Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  (Read 11719756 times)

zalmoxis

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17235 on: May 29, 2017, 11:43:01 AM »
    Zalmoxis:
   Are you using variable trim pots to adjust the frequency and duty cycle on a TL494 IC circuit?
  If so, you may have damaged or partially burnt them out at certain points on the pot(s).
   
  That is one of the problems that I'm dealing with now. At full duty cycle my 20k trim pot works ok, scope signals are stable and I can vary the frequency no problem. BUT, trying to adjust the duty cycle makes the signals on the scope go haywire.
This was caused by me reversing the input connections by accident, which damaged the 20k pot, along with both (12v and 15v) voltage regulators as well as some of the regulator's filter caps.  So, I'm fixing that problem now.
  Perhaps you have similar "phenomena".  If so, maybe check your trim pots.
  Let me know if that helps to find the problem, or not. 
 I've been getting to know my TL494 circuit, fet drivers, and such, with their problems and strange effects more intimately, now.
 Trying hard not to pull my hair out by the roots...

I've said that i'm working on Sergey Alexeew device, using ir2153 (with variable duty cycle ) + ir2110. No component is damaged. The effect does not involve earth or tesla coil.

zalmoxis

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17236 on: May 29, 2017, 11:53:51 AM »
No matter what kind of schematic we build TL494 , ir2153 .. we consume our time and money with trying to make everything perfect on the oscilloscope, super fine dutycycle tuning, clean signals etc .. but in fact we don't know when this effect should occur, we don't know when, and what to tune. Some of us are crazy on the schematic and pcb, i am crazy about the coil configuration ... i've built about 40 coils till now. No extra output! Used all kind of grounding. Now i use an industrial Lightning rod earthing! Nothing changed.
Have you ever noticed that all working devices, Ruslan, Dniester, Sergey they all first start the device and then they connect the resistive LOAD?
I wonder why? Could it be because a simple battery will not have enough Amps to start the device with load connected? ... OR ... the device should first enter into some kind of "work mode" and then after connecting the loads.
In the last 7 months all the time i've tuned the device with a Bulb load .. never ever tried to tune it without a load. Could this be a point of failure??

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17237 on: May 29, 2017, 12:23:37 PM »
Hi Been doing a few experiments with some of the suggestions going round, thought some of you might be interested this one was done after viewing some of the Tinsel NickZ problems over  the last few months/years ;), which inspired this (talk about nano pulse's ;) from a 494 note in this case 'v' goes up in gain as 'f' goes lower although the resonant 'f' of the core was 29khz (yoke was from an old display monitor delta gun) larger central hole. By using an alternative wind and connection the wave appears EXOR'd by some kind of inversion I mean it's a narrow pulse and no longer a sqr wave ;) I think I will investigate a bit more with this phenomena.

PS NickZ, thanks for pointing out my error. I might do a short vid on this later.

« Last Edit: May 29, 2017, 04:58:01 PM by AlienGrey »

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17238 on: May 29, 2017, 04:28:26 PM »
   Zalmoxis:
   I mentioned nothing about an earth ground, nor Tesla coil effecting your set up.
   There is no logical reason that I can think of that while adjusting the duty cycle or frequency pots the frequency should suddenly JUMP to some other frequency. But, mine does, and the reason is what I have already mentioned. Perhaps your set up works differently. But, my frequency does not suddenly jump to some other frequency, unless, I try to adjust the duty cycle pot. However, the signals can and do get affected and will distort between resonant points. I think that is normal to some extent, cause by the yoke/grenade interactions when connected to the TL494 and fet drivers while sweeping through the different controller settings. Without the yoke connected, the TL circuit and fet driver controllers are NOT affected in that same way, and the signal is steady, without distortions while sweeping through the different ranges.
 
   BTW, I do have some sync between my Kacher and the induction circuits. And the output bulbs do light up brighter when the Kacher is on.
   
   Perhaps you can show us what your "phenomena" looks like on a short video.

   AlienGrey:  I'm not sure what you're trying to point out when you mention,  XO-OR'd?

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17239 on: May 29, 2017, 05:11:44 PM »
No matter what kind of schematic we build TL494 , ir2153 .. we consume our time and money with trying to make everything perfect on the oscilloscope, super fine dutycycle tuning, clean signals etc .. but in fact we don't know when this effect should occur, we don't know when, and what to tune. Some of us are crazy on the schematic and pcb, i am crazy about the coil configuration ... i've built about 40 coils till now. No extra output! Used all kind of grounding. Now i use an industrial Lightning rod earthing! Nothing changed.
Have you ever noticed that all working devices, Ruslan, Dniester, Sergey they all first start the device and then they connect the resistive LOAD?
I wonder why? Could it be because a simple battery will not have enough Amps to start the device with load connected? ... OR ... the device should first enter into some kind of "work mode" and then after connecting the loads.
In the last 7 months all the time i've tuned the device with a Bulb load .. never ever tried to tune it without a load. Could this be a point of failure??

  Because if you don't have proper signals to begin with from the drivers, the rest of the yoke/grenade circuits will not work properly, no matter how you wind your coils. But, you can wind the coils first, then make the driver circuits, as Ruslan has recommended. Since you will need both the coils as well as the load to be able to properly tune the device. As the load is part of the circuit, as well as the earth ground line.
Normally a smaller coil, like a 40 to 60 watt bulb is used to pre-tune the running frequencies. Then later the load can be increased, and the frequencies re-tuned for the larger load.

  You can't really properly tune the device without any load, first. As adding a big load will change the already set up running frequencies and will kill the resonance and the bulbs will die out, or dim. If big load is added from the start of the device the surge is too high and can kill the resonance.
  They have shown that you can turn on the device with some smaller load on, IF, the load is not too much to drive. And if, once started with a smaller load like 300-500 watts, and another 500w load is added on, it will kill the already set up resonance point, and will need to be re-tuned.
 
   We do know what to look for, at least I do. And it is being shown on their videos also. Yet, the bandwidth is very small, and finding that point is no easy matter, either. Everything must be in sync, or it's a no go situation, like most of us are seeing.
  The resonant points should be somewhat close to what they are showing on their video, and not way off from that. But, if your coils are different, so will the resonant point be different. So, it's best to stick with the already shown way of doing it, which has been shown to work for them.

   First thing is to have a working sync between the Kacher signal and the induction circuit frequencies. Without which there will be no "effect" to be seen.
And if the resonant points are not in sync, earth grounding will not help much, either. No matter how long or thick the ground line is.
  Anyways, those are my thoughts and opinions based on what I've seen on my bench. 

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17240 on: May 29, 2017, 05:15:46 PM »
 
 
   AlienGrey:  I'm not sure what you're trying to point out when you mention,  XO-OR'd?

Thanks for pointing that out, On my device if i set my device up to a sqr wave output my amplitude gain is inverted as 'f' goes up so does amplitude as far as my yoke is concerned peeking at about 29khz, that's no good to me as my design is more like 17 to 25 kHz not sure exactly as need more caps to experiment with.  but with my current setup yoke winding, I think I can get what I want 17-25khz. will try to do a quick video to show what's going on later provided nothing changes.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17241 on: May 29, 2017, 06:03:47 PM »
  AG:
  Try adding more WIMA caps on the 3t coil circuit. You normally need at least one 0.47uf 1000v-2000v cap, or two of those caps. Other caps may work also, but, possibly not as well. Geo uses some of his 0.33uf caps, on top of the WIMA caps, and at the outputs. As the WIMA caps are very expensive in comparison.
 
   Akula states that his resonant points were at 17,27, and 37KHz. But, each self running device has been shown running at different frequencies. So don't try to replicate their resonant points, but look for where the sync happens on your device, instead. You'll know when you hit it, as the output will increase by quite a bit, and will drop when you pass it. Test with a load and ground line attached. Ground line going to the Kacher also, as those are not just small details.
 
   You should not have that kind of ringing on the square wave signal, as it should be abrupt, and not continuing to ring.

   I also see the signal inverting at certain frequencies, but no idea as to why it does that, as yet.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17242 on: May 29, 2017, 11:46:01 PM »

Bat1Robin2

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17243 on: May 30, 2017, 07:11:51 AM »
Pulse width input is generally energy input if no other changes are made. so therefore once enough energy is given to a system then a less efficient resonant multiple point can be seen ringing on the output. Also as pulse width increases it begins to deny or reject higher resonant frequencies. This is because it is more of a thud than a ding if that makes sense.  I seem to find that a pulse width of 25 -33%or so of the frequency your trying to efficiently ring is most efficient.  I bet the higher frequency ring output will begin to be seen as pulse width is being decreased. Following this theory a pulse width of 200 ns should ring my tesla 1.25mhz = (800 ns cycle time) most efficiently however im hitting a limit at 500 ns on my circuit capability. And my low speed arduino is limiting my input frequency range to 40 khz. i cant seem to get florescent to light well until i go clear into the 4 us pulse width. I already reported my most efficient yoke freq and pulse width before. This is just my opinion and does not mean anything important just trying to contribute my point of view. Not one single thing i have seen yet seems to be unusual. I may try and external generator input to see what happens at a higher frequency input and keep the 500 ns pulse width.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17244 on: May 30, 2017, 03:38:13 PM »
  Bat1Robin2:
  Perhaps then you should abandon the use of the arduino and build the TL494 board with the TC4420 fet driver circuit that most all the self running devices are using now. There may be other ways to go at it, but you'll be on your own if you go that route. And it would be best to be able to compare notes, and get up to speed on the same circuit.

   What I'm seeing when I view Itsu's last video of his circuit replication, is that something happens when he goes off resonance, the signal totally gets distorted, and does not work at all, then cleans up again at the next resonant point. I don't know if this is normal or not, but I am seeing the same or similar thing on my device. Perhaps someone can comment on that. As we have not seen the same effect shown on the supposed working self runners, as they have not been showing what happens when sweeping through the full duty cycle and frequency ranges on their devices on a scope, as a comparison to what some of us are seeing on ours.

   
 

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17245 on: May 31, 2017, 12:03:53 AM »
Hmm i did some software for 16f84 20mhz one it had no trouble doing the waveforms but once HV pulses EMF were reached it would go mad ;) EMP ;) they can't cope with it, perhaps EMP is the key don't know/

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17246 on: May 31, 2017, 01:40:47 AM »
   20MHz is way to high for either the Kacher or the induction circuits.
   Induction circuit should run at something like 15- 27Khz and the Kacher 1-2MHz.
   Don't know you mean by 16f84 20MHz.

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17247 on: May 31, 2017, 02:23:10 AM »
   20MHz is way to high for either the Kacher or the induction circuits.
   Induction circuit should run at something like 15- 27Khz and the Kacher 1-2MHz.
   Don't know you mean by 16f84 20MHz.
The 16f84 is an old microchip, microcontroller look it up it divides the clock by 4 so you have 5 usec blocks in time to play with, you don't have to use 20 Mhz clock you can use any freq you want it just means 20mhz is the maximum clock speed its totally programmable and dead cheap. I think Microchip are now into the satanic darker side of things now like chipping people with the bloody things oil barons and their cronies so I'm told.

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17248 on: May 31, 2017, 02:55:58 PM »
Hi all,

In addition to the input of AlienGrey and zalmoxis, there is no difference what you feed into low frequency part.
The heart of device is the Tesla coil which is making same conditions as pre-lightning in the rain.
I was also told several times by akula and others, the Tesla Radiant receiver (patent US685957 -  https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-685958-method-utilizing-radiant-energy ) is a simple way to detect right conditions when it is near top load of the Tesla coil and the potential on "live" wire is always positive in relation to the ground. No matter what polarity is on the Tesla coil, it never changes on the right frequency with sharp dischage and the right voltage. I was also told by akula, that potential stays for quite long time after Tesla coil is switched off..
It is the electricity harvested from the air charges on those devices!
So here are clues what to look for before going down another rabbit hole with the LC resonances and more complex circuitry.

Cheers!

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #17249 on: May 31, 2017, 05:12:33 PM »
   T-1000 and All.
   If it's so simple to produce the proper effects, and you mention it doesn't really matter if an arduino or some other controller circuit is used for the induction circuits, then why have you not been able to obtain any positive results, and produce a self runner? After all these years...
   
   Also, if commercially ready made controller circuits can be used just as well as the fairly complex ones that Akula and Ruslan (Oleg) and others are having to create, then why are they not using them, instead of spending time, so much time to invent their own?
   
   At one time it was thought that the Tesla coil could not be frequency controlled other than by adding or removing turns on the secondary coil, etz.
 Now we see that that is not the case. Yet, every single Tesla coil of all the self runners devices are running at different frequencies, and use different sized secondary coil.
Also, IF potential is still left on the Tesla coil once the input power is switched off, then why is it not showing up on the scope, or anywhere else?

   The only way that I can accept your thoughts and statements, is by proving them to be right, by showing a self runner, or at least showing what you mean. 

   As I mentioned, if each and every one of you guys want to try to invent your own way of achieving the desired result, by all means, go at it.
But, you'll be own your own...
    Also, keep in mind that even Kapanadze, who started this whole thing, was not the inventor of his circuits. Which Akula, Ruslan, and every one else showing self running devices have based their working versions on.

   Theories are fine, so long as they are backed by positive proof.  Otherwise it's just more and more unsubstantiated talk, with no one building anything to show for it.
   BTW: Tesla never mentioned that energy is coming from the air, nor the ground. He said is was drawn from the "surrounding ambient", in reference to the Aether, and not the physical properties of air nor the Earth.  Aether is ever present everywhere. Although we have no way to detect it, as yet.

   I will make another video of my device, soon. It seems to be working better now.