Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  (Read 11717601 times)

lost_bro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
    • youtube channel
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15960 on: November 21, 2016, 03:14:54 PM »
hi everyone,

I have just uploaded my latest prototype circuit into youtube-

High efficiency tesla driver circuit with interrupter 2.0
.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU2rMlRpCNA

Resonance frequency of test tesla coil is less than 2Mhz at around 110turns with Akula design with few turns of high Q coil at the top portion.

Using mere 12.8volts i have achieved internet highest "88volts" per turn at the tesla secondary coil using around 1.6Amps only.
The hv mica capacitor connected  in parallel with 3 turns primary helps improve output voltage.

Technically the kacher/tesla coil is also considered "high voltage nanosecond generator with interrupter" operating at nearly 1.9Mhz for the test tesla coil.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For curiousity this above circuit do generates 1.7kvpp using only 3volts from supply since i am only using cheap XL6009 buck/boost circuit from ebay to generate 20volts for the mosfet driver IXDI614

Good day MagPwr

Nice work, thanks for sharing;

I cannot read your attached diagram..... it is low resolution, can you please attach another with higher res.

Thanks in advance.

take care, peace
lost_bro

EDIT; just took screenshot of diagram from you YouTube channel, thanks

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15961 on: November 21, 2016, 04:20:03 PM »
   apecore:
   True, no input to output readings. Nor do I need them to show me what I already know. That there is no OU.  Nor does anyone else have it, either, yet there are self running devices. With more of them coming out continually.
   OU will only manifest it's illusive head when you can pull in extra energy from the ambient. But, at which point IT won't be OU either, as that does not exist, and never has existed. EVER!
   These are surrounding ambient Aether conversion (Ions,) devices. Not OU devices. As any extra energy has to come from somewhere, and not from "more out than in" false logic,  which is just plain dumb, especially hearing that from the forum members in this thread.

   Wesley states that it's ok, if you don't PAY for the "extra energy".  Such as with NMR, but, That is not the point, nor is free, as it's burning up matter to do so. Like burning wood or coal, is not OU. Even if it's free to pick up on the ground. It creates pollution, in one form or another.

  Lost-bro:  Can you please upload Mags higher resolution image from his video that you have.

   

bitbo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15962 on: November 21, 2016, 04:43:48 PM »
Here the bigger screenshot from YouTube:

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15963 on: November 21, 2016, 05:57:27 PM »
That is not the point, nor is free, as it's burning up matter to do so. Like burning wood or coal, is not OU.
Even if it's free to pick up on the ground
Converting coal to energy yields 35MJ/kg, wood - 18MJ/kg

...but completely converting matter to energy non-chemically yields 90000000000MJ/kg.  That's essentially free.

It creates pollution, in one form or another.
What pollution ?

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15964 on: November 21, 2016, 08:18:19 PM »
  Are you saying, now, that the process of NMR emits no radiation?
No isotopes such as from hydrogen, giving off Alfa, Beta, or any other negative emissions.
  Wesley can possibly chime in on that one. 
 
   Non chemical, as in what conversion process? 
   In any case, I chose to go with exploiting and tapping the available ambient energy, instead of converting matter to energy.
   NMR is another subject.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15965 on: November 21, 2016, 08:26:11 PM »
Nick,
It seems to me that your signal is not being affected by HF/HV interferences.
Wouls this ends the discussion as Hoppy stated that the effect is created by additional gate pollution?
Kacher does do its work as it should.
Unfortenatly Nick....no Input/Output power indication.
I am very excited what Hoppy's comments will be ;)

I commented in an earlier post to Nick, that his Mazilli is unlikely to suffer badly from gate signal distortion caused by HV. I say this because I used a Mazilli in my early experiments with the Grenade / Kacher setup and I had clean gate waveforms compared to when running with a TL494 PWM push-pull oscillator with mosfet chip drivers.

apecore

  • Guest
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15966 on: November 21, 2016, 08:42:48 PM »
I commented in an earlier post to Nick, that his Mazilli is unlikely to suffer badly from gate signal distortion caused by HV. I say this because I used a Mazilli in my early experiments with the Grenade / Kacher setup and I had clean gate waveforms compared to when running with a TL494 PWM push-pull oscillator with mosfet chip drivers.

If that is true that means that the effect is powered by the kacher .... in Nick case
The assumption that the effect comes from the pushpull aint not right.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15967 on: November 21, 2016, 09:23:29 PM »
    That may possibly be the case concerning my fets, but, I'll check further into it, as to them not being affected by the HV, HF, interactions.  Even with the ground lines disconnected from the devices, my gates, and drains show no peaks, just lower output.
   However, there are several other guys that have used the TL 494 to fet driver circuits, and have shown both the effect, as well as self running.  So, I hope we can move on now.
   
   By the way, not only was my Kacher on, during the scope shots, but it was producing the amplification "effect", as well.
Which can also be shown that in a video, if needed.
   
   My main concern for now is a proper working feed back path. Any help with that would be appreciated.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15968 on: November 21, 2016, 10:27:46 PM »
If that is true that means that the effect is powered by the kacher .... in Nick case
The assumption that the effect comes from the pushpull aint not right.

Its not as clear cut as that because in both setups, although understandably, the Kacher induced current will affect the resonant condition under optimum tuning, which is why Nick and I have been able to get some 'effect' with the Mazilli, it is more pronounced with the push-pull, which is being affected by the HV as described by Bat1Robin2. At least this was the case with my experiments.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15969 on: November 21, 2016, 10:41:30 PM »
Are you saying, now, that the process of NMR emits no radiation?
Correct.

The McFreey process emits fast electrons but they do not qualify as pollution.  Radiation - yes, but that does not linger and can be stopped with plain aluminum foil.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15970 on: November 21, 2016, 10:47:15 PM »
I commented in an earlier post to Nick, that his Mazilli is unlikely to suffer badly from gate signal distortion caused by HV.
Yes, especially when BJTs are used in the Mazilli circuit.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15971 on: November 21, 2016, 10:47:36 PM »
   
   My main concern for now is a proper working feed back path. Any help with that would be appreciated.

Yes, now to the crux of the matter! All schematics I've seen published on the fora, show a simple DC feedback loop directly from output to input of the source PSU, which in most cases is switched-mode. This feedback loop being applied after initial starting of the device by a small battery.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15972 on: November 22, 2016, 12:20:49 AM »
   Yes, but each device is showing a different way of doing so.
Which way may work best for me?
One consideration for a possible cause of HV interference of the drain or gate signals is the copper PCB which the components are mounted on. Which I don't use either.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15973 on: November 22, 2016, 01:18:26 AM »
  Verpies:
  After reviewing Willian J Mcfreely's PDF file, concerning OU devices, I come to a different conclusion.
  First of all with all his technical expertise he has not and can not replicate nether the Kapanadze device(s), nor the PTU device.
Which he explains as his opinion of examples of working NMR modes of operation.
  He does mention that some of what he calls NMR type devices do process radioactive properties, and should be shielded. Although he does also state that Beta radiations can also be emitted by some NMR devices, yet gives no clue as to how to shield those types of very dangerous radiations, other than saying that aluminum should be used as shielding. But, we know that aluminum will not work, in the case of Beta radiations. And which are not just simpler electron radiations of short duration.
  "What radiation" you had asked,  them there Alfa/Beta radiations,  I would answer.
 
  The article is full of unproven speculations, nor a self working device built by him to prove his point.
  In this case, and without going into further details, I would say,  "I don't buy it". 
 
   When a self running device using the principals of operation of NMR can be shown, and proven as to it cause and effect, and built without dangerous radiations, then, I'll consider further looking into it.
But, for now...  "I don't buy it".  Even if it were for sale, which it's not.  Nor would I want it in my home.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #15974 on: November 22, 2016, 02:36:28 AM »
After reviewing Willian J Mcfreely's PDF file, concerning OU devices, I come to a different conclusion.
 First of all with all his technical expertise he has not and can not replicate nether the Kapanadze device(s), nor the PTU device.
That assumption is based on your expectation of him bragging about such achievement.

Which he explains as his opinion of examples of working NMR modes of operation.
It is wrong to conflate the NMR with McFreey's technique, because the former is only a component of the latter.
NMR does not produce pulses of fast electrons (beta particles) by itself.

He does mention that some of what he calls NMR type devices do process radioactive properties, and should be shielded.
Devices based on the McFreey principle indeed would produce fast electrons internally, but devices based on NMR alone would not.

Anyway, calling these fast electrons radioactive is wrong because it gives the wrong impressions that you can eat them or breath them inside where they will do damage.  That is not true of fast electrons, which do not linger nor penetrate beyond light metal shielding.
You need to learn to distinguish between radioactive materials (such as beta emitters) from the beta particles themselves.

...yet gives no clue as to how to shield those types of very dangerous radiations, other than saying that aluminum should be used as shielding. But, we know that aluminum will not work, in the case of Beta radiations.
There is some mistake in your research.  Aluminum completely stops fast electrons (beta particles).  Maybe you confused aluminum with lead, with converts beta particles into X-rays, albeit it stops them, too.

"What radiation" you had asked,  them there Alfa/Beta radiations,  I would answer.
You need to learn to distinguish between radioactive materials (such as alpha or beta emitters) from the particles that they emit.
The former are dangerous, the latter are not after proper shielding is applied (clothing stops alphas and aluminum stops betas).

Gammas and neutrons are a different story.
 
The article is full of unproven speculations, nor a self working device built by him to prove his point.
When a self running device using the principals of operation of NMR can be shown, and proven as to it cause and effect, and built without dangerous radiations, then, I'll consider further looking into it.
Maybe but maybe the STAAAR Yoke device and TK, Dally, Akula devices, already work unknowingly based on this principle.
Anyway that explanation is much more rigorous that the energy from the ambient, which does not withstand even the simplest logical analysis.

If you hold the author to such high standards of empirical proof, you should hold TK & Akula, etc... to them, too.