Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  (Read 11719030 times)

itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17505 on: July 16, 2017, 11:53:29 AM »

Nick,

that 1Khz is very low considering you use a 1nF cap with 20K pot, so that points to a wrong/missing connection somehere in your circuit as you have already changed the TL494 chip, i think.
Make sure your pin 14 (+5V) is unconditionally stable.

Itsu

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17506 on: July 19, 2017, 08:51:01 PM »
  Itsu:
  As my frequency was too low, I replaced the 4k resistor on the 50k pot with a 1k resistor. This raised the frequency to about 5KHz, from the previous 1KHz. But, I think that even if I remove that 1k resistor, and replace it with a 100 ohm resistor, my frequency would still be low.
   Ideally we need 5KHz to 30KHz range. But, to reach that point I'd probably have to change the 50k pot, as well.
   Can it be replaced with a 20K trim pot, instead, if needed. And replace the now current 1k resistor with a 10k resistor, also?
  Your thoughts...

   The duty cycle controller works a bit better now, and shows little to no glitches, while running at the higher frequencies, such as 2.5KHz to the current 5KHz. So, I would think that at the right running frequencies, (15KHz to 27KHz), possibly the signals might be stable.
   I got these readings by using the two 10k resistor on the 24v input from the PSU, going to the fets, with the Fets installed.
   

itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17507 on: July 19, 2017, 10:32:05 PM »

Nick,

The 4K versus the 1K only makes a difference when the series 50K potmeter is set to 0 Ohm.
But if you really have a 1nF (0.001uF) cap for C4 it should have changed the frequency from very high (200KHz) to somewhat lower (130Khz), see
the TL494 data sheet Fig. 1 which shows the relation between the RC used and the frequency (that is with the 50K pot set to 0 Ohm)

With 1nF cap (0.001uF) and 1 to 50K resistors the frequency should operate in the red area, see picture.


If you say you are running between 1 and 5Khz (and still have a 1nF cap), then the resistance should be something like between 300K and 1M Ohm, see the blue area.

OR...... you do NOT have a 1nF cap, but a 10nF (0.01uF)

So double check the C4 cap make sure it really is only 1nF!
If OK, then there must be something wrong with your resistors/pot.  It looks like they have way to much resistance (300 - 1M Ohm) causing the frequency to be so low.

Itsu

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17508 on: July 20, 2017, 02:56:20 AM »
   Itsu:
   Although my C4 cap has always been the same ceramic disk cap which I thought was a 102 (0.001 uf), it is NOT a 102, but a 104 (0.01uf), instead. So, that explains the low frequency readings. 
My eyesight is not what it used to be, either. I had to use a magnifier this time to see the numbers on it more clearly.

  According to the data sheet, TL494 chip is not meant to run at lower frequencies than 1KHz, so that may also explain why my circuit goes haywire when it's readings show less than that lowest 1KHz operating frequency. Which it does anytime it's not at the maximum frequency on the 50k pot.
  So, it looks like you have solved another issue of mine.
Now I wonder if that has anything to do with the fet overheating issue, also.
  I'll change the 104 for a 102, and report back. You've made my day.
                    Thanks, again.
                                           Nick
 
 
   

itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17509 on: July 20, 2017, 10:49:16 AM »

Nick,

ok,  good to know what the problem is, but be aware that a 104 marked capacitor is NOT 0.01uF, but 0.1uF, see this chart:
http://grathio.com/assets/capacitor_tags.pdf

Hopefully this also solves the heating problem with only the 10K Ohm resistors at the drains.


Regards Itsu

MonsieurX

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17510 on: July 20, 2017, 06:30:30 PM »
Hello,

It all started in February of this year 17, the day I received my last bill from the electricity company, I named E.D.F. French Electricity.
I thought my eyes were looking bad and yet.
Retiring at 73, joining both ends of the month is very difficult.
I remembered this invention of Tariel Kapanadze.
English is not my native language, excuse me for the translation via Google.
The Topic contains 17517 messages, scanning as many messages is mission almost impossible.
And this is without counting the fakes, alas.
If you know this topic well, then you can help me clear the terrain.
Find the schema that works, I was electronics technician Radio Phone G.S.M.
The electronics is familiar to me, but this Overunity application is strange to me.
I can go and buy equipment, but I will do it if I can earn a few Kilowatts.
I thank you all for the help you will bring to me.
MonsieurX  ( my name has 2 X )

Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17511 on: July 22, 2017, 09:33:19 PM »
  Well, at least on this thread and its related devices aren't too expensive to replicate. It costs more for the scopes, signal generators, and such, than the actual components and coils to build one of these devices up.

   There are guys that have been financed to continue their tests, such as with Nelson. Who has earned their financial help.
Although his device is a bit different. But, hopefully it will also be able to be upgraded in the near future to produce much higher outputs, which can be used to run cars, bikes, and and possibly even power homes.

  I been able to get some more new fets, and so now I can continue with the tests on my device. I hope that they'll last longer than my last ones did. Those last ones quickly failed without even heating up. First time that has happened, to me.
Anyways, we'll see if the new fets will run cooler, without the overheating problems that I've had previously. As my TL board and fet drivers should be working ok, now.
 

I started to get interested 2017 April, when I suddenly realized that we being fed total bullshit. We are being kept as slaves on this planet and energy is the way to control us.

Now how I see it is that we have had free energy since Tesla and Moray. Gabriel Kron admitted having a negative resistor in 1930. Every once in a while people come up with a concept and they try to get it patented. I can understand that they want to get compensated for their efforts, but the patent office is just a mouse trap so they can find you.

Getting the scopes and shit is a pain, if you don't have them from work. But Tesla did not have scopes and digital signal generators. He just had an idea. We are lucky because we have the Internet. We don't have to send letters across the oceans. What I find the hardest is how few inventors want to share their concepts and principles. People can try shit out without expensive devices, but they need to understand the idea first.

Watching Wesley trying to understand Akula's drawings makes me wonder do I have any change of understanding it myself? I am beginning to wonder if it is the Morgan family and General Electric people who pay for the electricity books in my school. I mean it seems I have to toss everything to the garbage and start over.

I think Akula posted his device in 2011. How come it is so hard to get the information? Kapanadze has not provided any information that I can find. His device seemed to auto tune to  the load.

My current project is to get there the old school way. Tesla Radiant Energy patent -> spark gap -> square wave -> coils -> free energy

itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17512 on: July 22, 2017, 10:12:41 PM »

Hi MonsieurX,


i am sorry to dissappoint you, but there is no Schema that works.

Some people claim they have a working overunity device, but the schema (diagram) they provide never produced a working overunity device by anyone trying to replicate.

So the hunt for an overunity device is still on,   welcome.


Regards Itsu

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17513 on: July 22, 2017, 11:30:32 PM »
    Mr.X: Welcome.
  This type of replication is not an easy one to obtain positive results therefrom. As it requires much persistence, and some expense, as well.  Only a handful of Russians and a few others have been able to obtain any positive results.
   However, if you already have an oscilloscope, multi-meter, signal generator, etz... you can still make an attempt.
   Most guys here have not really made a true replication, but their versions of it, instead. And all the many different schematics posted have not been fully and properly tested. And the replications and different versions that were tested by us here, have not resulted in a self running device, as yet.  This does not always mean that the diagrams or schematic don't work, or are fakes, or lacking some important details. It may mean that the diagrams and schematic were not followed correctly, and the people doing these types of replications have given up trying.
   However, if you need some help, just let us know.
   As far as I'm concerned, there is not better project of this type to follow up on, and try to replicate.
   




   

Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17514 on: July 23, 2017, 12:04:10 AM »
Nick that was a great response, I will not give up as I speak Russian and Polish I have seen the original Kpanadze clip from 2004 (in 2004) and thought that was a body that was being disposed of.


Now pushing 13 and a half years later time is now slipped away and the potential for Kapanadze as he has aged is gone too...



I still peek here so often however myself left to work on mechanical devices ... I get better satisfaction.. and results..


Did I say thanks for all the years here, that is yes.


Acca


Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17515 on: July 23, 2017, 01:26:19 PM »
I just hope Kabanadze and other inventors realize that sitting on these devices will just play into these "J.P Morgan" type magnate's pockets. I understand that an inventor would like compensation for all he years of work he/she has put into the device, but when he is killed does this planet have another 100 years to wait for another invention?

Like I have this modest plan of putting all free energy related stuff out there for free and make something out of the residual inventions that come up in the process. When you play a lot around magnets and devices you come up with lots of stuff not related to free energy.

Free energy must be accompanied by anti-gravity also. I suspect he US already has this and there are couple of "patriots" guarding the Lockheed-Martin hangars. I mean if India and Africa are given free energy we need place to put this people that come out of it. Greed and nationalism will take care of us in the next 100 years, if we don't figure this out.

MonsieurX

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17516 on: July 23, 2017, 05:07:59 PM »
Thanks for the answers.
The failures of our attempts to operate T. K.'s reply is due to our ignorance of the operation of the Ether.
An attempt at explanation was described by a French engineer on the site Karmapolis.
See the link: https://www.karmapolis.be/pipeline/holodynamique.html
It's in French unfortunately for you, but it does not help me any more.
I only remember that there are "particles" vibrating at very high frequency. Hypothesis ?
If it is true, the apparatus of T.K. would come to disrupt these particles and put at our disposal energy.
The key is I think the Nanosecond generator and its frequency, and the width of the pulses.
I will try to collect some material including TL.
Of course I have an oscilloscope + measuring equipment.
Here. What scheme? That of T.K. of origin.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17517 on: July 23, 2017, 10:50:16 PM »
  In this forum thread we are not trying to replicate the Tariel Kapanadze devices. Mainly due to the lack of proper build information.
We have been working on replications from other guys that have shown similar self running devices, but which are showing full schematics as well as videos of their devices.
  If interested please let us know and I can place some youtube links so that you can check them out for yourself.
 
   There is also another thread on this forum, which deals with the actual Kapanadze devices.
   

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17518 on: July 25, 2017, 05:46:16 AM »
  Itsu:
  I've now changed the TL494's previous 104 frequency capacitor, and the #5 pin resistor, to the recommended 102 cap, and a 2.2k resistor.  And now it seams to be working at the proper frequency range. However, my square wave signal now looks like this (below). The sec/div setting is at 20us, in case you can't read it properly.
  Please let me know at what frequency it's running at now at that setting. So that I can compare that to what I think that it is running at.
  Is that wave form normal for a square wave signal, or not? As it's not showing the normal square wave now, as it had been previously.
 
  The upper probe signal is on one mosfet's drain, and the lower signal is on the other mosfet's gate.
The fets are Not firing at the same time now, and the signals readings are the same, or very similar on both fets.

  I'm still running the same duty cycle controls using a 10k resistor through the 50k pot, as it was before. But, the duty cycle readings seam to be slightly lower than 44% or so, compared to what they were previously, at the full duty cycle settings. The setting is at maximum duty cycle.
  If needed I can replace the duty cycle's 10k resistor and 50k trim pot back to the 20k pot that I had on previously, as well as the resistor to a 12k, if needed.
  Below are my scope shots. Let me know what you think.
 

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17519 on: July 25, 2017, 09:52:02 AM »
Nick:

Assuming you have probes positioned properly and no channel inversions going on.... the Drain trace seems to be indicating that the mosfets are not turning OFF very sharply. They are turning ON rapidly which is good. Do you have pull-down resistors between the Drain and Source of the mosfets? And perhaps also between the Pin 2 logic inputs of the 4420 driver chips and Ground (source)?

Since the mosfets work by charging the Gate to turn the mosfet ON, you need to provide a path for the charge to leave the gate in order for the mosfet to turn OFF again. Normally the driver chips can do this, but it looks like they aren't quite keeping up so you may need to experiment with pull-down resistors from Gate to Source to improve the turn-off times.

Mosfet Drain traces can be confusing because with N-channel mosfets the Drain signal should be HIGH when the mosfet is OFF and goes LOW when the mosfet turns ON.

Since you are showing the Gate of one mosfet and the Drain of the other one, the timing looks like it is right, with the Drain of the one mosfet going LOW (turning on) when the other mosfet's gate signal is LOW (turning off). However I am still concerned about the timing (dead time, or overlap). It might be easier to tell if you simply showed both Drains, instead of one Drain and the other Gate.

For capacitor values: when you see a number like 104,  you should read this as "10 and 4 more zeros" in picoFarads. So 104 = 100000 pF, or 100 nF, or 0.1 uF. And 102 means 1000 pF, which is 1 nF or 0.001 uF. 

See my annotations on your scopeshot for determining frequency from the scope trace and timebase setting.