Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

### GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 1980343 times)

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4215 on: March 29, 2018, 02:43:24 PM »
I was asked just the other day how in the world can the primaries exert motion into a secondary when both are stationary. ?

the primary electromagnets cause the E fields but it is the relative motion of the primaries being reduced and increased with the opposing secondary field between them that induces currant flow into the secondary and the load. once the polarization takes place and currant begins to flow the primaries and the secondaries part ways and it is the primaries becomes the motive force that exerts motion into the secondary provided the circuit is closed with resistance of it's own. ( ie a load)

So lets stop and think about that for a minute. the compression of the two opposing electromagnetic fields dictate the intensity of the electric field and as one is reduced and the other is increased both E fields are in the same direction as both are positive and additive.

now the only time power from the primaries (inducers) are transferred to the secondaries (induced) is when the secondaries are to be polarized. once this polarization takes place and currant begins to flow in the secondary and the load the Lenz law comes into play and an opposing field to the first is formed in the secondary.

since this opposing field will be in between the opposing field of the primaries it is the relative motion of the primaries being reduced and increased that pushes that opposing secondary field across the Electric field formed by the primaries in the space between the primaries occupied by the secondary. this will cause the secondaries to appear to have the illusion or appearance of motion in them to the Electric field thus currant will flow.

once this process takes place the primaries and the secondaries part ways and it is the relative motion of the primaries that exert motion into the secondaries provided the circuit is closed with resistance of it's own. after they part ways each system is essentially completely separate and no other time is power transferred to the secondary system. the power requirements of the induced (primaries)  is reduced to that of just the IR2 losses and the replacement of the currant in the process of reducing the primaries to get motion into the secondaries then back to full potential.

the power used to sweep the opposing secondary field ( Weightless Massless Field) across the Electric field formed by the primaries is so rediculously small that the unit can power it's self and the load once it is started.

part G in the patent is basically a dynamic inductor that increases or decreases the currant through the primaries that exert the illusion or appearance of motion into the secondaries.

BA-Bang said Figuera, someone actually listened to Mr Doug.

Marathonman

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4216 on: April 01, 2018, 05:31:17 PM »
A very good point that was posted another site talks about overunity laws.   http://www.overunitybuilder.com/index.html

Overunity law #2 that states Iron acts as a currant amplifier and that is so obvious that i don't think it needs to be touched upon except the 1932 Coutier device uses this concept exclusively as does all generators of any kind.

what i want to talk about is the OU law #3 that states electromagnetic energy can be recycled. to me this is a DUH ! statement since energy can not be destroyed only converted to another form of energy so to me it is quite obvious that it can be transformed from one energy state to another with ease. some are nonrecoverable as in the form of heat.

in an LC circuit we have the magnetic field potential from the inductor as it is being reduced transformed into an electric potential of the capacitor. when the capacitor releases the electric potential it is converted to the magnetic potential of the inductor on a continuous orderly basis.

In part G we have those energy states taking place. when part G which is an inductor it stores and releases magnetic field potential from the system on that same orderly basis to the form of electric potential. each half rotation of part G there is a rise or fall of the inductor potential either converting it to electric potential off setting the potential drop of the rising side of part G or storing the electric potential in the form of a magnetic potential in the rising side of part G.

The primary electromagnets do the same thing as part G. when the primary is rising it is storing a magnetic potential in it's field and the reducing primary electromagnet  field is releasing the magnetic potential into the system in the form of an electric potential. both released magnetic potentials of the reduced primary and the reducing part G inductor are converted to electric potential offsetting the potential drop of the rising electromagnet and part G as they are storing into the magnetic field.

what we have then is a very orderly rise and fall of potential that is constantly converted from a magnetic potential to an electric potential and back again many times a second depending on your country.

Part G becomes the power supply once the initial power supply is removed and it recycles the energy in the inducer side imparting motion into the induced side which is a closed system of it's own.

THIS ACTION CAN NOT BE DONE WITH A RESISTOR THAT WASTE ELECTRIC POTENTIAL AS HEAT. THE ELECTRIC POTENTIAL IS CONVERTED TO HEAT POTENTIAL THAT CAN NOT BE RECOVERED BY THE SYSTEM AND AMOUNTS TO MASSIVE UNRECOVERABLE LOSSES. ON THE OTHER HAND THE ELECTRIC POTENTIAL CAN BE CONVERTED TO A MAGNETIC FIELD AND BACK CONTINUOUSLY WITH VERY LITTLE LOSSES WHICH IS THE IR2 LOSSES.

Part G becomes the power supply once the initial supply is removed but as all systems build by man has inherent losses the secondary output is there to replace those losses occurred through heat, wire (IR2) and core losses.

Marathonman

#### NRamaswami

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 490
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4217 on: April 03, 2018, 12:58:15 PM »
If resistor array is wasting Electric Potential why Prof. Figuera put a resistor array before the current went in to the Magnetic Cores? Why did he do that?

A resistor array makes a low voltage Electricity to high voltage Electricity. But it would reduce current. What is the secret behind application of high voltage to a magnetic field and what happens when voltage is boosted.

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4218 on: April 03, 2018, 05:51:34 PM »
I guess i spoke to soon about the trolls.

The Figuera part G is NOT A RESISTOR ARRAY of any kind, it's an positive brush ROTATING INDUCTOR.
NO resistor array in the world will make low voltage into high voltage. what planet are you on ??

It is quite obvious that you do not have the intelligence high enough to understand what i have been posting and i do not have the time or inclination to try to to lower the technical aspects so you can understand this device..

I mean no disrespect at all sir but how many times do you have to read the patent that states. and i quote; " R the resistance is drawn in it's elementary manor to facilitate the understanding of the function of the device." end quote.
That means in plain English that what is shown is not the actual device. it is used to just explain the function and that is it. so what are you left with if it is NOT a resistor. think on that. (if possible)

I would surely suggest that you pick a device that you can actually understand it's functions as i really doubt anyone on this site has the time to explain it to you especially since it's been four or five years and you have learned absolutely nothing.
I see nothing has changed since years ago and it is quite obvious you learned absolutely nothing over the years.

if you can't .... oh well to bad. some people just do not have what it takes to learn something new or outside the box and i believe you are one of them Sir.
REREAD post 4220, 4223 and 4230. if you still can understand don't come crying to me because i don't want to hear it.

Marathonman
« Last Edit: April 05, 2018, 06:53:18 PM by marathonman »

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4219 on: April 07, 2018, 06:54:28 PM »
What really amazes me is the total non advancement  in the field of magnetic's and electricity in general in the last 118 years. it seams quite obvious in my research that JP Morgan was one of the sole perpetrators in destroying the advancement of these fields guided by good ole Rochefellers and the Rothschilds. he literally took school books from the system and had them changed to rid all traces of free energy. this would be grade schools and colleges and he spent millions in this process.

HOW SICK IS THAT, TOTAL GREED AT IT"S FINEST.

what also amazes me is the simple act of pulling a magnet or reducing an electromagnet from a coil causes the induced currant to reverse direction (reversed Electric field).  how in the world can something so disgustingly simple be so severely overlooked through out the scientific community is totally beyond me.

a simple technic of taking one electromagnet or magnet in or rise of currant and the opposite on the other side to reduce in currant or taken away from the coil causes the doubling of the voltage from the coil. what is amazing is Clemente Figuera did this 110 years ago and was purposely hidden from the people.

we can not sit by idle and let these rich disgusting fools take advantage of us any longer.

the Figuera device is simple, it uses a dynamic rotating inductor that varies the currant to two opposing north face electromagnets that cause the doubling of the electric field from the action of one electromagnet being reduced and the other increased all while keeping both in total unison. as long as the pressure between the primary electromagnets are maintained the Electric field presented to the secondary will remain at it's highest potential with increased output.

what is killing people is the standard way an inductor is used in present day. since people are so hypnotized by present day dogma science that states an inductor is just a passive device that just sits there and curbs currant only for a short time and stores then releases a magnetic field.
when on the other hand if you have a positive rotating brush on an inductor wound on a core with it core and winding's changing as the brush rotates causing both sides to increase or decrease in length will cause an orderly rise and fall of magnetic fields used to curtail currant on an absolutely orderly basis. then using those magnetic fields in a positive advantage manor to offset the potential drop of the rising side and splitting the feed into two separate feeds.

currant in an inductor will change in intensity if the condition of the circuit changes ie.... the amount of core material,  the winding count and the length of the inductor. even if the circuit is presented with say 10 amps the window of the inductor will allow only the amount you need as per the winding count and the radius of the brush.

this very use of an inductor takes it from a passive device to an active device on a dynamic basis as the brush rotates. and this my friends can not be found in NO school books around the world.

welcome to my world and the world of Clemente Figuera and the infinite energy machine.

AND THAT MY FRIENDS YOU CAN TAKE TO THE BANK, LOCK, STOCK AND BARREL.

Marathonman
« Last Edit: April 08, 2018, 06:09:03 PM by marathonman »

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4220 on: April 08, 2018, 05:52:40 PM »

I am assuming everyone knows i am working on the Figuera 1908 patent. even though the part G inductor/regulator/controller rotates,  the Generating part is stationary in opposing fashion. i really think Figuera in his infinite Genius and wisdom knew that his patent would eventually run out and people would find it and build it. so i really believe he gave this device to the world to help humanity. his prototype device he took to the patent office even with defects put out over 550 volts and stated that it powered a 20 HP motor. the 20 HP motor alone requires 15 Kw to power plus he powered his lights in his house and the street lights outside his house. this device had to put out darn near 20 Kw even being small in size. back then you had to have a working device to get a patent and also it was certified by the Barcelona Patent office to actually work.

his 1902 patents which consisted of 4 patents were sold to the bankers for a rather large sum of money to pay back his financial backer Buforn and to finish his grand daddy of them all his 1908 device. the subsequent patent after 1908 were legally nul and void as they were a direct infringement on the 1908 patent and i am quite surprises they were issued to Buforn in the first place.

in the 1908 patent it talks about part G as having some resistance yet NEVER mentions resistors explicitly and states in the patent for the understanding of the function in it's elementary form. so being in it's elementary form just for the understanding of the device is just that, for the understanding and function and is in NO WAY a resistor or a resistor array.

Quote;  "to pass through a rotating brush which, in its rotation movement, is placed in communication with the commutator bars or contacts of a ring distributor or cylinder whose contacts are in communication with a resistance whose value varies  from a maximum to a minimum and vice versa, according with the commutator bars of the cylinder which operates, and for that reason the resistance is connected to the electromagnets N by one of its side, and the electromagnets S at the other side."

and

" a switch and comprising a brush or rotary switch, which makes contact successively on the series of fixed contacts and get a continuous variation of the current flowing through the coils of the inducer electromagnets."

think about this for a second, he is giving you clues as to the way part G is built. since having thick commutator bars embedded into a cylinder then connecting them with thin wires would be total insanity as the thin wires would burn up immediately. but there is more, or contacts of a ring distributor or cylinder,  a ring distributor or cylinder would imply an iron cylinder of some sort.

whose contact are in communication with a resistance whose value varies from a maximum to a minimum and vise versa. this tells me that the contacts are actually the winding's on the cylinder that has some resistance but is not a resistor of any kind and the value varies from a maximum to a minimum as the brush rotates making contact with more than one winding at a time.

The brush as it rotates around the cylinder making contacts with the winding's magnetically linking or unlinking to the system that increases or decreases the size of the inductance with the movement of the brush. if there are no resistors then it has to be controlled by magnetic resistance in which it has to be a dynamic inductor that varies the currant as the brush rotates magnetically linking and unlinking causing an orderly rise and fall of currant. (varying the self inductance dynamically as the brush rotates)

this would also allow part G to split the feed into two by having north opposing fields at the brush keeping them totally separate but remain in complete unison as the currant rise and fall in an orderly fashion.

it would also allow each half to act independent one storing into the magnetic field and the other releasing some of it's magnetic field to offset the rising side of the inducers and part G.

there is no way in hell a resistor can do this as all it would be for in this case is waste power and heat up your house. on the other hand an inductor will not only change the currant level but store and release energy at the right time to counter act any potential drop that may occur in the process of storing the potential in a magnetic field in the rising side part G and the primaries. as the reducing side of part G is releasing potential into the system so is the reducing primary. both magnetic potential when reduced will release that reduced potential into the system off setting the rising side of part G and the rising primary potential drop.

PART G IS A DYNAMIC INDUCTOR and is in NO WAY a resistor of any kind.

Marathonman

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4221 on: April 10, 2018, 09:20:23 PM »
Part G;

The illusive part G that has so many confused to no end. as i was on two free energy site before this one and all i heard from people every single day was that i was crazy thinking part G was not resistors, even to this very day.

SIMPLY PUT, BECAUSE HE DIDN'T USE A RESISTOR ARRAY in the first place.

like my previous posts the patent specifically says " in it's elementary form for the understanding of the function" why in the world can't people get past this very factual statement as the picture is just that a picture for the UNDERSTANDING OF THE FUNCTION.  if Figuera had used resistors the device would be so wasteful that it would never be able to be self sustaining if it had to replace the massive losses from heat in which it would of heated his house to an unbearable temperature. i personally think the picture was purposely drawn and  worded to confuse beyond belief as most of the public CAN NOT GET PAST THE PICTURE.

while i was on this other sites i was trying to convey the fact that the core not only was not a resistor but was an inductor that rotated on a closed core. Figuera in his utter genius would have never used heat death resistors in his device if he wanted to use the most efficient way he could to control his device. not only that it was passed to me many years ago that the device was a continuous winding. well a person wound the device then stated that it can not work with a continuous wind and i was publicly labeled as wrong and a fraud. well i finally found out the the person in question only used 20 to 40 winds on part G and this is not nearly enough to get the proper currant reduction as i so found out through my research. if the person would have doubled his winding count the device would have worked just fine and not be almost a dead short. his core was to shallow also as the graph i posted on parameters to control inductance.

think about this for a while. if part G splits the feed into two, forward biases the rising side like a magamp controlling saturation, attenuates the currant on a dynamic basis and stores and releases magnetic potential to offset the rising side of part G and the primaries all while remaining cool then how in the world can someone think a resistor could be used here. it in fact can NEVER be used in this device. the amount of power wasted would be unbelievable compared to an inductor that would be in the range of around 97% to 99% efficient. the only losses ocurred would be a few percent in the worst case scenario.

an inductor is not just a passive device,  it can be used as an active device in a dynamic state of continual rotation. the present day usage of an inductor says that currant changes control the amount of magnetic field opposition (self inductance ie..Lenz Law, reverse EMF)  to the original currant flow and thus eventually evens out to a steady state as does the magnetic field.  the magnetic field is in a steady state until the currant rises or falls then self inductance will raise it's head again.

while this is fine and dandy what they don't say that if the condition or parameters of the circuit changes as in the adding or subtracting of core material and the winding count that the self inductance, reverse EMF to the original currant flow can be changes also on a dynamic basis giving a way to control currant in an orderly rise and fall of currant.

by utilizing a positive brush on a closed core system,  the self inductance (reverse EMF)  of the windings can be amplified fron the iron to control currant flow as the brush rotates increasing or decreasing the size of the inductor as this is directly correlates to the amount of self inductance, reverse EMF to the original currant flow.

welcome to Figuera  part G Dynamic Inductor 101.  resistors 101 has been cancelled indefinitely due to fire damage.

Marathonman

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4222 on: April 12, 2018, 05:06:03 AM »
Another thing i think people are having a hard time understanding is if part G becomes the power supply when the original supply is removed then how can the current not be reversed in the primaries.

Simple, the currant travels in the same direction at all times.

if you read up on how a an inductor works you will then realize that when the twin part G inductors on either side of the brush are fed DC currant then reduced, the magnetic field releases that potential which travels in the same direction in which it was receiving the currant in the first place. what it does is try to maintain the currant direction in the closed system thus the rising side of part G and primaries are fed from the reducing primaries plus the reducing side of part G to offset the potential drop of the rising side. the currant is never reversed only attenuated from the reverse EMF of the twin inductors. the original currant flow is always in the same direction,

an inductor's self inductance resists the flow of electrons not the direction of the flow itself.

as you can see from the pic's below that the currant direction does not change whether the Inductor is storing or releasing potential. each half of part G's brush acting independent either storing into the magnetic field or releasing from the magnetic field. the increasing side is storing into the magnetic field to feed the reducing side the next half rotation and the reducing side is feeding the rising side only to reverse it's operation the next half cycle.

each time the source of potential is released it acts as a short term battery feeding the system. so if you have two sources of potential back to back, the reducing primaries and the reducing side of part G,  it will act just like two batteries in series offsetting the potential drop to the rising side just like a boost converter.

Marathonman

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4223 on: April 12, 2018, 07:53:20 PM »
Another thing i would like to bring up is even though the picture in the patent is in it's elementary form for the understanding Figuera did give a few subtle clues as to what the part G device really was.

in the pic below you will see what i mean and judge for your self. the first pic is an Inductor it has been used since the days of Pixii in France as the symbol for either a coil of wire or an inductor.

the second pic is the symbol used for a resistor since the days of Pixii in France and has NEVER changed.

the bottom pic is the elusive part G's so called resistance according to the patent of having some resistance. just look closely at those wavy lines. my oh my how does it look just exactly like the symbol of the Inductor used since darn near Pixii in France.

Simple clues so highly overlooked, can you say INDUCTOR,  imagine that !

Marathonman

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4224 on: April 12, 2018, 07:54:41 PM »
In this graph Below you can see with the North >< North fields at the positive brush are what keeps the inductor sides separate from the currant flow from set N and set S. as the brush rotates adding or subtracting winding's and core on that side of the brush that causes the magnetic fields opposing the original currant flow to rise and fall in an orderly linear fashion from the self inductance being raised and lowered.

on the opposite side of the core from the N><N brush is the perfect place to introduce the secondary output.   if the secondary in being introduced here which will be negative in sign it will be opposing South><South fields at the brush since part G is wound CCW. what this will do is add to the cores magnetic fields if they are are in need of more potential from the losses occurred in it's function. this will allow part G to become the sole power supply once the starting supply is removed.

since a commutator is rotating with the brushes it can be used to always keep the secondary polarity in the opposite half of the core as to not interfere with the positive brush. so this means that the negative sides and the positive sides will always be opposite from one another.

i know this might sound a little confusing but if you study the graph, the rotation of the fields and the interaction of the currant you will begin to realize what i am trying to convey to everyone. the twin inductors will allow the currant to be absorbed into the magnetic field and not be a dead short as you might be thinking. as the negative secondary brush rotates towards the input from the primaries the potential will be at zero as we are infusing AC through the commutator in a DC fashion. this will allow the peak of the AC wave to be exactly in the middle of the two primary inputs fading to zero as it approaches them. thus infusing potential every half rotation.

Marathonman

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4225 on: April 13, 2018, 04:08:21 PM »
I do apologize for the mistake i made in the previous post, graph in incorrect. the peak of the AC wave from the secondary through the commutator to the opposite brush is in fact at the inputs from set N and set S. this will cause an amplification when combined with the reducing primaries and the reducing side of part G to the rising primaries.
again i do apologize for the brain fart on my part as i was not feeling well at the time. since i can not delete the post or correct it i will post a corrected graph in my next post. since i am moderated it will take days or even a week to correct my mistake.

Here is the corrected post.

In this graph Below you can see with the North >< North fields at the positive brush are what keeps the inductor sides separate from the currant flow from set N and set S. as the brush rotates adding or subtracting winding's and core on that side of the brush that causes the magnetic fields opposing the original currant flow to rise and fall in an orderly linear fashion from the self inductance being raised and lowered.

on the opposite side of the core from the N><N brush is the perfect place to introduce the secondary output.   if the secondary in being introduced here which will be negative in sign it will be opposing South><South fields at the brush since part G is wound CCW . what this will do is add to the cores magnetic fields if they are are in need of more potential from the losses occurred in it's function. this will allow part G to become the sole power supply once the starting supply is removed.

since a commutator is rotating with the brushes it can be used to always keep the secondary negative polarity in the opposite half of the core as to not interfere with the positive brush. so this means that the negative side and the positive side will always be opposite from one another.

i know this might sound a little confusing but if you study the graph, the rotation of the fields and the interaction of the currant you will begin to realize what i am trying to convey to everyone. the twin inductors will allow the currant to be absorbed into the magnetic field and not be a dead short as you might be thinking. as the negative secondary brush rotates towards the input from the primaries the potential will be at it's peak allowing that potential combined with the reducing primaries and the reducing half of part G combined giving an amplification of potential to the rising primaries. the magnetic fields are of course inside the core as this is just for visualization purposes.

Marathonman
« Last Edit: April 13, 2018, 10:02:41 PM by marathonman »

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4226 on: April 13, 2018, 10:05:25 PM »

Please excuse the poor graphics but i am sure the point will still be conveyed.

if you look at the graph you will see that as the secondary output is at it's peak it will be at the input of the low side of part G and primary either set N or set S.  since the reduction of the primaries magnetic field is being released as is the low side of part G's inductor,  the potential from the secondary and the other two will give the amplification to the rising side of part G and the primaries boosting the output to the secondaries. by looping the secondary back to part G through a commutator it will allow the device to be self sustaining as we are basically replacing the losses from the system in the inducing side which is a closed  system. the commutator keeps the negative side of the secondary AC wave turned to DC in the opposite side of the positive brush at all times. the same is true for the positive side of the AC wave as it keeps both positive side together.

and this my friends is how Figuera loped his secondaries back to the system to attain self sustainment.

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4227 on: April 17, 2018, 08:52:11 PM »
Inductive Reactance
The reduction of current flow in a circuit due to induction is called inductive reactance. By taking a closer look at a coil of wire and applying Lenz's law, it can be seen how inductance reduces the flow of current in the circuit. In the image below, the direction of the primary current is shown in red, and the magnetic field generated by the current is shown in blue. The direction of the magnetic field can be determined by taking your right hand and pointing your thumb in the direction of the current. Your fingers will then point in the direction of the magnetic field. It can be seen that the magnetic field from one loop of the wire will cut across the other loops in the coil and this will induce current flow (shown in green) in the circuit. According to Lenz's law, the induced current must flow in the opposite direction of the primary current. The induced current working against the primary current results in a reduction of current flow in the circuit.

It should be noted that the inductive reactance will increase if the number of winds in the coil is increased since the magnetic field from one coil will have more coils to interact with.
Similarly to resistance, inductive reactance reduces the flow of current in a circuit. However, it is possible to distinguish between resistance and inductive reactance in a circuit by looking at the timing between the sine waves of the voltage and current of the alternating current. In an AC circuit that contains only resistive components, the voltage and the current will be in-phase, meaning that the peaks and valleys of their sine waves will occur at the same time. When there is inductive reactance present in the circuit, the phase of the current will be shifted so that its peaks and valleys do not occur at the same time as those of the voltage. in a DC circuit this is not so.

Self inductance or Inductance
The above scenario is when using AC with DC we have a whole new ball game. in a DC operated device it is called self inductance or inductance. since DC is a semi steady state how are we to get the same reactions of currant reduction simular to that of AC which is alternating currant.
we have to make some kind of changes to the circuit to cause the magnetic field to change in intensity that causes the field to interact with the windings next to it to produce the reverse EMF to oppose the original currant flow. something has to move to induce a change. there are three ways to achieve this 1. change the currant like AC does. 2. change the magnetic field. 3. change the circuit parameters...ie the length, core and winding count which in turn changes the magnetic field that changes the currant flow.

Any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current.

this is what the positive brush does. as it rotates it is magnetically linking or unlinking to the circuit and it is this that causes the magnetic field to change that produces the reverse EMF to the original currant flow. in the AC device the currant up or down causes the reaction,  in the DC circuit the circuit increasing or decreasing  in size is what causes the currant change.

The AC device is static but the alternating currant causes the change.

In the DC device in order to get the changes the device has to be changed from a static device to a dynamic device thus the use of a positive rotating brush allows this device to have currant changes dynamically on the fly.

If the device operation was static the magnetic field would even out over a short time and allow a steady currant to flow so in order to get a constant currant rise and fall the circuit has to be constantly changed in length adding or subtracting winding's and core material dynamically as the brush rotates.

and this my friends is how Figuera's part G operates.

Marathonman

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4228 on: April 17, 2018, 08:53:50 PM »

If you haven't already noticed Figuera was a sheer Genius of the fact that using the reducing magnetic fields to his advantage aiding the device in a very positive way.

take the primaries for instance, powering up the primaries to full potential will have a  very nice magnetic field projecting out of it's core. since we all know now that once that magnetic field is established the power to maintain said field will be reduced to the IR2 losses of the wire. as per Sparky Sweet that field is essentially separate from the currant which becomes the property of incoherent  energy Quanta . when the primary electromagnet is reduced to induce motion into the secondary it releases that potential amount of reduction from the field in the same direction it was traveling in the first place. since it is traveling in the same direction it will be added into part G.

Now at the same time part G's reducing half is doing the exact same thing releasing it's reduced potential in the same direction it was traveling in the first place. now you have the reducing primaries potential added to the reducing potential of part G's inductor and at that very same time the secondaries potential will be added also. these potentials combined give an amplification to the rising  primaries boosting it's output to the secondaries.

since we all know that when an an inductor is increasing,  storing into it's magnetic field there will be a potential drop across the conductor. this is also true for the increasing primary electromagnet as they are storing into the magnetic field. as there will be a potential drop across both of them the potentials from the reducing magnetic field offsets these potential drop giving an amplification to the rising sides of the device.

this action happens twice in every rotation each reducing side feeding the increasing side in one half then the opposite takes place in the other half.

Marathonman

#### marathonman

• Hero Member
• Posts: 860
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4229 on: April 17, 2018, 10:20:05 PM »
This post is dedicated to the brain dead people that still think part G is resistors.

And i quote from Wikipedia on Inductance;

"Any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current."
That means larger inductor = less currant flow, smaller inductor = more currant flow and as the brush is constantly rotating so is the size of the inductor on either side of the brush.

Now do you understand Rswami.

now i think that is all i have to say about that. if you still don't get it i guess i am through with you to.