Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11809689 times)

NickZ · « **Reply #17490 on:** July 06, 2017, 11:15:41 PM »

And I also like hearing from you, as well. Just re-reminding you of what this thread is all about, as to not distract from it, and to help to keep it focused and on track.
It's always good to hear your video translations, especially of the non mechanical and non nuclear decay type of devices. As you already know my thoughts concerning those other types of contraptions.

AlienGrey · « **Reply #17491 on:** July 07, 2017, 12:45:40 AM »

Quote from: AlienGrey on July 06, 2017, 02:53:38 PM

this might help Forest and others'.

Look Hoppy I don't think they use hidden battery's can I suggest you sling all your junk in the bin but salvage your TL 494 driver and output stage next get some decent ferrite toroids 50 to 70mm in Dia pick some with high permeability and bifilar wind them with 8 +8 turns of something like 18 to 12 swg copper wire Oh and insulate the toroid with good quality tape first then connect a signal generator and a tuning pulse charging cap in series with the cap and sig gen and look on your scope to find where the signal peaks changing the cap as necessary start with a low value and it will charge in blocks it needs to be between 17khz and 26khz 29 and above is far too high, when you have worked out the series cap connect the toroid to the push-pull driver and again find the new peak again it should peak around 17 to 26 khz then connect up the 4 turn winding and cap to the grenade inductor and sample the grenade secondary to see if you can find the peak in the grenade if it's different something isn't in tune and your windings are not right but if the grenade response is flat and your toroid still peeks your in business with that part. If it gives a crazy wave as if it's into Fero resonance even better.

AG

Thanks for your comments but doing such a video would be very time consuming and i'm assuming you know what you're doing and you have your own components to tune regarding the toroid and grenade should they be wound write !! nothing else

The key here is to find the TRUE resonant frequency of the toroid and the grenade.

AG

stivep · « **Reply #17492 on:** July 07, 2017, 08:29:37 PM »

I do not want to contaminate your discussion but Tariel and others have been dealing with :
1. spark gap
2. plasma
3. high voltage
So there is something that was never I assume mentioned on this forum.
In plasma physics, an upper hybrid oscillation is a mode of oscillation of a magnetized plasma. It consists of a longitudinal motion of the electrons perpendicular to the magnetic field with the dispersion relation

Any electrically oscillating signal (AC) when in variably condensed medium ( plasma, air) should be understood as now electromagnetic in nature acting as a wave.
So for all of these years I was trying to find direct interaction between electromagnetic quantum physics based (photonic) energy and Longitudinal one that is very much promising
for us, as it is mechanical response to a force plasma)
And now there is direct dependency between two of them .
Even proposed by me Electrostatic Pump was using inertial motion of an electrons that was in did motion of mass.
So while you make appreciated by all of us practical experiments,
I strongly believe that learning the process of fundamental mechanisms in its consequence will create guide , a manual - for most of you as easy as like reading manual for assembly of bookshelf from IKEA.
It took thousands of years for humanity to invent a wheel. And now every child can do it.
It was only in the mid-19th century,flush toilet was manufactured for wealthiest.

some links for few of you who care:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_hybrid_oscillation
https://amostech.com/TechnicalPapers/2012/POSTER/SOTNIKOV.pdf
Kinetic theory of plasma waves ( do not have to be paid) but opens and last page so you need to go to first page manually:https://books.google.com/books?id=Che5F-ZdvLQC&pg=PA639&lpg=PA639&dq=Electrostatic+Pump+Theory&source=bl&ots=ZOeDC1m_II&sig=w1ehP7Yv9Awh8KD3PxaeUnzKpVY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjkuO7T0vfUAhXDZj4KHffrDQoQ6AEINzAD#v=onepage&q=Electrostatic%20Pump%20Theory&f=false

http://www-pw.physics.uiowa.edu/~dag/publications/1979_IntenseElectrostaticWavesNearTheUpperHybridResonanceFrequency_JGR.pdf
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/plasma-exp/references/publications/PRL/PRA-11-2057-1975.pdf
Acceleration of mass or reverse(photon production) is evidently missing link at very bottom mechanism of both
- electrostatic conversion and
-electrostatic conversion with electric motor supported conversion mechanism.( such as Tariel Tent Presentation, Tariel in Germany, Tariel in Turkey for Westel presentation, Tariel in wearhouse Tbilisi presentation for president Shevardnadze)

Wesley

NickZ · « **Reply #17493 on:** July 07, 2017, 09:27:49 PM »

More discussions on theory, yet, No tests to prove how these ideas can produce a free energy generator.

You mentioned, plasma, high voltage, and spark gaps. As if these topics have not been looked into or discussed on this thread. However, those topics have not only been discussed here many times, but ongoing tests may still be conducted by some, as well. Along with Earth ground connections, and such.
Maybe ask T-1000 how it went when using spark gap, as Akula had suggested that he should try. The simpler or easier route. And how long that spark gap can last in the open air, before being completely burned up.
Perhaps he didn't follow Akula's advice on that subject.

It seams to me that you are still seeking to understand free energy from the perspective of extraction of energy from preexisting mas. As well as associating photons, electrons, etz... quantum particle physics, which are not "particles", as we know them, at all.
Instead of Aetheric physics, as Tesla has elaborated on.
There have been no free energy devices based on quantum physics, as yet. So you may still have a long road ahead to reach the free energy goal. Such as when trying to extract use able energy by the Colman type devices. Looks like a dead end, as well.

There is nothing "free" about burning mass to release energy. Even burning wood from your back yard to heat your house has negative consequences. But, "it doesn't cost anything", so it's free energy, you say.
We have been burning things up since the cave man era. Maybe it's time to stop burning things in the name of free energy. And to start studying Tesla's ideas of harvesting energy from the Cosmic Soup, and it's invisible Aetheric source.

stivep · « **Reply #17494 on:** July 07, 2017, 10:22:04 PM »

NickZ

Quote

More discussing on theory, yet, No tests to prove how these ideas can produce a free energy generator.

You mentioned, plasma, high voltage, and spark gaps. As if these topics have not been looked into or discussed on this thread. However, those topics have not only been discussed here many times, but ongoing tests are still being conducted by some, as well.
Maybe ask T-1000 how it went when using spark gap, as Akula had suggested that he should try. the easier route. And how long that gap lasted before being completely burned up. Perhaps he didn't follow Akula's advice on that subject. Oh well...

It seams to me that you are still seeking to understand free energy from the perspective of extraction of energy from preexisting mas. As well as associating photons, electrons, etz... quantum particle physics, which are not "particles", as we know them, at all.
Instead of Aetheric physics, as Tesla has elaborated on.
There have been no free energy devices based on quantum physics, as yet. So you may still have a long road ahead to reach the free energy goal. Such as when trying to extract use able energy by the Colman type devices. Looks like a dead end, as well.

There is nothing "free" about burning mass to release energy. We have been burning things up since the cave man era. Maybe it's time to stop burning things up in the name of free energy. And to start studying Tesla's ideas of harvesting energy from the Cosmic Soup, and it's invisible Aetheric source.

Gush my dear Friend ./..
Electricity is quantum based explained. And only quantum based not any other way at its very core.
Your cellphone is based on EM also quantum based explained and not any other way at its very core
Influential function of amplification/interaction taking place, between mechanical longitudinal wave and quantum explained photonic processes, was not yet discussed on this forum (to my knowledge)

Quote

NickZ perspective of extraction of energy from preexisting mass

in a sense it is true.
http://www.jick.net/hr/skept/EMC2/node4.html
That is, one KILOTON's worth of energy is released in the conversion of 0.04658 grams [46.58 mg] of mass.
Thus a MEGATON [equivalent to one million tons of TNT or 10³ kt] is released in the conversion of 46.58 grams of mass;
and the largest thermonuclear device bomb ever detonated, about 100 megatons' worth, converted some 4.658 kg of mass directly into raw energy.

But you do not have to eat at once all food in the can, leave some of it for later. We humans convert small amount energy due to transmutation/ disintegration at one time.
Lithuania experiment was based on extraction energy from mass due to transmutation.
And in here Canadian ad Hungarian scientists clearly state ( wording: due to ..high iron loss) https://youtu.be/yAu297FCjcY?t=884
I was silent here for quite a time no problem Nick ..you a smart guy do whatever you think is the best and thank you for your work

Wesley

NickZ · « **Reply #17495 on:** July 07, 2017, 10:50:47 PM »

Most all commercial energy producing generators are based on the movement of magnets, around coils. Yet, the energy they derive does not come from their movement around each other. As we are told. But, from an external source that make this all possible. Therefore, we are being taught error for fact.
Neither does so called "Sun Light" come to us from the Sun. There is NO light in deep space, nor heat.
Just remember what I said, I know most will not believe it at this time, due to the current brainwashing efforts.
But, you'll see what I mean, in the near future.

However, some of the Russians, and Slavic decendents such as Tesla, didn't buy into that idea, as the true cause of electricity manufacturing. Even though Tesla did produce his own electrical generators based on those ideas, at first. Until he found the real and true cause of the effect of that electricity and its production. Until we also see through the error in the current logic we will not have free energy.

Wesley, we don't need to agree on everything. We just need to find out how to produce what we need for our daily use, without contaminating the environment. Everything can be made from that "Cosmic Soup". Food, water, fuel, gold. Everything.
IF we only knew how... of course if people are taught that it's not possible. And they buy into that idea. Well...
I'm here to prove that Tesla was right. All along. Even if I never reach that goal in my lifetime.
You are a smart guy, also, so don't neglect the truth. Not my just truth, but the real truth.
There are other "ways", and much more to it than just electromagnetism, and currently known Laws.

AlienGrey · « **Reply #17496 on:** July 07, 2017, 11:15:27 PM »

Quote from: NickZ on July 07, 2017, 10:50:47 PM

Most all commercial energy producing generators are based on the movement of magnets, around coils. Yet, the energy they derive does not come from their movement around each other. As we are told. But, from an external source that make this all possible. Therefore, we are being taught error for fact.

Err what's this then ? could you see it I can !

NickZ · « **Reply #17497 on:** July 07, 2017, 11:33:23 PM »

It's called our Sun.
But, it's Not a "nuclear reactor", as we are being told. It's an implosive vortex, (not explosive), such as a nuclear bomb.
Any time that you over amp anything there can be destructive reactions therefrom. The cosmos is being over charged, at this time. Even though our sun is now also going into it's normal dormant 11 year cycle. The input to it from the exterior can result in super novas, etz...
You might ask: Where does the Sun get all it's energy from, in the first place. As nothing can provide energy forever, without receiving it or absorbing it in the first place, or continually. Tesla said that Earth's energy comes from the Sun. But, that is not the whole truth. I look for the cause of causes, as well.

I'm not here to argue what is currently being taught. I'm here to prove that they are very wrong.
And no, I'm not a flat earth idiot, either.
Just give me a chance... Rome wasn't built in a day.

forest · « **Reply #17498 on:** July 08, 2017, 03:11:29 PM »

The main problem is that really nobody having big money is interested to correct the current status quo. It would be as easy as replicate one Figuera generator. Easy cake for the people who have access to manufacturing facility ,scientists, engineers.
It's just as easy as modifying the current generator to rotate only coils mounted on drum-like rotor while fixing the armature and original stator coils. Just convert stator and armature into strong electromagnets.

AlienGrey · « **Reply #17499 on:** July 08, 2017, 05:29:51 PM »

Quote from: forest on July 08, 2017, 03:11:29 PM

The main problem is that really nobody having big money is interested to correct the current status quo. It would be as easy as replicate one Figuera generator. Easy cake for the people who have access to manufacturing facility ,scientists, engineers.
It's just as easy as modifying the current generator to rotate only coils mounted on drum-like rotor while fixing the armature and original stator coils. Just convert stator and armature into strong electromagnets.

Forest did you post it on the wrong thread? only it doesn't work anything like a motor as it has no moving parts I know of, and I'm pretty sure if you know how it works and want to take the risk of upsetting the world petrochemical economy go ahead, PS it's been nice knowing of your existence, and good luck where others have fallen.

NickZ · « **Reply #17500 on:** July 08, 2017, 05:42:53 PM »

Well, at least on this thread and its related devices aren't too expensive to replicate. It costs more for the scopes, signal generators, and such, than the actual components and coils to build one of these devices up.

There are guys that have been financed to continue their tests, such as with Nelson. Who has earned their financial help.
Although his device is a bit different. But, hopefully it will also be able to be upgraded in the near future to produce much higher outputs, which can be used to run cars, bikes, and and possibly even power homes.

I been able to get some more new fets, and so now I can continue with the tests on my device. I hope that they'll last longer than my last ones did. Those last ones quickly failed without even heating up. First time that has happened, to me.
Anyways, we'll see if the new fets will run cooler, without the overheating problems that I've had previously. As my TL board and fet drivers should be working ok, now.

apecore · « **Reply #17501 on:** July 12, 2017, 08:59:22 PM »

Quote from: NickZ on July 08, 2017, 05:42:53 PM

Well, at least on this thread and its related devices aren't too expensive to replicate. It costs more for the scopes, signal generators, and such, than the actual components and coils to build one of these devices up.

There are guys that have been financed to continue their tests, such as with Nelson. Who has earned their financial help.
Although his device is a bit different. But, hopefully it will also be able to be upgraded in the near future to produce much higher outputs, which can be used to run cars, bikes, and and possibly even power homes.

I been able to get some more new fets, and so now I can continue with the tests on my device. I hope that they'll last longer than my last ones did. Those last ones quickly failed without even heating up. First time that has happened, to me.
Anyways, we'll see if the new fets will run cooler, without the overheating problems that I've had previously. As my TL board and fet drivers should be working ok, now.

Good day Nickz,

How are your FET's doing at the moment?
If they still being destroyed without getting hot it would be probaly overvoltage @ DRAIN_SOURCE.

I would if i were you mount some bigger caps for the snubber part, if you aint eliminating the spikes out of the primairy Yoke in a different way.
Else you probaly conitning burning up FET's while adjusting the Duty_Cycle .

Don't be shy.............

Greetings

NickZ · « **Reply #17502 on:** July 12, 2017, 10:21:03 PM »

We'll see. I may have found another problem at the zeners on the fets, and the way that I had mounted them.
I've not seen any spikes, yet.

If Stalker was able to make it work with his push pull, I should be able to, also. If I can only follow the schematics.
He also has his yoke wound differently than mine. All my turns are wound clockwise. His aren't.

Waiting for your beast grenade at work...

stivep · « **Reply #17503 on:** July 15, 2017, 02:40:58 PM »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWnh7FSndow&feature=youtu.be

Wesley

NickZ · « **Reply #17504 on:** July 16, 2017, 05:20:51 AM »

Itsu:
I tested the frequency output of my TL494/UC board with both my scope as well as with my frequency generator.
The scope read right at or around 1kHz, and comparing the wave form to one from my SG, which also showed lightly less than 1Khz, on its square wave 1kHz setting, (on the SG). So, the highest frequency I can output at the fets gates is 1KHz, or thereabouts.
At a previous time I remember being able to hear a higher tone, from the device, and I was also able to raise the tone to where I couldn't hear it. Which for me at about 11.500KHz.+ So, it was working at a higher frequency at one point, but not now.

I'll try another TL494 chip on the IC holder tomorrow and see how it compares to the one I'm running on now.
I wish that I had paid the extra money for the Texas Instruments brand Tl494 chip. Although they'd probably go up in smoke, just the same as the cheaper ones do. Well, you know what I mean...

News:

User Menu