EMF to the original current flow.

imagine that ! Figuara's inductor controller backed up by Faraday himself. now is that enough Physics fact for ya. Figuera used an Inductor as his controller plain and simple backed by the Grandfather of Physics himself.
Now if that is not "IN YOUR FACE" Physics i don't know what is and have no clue what to do with ya.
Regards

Marathonman
« Last Edit: July 04, 2018, 02:44:57 AM by marathonman »

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
The 3600 for the US and 3000 for all the rest is the brush rotation speed (RPM) in the above post which will equal 60 hz for the US and 50 hz for all the rest.

Marathonman

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
Self inductance is the ratio of magnetic field per the amount of current in a circuit so if you add loops that magnetically link to the circuit you are changing this ratio. if you have say 1 amp of current flowing trough a circuit and add another loop to that side of the circuit it changes the ratio and you will experience a current drop in the system on that side of the circuit.

since self inductance (self induced within the circuit) is the magnetic linking that opposes the original current flow so by adding or subtracting loops to that side of the circuit you are changing the magnetic flux to current ratio.

this is how Figuera changed the current in his primaries one up and the other down in complete unison changing the magnetic flux to current ratio as the brush rotates. if the brush stopped so would the self inductance thus the current to the primaries would become a steady flow since it is DC.

Figuera on the other hand figured out that if you have a rotating positive brush contact he could change the magnetic field to current ratio on a steady basis and use the storing and releasing of potential to his advantage. with the rising side of part G and the rising primaries you will indeed have a voltage drop (Physics Fact)  because they are storing into the magnetic field but at the same time the reducing side is releasing the reduced potential into the system (Physics Fact) to off set this voltage drop which is exactly proportional to each other minus some losses and that is where the secondary feed back comes into play to replace those losses and to give an amplification to the rising primaries.

L (Self Inductance) increases if you add another loop to the circuit which increases the magnetic flux to current ratio thus the opposition to the original current flow. the more loops you add to that side of the circuit increases this ratio which decreases the current flow and the opposite is also true as you decrease the amount of loops that magnetically link to the circuit the current will in fact increase in that side of the circuit. putting them together and separating them with North opposing fields will allow you to control the current flow in to different sets of primaries in complete unison. so as the brush rotates you are adding loops to one side of the circuit and subtracting loops from the other side of the circuit at the positive rotating brush in complete unison.

I sure hope you can understand what i am trying to convey to you as this is very important in the self sustaining process.

I am not seeking any recognition or 15 minutes of fame what so ever just trying to change Humanity as the currant path leads us to extinction as Corporate and Government greed is killing us off one by one.

 

 

Regards,

 

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
L (Self Inductance) increases if you add another loop to the circuit which increases the magnetic flux to current ratio thus the opposition to the original current flow. the more loops you add to that side of the circuit increases this ratio which decreases the current flow and the opposite is also true as you decrease the amount of loops that magnetically link to the circuit the current will in fact increase in that side of the circuit. putting them together and separating them with North opposing fields will allow you to control the current flow in to different sets of primaries in complete unison. so as the brush rotates you are adding loops to one side of the circuit and subtracting loops from the other side of the circuit at the positive rotating brush in complete unison.

if the loop is located next to another loop it will magnetically link to that circuit causing a current drop and when a iron core is added it magnifies that reverse magnetic field by many many time then on top of that using a closed loop controller it will have very little flux leakage.
so by the below graph the more loops you add to the circuit the more opposition to current flow and the less loops the less opposition to current flow as the brush rotates.

These are in fact (Physics facts) and can NOT be denied or disputed by ANYONE.

Regards,

Marathonman

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3702
But inductance Control change od current not current

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
With lots of respect Mr Forest, that would be your and everyone else misconception not mine.
it is a Physics fact with a steady DC current is applied to a coil over a core and the magnetic field is increased the current will in fact be reduced. this is the magnetic flux to current ratio and when the loops increase so does the resistance to current increase causing a current reduction.

this is something that is not taught in no college anywhere as all they teach is that an Inductor is a static device when in fact it can be brought to an active position in a circuit to control current flow. i have posted so much info on this part G it is ridiculous as to why everyone is still scratching their heads when all it takes is a simple test to prove it to your self.

when a moving positive brush contact moves across a coil the ratio of magnetic flux to current will in fact change according to the laws of induction set forth by Faraday and Lenz that state any change in a circuit whether it is the current or the circuit it's self an EMF will be produced and the EMF product will be opposing the original current flow.

with all those posts you have you should know this Mr Forest. I myself choose to not leave any stone unturned. maybe some time should be set aside to actually read and understand my posts instead of just disagreeing. I myself love to learn new things.
It would be nice if one of these days someone actually reads the posts or information presented.

Regards,

Marathonman
« Last Edit: July 10, 2018, 03:44:53 AM by marathonman »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1990
But inductance Control change od current not current
really ? try adding another winding to it and passing DC trough it and see what happens !

AG

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
   Exactly my point the inductance will in fact have changed because a loop was added which changes the magnetic field to current ratio lowering the original current flow.
With a moving brush the inductance changes with each side of the brush either adding or subtracting winding's that are magnetically linking to the circuit which changes the magnetic flux to current ratio.
with a steady current applied to a circuit with changing loops count that magnetically link to the circuit you will in fact change the current flow from the increase or decrease in magnetic flux to current ratio.
I have even had a Physics major and an electrical engineer Pm me and tell me i was spot on so i can care less who disagrees with me.
my own bench does not lie and yours wouldn't either if you did some tests.

regards,
Marathonman

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline pmgr

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 150
    • Stop organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners
MarathonMan is spot on.

EMF = d(flux)/dt = d(L*I)/dt which only simplifies to L*dI/dt in case L is constant (and this last simplification is the only thing we are taught in school).

Adding or subtracting windings to an inductor changes L itself and thus L*dI/dt no longer applies. Instead d(L*I)/dt should be used. And with that it is very simple to obtain an overunity system as long as the amount of energy that it costs to change L is less than the amount of excess energy you obtain with the system.

The more difficult part of this is to design a system that will do exactly this and which can be built in practice. The Figuera device is such a device.

PmgR
=====
Help end the persecution of Falun Gong * www.faluninfo.net * www.stoporganharvesting.org

* Truthfulness * Compassion * Forbearance * www.falundafa.org

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
Massive thanks PMGR ;D 8)
even though i knew i was right all along and they were in fact the one's that were wrong.
Regards,
Marathonman
« Last Edit: July 11, 2018, 01:26:07 PM by marathonman »

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
Exactly and well put pmgr, the amount of power used to turn the motor for the brush rotation is quite small plus the losses from the switching of the magnetic field to the electric is quite obvious very efficient so all that is required from the secondary is the replacements of the losses which is small, the motor operation and the amplification to the rising primaries.
the power draw of the primaries is reduced to that of the IR2 losses when to full potential and the reducing side offsets the rising side voltage drop so the secondary is there to replace losses and to give amplification to the rising primaries.

Thanks for being here, one with a brain that uses it i might add.
regards,
Marathonman
« Last Edit: July 12, 2018, 03:18:29 PM by marathonman »

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
That is basically the initial problem that everyone has been taught that in order for self Inductance to take place there has to be a current change which changes the intensity of the magnetic field induced within the circuit it's self that opposes the original current flow.

in order for self induction to take place withing the circuit something has to cause the magnetic field to change in intensity either up or down. with AC it is the steady current rise and fall that produces this change in magnetic field that opposes the original current flow. it is this and only this that is taught in every school and university around the world.

In a DC circuit it will still be the same, something has to change in order to change the magnetic field intensity. since the current is steadily applied to the circuit how are you to get the magnetic field to change on a continuous basis. ????

This is what is NOT taught in any schools;
you change the circuit it's self,  by adding loops to the circuit you are in fact changing the magnetic field intensity from the magnetic linkage of the added loops to the circuit. with the added linkage you are in fact changing the intensity of the magnetic field which is the magnetic flux to current ratio.
when you change the magnetic flux to current ratio you are in fact changing the opposition of current flow it's self which is produced within the circuit known as the Lenz Law. any EMF generated in the circuit under these circumstances  will be induced in a direction that opposes the original current flow.
this exactly follows the induction Laws set forth by Faraday himself and Lens thus does not violate not one Law.

L=(L*I)/dt self induction changing over time.

Welcome to Figuera inductance 101.

Regards,
Marathonman

 

OneLink