Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 2318715 times)

seaad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4530 on: September 07, 2018, 07:05:58 PM »
See corr above.

Dead short thru 1/4 turn of G-coil !

Regards Arne

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4531 on: September 07, 2018, 07:27:43 PM »
At that position of the brush the commutated secondary is at ZERO so there is no dead short. plus i am using a 16 pole commutator with one pole not connected at that point on each side of part G. and that is every 1/2 turn by the way not 1/4 turn.

The way i see it there is only two ways to get the loop back function. the way i an trying or using the Tesla AC to DC one side connected to the positive brush and the negative connected to the negative side of the primaries. that way it allows current to circulate around the system remembering part G becomes the supply once the starting is removed. the secondary loop back can then be commutated and the positive connected to the positive brush and the negative side connected to the negative of the primaries. this will give the added boost to the rising primaries. i see no other scenario but these two cases.

Regards,
Marathonman

seaad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4532 on: September 07, 2018, 08:08:54 PM »
Not a 1/4 of a brush rotation on top of the G-coil.

But a short cut thru a 1/4 of a coil turn. From + to - via the coil cupper wire.

Regards Arne

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4533 on: September 07, 2018, 09:26:07 PM »
Tell me WHAT you see as a short. the secondary will add to the magnetic field of part G through moving contacts which will add to the potential being circulated in the system. the secondary at that time will be ZERO.

any power running through part G will have magnetic resistance and will not be a dead short but add to the system potential in the form of a magnetic field.
IF i find it to be incorrect i can very easily change to the only other option with the Tesla AC to DC patent addition and removing the second brush. until then it stays in my build.

Regards,
Marathonman

seaad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4534 on: September 07, 2018, 10:07:50 PM »
Tell me WHAT you see as a short.

Marathonman

Pls see pic.
Between the brush with +voltage and the brush with - voltage is it a piece of a wire, a (1/4) part of a turn in the G- coil at that time and actual ?-? position.
 When puttting a short piece of wire beetween battery poles what happens?.  Spark= short cut.
But a wire diagram as I asked for long ago maybe could help missunderstandings.

Regards Arne

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4535 on: September 07, 2018, 10:51:26 PM »
The reason i did not post a wiring diagram is because of the two scenarios and i will not find out which one is correct until i build it.
the plus sign is connected to the brush and the negative is connected to the negative of the primaries, follow me so far. i then ran the secondary loop back through a commutator  to the positive brush which being commutated will always stay positive and the other to a negative brush on the opposite side of the positive brush. when it rotates and comes to the position you are referring the secondary will have no power in it as it will be at the zero volt line. plus as i have said the commutator has a non connected pole at those position as a safety precaution. there will be no direct short of any kind because the secondary IS AT ZERO....Got it. NO POWER NO SHORT. if you still do not understand me that i can't help you with just like when Cifta did not understand part G for 5 or 6 long years.
Regards,
Marathonman

seaad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4536 on: September 08, 2018, 12:25:01 AM »
The reason i did not post a wiring diagram is because of the two scenarios and i will not find out which one is correct until i build it.
the plus sign is connected to the brush and the negative is connected to the negative of the primaries, follow me so far. i then ran the secondary loop back through a commutator  to the positive brush which being commutated will always stay positive and the other to a negative brush on the opposite side of the positive brush. when it rotates and comes to the position you are referring the secondary will have no power in it as it will be at the zero volt line.

Marathonman

Not easy :
the plus sign (at/From)  is connected to the brush (you have five) and the negative (brush? at) is connected to the negative of the primaries

See pic of my interpretation

How about short cut at start up (with ext. battery?)

Regards Arne

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4537 on: September 08, 2018, 05:12:23 AM »
OMG your F-in stupid. sorry it is like talking to an 85 iQ dumb ass.
 please don't worry about what i do as you must be so unintelligent to understand simple directions or explination. i have to ask you what grade did you complete, just curious as you are acting just like Cifta did for so many years. really stupid as usual.
Imagine that ! the norm for Seaad. what is the matter not getting enough attention boy to your crazy ideas.
How pathetic you are as i have explained in FULL DETAIL.
Typical seaad just like Hanon, Cifta,  Bistander and the list goes on and on and on and on and i am wondering when will your BS ever end. please go away, like forever. you can disrupt but you can NEVER STOP ME FOOL ie TROLL.
Marathonman

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4538 on: September 08, 2018, 01:49:42 PM »
If you are going to be such a lowlife pathetic person that you will continue to attack me after I have publicly apologized to you, would you please learn how to properly spell my user name.  Even a 5 year old can copy how to spell something.


My user name is CITFTA


And seaad is correct.  Your new design for part G sucks.  It has too many problems with it to ever work like you think it will.



marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4539 on: September 08, 2018, 04:23:56 PM »
It's to bad your to ignorant to realize the C has already been tested in sim and on the bench and verified by another builder and it worked like a charm so G-T-H fools. your less intelligent than i first imagined.
here we go again you idiots thinking i was wrong when i was right the whole time and it only took 5 or 6 years to pull your head out of your back side. so who is the non intelligent one.
Please from now on don't run your mouth when you know absolutely nothing about the C core part G or how it performs because that is all you are doing is running your mouths. (TYPICAL)
try acting like researchers instead of TROLLS.
it could be SHITFA for all i care.
so go back to E and work on that piece of junk you call part G and maybe, just maybe someday it will work as good as my C core.

also your foolish attempts to get a good output have failed and will continue to fail as is UFOP's output also which if you would have read post 4527 you wouldn't be in that situation.
you knowing more than me, yah right. iv'e heard all the BS before.

Marathonman

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4540 on: September 09, 2018, 05:28:34 PM »
Now i see Seaad ran off to entergetic and started running his mouth as usual. what a pathetic excuse for a man hiding behind the internet like a coward that he is and has been since he logged on at entergetic. these people are as rotten as they come putting everyone down on many, many threads. when is it ever going to end.
I share all my work and if you don't like it G T H.
Regards,
Marathonman

ourbobby

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4541 on: September 09, 2018, 11:28:48 PM »



Hi Marathman,
                      If I might ask you a question regarding where you get your big toroids from.


Thank you


Ourbobby

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4542 on: September 10, 2018, 02:25:07 PM »
I don't have a big toroid and never did but i do get my core supplies from Bridgeport Magnetics.
http://www.bridgeportmagnetics.com/contents/en-us/d44_Toroidal_Standard_and_O-Cores.html
their stocked items can be had for a good price but fore warned their custom items are through the roof.
Regards,
Marathonman
« Last Edit: September 10, 2018, 05:21:35 PM by marathonman »

Cadman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4543 on: September 10, 2018, 06:44:55 PM »
Hello MM,

Although I haven't posted in a while I still keep an eye on your progress. I see some people still don't get part G even though they supposedly followed the build thread at Energetic long ago.

Part G works on the exact same principle as an autotransformer or a variac. The rotating brushes changes the number of turns in the coil wrapped around the core. As the brushes sweep toward the ends of the coil the number of turns increase. As the brushes sweep back toward the center of the coil the number of turns between the two brushes decreases. Continuous change.
It's just that simple.

Doug1 posted pictures of that ages ago.

Keep on keepin' on, MM.

Regards
Cadman
 

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4544 on: September 10, 2018, 07:35:38 PM »
Thank you most kindly Mr. Cadman. i was wondering just the other day where you were.
i have had a few mishaps along the way but i am getting there.

Yes i know it's just that simple and i even posted very descriptive posts on the very subject yet some still don't get it. a continuous change of magnetic flux to current ratio,  magnetic linking and unlinking to the circuit on each side of the brush.

PS. the toroid i had worked which was similar to Dougs' but the parallel inductance on the non active side caused a lot of balancing issues so i redesigned it with a duel C but not finished with it yet.

and yes i plan on keepin' on.
Thanks and regards,
Marathonman