Hi,

I haven't got the videos, but I have obtained a schematic of this device elsewhere. From the schematic, it doesn't appear to be overunity.

Hi Steadyfield.
I agree that schematic is conventional. I also built it and as expected there is nothing special. But! Not even close to his device efficiency. I was lucky and i have seen this video that i am looking for. I believe his secret is on the yoke core side which is covered in his videos. He built a high voltage coil in there and i believe he uses high voltage spikes to discharge or charge the in-series capacitor while in oscillation. Needs further investigation.
Thanks anyway.
Jeg

Really appreciated

Am awaiting a scope.

If you measure frequencies with a frequency meter then i suggest you waiting for the scope. What you measure is self oscillations which show a bad calculated snubber. Without a scope you just go blind.

That looks like bucking coils, and some resonance...


bucking coils..


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEyxKFUqvU0 (especially 16:15-ish)


https://youtu.be/oEyxKFUqvU0?t=975


These are impact traces of EVO's.  They are 'exotic vacuum particles' ala Ken Shoulders, John Hutchison....


These are face-on impacts of toroidal structures, which fracture into multiple perpendicular toroidal formations...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVbdbVhzcM4


I would expect that there's a way to stabily collide fields and result in multiple copies of the same thing....


If those toroids could absorb ambient energy to stabilize into full stable versions of themselves, it would explain coldness associated with excess output.


There's so much I've stumbled on that has enlightened my view, and revealed how simple the universe actually is...


For instance, stars and heavy objects don't 'warp space' ... the same effect of light bending around a massive object is modeled in fluid dynamics and the reynolds number of a fluid sticking to the surface ....


There's different dynamics, because the curvature is innate and not driven by collisions...


I expect i've had systems similarly stable... but I also imagine the quantum wierdness of looking in the box may prevent stable collapse because of the observer phenomenon... if you measure an entangled photon it can collapse to one or the other position.. [size=78%]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed-choice_quantum_eraser[/size]


- was just reflecting on cause and effect; such that if a system worked like this, what sort of behavior might it require? 
Fractional electron fields are probably not as 'potent' as full fields, could it be possible that they are able to rectify themselves into full electrons?  Would sort of be an endothermic reaction; (Geet carburator has cold exhaust when working well, john bedini(maybe that was bearden?) had some devices had tempurature characteristics; and I hate to bring up such a 'scam' - but Searl Effect Generator is endothermic... resulting in electrical energy which absorbs ambient heat to become viable spinning particles?

-------


To go back to Martin Fleishmann project on youtube, the reveals a helical nature of particle discharges from LENR reactions... (Nickel Hydrogen reactors generate a field that generates torque on magnetic plates....


https://youtu.be/MUx1vdw5pes?t=295  (original russian footage)
auto translate works okish... there's another video with english interpretation...   'nickel plate, neodymium magnets on corners, LENR nickel hydrogen reactor getting to reaction tempurature around 350C, emits a radiation that cause a spin torque.


----


Also the windings in the kapanadze coil produce that sort of collision - it's a matter of stabilizing that into a useful form....

When someone speaks Chinese the only  left for us Westerners  form  of communication is paper  drawing and  sign language for hearing- impaired   individuals.
Language  of physics uses characters of e.g English language  adds to it its own symbols, forms equations, meanings  and rules needed to communicate in this language.
 
So  lets take  Chinese trying to explain something in Chinese,+ sign+ drawings, but he doesn't know  physics and is totally wrong.What would you learn  from him?
Chinese  students are occupying our American  universities  to be able to communicate in our universal English language.
But  if they are not educated in language of physics than their English explanation  may be  incorrect.
So some of them who knows  English  and are in Physics  can  correct other Chinese..

Conclusion:
every language  doesn't need to explain  meaning of blocks of information  widely known with words such as: Earth, air, flow, mechanics, baby, art, and so on..
But there are  professionals in e.g mechanics and some others in science of e.g mechanics.
Their knowledge is higher  than average Joe in that particular field.
________________________________
So you Smudge need to  try to talk in language of physics using English   descriptors .
But what if you  only know English  but  only to some extend  physics?
Well than you need help from these who speaks physics better..

But how do you know that someone is not wrong in physics and knows it better than you?
Well By  using process of verification  in the internet  you can differentiate between  e.g dull Russian troll  and  professional.
Yes : Talented Russian troll may fool you too because he is paid money for  confusing you and sending into wrong  path.
Yes:  there are people like me who are not paid  and dedicate their time  for others to understand physics better.
Yes:  I can be mistaken too , but that will be surprise to myself too.
__________________________________________________________
over unity-energy.  doesn't exist never existed and will never exist.
perpetual generator supplying power.
perpetual motion is fiction. It doesn't exist never existed and will never exist.
Eather  doesn't exist never existed and will never exist. but it was just  a concept- a model rejected by science .
so these meanings or information blocks  must be excluded as  totally wrong till anyone will come with supporting  it explanation.
But using these blocks to explain anything is wrong.
Example :
 1. Using magic or God teaching to explain   
difference between effect of sperm of  human  causing  birth, and other mammals sperm causing the same.

2. physics doesn't recognize any "gods or any magic" so these blocks must be excluded  as false models of the past
for physics we are just HUMAN ANIMALS  whether you like  it or not ....
____________________________________________________________
conclusion: we may find  and I'm sure that there  is  way to  use NMR
in the processes associated with energy conversion and energy extraction .And this alone is worth of my time  here.

Wesley



=========================


자석은 1400년전 한반도에서 풍수지리학을 하는 학자들에 의해 심층적으로 연구됐습니다.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8-Kek8Halc&t=10s
무덤연구라 추천은 안합니다.

비슷한 시기에 물레방아는 쌀과 왕겨를 분리하는 기계로 이용했습니다.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hH6IMrOXtBg&t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5O5O2dz3Ls&t=18s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y-eDX0y0pc
 
프랑스 철학자 Jacques Derrida는 언어와 현상계를 접목시키려는 인간들의 노력을 Différance이란 말로 비꼬았다.

당신들이 한국어를 모르는 것에 대해 나는 슬프게 생각하지 않는다.
보통사람이 천재를 시기하는 것은 전통입니다.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzVQzLf2ovc
못생긴 남자가 미남을 시기하는 것과 같은 이치입니다.

Wesley :

어떤 자유에너지 원리를 이해하지 못하는 것은,
당신들이 잘 아는 지식의 틀에 갇혀있어서다.
그리고 자신이 바보라고 떠들어댑니다.


AlienGrey :

I'm bored.

Wesley,

interesting picture.
2 snakes, just as on health symbol, caduceus symbol.

But, we can see here another 4 turns coil, or capacitor?

Coincidence?