Ramaswami,
to have one free energy vulgo "overunity" machine is one thing !
To reach the "thesis"-level(Doctor-degree,docere=dozieren/teach) another !
The "thesis"-degree,Dr.-title hono(u)r, you get by academy peers ,Professors/Docents ! For honor ! = industrial "open source"
Commercial this "thesis"-level is the "patent grant" ,examination by patent office "peers" ! For industrial production !
A patent application gives you the possibility to get object claims examination and approvement or object claims deny !
Anyone are against application for the "patent grant"-ing status : Why ?
Monopole-(market power)?
Condition : only examination/peers approvement interests (and/ or cheap mass-production) :
200 estates in the U.N.O. , application only for 1 estate
but the examination result will become world-wide "technical standart" !
Second : safety-approvement (TUEV,UAL and other recognized laboratory organisations)
Third : Warranty (machine longivity,hazardfree, no rare materials, no ambiental risc )
Fourth: scaleabilty
= sustainable development
Some grams "machine" are not the breakthrough !
It is only the demonstration for a long path -over all instances !
Target: each household/consumer worl-wide -private and commercial
there are atomic bombs and atomic reactors.
there are fusion bombs but no fusion reactors
(probably beginning of commercial energy production: 2050,I.T.E.R.)
Now we got informated about high energy conversion densities :
MW per " 1 gram machine" as nano-foil (+ two different currents/streams)
http://overunity.com/16727/real-water-power-that-could-be-the-game-changer/15/#.V7rVA9crwSM Onced "Impossible !" in theoretical numbers making this to future standart = NORM !
some generations before:
Trains with more than 20 Km/h velocity ? The cows will becoming mad !
Mad-cow-syndrom
The first free energy/overunity machines appeared more than 100 years before .
denied as perpetuum mobile machines(1.kind) or academical withdrawn as 2.kind machines :
ambiental/human health riscs :
uncontroleable chain reaction with "point of no return"-entering:
self-destruction
The Messieurs Biot and Savart has been members of the Parish Academie of Science,
the first institution worldwide which denied the possibility of such machines.
I reed in one of them bibliography that there has been the hypothesis
in the 19.century from a french inventor about a
"watermotor- with perpetuum mobile effect";
Biot (or Savart) helped him to realize the hypothesis to reality/thesis !
Neither this french inventor is today known,nor Biot and Savart and their law
-outside academies !
We can call them "dissidents": working against the Dogma/Doctrin
Projects risk examples, total professionality/experience and up to billions financial units
investment and menpower hours :
Tata Nano,Thyssen Brazil steel plant,Siemens production plant GB
Friendly partners will become your enemies, meant enemies probably friends and partners
over the development instances.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lorentz-Kraft(=force),wikipedia german edition
Biot-Savart law and Biot-Savart force
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentzkraft deutsch/german
Kraft zwischen zwei stromdurchflossenen LeiternSiehe auch:
Ampèresches Kraftgesetz Verknüpft man die Formel für die Lorentzkraft auf stromdurchflossene Leiter mit dem
Biot-Savart-Gesetz für das Magnetfeld um stromdurchflossene Leiter, so ergibt sich eine Formel für die Kraft, die zwei stromdurchflossene dünne Leiter aufeinander ausüben, was in der Literatur auch als ampèresches Kraftgesetz (nicht zu verwechseln mit dem
ampèreschen Gesetz) bezeichnet wird.
[3]Wenn die beiden Leiter dünn sind und einander parallel gegenüberliegen wie die gegenüberliegenden Seiten eines
Rechtecks, dann ergibt sich die schon von der
Ampère-Definition her bekannte einfache Formel für den Kraftbetrag F 12 {\displaystyle F_{12}} (
https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/35bd8bf2dd739f74f6c888ae839d364d7ca8cf8d) der aufeinander wirkenden (nach dem
Wechselwirkungsprinzip gleich großen) Kräfte:
F 12 = ℓ ⋅ μ 0 2 π I 1 I 2 r {\displaystyle F_{12}=\ell \cdot {\frac {\mu _{0}}{2\pi }}{\frac {I_{1}I_{2}}{r}}}
Dabei ist ℓ {\displaystyle \ell } die (bei beiden Leitern gleich große) Länge der Leiter, r {\displaystyle r} ihr gegenseitiger Abstand und
I 1 , I 2 {\displaystyle I_{1},I_{2}} sind die Stromstärken in den beiden Leitern.
english translation by google:
Force between two current-carrying conductors
See also: Ampèresches force law
Related to the formula for the Lorentz force acting on a current-carrying conductor with the
Biot-Savart law for the magnetic field around current-carrying conductor, the result is a formula for the force to exercise the two current-carrying thin conductors each other, which in the literature as ampèresches power law ( not to be confused is designated by the Ampere's law). [3]
If the two conductors are thin and parallel to each other are opposite as opposite sides of a rectangle, then the already forth known by the ampere definition simple formula results for the amount of force F 12 {\ displaystyle F_ {12}} {\ displaystyle F_ {12 }} of interacting (equal to the interaction principle) forces:
F 12 = ℓ ⋅ μ 0 2 π I 1 I 2 r {\ displaystyle F_ {12} = \ ell \ cdot {\ frac {\ mu _ {0}} {2 \ pi}} {\ frac {I_ {1 } I_ {2}} {r}}} {\ displaystyle F_ {12} = \ ell \ cdot {\ frac {\ mu _ {0}} {2 \ pi}} {\ frac {I_ {1} I_ { 2}} {r}}}
Here is ℓ {\ displaystyle \ ell} \ ell the (for both conductors of the same size) length of the conductor, r {\ displaystyle r} r their mutual distance and I 1, I 2 {\ displaystyle I_ {1}, I_ {2 }} {\ displaystyle I_ {1}, {2}} I_ are the currents in the two conductors.
Lorentz-force,wikipedia english edition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force somebody reads about Biot and or Savart
Or Laplace/Ampére (force) ?
Does this matter ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lorentz-force is the nuclear force ,the only used perpetuum mobile science : the atomic radiation activity during the decay cycle=
during elementar transformation
accelerating the force and forced decay by Biot-Savart force(or Laplace/Ampére force)
Lorentz-Transformation gives us e=mc² c= velocity of light X²= acceleration m=result from (M1-M2) decay
Nikola Tesla did a structural change : e=tc² Minkowski( Einstein was one of his students) RAUM(space)-Zeit(time)
https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=39663https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/electromagnetics-and-energy.912307/ Does this really matter ?