I didn't say it was, energy is the goal not measuring it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PW7mwcLk9PM

AG

I'm afraid I don't take anything from that previously posted very grainy video.

If you bother to scroll down that page it does give a link to a HIGH RES list of video's

I'm sure if you look you will find that one ! http://www.matri-x.ru/video.shtml but then what difference when your already decided it's fake ! Just listen to the guys tone and body language you can tell he knows he is wasting his time.

If you bother to scroll down that page it does give a link to a HIGH RES list of video's

I'm sure if you look you will find that one ! http://www.matri-x.ru/video.shtml but then what difference when your already decided it's fake ! Just listen to the guys tone and body language you can tell he knows he is wasting his time.

Thanks for the link. I have already seen most of Vasmus videos (all grainy) and yes he comes across quite frustrated on video, apparently from negative comments on the fora about his demos.

Once I figure out just what causes the "amplification effect", exactly,  I'll let everyone know. For now I believe it is the way the device is connected up, as the most important point.   

Have you experimented with the way the components are placed relative to each other or only with the way they are "connected up" ?

That Konrad & Brudny paper gives us a hint, that the HF electric field from the Kacher/TC can modulate the permeability of the ferrite core on which the transformer is wound.  This means, that the position (and 3D orientation) of the transformer, relative to the Kacher/TC, can matter.
Permeability modulation also suggests that attention must be paid to the phase between the current flowing in the transformer and the density of the electric flux that its core is subjected to.

Verpies
Permeability modulation might be present also
as how I tune the device by displacing the yoke.
I will test moving the Yoke bit further away from antenna. see what happens
Although I did some time ago few 20cm's and it almost did like it has no more influence but not sure.
will see to check

Nick,

As i have told you many times before the effect that you talk about as the tesla circuit is pulsed and the bulbs get brighter is due to the pulse width change of the yoke fet. Due to its direct connection to the same ground as the tesla pulses it causes a field effect shut off of the yoke fet. It shuts off the yoke drive early and reduces duty cycle to about 20% vs 50 %(and is adjustable by the pot). This is more efficient operation of the yoke which in turn increases output up to the 72% efficiency range. I stumbled upon it only by accident  in the beginning i used 2 separate power supplies for the yoke and tesla when you use too much filter capacitance or isolated power supplies it will not show up follow the schematic and you will see it. But the effect as you say is not an OU effect only a smoke and mirror increase in output effect.  Because tesla is pulsed in mid cycle of the much slower fet drive pulse. This is my experience, also this happens to be the hot running fet on the yoke drive push pull. and will be the first one to fail when overloading the output or going above the 14-40 khz range. I don't know why other than voltage spikes but it does.  I have provided scope shots and videos yet you ignore this info. Scope reveals this right away when it happens, nothing special. NO OU.

...just placing the components as Ruslan has his, as that is the device that I'm working on, to replicate, for now.

Do you use an identical transformer core as he does?

Magnetite magnets can also affect in a positive way the permeability of the ferrite yoke cores,...

No

...,as well as the output at the load.

Perhaps, but that is a different issue.  It is wrong to assume that increased core permeability is needed for increased output at the load.
In conventional circuits it is just the opposite - decreased inductance, results in smaller reactance and higher series AC current flowing through inductors.

   Verpies: 
   Do I use the same transformer as Ruslan does?  Well, you'll have to ask him about that. But, my yoke is the same size, wound the same way,  and used for the same original purposes in a tv.  You know that we'll never know the composition of both yokes, to determine the answer.  Or did you expect a different reply?
  These are not conventional devices, nor are they closed circuits, and have little to do with normal conventional system operations. 
   So, how do you know that magnets don't change ferrite core permeability?  Perhaps, they don't, maybe permeability is not the proper term then, as the "issue" is about the added gain from magnets,  and not about ferrite core permeability.
   
    What I am doing in these tests are with my own version of Ruslan's device, not an exact replications, but my replication and version instead, using material that I have at hand, along with the recommended fets and transistors. 
I am not trying to just copy Ruslan's device, nor Akulas.

  Magnets added to the yoke can increase output, for whatever reason, whether they change the permeability or not, they add to the gain. Even though at times depending on the running frequency they don't, but mostly on my set up they do work to improve the gain at the output considerably. That is why I mention it.  Tiger did also...

   Of course when the Kacher circuit is connected up to the 28t yoke/grenade coils there is going to be an interaction of some sort. That is the point of it all. But up to now only a couple of us are able to show any added gain (at all) by the two circuits working together, no matter how they are connected up.
   
   Bat1Robin2:
   I am not using any duty cycle controller presently.  Nor do I see what you are talking about on my scope. So, just show us what you think is happening, not by explaining about your take on it,  but by showing it doing so. Show us how the addition of your Kacher's output to the induction circuit can drop the duty cycle of the fets, as well as to please show the brightening of the bulbs using 200w to 300w or higher wattage loads, at the SAME time.  I'll believe it, when I see it... as I doubt that you'll be able show any brightning of the bulbs, by your Kacher's interaction.
   
   I have used two separate PS in the passed. But, that is not how the device is designed to self run, using two separate power sources, instead of being connected up in a way that will allow it self power itself.  As that is what I'm working on now, not to separate the two circuits, but to join them together, instead.
   Please show us in a video using your scope just how your Kacher can drop the duty cycle on the fets in the yoke circuit as you suggest.  Or if you can't do that, then just show how dropping your duty cycle to 20% will show any additional gain at the output load, while lighting the mentioned load of bulbs.
   Mentioning about this, is not the same as showing it doing so.