Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  (Read 11717926 times)

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16020 on: November 23, 2016, 10:41:29 PM »
My dear Wesley.

With the assistance of Verpies I did several videos looking at ferrite using piezo stimulation. Starting here....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPV89JWVdtY

Four in between....

Finishing here....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TTM414t_zI

It was however, 3 years ago, much water has flowed down the river of life!   ;)

With all best wishes, Graham.
Hi please bear in mind the piezo device is a pressure wave device and therefore a longitudinal transmitting device !

Regards A G

lost_bro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
    • youtube channel
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16021 on: November 23, 2016, 11:56:47 PM »
quite intriguing  as long as I can remember , when ferrite starts to make noise "no one" of you guys thought about nature of noise, the very mechanism of noise, the very latices response  and form of this
response
Nobody of you I think thought about mechanical vibration of ferrite  dipoles as gazillions of small particles of iron( not always only iron but doping  of other materials) that responses according to Longitudinal Wave principals.
so think guys,
I'm just striping you and anyone else from ability to patent it ever  by posting that little  small set of words here.
Thank you NickZ and Verpies for joined effort in new frontiers struggle to give it to humanity..

That also means give it out to bunch of idiots, ignorant "fricken lambada  flat brains" who have no other sense of being on this planet   but to trash it , use it and abuse it.,
If some of you are offended with statement I say recycle yourself from trash to  the value respected by others who fly higher than you. Never equalize yourself with  level you belong  to.
I'm not educated in many areas ( medicine) But I'm not an IGNORANT to it.
The problem I  see  is that you tend to skip what I write unless there is money in it or personal  immediate gain  visible noticeably  at your perception  level . You want to be and idiot be my guest  go dance Lambada with bunch of other idiots.
However I'm OK with it.

==============================================================================================================

Particles bonded in ferrite  starts mechanically move in this bonding compound.
Mechanical movement is slow in its response but slow "in  going to rest"
stimulating  forces are enormously fast.
 electrical  or electromagnetic stimulating force impacts ferrite and
-if it is electrical than it is causing magnetic field around the conductor that is in Near Field to interact with  metal filings in ferrite  redirecting magnetic dipoles into ordered fashion response.
-if it is electromagnetic in Near field = the response will be near the same


Properties of single grain of  ferrite:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_(magnet)
-vibration means movement of magnetic dipole that is switched to its newly set direction
-moving "magnet" ( the magnetic dipole known as magnetic domain) induces both  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_domain
a.  electric current in the conductor( and that can be the same conductor that was previously making mechanical and magnetic response of that grain!!in ferrite( magnetic dipole aligment)
b.  mechanical response of other magnetically active metals or other domains in within the same ferrite or ferrites in close field vicinity

Now we  are dealing with conflict of responses that can
a. add to concentration of energy but now mostly according to longitudinal wave properties ( and mechanical resonances)
b  subtract or  transfer  energy to  another form  e.g. electrical gain in the conductor in Near Field  with creation of  electrical resonances
c. if not tuned to utilize the responses it shows total losses and energy dissipation in form of heat.

And now we are ready for NMR to come to play...

The more  I think about Lithuania Experiment the more clear and consistent  is for me picture of energy extraction .
At this point  the little  addition of controlling force like  Neutron gun  or beta, alpha emitter could be sufficient enough  similar to mechanical analogy of the guy who suck fuel from the neighbor car tank using small tubing . All he needs is one single suck ( one impulse at the beginning) and than gravity  is doing  all of the job.
at the  end  the guy did not pay for fuel  and did not pay for  fuel flow. ( Tariel Kapanadze one impulse from battery)

...
The difference of potential  in electrostatic concept devices  according to my incomplete  as of yet Electrostatic Pump Theory
acts as a "bait" to electrons from the ground.
Motion is creative not  a balance . Balance is mostly form of rest and not a form  of work present http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/energy/Lesson-1/Definition-and-Mathematics-of-Work
So if Electrostatic HV potential is delivered in impulses it creates electron response having significant inertia.( between the impulses)
Even if  mass of an electron is small than volume ( addition) of all of the inertial motion usually is manifested somehow e.g heat dissipated by that conductor  (increase of the current)

and here is interesting moment .

 once we established that first impulse from battery( the first force) creates  current in the conductor raped around ferrite core,   than  if that is nano second impulse than it creates response from magnetic domains  of every  grain of metal in the ferrite. Than magnetic moment is flipping to align itself  ( you can even  hear it) ( you can dis-align it  with knocking it  with the hummer)
Now delta T of that mechanical response being slow has delay factor  in respect to fast changing  electrical impulses.
The delayed mechanical change gives with delay additional electrical energy than if that is coordinated with inertia of electrons flowing from the ground towards HV electrostatic potential  now we only need to find what that  energy to sustain  the motion is coming from..

- NMR?



Wesley

Going with that  somehow convoluted thoughts we can make answer  very quick of how to build Free of Charge  energy Device 
-

Good day Wesley,
Maybe I shouldn't rise to the bait:  but..............

Hello All:
I believe this to be relevant concerning ferroresonance and dimensional resonance:
and in relation to AC power systems:

"Ferro-resonance can generate overvoltages of upto 12 times line to ground source voltage upon opening a single phase device or poorly synchronised 3 phase device. Voilent failure can occur exposing personnel to the high voltage failure and accompanying conditions. Ferro-resonance conditions can result in damage to lightning arresters, switching devices, buried cable, transformers and associated equipment.
Ferro-resonance can be initiated when all of the following elements are present and the switching means at the dip point or takes off when a single phase device or an unsynchronised 3 phase device that does not operate all phases within 1/2 cycle.
1.System grounded at the source, but with no ground at the transformer bank
2. Shielded cable length or overhead conductor length sufficient to create the capacitance necessary
3. Transformer size that permits saturation of the iron core at the operating voltage
4. Transformer unloaded or lightly loaded.
Prevention or control of ferro-resonance can be by:
1. Using wye-wye transformer withboth neutrals grounded and tied to systems neutral
2. Using only phase-to-neutral (not phase-to-phase) transformers connections for single pahse transformers.
3. Limiting length of underground cable
4. For poorly synchronised switching devices, extra resistive load of 2% of the transformer capacity on underground cable. "
Ref:www.tpub.com/doeelecsafety/electri... safety

Food for thought, and it does correlate with the Russian stories of the cores self-destructing after a short runtime:

take care, peace
lost_bro

Actually we had discussed in depth the relative possible origins of the *screaming* Russian Ferrites a couple of years ago.   The above was just one of my posts in relation to Ferro-resonance and *possible* related phenomenon.
This post was made during the discussion pertaining to Akula and his perpetual 30watt LED.  I really don't remember now if we spoke of this on this thread because the 'Grenade/inductor'-Tesla Coil does NOT use Ferrite.

take care, peace
lost_bro

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16022 on: November 24, 2016, 12:25:26 AM »
  Verpies:
  Concerning the suggested magnet test on the ferrite yoke core for observing if there is any NMR involved to my device. As I've mentioned and shown in my videos, I use a magnetite magnet in or on my yoke core most all the time. Yet, the reaction that I've noticed is an increase of output at the bulbs, higher output throughout the coils, and not a diminishing effect, as you mentioned. Although I can also adjust the magnet to do just the opposite, as well, but as that is not the idea, I tune for maximum output gain, using the magnet, instead.
  So, in relation to your suggestion of the magnet test on the ferrite yoke core, what are your thoughts and ideas concerning the above mentioned results.

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16023 on: November 24, 2016, 12:25:11 PM »
  Verpies:
  Concerning the suggested magnet test on the ferrite yoke core for observing if there is any NMR involved to my device. As I've mentioned and shown in my videos, I use a magnetite magnet in or on my yoke core most all the time. Yet, the reaction that I've noticed is an increase of output at the bulbs, higher output throughout the coils, and not a diminishing effect, as you mentioned. Although I can also adjust the magnet to do just the opposite, as well, but as that is not the idea, I tune for maximum output gain, using the magnet, instead.
  So, in relation to your suggestion of the magnet test on the ferrite yoke core, what are your thoughts and ideas concerning the above-mentioned results.
N M R National Milk Records ? I hate lazy terminology when you mean Nuk Mag Res !
Just get your Sig Gen on it and your Scope on the other end and see where the peaks are! anyway
 not all Res fits all ! But your after a conveyor belt production line once you have it going.
In a way your spending your winnings and you don't yet have a ticket :D
The other thing is If there is no such thing as free energy or a free meal, where did the Universe come from ???

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16024 on: November 24, 2016, 12:47:38 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r40h66qiF5I

 βNMR at ISAC is about 10 orders of magnitude more sensitive than a conventional NMR experiment.
http://bnmr.triumf.ca/


http://www.brynmawr.edu/chemistry/Chem/mnerzsto/The_Basics_Nuclear_Magnetic_Resonance%20_Spectroscopy_2.htm


https://groups.nscl.msu.edu/becola/bnmr.html
The polarized RIB is stopped on a surface of a single crystal under a strongmagnetic, applied parallel to the polarization axis to maintain the polarization in the crystal. Anapplication of a radio frequency (RF) can induce transition of between adjacent Zeeman levels at the resonant frequency (Larmor Frequency

there is no need for complicated electronics  beta is beta and emits like beta
neutron emitter is used for energy production and for "making"  atoms  to decay
and that decay can be also in betas

to make  neutron "gun"  it takes few minutes of work

all we need is a self powered stimulator/power supply  of nano impulse generator




Wesley

magpwr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1168
    • Youtube Channel
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16025 on: November 24, 2016, 01:12:14 PM »
Good day Wesley,
Maybe I shouldn't rise to the bait:  but..............

Actually we had discussed in depth the relative possible origins of the *screaming* Russian Ferrites a couple of years ago.   The above was just one of my posts in relation to Ferro-resonance and *possible* related phenomenon.
This post was made during the discussion pertaining to Akula and his perpetual 30watt LED.  I really don't remember now if we spoke of this on this thread because the 'Grenade/inductor'-Tesla Coil does NOT use Ferrite.

take care, peace
lost_bro

hi  lost_bro,

Regarding Akula and his perpetual 30watt LED using "Sony" Flyback core which is a perfect match merely by comparing various core design some time ago.

I think none in this forum even come close  in getting 2 TL494 to talk to each other via the positive rail :D .If you tune it right the output of one of the TL494 would produce a interrupter pulse. 

Sadly no one as usual in this forum even with the Akula circuit presented in front of your eyes is unable to crack the "simple circuit riddle".What many complaint their stupid both TL494 are both producing 2 different frequencies.In this case i don't blame the circuit it is just the way people do things here.

There are members whom can do much better presentation than i do with a phone in my hand but sadly they choose to listen to the mass and carry out their experiment.So be it.

Base on your electronic experience i am sure you will have enough patience to tune one the TL494 such that it just started firing interrupter pulse while the other TL494 is already producing double pulse in one go at lower frequency.

Yes i have got past the point like 7volts in and 12volts out so that the white led starts lighting and still show 0.00Amp reading in my variable supply.Very very close but not self runner yet.
For BEMF recovery just do the reverse highest peak should not be connected to the positive it's the other way around for Akula case. :D :D :D

Because at that time my theory is Akula would likely created micro fractures or "micro cavity" inside the ferrite core likely by dipping in hot oil and then cooling(dipping in hot water) action maybe once or repeat up to 3 times.

The thing is i only got one Sony core and one shot at this which i have paid i think around  60usd for the flyback transformer. :o

Simple trick to remove core from flyback transformer is to heat using hair dryer or better still point heat gun at core for few minutes. It's a much better solution.

May the electrons be with you. :D

You got one shot to prove me there is interrupter pulse before i can continue further. :D


 

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16026 on: November 24, 2016, 03:15:38 PM »
hi  lost_bro,

Regarding Akula and his perpetual 30watt LED using "Sony" Flyback core which is a perfect match merely by comparing various core design some time ago.

I think none in this forum even come close  in getting 2 TL494 to talk to each other via the positive rail :D .If you tune it right the output of one of the TL494 would produce a interrupter pulse. 

Sadly no one as usual in this forum even with the Akula circuit presented in front of your eyes is unable to crack the "simple circuit riddle".What many complaint their stupid both TL494 are both producing 2 different frequencies.In this case i don't blame the circuit it is just the way people do things here.

There are members whom can do much better presentation than i do with a phone in my hand but sadly they choose to listen to the mass and carry out their experiment.So be it.

Base on your electronic experience i am sure you will have enough patience to tune one the TL494 such that it just started firing interrupter pulse while the other TL494 is already producing double pulse in one go at lower frequency.

Yes i have got past the point like 7volts in and 12volts out so that the white led starts lighting and still show 0.00Amp reading in my variable supply.Very very close but not self runner yet.
For BEMF recovery just do the reverse highest peak should not be connected to the positive it's the other way around for Akula case. :D :D :D

Because at that time my theory is Akula would likely created micro fractures or "micro cavity" inside the ferrite core likely by dipping in hot oil and then cooling(dipping in hot water) action maybe once or repeat up to 3 times.

The thing is i only got one Sony core and one shot at this which i have paid i think around  60usd for the flyback transformer. :o

Simple trick to remove core from flyback transformer is to heat using hair dryer or better still point heat gun at core for few minutes. It's a much better solution.

May the electrons be with you. :D

You got one shot to prove me there is interrupter pulse before i can continue further. :D

Wesley

What happened earlier on I was reading your blog about ferrite and John Baldini saying Russian ferrite was special, and Overunity crashed now it's gone, can't find it ! Did you change your mind ?

Magpower

Interesting idea of yours, I'm a bit confused on how you Link the two TL494 I can't see how the two devices are 'synchronised' I looked at this myself 3 or 4 years ago but took it no further as reports were it was suspected as another scam, re the flyback transformers, I have some ferrite including the device Akula used it didn't work, what sort of frequency are we talking about when the resonance is suppose to occur ? and or any other useful tips you might have.

Here is a pointer for the TL494 data sheet b http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/5775/MOTOROLA/TL494.html
« Last Edit: November 24, 2016, 10:35:56 PM by AlienGrey »

lost_bro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
    • youtube channel
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16027 on: November 25, 2016, 01:56:10 AM »
hi  lost_bro,

Regarding Akula and his perpetual 30watt LED using "Sony" Flyback core which is a perfect match merely by comparing various core design some time ago.

I think none in this forum even come close  in getting 2 TL494 to talk to each other via the positive rail :D .If you tune it right the output of one of the TL494 would produce a interrupter pulse. 

Sadly no one as usual in this forum even with the Akula circuit presented in front of your eyes is unable to crack the "simple circuit riddle".What many complaint their stupid both TL494 are both producing 2 different frequencies.In this case i don't blame the circuit it is just the way people do things here.

There are members whom can do much better presentation than i do with a phone in my hand but sadly they choose to listen to the mass and carry out their experiment.So be it.

Base on your electronic experience i am sure you will have enough patience to tune one the TL494 such that it just started firing interrupter pulse while the other TL494 is already producing double pulse in one go at lower frequency.

Yes i have got past the point like 7volts in and 12volts out so that the white led starts lighting and still show 0.00Amp reading in my variable supply.Very very close but not self runner yet.
For BEMF recovery just do the reverse highest peak should not be connected to the positive it's the other way around for Akula case. :D :D :D

Because at that time my theory is Akula would likely created micro fractures or "micro cavity" inside the ferrite core likely by dipping in hot oil and then cooling(dipping in hot water) action maybe once or repeat up to 3 times.

The thing is i only got one Sony core and one shot at this which i have paid i think around  60usd for the flyback transformer. :o

Simple trick to remove core from flyback transformer is to heat using hair dryer or better still point heat gun at core for few minutes. It's a much better solution.

May the electrons be with you. :D

You got one shot to prove me there is interrupter pulse before i can continue further. :D

Good day MagPwr.

I will give you credit on the observation regarding the Chinese D.S. replication by 'Salty Citrus';  ie; the 3825 IC chip being used  to generate a nano-pulse by using sub-prime voltage levels @ Vcc.  Good observation :D

So........ have attached a diagram of the Akula double TL-494 circuit (Miller clamped).  This was NOT the circuit that we experimented with.  We experimented with the Single TL-494 30watt circuit (see attached) that used an EE-ETD49 core, not the Flyback core you speak of.  The Flyback core was used in the double TL-494 circuit.

Being that I have not experimented with the circuit you are speaking of, I will comment from observation of the attached schematic:  I see that the bottom MOSFET has an *Active Miller Clamp* in the form of a PNP transistor. This type of application of a PNP transistor allows for a faster discharging of the MOSFET gate-source internal capacitance at turn-off (Signal low).  It is kind of odd that only ONE of the TWO MOSFETs have this clamp addition... Unless it is for a reason ;)

Why is that?  Along the lines of your suggestion that one of the two Mosfets be switched ON/OFF very abruptly in order to generate a super short switching time (interrupter), It makes sense that the lower MOSFET is the FET that is *fast Switched* and that PNP clamping transistor supports a much faster *turn-off* speed than the upper MOSFET without the clamp. So you could be on the right track. Does this second fast switched TL-494 also use a marginal VCC to instigate the fast switching?

I would like to find the possible mechanism(interrupter) for the attached single TL-494 30watt AKULA schematic. We spent much time on that circuit to no avail.
Guess we could of used your help with that one MagPwr.

take care, peace
lost_bro

EDIT: sorry to going OFF thread.........

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16028 on: November 25, 2016, 03:43:41 AM »

Wesley

What happened earlier on I was reading your blog about ferrite and John Baldini saying Russian ferrite was special,

Magpower


I was just giving you an answer for the past  half of an hour  and my computer crashed.After rebooting I lost my work  on this post.
 I'm going to make it short..
No I did not  change my mind.Just some ideas around the subject. Some other thoughts.

Wesley

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16029 on: November 25, 2016, 04:33:47 AM »
So, in relation to your suggestion of the magnet test on the ferrite yoke core, what are your thoughts and ideas concerning the above mentioned results.
Since you do not have working device that test is inconclusive.

Your device is clearly sensitive to magnetic fields.  The question is why?  Is it a simple permeability modulation of the Yoke's core or something else?  The former will manifest as the classical BH curve distortion.

If you can make the tuning suboptimal without the magnet and optimal with the magnet, then it is just a matter of shifting the optimal point as there are internal magnetic fields to account for, besides the field of the PM.

The first question is what is the magnet influencing? I assume the answer is: "the Yoke's core"
The second question is how is it influencing it?  How sensitive is the frequency to the? magnet's orientation and proximity?

Note how sensitive the water magnetometer is to external magnetic fields.

magpwr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1168
    • Youtube Channel
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16030 on: November 25, 2016, 01:18:01 PM »
Good day MagPwr.

I will give you credit on the observation regarding the Chinese D.S. replication by 'Salty Citrus';  ie; the 3825 IC chip being used  to generate a nano-pulse by using sub-prime voltage levels @ Vcc.  Good observation :D

So........ have attached a diagram of the Akula double TL-494 circuit (Miller clamped).  This was NOT the circuit that we experimented with.  We experimented with the Single TL-494 30watt circuit (see attached) that used an EE-ETD49 core, not the Flyback core you speak of.  The Flyback core was used in the double TL-494 circuit.

Being that I have not experimented with the circuit you are speaking of, I will comment from observation of the attached schematic:  I see that the bottom MOSFET has an *Active Miller Clamp* in the form of a PNP transistor. This type of application of a PNP transistor allows for a faster discharging of the MOSFET gate-source internal capacitance at turn-off (Signal low).  It is kind of odd that only ONE of the TWO MOSFETs have this clamp addition... Unless it is for a reason ;)

Why is that?  Along the lines of your suggestion that one of the two Mosfets be switched ON/OFF very abruptly in order to generate a super short switching time (interrupter), It makes sense that the lower MOSFET is the FET that is *fast Switched* and that PNP clamping transistor supports a much faster *turn-off* speed than the upper MOSFET without the clamp. So you could be on the right track. Does this second fast switched TL-494 also use a marginal VCC to instigate the fast switching?

I would like to find the possible mechanism(interrupter) for the attached single TL-494 30watt AKULA schematic. We spent much time on that circuit to no avail.
Guess we could of used your help with that one MagPwr.

take care, peace
lost_bro

EDIT: sorry to going OFF thread.........

hi lost_bro,

It seems i have never looked into that circuit before.
I think there is a video for this device and i have never saved that link before.

It would be nice if you can pass me the old video link somewhere from youtube for me to look into.

I leave it to you if you want to private message me or post it in the other Akula device topic created previously.
This is one of the I/C which was spotted on Akula device.

Take note of timezone over here is about 12hr ahead of USA.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16031 on: November 25, 2016, 03:21:56 PM »
Since you do not have working device that test is inconclusive.

Your device is clearly sensitive to magnetic fields.  The question is why?  Is it a simple permeability modulation of the Yoke's core or something else?  The former will manifest as the classical BH curve distortion.

If you can make the tuning suboptimal without the magnet and optimal with the magnet, then it is just a matter of shifting the optimal point as there are internal magnetic fields to account for, besides the field of the PM.

The first question is what is the magnet influencing? I assume the answer is: "the Yoke's core"
The second question is how is it influencing it?  How sensitive is the frequency to the? magnet's orientation and proximity?

Note how sensitive the water magnetometer is to external magnetic fields.

  Verpies:  Ok, thanks for your reply.
  Are you saying that to study the affects of NAR or NMR the devices has to be self running, or what exactly? As my system is running, but not self running, as I haven't even tried to do that yet.
  First question:  The magnet is affecting the magnetic domains of the yoke core, and that is also affecting whole system, not just the yoke, as are the HV/HF interactions.
  Second question: The frequency response to the magnet is very sensitive.  The frequency can be altered, and the output voltage and wave forms as well. Even placing the magnet a couple of inches away from the yoke. Magnet orientation is also affecting the wave forms, and it's somewhat tricky finding the best location and orientation of the magnet, or magnets. Adding more magnetite magnets also can produce an even higher output, than just using a single magnet.
  I can't get the same output without the use of the magnet on the yoke core, as I can with it. No matter what I do to tune the device. However, sometimes neither the magnet nor adding ferrite into the grenade former tube will produce a better output.
So, it seams to matter how the system set up, and where its normal running frequencies are at, if these things will add to the output, or not.  In my case they do help, but that may not be the case with other devices.

Bat1Robin2

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16032 on: November 25, 2016, 04:58:24 PM »
Hoppy, its funny how we talk about yoke fet interrupted over a year ago and then someone says no one notices.
Finally confirmed on the bench that a 50/50 drive on the yoke is far less efficient than about 43% duty cycle drive making sure to give a few microseconds of pause between each push and pull.  Its a dramatic increase and is the same effect that i have seen from the tesla nano second pulse, that does the interrupting the yoke fet in mid drive. As you back away from a 50 50 drive the output increases while input decreases. Just simply giving time for the magnetic field to begin to collapse on its own rather than drive it immediately nothing special. Arduino micro controller can indeed do the drive signals if you use the direct port control of the outputs and use its internal timer to maintain exact frequency and timing. I am using Yoke drive only and seeing a dramatic effect of increased output while at the same time less input.  Arduino can be cheap programmable signal generator for $5.00. I am setting up 3rd output to drive tesla nano second driver later on after this is fully explored. Also plan to experiment with one shorter signal than the other. for example short push and long pull. Probably will find nothing but easy to do. Also noticed a large magnet 4x6x1 ferrite about 2 inches away from the yoke increases output slightly any closer and it decreases output.
Program:
  Timer1.initialize(108);                        //  preseting freqency at startup repeats every 108 microseconds
  Timer1.attachInterrupt(yokedrive);   // yokedrive sequence
// This interrupt will turn on and off FET yoke drive. A driver ic located in front of each fet to sharpen the signals.

void yokedrive(void)
{
PORTD |= 1<<5;      // sets output bit 2 high DRIVE FET (push) on
delayMicroseconds (35);
PORTD &= ~(1<<5);   // sets output bit 2 low OFF
delayMicroseconds (18);
PORTB |= 1<<2;      // sets output bit 2 high DRIVE FET (pull) off
delayMicroseconds (35);
PORTB &= ~(1<<2);   // sets output bit 2 low OFF
  }                 //this is natural pause here of about 18 microseconds until next yoke drive sequence.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/MINI-USB-Nano-V3-0-ATmega328P-CH340G-5V-16M-Micro-controller-board-Arduino-T1-/121752070343?hash=item1c58fd28c7:g:OoQAAOSw3ydV60zz

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16033 on: November 25, 2016, 05:27:34 PM »
lost_bro


How this active miller clamp can be extended for two fets connected together to make bi-directional switch, which can work also wit AC signal ? I see the important to clamp signal immediately and in both directions, but the DC SSR's are slow.

lost_bro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
    • youtube channel
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #16034 on: November 25, 2016, 05:37:45 PM »
Hoppy, its funny how we talk about yoke fet interrupted over a year ago and then someone says no one notices.
Finally confirmed on the bench that a 50/50 drive on the yoke is far less efficient than about 43% duty cycle drive making sure to give a few microseconds of pause between each push and pull.  Its a dramatic increase and is the same effect that i have seen from the tesla nano second pulse, that does the interrupting the yoke fet in mid drive. As you back away from a 50 50 drive the output increases while input decreases. Just simply giving time for the magnetic field to begin to collapse on its own rather than drive it immediately nothing special. Arduino micro controller can indeed do the drive signals if you use the direct port control of the outputs and use its internal timer to maintain exact frequency and timing. I am using Yoke drive only and seeing a dramatic effect of increased output while at the same time less input.  Arduino can be cheap programmable signal generator for $5.00. I am setting up 3rd output to drive tesla nano second driver later on after this is fully explored. Also plan to experiment with one shorter signal than the other. for example short push and long pull. Probably will find nothing but easy to do. Also noticed a large magnet 4x6x1 ferrite about 2 inches away from the yoke increases output slightly any closer and it decreases output.
Program:
  Timer1.initialize(108);                        //  preseting freqency at startup repeats every 108 microseconds
  Timer1.attachInterrupt(yokedrive);   // yokedrive sequence
// This interrupt will turn on and off FET yoke drive. A driver ic located in front of each fet to sharpen the signals.

void yokedrive(void)
{
PORTD |= 1<<5;      // sets output bit 2 high DRIVE FET (push) on
delayMicroseconds (35);
PORTD &= ~(1<<5);   // sets output bit 2 low OFF
delayMicroseconds (18);
PORTB |= 1<<2;      // sets output bit 2 high DRIVE FET (pull) off
delayMicroseconds (35);
PORTB &= ~(1<<2);   // sets output bit 2 low OFF
  }                 //this is natural pause here of about 18 microseconds until next yoke drive sequence.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/MINI-USB-Nano-V3-0-ATmega328P-CH340G-5V-16M-Micro-controller-board-Arduino-T1-/121752070343?hash=item1c58fd28c7:g:OoQAAOSw3ydV60zz

Good day Bat1Robin2

Nice, Interrupt Service Routine with direct PORT manipulation, much faster response than coding via the  Arduino GUI.

Please keep us updated as to your progress......  I have had problems before with  RF interference when driving logic is from a Micro controller source.   Good shielding techniques, ie; Arduino inside a Grounded Aluminum enclosure & all signal wires bundled/twisted and as short as possible seems to do the trick.
Try a ferrite bead on the Positive of the bundled pair feedback wires, close the the microcontroller board.

thanks for sharing.
take care, peace
lost_bro