GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 496549
  • *Total Topics: 14696
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 24
  • *Total: 27

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 1334651 times)

Offline norman6538

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 353
Figuera discussion on another forum
« Reply #4200 on: February 07, 2018, 10:44:01 PM »
There is some Figuera discussion here that you should follow.
I hate to jump all around to other forums but its important.

see
http://forum.hyiq.org/thread/clemente-figuera/

Norman

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Figuera discussion on another forum
« Reply #4200 on: February 07, 2018, 10:44:01 PM »

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4201 on: February 08, 2018, 06:29:38 PM »
Statement from (sparky) Floyd Sweet

" Why the field of a magnet is not the property of the magnet: First the electromagnet – it takes power from a source to initiate and bring to steady state the field of the magnet. Once the field is stabilised and the exciting current is no longer changing, no further power is needed from the source. The only power required is that needed to support the I2R losses due to the ohmic resistance of the conductor comprising the coil of the magnet. This loss appears as heat.

Now we have a magnetic field, a potential source of energy in existence without support of the source of power to the coil. True, the moving charges through the copper conductor are accompanied by a magnetic field, also true this field requires no power from the source. As stated, the only power is that supporting the I2R losses. Then the field due to the moving charges is not a property of the current drawn from the source but a property of incoherent energy quanta in the surrounding space interacting coherently with fields produced by moving charges on the electrons in motion through the coil."

In a standard generator you have the power (DC) to the inducers on at all times in which you would think it uses a lot of power but if you did you would be mistaken. as per the post on Sparky Sweet once the field of the electromagnet is brought up to working conditions the currant to the inducers just passes by as if it were a straight piece of wire. this is because once the field is established, it can not hold any more in the field per the amount of currant so the currant draw on the inducers is reduced to that of just the IR2 losses from the wire to maintain the field needed. since there is residual magnetism in the inducers it does not require flashing of the inducers to get a magnetic field to produce power once rotated. rotating the rotor through the magnetic fields causes a increase and decrease of magnetic flux as per Faraday's laws of induction.

In the Figuers device we have the exact same thing except the flashing has to take place every time it is shut off and restarted.  again once the field of the inducers are brought up to working conditions the power used to create the magnetic field is reduced to the currant used to maintain the magnetic field which is the IR2 losses.

since we do not have a rotating rotor how are we to get motion into the secondary when the secondary and the primaries are stationary. you move the magnetic field presented to the secondaries which causes induction as per Faraday's laws of induction. by manipulating the currant in the primary you cause the magnetic field to increase then decrease in strength which is the exact very thing as a standard generator. the only difference is once the secondary creates a opposing field to the first there is no way to bring it back to the other side once you push the opposing field across the E field. so Figuera put another inducer on the opposite side of the secondary to push that field back across the E field to the opposite side of the secondary. in doing said action one of the primaries has to be reduced and one increased to get full motion across the secondary but in doing so the reducing primaries E field is reversed to match that of the rising electromagnets E field causing the square of the two output.

you only reduce the primary to just clear the secondary then back up to full potential reducing the opposite primary at the same time. by keeping the primaries in complete unison the power from the output will rise very rapidly producing a substantial amount of power from a small device. this operation uses very little power to fluctuate the field back and fourth just like a standard generator except the fact that in the standard geny you are rotating a HUGE mass of iron through the north and south fields with MASSIVE LENZING EFFECT and in the Figuera device you are fluctuating the weightless massless field back and fourth only replacing the power of the reducing electromagnet to full potential which is very minute plus standard losses from wire and heat ie. IR2 losses.

Ain't that right Doug.

so on that note i will leave it to your imagination as to which one produces the most output compared to it's required input.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4202 on: February 21, 2018, 04:33:12 AM »
 I can not emphasize the importance of reading and understanding the patent using the tools and know how of that time frame of the turn of the century.

in the patent it specifically says and I Quote, " To fix ideas is convenient to refer to the attached drawing which is no more than a sketch to understand the operation of the machine built using the principals  outline before."

and

" Let be "R" a resistance that is drawn in an elementary manor to facilitate the comprehension of the entire system." end Quote.

so if it is just a drawing for understanding of the system and the resistance is in it's complete elementary form then thinking of that time frame this really reduces the outcome of the possible uses he used and implemented in his device.

IF R has some resistance but is NOT a resistor as stated in the patent of just some resistance then how could someone reduce the currant without using resistors that waste power like no tomorrow through heat then we are left with ONLY ONE LOGICAL OUTCOME and that is magnetic resistance.

very few used this technic to manipulate currant and Tesla was one of them. Figuera on the other hand figured out that by putting winding's on a iron core (Amplifying self Inductance) with a rotating positive brush he could split the feed into two and manipulate each side of the brush keeping them completely separate with north opposing fields and vary their currant in absolute unison. this allowed Figuera to get his primaries a very orderly rise and fall of currant presented to them and maintaining the required pressure for a specific output.

the pressure between the primaries is directly related to the number of field lines thus the intensity of the E field presented to the secondaries. if this pressure is not maintained between the primaries the induction will fall to that of just the rising electromagnet.

Marathonman

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4202 on: February 21, 2018, 04:33:12 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4203 on: February 21, 2018, 04:45:37 AM »
If your device does not operate with the actions or parameters of the last few posts then i hate to be a bearer of bad new but you are NOT building the Figuera device.
and i really hope your guidance isn't from PJK as that description on youtube is laughable at best.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4204 on: March 06, 2018, 03:57:25 AM »
In the Figuera device the primary electromagnets are never taken to zero. the reason is like trying to use AC in the Figuera device is that if you take the electromagnets down to zero it will take to long of time to build up the magnetic fields to proper field strength as it has to plow through the resistance thus loosing coherency between the primary electromagnets which equates to loss of induction from the reducing electromagnet. even in a standard generator the field magnets are on full all the time.  Figuera did NOT reduce the electromagnets down past 1/3 to 1/2 which allowed his electromagnets to remain in coherency of E fields doubling the output.  the time it takes to reduce the electromagnet to 1/3 then to full power and reducing the other at the same time is so small that the Primary electromagnet E fields remain in total coherency as the reducing electromagnets E field is reversed to match that of the rising electromagnet E field.

According to Maxwell and Faraday all that is needed to produce electricity is a rise or fall of magnetic field strength like that of a standard generator but in the Figuera device to keep the two primary opposing fields coherent he only reduce them just enough to clear the secondary then back up to full potential reducing the other side at the same time.

what this did was allow the field magnets to retain 80 to 90% of there field strength and still get the required reduction and rise of magnetic field  strength to induce currant flow just the same as a standard generator but in a stationary scenario.

i posted a graph of the window of currant required to keep the primary electromagnets in coherency. part G allows this to happen when the brush rotates around adding and subtracting winding's that magnetically link or unlink to the system allowing an orderly rise and fall of currant through the primary electromagnets. part G also stores and releases energy into the system which aids the rising electromagnet to counter act the potential drop of the rising side of part G. part G also splits the feed into two and keeps them separate by using two North face magnetic fields allowing them to remain separate but in total unison keeping the primary electromagnets in total coherency. yes there is always some resistance in part G as it never reduces it's fields in the core to zero just like the primaries thus a magnetic field is always present reducing or rising of the currant flow to the primaries.

so as you can see part G CAN NOT be replaced with electronics or at least with no less than a truck load of parts and i find no personal satisfaction in that.

it is quite funny when the truth is right in your face how silent the crowd becomes. the best advice i could give is open your ears and listen to the rotation of the brush and how the currant is being raised and lowered. DUH !

Marathonman

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4204 on: March 06, 2018, 03:57:25 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4205 on: March 07, 2018, 04:45:17 PM »
So the basic concept of the FIguera device is this.

two primaries facing each other being opposing north face electromagnet one increasing one decreasing. the decreasing electromagnet will catch the back side of the spin as it is retreating causing the E Field to be in the same direction as the increasing electromagnet. either electromagnet is only taken down 1/3 to 1/2 just enough to clear the secondary the back again to the other side as it is increased. in this process the secondary being between them connected to a load, currant will begin to flow producing an opposing field to the currant flow so what we end up having is similar to that of a squirrel cage motor. the primaries cause the initial induction in the secondary but as the currant starts to flow in the secondary and load it created a second field opposite to the first ie... lenz law. is it this field that is shoved from side to side in the secondary from the primaries. what we end up having is  N>N<N with the secondary field in between and is easily moved from side to side with very little effort.  moving the weightless, massless field which is much easier than a massive hunk of iron in regular generators.

 

as the currant flows through part G we have a set of conditions that control the currant flow. since we have a brush rotating around the cylinder the amount of winding's change as the brush is rotated thus we are changing the amount of winding's magnetically linking to the circuit thus changing the opposing magnetic field that opposes the original currant flow through the circuit. since currant is flowing in two direction we have a north north opposing fields at the positive brush that keeps both sides of the inductor separate allowing complete unison as the brush rotates.

 

as the brush rotates to one side the reducing side magnetic field is reducing releasing energy back into the system and at that same time as the low primary is shoved out of the secondary into it's own core a high pressure is built up in that core and is shoved into part G feeding the high primary. this sequence of events happen every half rotation of the brush thus we have an orderly rise and fall of currant through the primaries.

 

you could say that part G is a duel dynamic inductor that is basically a pressure regulator regulating the currant flow through the primaries with two independent sides that act like short term batteries charging and discharging every half rotation all while varying the currant.

the larger the magnetic field the more drag on the original flow of currant. in the regular teaching of an inductor they only teach you that a change in currant causes more or less opposition to currant flow. what they never say is the reverse is also true by changing the conditions of the circuit ie.. winding's and core length (magnetically linking) you can also control the currant flow and this you will never find in ANY University around the world.

 

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4206 on: March 11, 2018, 06:44:17 PM »
The picture posted is by a member known as electrocute on Hyiq dot org. what he did was take a stack of button hole magnets and put them in opposition on a brass rod then dropped them through the PVC tube with a coil attached to an Oscilloscope. his first drop was with one magnet set and recorded 4 volts. he then put the opposing stack on the rod and did another drop with not so good results so he moved the magnet stacks closer then dropped again. what he then attained was double the voltage of the single stack hitting 8 volts. this test and the one i have performed as in my video prove the validity of the Figuera device hands down with NO denying the facts.

The experiments performed by myself and electrocute can be performed by anyone who reads this thread. in the case of the magnets or electromagnets opposing fields the field lines are compressed at the collision point doubling the field lines present. when dropped through the coil the first magnet through the coil will act as it is being reduced and the second magnet will act as it is being increased doubling the output of the E field thus the voltage from the coil or secondary. the first magnet's electric field is reversed to match that of the second magnet giving the appearance of the first magnet reducing and the second increasing. this will cause the E fields to be in complete coherency.

in the Figuera device the electromagnets are doing the exact same thing except the primary electromagnets are raised and lowered in complete unison from part G. the reducing electromagnet's are reduced to just clear the secondary the increased to full potential as the other primary electromagnet is reduced thus the field intensity of the electromagnets remain very high.

the opposing fields in part G will cause the inductors to remain completely separate but in complete unison all while raising and lowering the currant supplied to the primary electromagnets.

all the said action of the magnets and the Figuera electromagnets are in complete compliance with Faraday's Laws of induction and CAN NOT be denied.

Marathonman

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4206 on: March 11, 2018, 06:44:17 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4207 on: March 14, 2018, 05:28:28 PM »
Inductance is a property of an electrical conductor which opposes a change in current. It does that by storing and releasing energy from a magnetic field surrounding the conductor when current flows, according to Faraday's law of induction. When current rises, energy (as magnetic flux) is stored in the field, reducing the current and causing a drop in potential (i.e, a voltage) across the conductor; when current falls, energy is released from the field supplying current and causing a rise in potential across the conductor.

These effects are derived from two fundamental observations of physics: a steady current creates a steady magnetic field described by Oersted's law and a time-varying magnetic field induces an electromotive force (EMF) in nearby conductors, which is described by Faraday's law of induction.  According to Lenz's law a changing electric current through a circuit that contains inductance induces a proportional voltage, which opposes the change in current (self-inductance).

A current  flowing through a conductor generates a magnetic field around the conductor, which is described by Ampere's circuital law. The total magnetic flux through a circuit  is equal to the product of the magnetic field and the area of the surface spanning the current path. If the current varies, the magnetic flux through the circuit changes. By Faraday's law of induction, any change in flux through a circuit induces an electromotive force (EMF) or voltage  v in the circuit, proportional to the rate of change of flux.  thus the surface area in the circuit path in Figuera part G changes dynamically as the brush rotates varying the currant on both sides of the brush since the north opposing fields keep them separate they will act as two independent inductors but in complete unison.

The negative sign in the equation indicates that the induced voltage is in a direction which opposes the change in current that created it; this is called Lenz's law. The potential is therefore called a back EMF. If the current is increasing, the voltage is positive at the end of the conductor through which the current enters and negative at the end through which it leaves, tending to reduce the current. If the current is decreasing, the voltage is positive at the end through which the current leaves the conductor, tending to maintain the current. Self-inductance, usually just called inductance,  is the ratio between the induced voltage and the rate of change of the current. in the Figuera part G we actually have no pole reversal as the opposing magnetic field keeps them separate but the process is still taking place as currant in an inductor when releasing will always travel in the original direction to maintain currant flow.

So therefore inductance is also proportional to how much energy is stored in the magnetic field for a given current. This energy is stored as long as the current remains constant. If the current decreases, the magnetic field will decrease, inducing a voltage in the conductor in the opposite direction, negative at the end through which current enters and positive at the end through which it leaves. This will return stored magnetic energy to the external circuit in which can be considered as a short term battery feeding the system each half rotation of the brush.

a variable Y (Currant) is said to increase or decrease linearly with another variable X (Magnetic Field)  if every increase or decrease of a fixed amount in X (Windings and Core Material)  results in another fixed increase or decrease in Y. In terms of a graph, the relationship is a straight line of currant increase or decease.

If y tends to increase linearly as x decreases, the variables are linearly correlated.  If y tends to decrease linearly as x increases, the variables are linearly correlated also.

When an inductor operates in continuous mode, as in the Figuera device, the current through the inductor never falls to zero just like the primaries. a certain amount of field is always present as reducing this magnetic field to zero will take to long to build up thus induction in the primaries would loose coherency reducing the output to the rising electromagnet. since the whole objective is an orderly rise and fall of a specific amount of currant the inductor is only reduced to get the reducing electromagnet to clear the secondary then increase as the other side is reduced.

Inductance, L is actually a measure of an inductors “resistance” to the change of the current flowing through the circuit and the larger is its value in Henries, the lower will be the rate of current flow. thus in the Figuera part G we have a constant rise and fall of magnetic resistance which correlates to a steady rise and fall of currant flow in the primaries.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4208 on: March 14, 2018, 06:00:58 PM »
Confusion, Confusion and more Confusion.

It seams there is some confusion about the patent wording. in the patent it says when one electromagnet is full the other is empty. while this is all fine and dandy in reality it can not happen and here is why.

if the whole objective is to get the highest possible inductance to the secondary from the primaries then why would someone reduce a primary so low that induction is lost. by reducing a primary to zero the pressure is lost between the primaries thus inductance is substantially reduce to just the rising electromagnet. if in the process of reducing the electromagnet to just clear the secondary then back up again to peak potential you will retain 80 to 90% of the magnetic field that is being used to induce the secondary in which will require much less currant to bring the electromagnet back to full potential.

if in the process of reduction the electromagnet is reduced passed half way or to zero the time it takes to bring the magnetic field to full potential is far grater than the time it takes to just reduce it to 80 to 90 %. this is the main reason why AC can not be used as induction is lost from the speed of the rising electromagnet being to slow since it has to overcome the resistance of the wire plus the flipping of the magnetic domains . since the whole objective is induction to the secondary why would you reduce it to zero when you don't have to thus keeping the fields at maximum potential equates to the highest output possible. even in the process of reducing and increasing the electromagnet very little you will still get induction as per Faraday and Maxwell equations but since the electromagnetic fields are at their maximum so will be the induction. thus the output of the Figuera device will be many orders of magnitude higher than that of a standard generator.

since complete unison of the primaries is required in the Figuera device he came up with a solution to not only keep the primaries in unison but to also reuse the power running through it. part G the controller regulator is an inductor being like a cross between a magamp and a variac. when the brush rotates around the core each side of the brush will act as independent inductors adding or subtracting winding's that are magnetically linking to the circuit. as the individual magnetic fields rise and fall, currant will be reduced or increased from the magnetic field opposition. bemf from this field reduces currant flow so as more winding's are added to the circuit more currant reduction takes place thus the reverse is happening on the other side of the brush as less winding's equate to less opposition to currant flow.

in the process of reducing the primaries being pushed out of the secondaries, a EMF is produced and fed into part G thus combining with the reducing inductor EMF will cause an amplification to the rising electromagnet. since the the rising side of the inductor is storing a magnetic field for the next half cycle of reduction there will be a drop in potential across the inductor thus the two previous mentioned sources of potential will cause an increased potential to the rising electromagnet offsetting the drop.

since the part G controls the currant why would anyone wind the primaries to have resistance high enough to control currant when that is the job of part G. by winding the electromagnets specifically as electromagnets will allow them to achieve their intended goal to produce a magnetic field. the added bonus of winding them this way is the response time of the electromagnets are increased substantially from lower resistance and self inductance allowing them to respond to the rise and fall of currant in a timely manor.

 

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4209 on: March 14, 2018, 06:22:38 PM »
Since a Magnetic Field intensity Changing in Time is a requirement for Electromagnetic Induction according to Faraday's Laws of induction no matter how small we have the Figuera device doing just that, two independent electromagnets decreasing and increasing just enough to clear the secondary both opposing but the E fields acting as one field. these bucking field are the exact thing Chris at Hyiq dot org is working on except the fact that Chris is completely reducing a primary and in the Figuera device we are not.

thus the change in the field no matter how small according to Faraday will produce induction and since we are using two electromagnets in unison we end up with square of the two output.

Figuera had the device working in his house and supposably it was fairly small yet put out a fantastic amount of power near 20 kilowatts and violates not one of Faraday laws of induction.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4210 on: March 19, 2018, 07:06:02 PM »
By the time the true direction of electron flow was discovered, the nomenclature of “positive” and “negative” had already been so well established in the scientific community that no effort was made to change it, although calling electrons “positive” would make more sense in referring to “excess” charge. You see, the terms “positive” and “negative” are human inventions, and as such have no absolute meaning beyond our own conventions of language and scientific description. Franklin could have just as easily referred to a surplus of charge as “black” and a deficiency as “white,” in which case scientists would speak of electrons having a “white” charge (assuming the same incorrect conjecture of charge position between wax and wool).

He also discovered that only one of these charges can move while the other is stationary. He didn't know which so he made a guess and said the current flow from + to - which he had a 50/50 chance and got it wrong. Then in 1900, J.J. Thompson discovered an electron and proved electrons are negative and that they flow to a positive charge. In reality, - flow to + Physicists use: - flow to + Engineeers use: + flow to -.

Why engineers use a wrong assumption? Becuase during 1900's they didn't change their textbooks. So we are stuck with a wrong convection current.

However, because we tend to associate the word “positive” with “surplus” and “negative” with “deficiency,” the standard label for electron charge does seem backward. Because of this, many engineers decided to retain the old concept of electricity with “positive” referring to a surplus of charge, and label charge flow (current) accordingly. This became known as conventional flow notation:

yes i do agree that the pressure flow is from - to + but i personally do not believe there is such a thing as positive or negative charged particles anywhere in our universe as i do believe in a few things Ken Wheeler says and that is eather pressure modalities. the so called negative is actual charging to a higher pressure potential (counter space) creating heat and positive is radiative discharging (Space) to less pressure which is radiated to cold in an never ending cycle.

Just something to consider and keep fresh on your mind is the direction the actual currant is flowing, the spin direction of the rotating fields and the pressure between the primaries required for a specific output.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4211 on: March 22, 2018, 06:59:18 PM »


 If an inductor is designed so that any one of these factors may be varied at will, its inductance will correspondingly vary. Variable inductors are usually made by providing a way to vary the number of wire turns in use at any given time, or by varying the core material or both.

that is exactly what Figuera did in his part G by varying the amount of winding's magnetically linking and unlinking to the system he added or subtracted core material and winding's as the brush rotated keeping them separate with N><N fields at the brush. by changing these two parameters increased and decreased the size of the inductor this allowed him to vary each inductor on each side of the brush separately while remaining in complete unity and pressure between the primaries is maintained at all times.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4212 on: March 27, 2018, 04:04:27 PM »
Stefan Hartmann ( Admin)
When are you going to release the graphs with my last post. the graphs are for the understanding of the description of the Figuera device.
it has been well over a year since i wad moderated and the trolls have since moved on.
Please reevaluate the situation.
this message is for you and not the thread.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4213 on: March 29, 2018, 02:37:52 PM »
I see someone is really one his toes.

Continuing on the common sense theme part G will become the power supply of the device after the initial start of the device then the power supply can be taken away.  every half rotation of part G it stores and releases energy into the system each half of part G almost acting independent but feeding each other. when one side is storing energy in the form of a magnetic field the other side is releasing energy into the system from it's magnetic field. in the next cycle the reverse is true, the previous rising side will be releasing energy into the system and the reducing side will be storing into the magnetic field.

as the magnetic field is released into the system from the reducing side of part G the reducing primaries magnetic field is reduced also releasing that part of the reduced magnetic field into part G. both sources of potential are combined causing a forward biasing of part G similar to a mag amp. this amplification off sets the rising side of part G potential drop as any inductor when currant is rising will store into it's magnetic field causing a potential drop on that side of part G.  both sources of potential combines off setting this potential drop causing an amplification to the rising electromagnet boosting it's output. these magnetic fields are also used in the manipulation of the currant. with each half rotation of the brush each side of the brush will act as independent inductors with the length of the inductor changing with the brush movement adding or subtracting winding's that magnetically link or unlink to that half of the inductor causing a linear rise and fall of currant.

once the fields are up to working conditions the currant draw of the device will drop as per Sparky Sweet and the only power needed will be the replacement of the IR2 losses and the rising electromagnet to full potential which is small since the primary is only reduce to just clear the secondary then back to full potential.

just like a standard generator a small portion of the output is fed to it's exciting field to replace the losses which are inherent in all man's devices as nothing is 100%. just like a standard generator once the magnetic fields are up to working conditions the currant draw is reduced to that of just the IR2 losses to maintain the fields.

the inducing side and the induced side are actually separate system and the only power used from the inducing side to the induced is to polarize the secondaries. once the secondaries currant starts flowing they part ways and almost act independent of each other.  when the currant flows in the output according to the Lenz law an opposing field will form opposing the original currant flow and this opposite field is what is pushed side to side from the primaries across the circular Electric field that is formed around the secondaries from the actions of the primaries.

in a standard generator the exciting fields are on all the time and as the rotor rotates through the magnetic fields it encounters different strengths of magnetic field and the closer it gets to the exciters the stronger the field gets thus the farther it gets from the exciters the weaker the field gets. so in the FIguera device since the electromagnets are stationary with no moving parts in order to get the rise and fall of magnetic field strength he had to raise and lower the currant to the primary electromagnets to mimic this process and that is where part G comes into play inducing an orderly rise and fall of currant in a linear fashion.

all said actions of a standard generator and the Figuera stationary generator are the laws of induction set forth by Faraday and violate not one as any and i mean any increase of decrease in magnetic field strength will cause an EMF in the output and the Figuera device does just that.

It is quite obvious no one listened to Mr Doug, imagine that.
 

 

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4214 on: March 29, 2018, 02:41:45 PM »
In my research the reason i brought in William Hooper and associated his work with Figuera was his table top experiment dealing with motional electric fields.

In my research in magnetism i found that two opposing magnetic fields can not occupy the same time space domain at the same time. it has to be one or the other not both. when two opposing magnetic fields are forced together the magnetic field line are highly compressed but still remain separate, if these two fields remain separate then how in the world did Figuera get such an amazing output from such a small crude device.

Two words...... "ELECTRIC FIELD"

The Motional Electric Fields are not like the opposing magnetic fields. they are the same coin but the other side acting differently in respects to time space domain. even though the magnetic fields remain separate the Motional Electric Fields do not and are positive and additive.

Figuera in his amazing research found out that by increasing the currant in one opposing electromagnet and decreasing the other at the same time both electromagnets Motional Electric Fields were both positive and additive as both were in the same direction giving him double the output as one electromagnet alone. all that is required to keep this action at a constant is maintaining the magnetic field pressure between the primary electromagnets when one is reduced and the other increased allowing the Motional Electric Fields to remain in coherency....ie in phase.

the magnet tests that were performed are the exact same actions of the Figuera electromagnets. as the first magnet through the coil it's magnetic field will act as it is being reduced and the second approaching the coil will act as if it were being increased. with the opposing magnetic fields compressed  just like the electromagnets in which is directly correlated to the to the amount of output you will get the magnets create the Motional Electric Fields just the same as the Figuera device. both magnets electric fields are positive and additive as both are in the same direction.

The Figuera device is intriguing, fascinating and has captivated all my attention.

Marathonman

 

OneLink