i guess that is the real problem with the world today as no one wants to take the time to either use their brain god gave them or think for any length of time.

Please do not take offensively - people use facts not fantasies for real world applications. Same situation with your posts as you are flooding this thread with them. One video proving you claims would be much better than hundreds of posts. Simple as it could be... "Seeing is believing".

Again the mentally challenged has to chime in with again NOTHING to add but completely stupid rhetoric, a pimple on ones backside for sure. mr goof dressed in purple.
If you people think you can come up with something better well lets here it if it's more than a pop up from your childhood book.

I post real provable information and if you  unintelligent people have nothing to add what are you doing here in the first place. try posting anything remotely valuable to the readers other than how to act an ass.
my posts are not only informative but are packed full of valuable information that apparently you lemmings can not decipher in any way shape or form. not all readers are as dense as you people and just maybe a little more intelligent to boot.

if you have nothing positive to add i would suggest you clowns get packing because your lack of intelligence is getting very old. third grade responses to research does not work very well so you might need another approach as it seems you have absolutely NOTHING for the Figuera device nor will you ever because ping pong ball brains don't work with the Figuera device. it happen's to take intelligence which seams to be lacking in your area.

Marathonman

MM

Perhaps an electronic part G approximation may work. If so, all you need a is a coil with several taps that connect to ground via switches (transistors or FETs) and have the ends of the coil connect to the negative side of the two exciter coils that are fed from the electronically controlled power supplies. The switches are easily synchronized with the sine wave generator as shown in the attached concept drawing. This is adapted from the drawing I posted on page 289. It only shows the changed pages.

I realize that you have posted copious explanations of how part G works and I understand what you are saying, but it seems unnecessary for the following reason. A generator is formed when a conductor cuts the flux lines of a magnetic field. It's the relative motion that matters. If two electromagnets have like poles facing across a coil, their fields collide somewhere between them and add, and if their relative strength is changed by changing their excitation voltages, the collision point moves toward the weaker field. If the electromagnets are excited by complementary waveforms, the collision point moves back and forth across the coil causing flux cutting due to the relative motion....and you have an AC generator with the frequency of the excitation voltages. It seems to me that the part G plays no part in that action and is not necessary. Perhaps my experiments will show me the reason why you say it ain't gonna work. 
Sam6

MM

Perhaps an electronic part G approximation may work. If so, all you need a is a coil with several taps that connect to ground via switches (transistors or FETs) and have the ends of the coil connect to the negative side of the two exciter coils that are fed from the electronically controlled power supplies. The switches are easily synchronized with the sine wave generator as shown in the attached concept drawing. This is adapted from the drawing I posted on page 289. It only shows the changed pages.

I realize that you have posted copious explanations of how part G works and I understand what you are saying, but it seems unnecessary for the following reason. A generator is formed when a conductor cuts the flux lines of a magnetic field. It's the relative motion that matters. If two electromagnets have like poles facing across a coil, their fields collide somewhere between them and add, and if their relative strength is changed by changing their excitation voltages, the collision point moves toward the weaker field. If the electromagnets are excited by complementary waveforms, the collision point moves back and forth across the coil causing flux cutting due to the relative motion....and you have an AC generator with the frequency of the excitation voltages. It seems to me that the part G plays no part in that action and is not necessary. Perhaps my experiments will show me the reason why you say it ain't gonna work. 
Sam6

I agree to your explanation. I however do not believe it is the original Figuera concept. What we are discussing here is the evolved concept  developed further by Buforn. The original Figuera concept seems to me the way to move magnetic field (as was shown in other thread here) while keeping the fields  in NS NS NS pattern like in normal generators - by properly switching coils in sequence. If you read patent description it explains some weird parts.
Is your circuit really produce clean sinewaves at 180 degrees out of phase one to another ?

MY TWO BOBS WORTH, THIS INVENTION WILL NEVER WORK.
REASON BEING TO PUMP EFFER  THE MAGNETIC FIELD HAS TO BE
MOVING, NOT JUST PULSING OR VARYING IN INTENSITY..IT HAS TO BE
MOVING FROM A TO B..OTHERWISE IT IS JUST LIKE A TRANSFORMER..
THAT IS WHY I POSTED THIS IDEA AND I HAVE BEEN JEERED AT.

THE MAGNETIC FIELD HAS TO BE MOVING,
NOT JUST PULSING OR VARYING IN INTENSITY..
.OTHERWISE IT IS JUST LIKE A TRANSFORMER..

I'm agree fully to that above.


Try to explain the principle to your picture step by step.

NIBs or not or FIGUERA or not I don't care.
If you're principle produces overunity it's just fine to me.

Regards Arne

Having already done these experiments at 50 Hz AC using soft iron core I will try to do another experiment in the coming weeks using pretty much smaller table top sized devices and using permanent magnet core and about 840 hz.

I believe that Figuera used NS-NS-NS combination only but the primary and middle cores are permanent magnets and that the resistor array was used to increase the voltage of primary. From experience I know that higher the voltage of primary higher is the voltage of secondary. Higher the secondary voltage higher is the current from secondary. The mistake done by me is to use soft iron core rather than permanent magnet core. It should be essentially a Magnetic amplifier effect combined with a high voltage primary coil to oscillate the primary permanent magnets. The rotary coil was used by Figuera to oscillate DC input.  I think we can try to do a very small device and check if it would work.

This is my personal belief and assumptions only at the moment and I will post results of experiments and our observations after we test. Only very small device will be tested to avoid costs and labour and I will update after we do it. We intend to use MOSFETs to do the oscillation part. We will check if high frequency and high voltage combination can also be used using appropriate transistors. We need to wait and see.

Rather than 7 or 8 modules used by Figuera we will test with only one module and if results are promising we will add more modules.

I think it can work but let us wait and see.

Regards

Ramaswami Natarajan