https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tplRbd-fso
SCALAR WAVES:
Some comments about this video:1.Reasoning:Money making
a. product cost about 800 Euro.
b.product is protected with copy rights
c.wording used by presenter Dr Konstantin Meyl
http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=10_Home&page=1&sublevel=0 does not stand for his wealth of knowledge, but looks like "amateur on
the move" who wants to grab some money based on amusement of even less educated crowd.
Words used to magnify crowd attention are : "Tesla", "many clients" "many universities and scientific institution"
Assuming video was made in 2013 ( dr Mayl says 10 years passed since 1999) than something wrong is with his math
No significant language training was done during that time, to better
subscribe the phenomena he was probably tutoring or maybe not?
Dr Meyl is Ph.D so we should expect from him backing it with his scientific affiliation and scientific language used as well.
d. 10 years ?? ( it is 14 years) after 1999 and at 2013 there is no significant progress or any progress other than just that they changed mechanically form of the device offered for sale.
conclusions to point 1
-from simple logical standpoint product for sale should be promoted- So we listening to the "salesman".
-there is a lack of credible list of clients and scientific institution and lack of their expressed opinions as a support of sale or support of its scientific value( no evaluation)
- reasoning does not look good for Dr Meyl .
- place used for presentation looks like typical comforting cabin of the guy who has not much to do with anything ,
but average Nordic form of relax.
- there is a lack of articles supporting , contradicting, conforming or rejecting the idea or device or device concept.
(it looks like nobody was moved to much with it)
in
http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=47_Papers&page=1&sublevel=0 we see no change no addition nor revision standing for progress directly related to the device or its
concept.
Biography:- in
http://www.k-meyl.de/go/25_Meyl/lebenslauf_meyl.pdf we see
impressive: 1984 Dr.-Ing. (Ph.D.) Promotion, Fakultät Elektrotechnik an der Universität Stuttgart.
This is one of 9 leading German educational facilities.
However language used by Dr Meyl looks like "student of biology talking about electronics."
let's go to the video step by step:
Please note that I do not judge anyone but simply point mathematically at existing reality from the perspective of typical scientific events documentary.!!!!!!!2:07 mentioned about over 1000 customers :
what customers, what universities, what institutions what medical hospitals?
where is prove of any independent evaluation?
5:00 quote: the whole circuit is working as one oscillation circuit..
Yes he is right - even the wire shape connecting RX and TX causes frequency drift.
5:50 Dr Meyl does not know what frequency the device is operating with or what is the frequency region in kHz or Mhz .
6:13 Dr Meyl mentioned Tesla technique of comprising resonance
( Wesley's comment :first you must resonate than you can radiate)
Dr Meyl does not point at any special benefit of half wave vs quarter wave resonance in regards to his device for sale.
He just throw the information "down the drain"
6:29 Dr Meyl narrow down his sales speech to 800 Euro for experimental kit.
( value of PCB material around 12 US dollars + 2 tripods $3 each.)
( The TTL chip set of 7 for digital display $4.10)
1 Quartz resonator, resistor and LCD display $3.50.
Place on the top of it $30 for labor miscellaneous and assembly.= ~~ $52= 45.84 euro.
That gives 800-45.84=754.16 Euro net profit.
10:09 Dr Meyl specifies 4.02MHz frequency of "hertzian resonance" ( transverse wave)
10:18 Dr Meyl talks about resistance matching to 10 ohm ( I assume ) for AC circuit.
It sounds like he never heard about impedance, or the impedance matching between antenna and TX output for Mr Meyl is not important.
For those who cares -
Impedance is made out of 3 components and is based on given frequency .Reactive C, Reactive H and
Resistance.
11:14 Dr Meyl presents Traditional resonance ( transverse wave function )
We can not conclude it this is series or parallel resonance
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-6/resonance-series-parallel-circuits/but we may assume that he is operating in
Near Field. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_and_far_field12:18 Dr Meyl talks about
Faraday cage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cageWell he did not use any Faraday Cage to support his concept.
He just used his hand to "tune out" his device
But now the device is one resonating circuitry,that is out from resonance by changing its capacitive and/or inductive reactances ( or/end coupling)
13:19 Dr Meyl for the first time talks about current, voltage and phase shift
( used wording phase in between) however he is mentioning rectifier with no solid explanation.
(But OK let's consider this comment - valuable )
13:32 I have problem with Dr Meyl explanation :
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magfor.htmlplease look at
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/imgmag/lorfor.gif or
https://www.pdx.edu/nanogroup/sites/www.pdx.edu.nanogroup/files/4-2-C__Relationship_between_the_E_and_B_fileds.pdfThe easiest would be to look at:
http://www.phys.utk.edu/courses/spring%202007/physics231/chapter27_part1.pdfquote: "The magnetic force is zero if the velocity is either parallel or anti-parallel to the magnetic field"-
but that does not specify properties of Electromagnetic wave in respect to medium Near field /Far field.
End of part 1 of the comment
Wesley=================================================================
Please note that I do not judge anyone but simply point mathematically
at existing reality from the perspective of typical scientific events documentary.!!!!!!! Wesley
Part 2 of the comment : 13:54 PIERS Proceedings,
Progress in electromagnetic research, Stockholm, Sweden, August 13, 2013
surprisingly at the conference dr Meyl was talking about Consequences of the Extended Field Theory,
so the device was just a toy used to entertain the crowd.!!!!!!,.
http://saltspacolorado.com/scalar-balancing/peer-reviewed-papers-by-prof-dr-ing-konstantin-meyl/The conference did not show( or I did not find) any MIT support nor involvement in it.
One of the guests was Prof. John R. R. Searl:
http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/conference/Weinfelden/Very interesting group of
"scientific degenerates" or scientifically not recognized or rejected individuals.
14:53 there is no prove provided .
It is just evidence of inductive and capacitive components that are now excluded in that part of the circuitry
( he can touch the metal ball- now at any possible way.....)
The involvement of the ball in impedance matching is minimized due to frequency change -
FREQUENCY of 7.3MHZ IS NOT RELATED TO HARMONICS PRODUCT OF THE FIRST TUNING
It was 4.1MHz and now is 7.3 MHz
Example :Let's say that you have
-10 dipole antennas connected to one 50 Ohm coaxial feeder.
-There is perfect SWR and perfect impedance match.... only now every dipole antenna out of 10 antennas, is tuned to different frequency -
-Frequency of each antenna is not corresponding to possible mix harmonic product. )
conclussion: NONE OF 10 DIPOLES CAN SEE EACH OTHER AND ONLY THAT ONE THAT IS RESONATING AT TUNED
FREQUENCY IS NOW VISIBLE TO THE COAXIAL FEEDER LINE AND TRANSMITTER.
Picture 1: So till now I see findings of Dr Meyl unsubstantiated .
Simple analogy guys. For small screw you use small screwdriver but for big one you use big screwdriver.
It would not work otherwise. Got it?
16:14 here Dr Meyl start to make some important comments.quote:
"TX knows if RX is on or off.".. and how many people are listening to the station (TX)
Dr Meyl did not provide any practical experiment proving that there is any difference in Tx based on 2 or 3 or 5 Rx stations listening.
He just said that this is what it is. Guys. I do not sale anything nor advertise my self with my scientific achievement.
So I can make statements of any kind.
Dr. Meyl can only make statements increasing his profit despite of the fact how real the comments are.
He is 64 years old now as a retired professor he doesn't care much about anything.
Just few bucks more in the pocket. 16:52 Dr Meyl says about phase angle of 90 degrees between current and voltage describing it as Near Field properties of an antenna
And state that Near Field is typical property of Scalar Waves that is Longitudinal Wave
My understanding is that Dr Meyl comments to this line of thinking are either:
a) misinformed,
b) ignorant of the science, Logically Longitudinal Wave (LW) can be a "body" that contains substructure manifesting
one or more properties of LW called now the Scalar Wave.(SW)
However must differ from LW somehow.
We are being left in the dark as to the relation between LW and SW in Dr Meyl brain?
Is SW part of LW or it is reverse.
17:13 Dr Meyl explains Near Field by sending us to the text books
17:40 Dr Meyl says that his scalar Near Field is 10 times bigger that typical EM Near Field. comparing it to Tesla expanded /extended Near field.
My question :
Are we talking about the same Near field but only extended or Scalar Wave (SW) uses its own Near Field? [/size]
20:10 Gush quote: .." relation of frequency is identical to the relation of the speeds?"
Yes nothing new....... no change in medium than there is no change in speed.
But if you talking about different mediums that question is :
-what speeds in what medium?
?
Please note guys that : the frequency does not change but the speed varies thru the medium ( EM)
Yes if he is talking about LW than this article applies :
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/waves/Lesson-2/The-Speed-of-a-Wavebut Tesla was not talking about LW. He had not much of an idea what the difference
is but Dr Meyl decided to educate Mr Tesla long after his death :
http://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/Scalar-Waves.pdfThere is none of known to me scientific journals, that has published this paper of Dr Meyl.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Guys simple to understand is that Dr Meyl did not change frequency and did not
change medium but
he tries to prove that his scalar Wave has speed of 1.5 times of speed of light???19:45Dr Meyl calculations (the prove is what Tesla said,,.....
Yeh Tesla said... Yeah...... Do not dare to question it............ yeah
19:49 - when? what source to look for?
21:10 Quote "report from Austria from University" what University?
, what report? where to find it?
27:17] Dr Meyl presents unknown publication in unnamed book in German as a prove of something.
He is mentioning Nottingham University paper inside his book , pointing at book he holds in his hands..
Undocumented 500% efficiency is reported by Dr Meyl I hope book sales good as well.
28:50 Dr Meyl calls his device Energy Harvester with 110% of overunity from 10 mW
But he got me lost in the process... You going to get lost as well. And that is given .
29:10 DR Meyl did not provide the answer to :
What is the coupling mechanism and what is the form of energy from environment that can be utilized by Dr Meyl "Energy Harvester"?
How the mechanism works?
29:30 Dr Meyl talks about Oveunity
Please memorize guys once for you entire Life.
THERE IS NO AND THERE WILL BE NO OVERUNITY EVER. THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH. . That what is free lunch for you is the expense to someone. and if you do not care than you got your overunity.
OVERUNITY IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN $10 YOU HAVE HAD IN YOUR POCKED AND $100 THAT YOU FOUND ON THE STREET.
Overunity" can be for us coming from utilization of the energy that is free of tax and expenses.
(e'g. Solar ,Gravity, some forms of :Kinetic and potential energy, external force, preexisting dis-balance of forces , inertia force)
30:20 Dr Meyl says more or less that Tesla could not use energy sources utilized by dr Meyl.
because the sources have not been there at Tesla time . ...
So what was there than? and are you found Dr Meyl new form of collecting existing energy from RF sources?
remember Russians powering houses out of strong Russian propaganda stations using just piece of wire of the length of 1/4 y of frequency of that transmitter.
32:26 Dr Meyl talks about Tesla Colorado Springs tower
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Experimental_Station32:33 Dr Mel talks about noise>>> the
Ground Noise level
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_noise or rather about
Cosmic Noise level.>>>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_noisehe did not specify it very precisely.
However he mentioned square root of the
noise vs frequency In electronic devices we would talk about
this:
http://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/32257/noise-and-what-does-v-%E2%88%9Ahz-actually-meanRoot Mean square uncertainty (RMS noise) very interesting graphics:
http://ridl.cfd.rit.edu/products/training/Detectors%20465%2020083/Lecture/Lecture%2011-Noise/Lecture%20Noise.ppt32:49 Dr Meyl quote: "Scalar Wave can be measured in value of antenna noise
]"
Military unclasified :
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwi1kPvH75PNAhUH64MKHVDZBioQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dtic.mil%2Fdtic%2Ftr%2Ffulltext%2Fu2%2F265414.pdf&usg=AFQjCNENXU930djsaiXsGUTXrzZGS5vCbg&sig2=onHAhk2yPMRv9W2xoZFlJw&bvm=bv.123664746,d.amcI assume he was talking about receiver RX antenna.
32:33Dr Meyl talks about frequency vs energy per period.
However he is incapable to even name it this way. so
I must to do it for him.
But by that his 800 Euro toy with 7 MHz
frequency region is useless .
just skip this one:
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/waves/Lesson-2/Frequency-and-Period-of-a-Wavelook here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrumand here :
http://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-electromagnetic-spectrum
34:00 lorentz contraction:
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/14362/help-me-gain-an-intuitive-understanding-of-lorentz-contractionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rek7881OGRYhttp://www.alternativephysics.org/book/LengthContraction.htm34:12 Withe Noise:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_noise34:40Vortex - bullishness till more accurate specified just not even worth my time spend.
34:59 Scalar Wave is now named an Electric Energy Wave that transmits Electric Energy.
Dr Meyl uses quite wrong and unfortunate set of words.
http://sciencelearn.org.nz/Science-Stories/Tsunamis-and-Surf/Waves-as-energy-transfer35:12 Electric field transfer: quote"Ball to ball"
please skip that:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/capsph.htmlend of part 2
of the comment Wesley
==========================================================================
Part 3 of the comment: Electric and magnetic fields are created by charged particles - electric field is not a particle but a property of given state at given time frame. It is hard for me to see electric field as not related ( separated) and traveling by itself .
But you can give me some advice if you will.
36:33 Dr Meyl is concerned about the same problem Tesla had with JP Morgan in 1896 lack of control over the energy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._P._Morgan http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/tesla.htm40:59 He presents more power transfer by applying an amplifier
43:31 Dr Meyl shows significance of having amplifier in the setup ( for me it is sales speech) 479,00 EUR incl. 19 % Tax excl.Shipping costs.
http://www.k-meyl.de/xt_shop/index.php?cat=c5_Kits---Devices.html&XTCsid=d94e42b65252b38b4c5080bfa94af36c44:49 now you can see( with amplifier some of ionized gas of fluorescent lightbulb)
53:30 Dr Meyl point into unspecified unnamed and unchecked "Biological Benefits"
by pointing the orientation of magnetic field on the Tesla Coli driven by 2V++ unknown, not described to us amplifier.
54:47 instruction of how to apply medical biological "something " in order to see "something else" Sorry guys NO LINKS here. ....
56:36 field vortexes scalar wave Again use it with skepticism
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.502.5032&rep=rep1&type=pdfthere are no other sources available for me...
only dr Meyl...... can you believe?
The only one dr Meyl...
56:52 DrMeyl speculates over antenna gain role in """amplifying """" original power output of the transmitter.
Please skip that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_gain go here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVOo-miuIFQ58:03 "damaging effect of Electromagnetic Waves" >>
Guys there IS NO damaging effect other than heat in close proximity few mm.
In Lithuania Experiment I was dealing with NMR and possibly decaying doped structure of that very specific ferrite.
There have been also very much significant vibrations present however we did not established its direct impact to the health of the participants.
1:01:29 Wave Equation :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_equation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck-r_qmNNG0 this one is classical so do not get confused with the other two links :
http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/Classical_Waves/Classical_Waves.html1:01:40 The Laplace Equation and Wave Equationhttp://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9781441970541-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1015080-p174035270 dr Meyl mixes up classical mechanic with quantum mechanics of Electromagnetic Waves EM.
I have nothing against any social or sexual orientation even if it couples in physics..
Just tell me how and what technique is being employed . I need to know how to separate trash from another trash
with hope that I can find something valuable in it. Everything is possible guys
This is end of evaluation of Dr Meyl Scalar Wave commercial device Please note that I have spend 7 hours of my day time just to go to the end of this one hour long video.
Judge it for yourself
Wesley