Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11802454 times)

Dog-One · « **Reply #13770 on:** April 20, 2016, 02:49:34 AM »

Quote from: nelsonrochaa on April 20, 2016, 12:23:12 AM

About put my fingers without take a pummeled :

The output that Doug talk is 32v so no "blim" but even the high voltage output without have the step down stage and stored in the cap output don't give "blim" too ;
of course after stored in cap will be letal for sure . but we will not letal if we learn to control and it not stored in capacitor . One year ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Is9fOtBeo_I is one of the stages used in the main box that could be find in the photo . If someone are really interest see all the video and what i show and will see that i not get pummeled even with voltages around 800v rms.

In the channel the people interested will find all the stages until i reach that box month to month , until i stop put videos is like a book , but most only search the GOLD and forget the work behind....
I start with nothing ! just work with lab work without equipment and material only search to old pcb to salvaged components .
I was not born in a golden cradle and even that with cunning and ingenuity adapted the materials he had. but most of people have almost resources and even that only teorize . GO WORK TO BENCH !

I got it now! The old video you linked is exactly what I needed to see again.

You're a good sport Nelson and I'm very glad you are still watching over our shoulders.

In the coming days I plan to make a video using a whiteboard for explanation. If you will, all I need is a nod as to whether I'm on the right track.

The GOLD is starting to look much less complicated than I had originally thought, but it is no doubt still GOLD.

M@

verpies · « **Reply #13771 on:** April 20, 2016, 03:23:42 AM »

Quote from: a.king21 on April 19, 2016, 02:16:54 PM

Question for Verpies or other knowledgeable EEs.
If a bifilar coil is wound over a standard coil will it double the voltage or frequency?

There are two types of bifilar coils and I do not know which one you are asking about and whether you comparing it to a non-bifilar coil of the same turn-count or not.

verpies · « **Reply #13772 on:** April 20, 2016, 03:34:53 AM »

Quote from: NickZ on April 20, 2016, 12:11:37 AM

Possibly Verpies can best answer some of those questions, in a conventional way.

Full wave rectifiers built with ultrafast diodes or Schottky diodes will rectify even MHz AC.
Full wave rectifiers can also be built with MOSFETs using a principle known as synchronous rectification, which at certain amperage levels is more efficient than diode rectification.

I do not know the relationship between fast rectification and Aether but I do know that even very slow silicon rectifiers can generate nanosecond spikes through an unintended DSR effect when their reverse conduction ends abruptly.

NickZ · « **Reply #13773 on:** April 20, 2016, 04:14:19 AM »

Quote from: verpies on April 20, 2016, 03:34:53 AM

Full wave rectifiers built with ultrafast diodes or Schottky diodes will rectify even MHz AC.
Full wave rectifiers can also be built with MOSFETs using a principle known as synchronous rectification, which at certain amperage levels is more efficient than diode rectification.

I do not know the relationship between fast rectification and Aether but I do know that even very slow silicon rectifiers can generate nanosecond spikes through an unintended DSR effect when their reverse conduction ends abruptly.

Very interesting... thanks.

The question of how to use fast rectifier diodes, or fets, to obtain the best rectification results as in the case of the Aether conversion, is a good question. That's where hands on experimentation comes in. However, it looks like the capacitors are what separates the positive from the negative, from the Aether, so that it can be made to work with our normal electrical devices.

yfree · « **Reply #13774 on:** April 20, 2016, 04:25:10 AM »

Quote from: verpies on April 20, 2016, 03:34:53 AM

... but I do know that even very slow silicon rectifiers can generate nanosecond spikes through an unintended DSR effect when their reverse conduction ends abruptly.

This very effect is used in DALLY FREE ENERGY device ...

Dog-One · « **Reply #13775 on:** April 20, 2016, 05:10:18 AM »

Quote from: NickZ on April 20, 2016, 04:14:19 AM

However, it looks like the capacitors are what separates the positive from the negative, from the Aether, so that it can be made to work with our normal electrical devices.

From what I can tell so far, capacitors should not be charged while connected to a load. Doug Konzen made this explicitly clear. One can rectify a sine wave source (coming from Aether vibrations, specifically sympathetic Aether vibrations) and charge a capacitor. The capacitor is then dumped to a load at regular intervals once it is charged sufficiently. Once dumped, the capacitor is disconnected from the load and recharged. The higher the frequency of the vibrations, the faster you can recharge the capacitor. Kilohertz will probably work; megahertz will probably work better. Schottky diodes are plenty fast for megahertz work.

What Nelson was showing us in that video, is that Aether disturbances are all over the place from the simple low-power driver he was using. If you collect these disturbances in the right place (no inductive association with the exciter), you can add as many of them as you want. And if your exciter is truly efficient, it should take almost zero amps to run it. Then everything you collect is gravy. What we need to pay attention to is how to collect the Aether disturbances without an inductive link back to the exciter. If you do it wrong, the exciter output will drop and its input will begin to draw more amps.

Back to the bench...

M@

nelsonrochaa · « **Reply #13776 on:** April 20, 2016, 08:13:55 AM »

Quote from: a.king21 on April 20, 2016, 01:32:17 AM

Nelson: It looks your HV is created by a HV module.
In other words a HV module you can by from China?

Is that correct?

Hi a.King21 no is not correct . Every stage is designed by myself , since the very first detail you could see is pcb proto , i call modules because in that time i "join" all the parts and each one have their application .

cheers

nelsonrochaa · « **Reply #13777 on:** April 20, 2016, 08:29:08 AM »

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on April 20, 2016, 01:40:31 AM

This looks somewhat over-complicated to me. Kapanadze generates 5KW out of a small tin can without sophisticated electronics. Maybe you doing something wrong here since you need all these parts for less than 5KW?

Could be complicated to you understand , something that you never see run alive this way you talk like you have already find your own "goal" but seems not .

What sophisticated electronics you find only by a picture ? some transform , some home coils and caps made by myself and my pcb is that to you call sophisticated ?
So if you see what i work at moment you will simple run run away... lol

Now you become arrogant too ! you say that maybe i made something wrong , because in that demo i use so much components to output less 5KW ... this is a comedy ? or tragedy?

Better you find kapanadze to you ask them by exactly details ... if he could give that information !

I deal with true things not with suppositions if work or if are true, bu you t to someone that want to learn , that arrogance that you show only will conduct you to nothing ... nicles

seychelles · « **Reply #13778 on:** April 20, 2016, 08:40:33 AM »

Can somebody please enlighten me in block diagram how this thing is suppose to work..

Zeitmaschine · « **Reply #13779 on:** April 20, 2016, 11:00:26 AM »

Quote from: nelsonrochaa on April 20, 2016, 08:29:08 AM

Now you become arrogant too ! you say that maybe i made something wrong , because in that demo i use so much components to output less 5KW ... this is a comedy ? or tragedy? Better you find kapanadze to you ask them by exactly details ... if he could give that information !

I'm just wondering if we deal in each and every case with the same phenomena!

Tesla 1931 and Moray 1936 worked with an antenna. Kapanadze, Stepanov and Barbosa do not. How can that be?

So I would guess we deal with principle #1 when high voltage (and ionization) is involved and thus an antenna is needed and we deal with principle #2 when only ground is needed without an antenna and without high voltage.

It looks like this is causing a lot of confusion. We have (at least) two different types of devices mixed up. The high voltage device works via an electric field and the low voltage device via a magnetic field. Because when an arc welder makes a meter running backwards I can't see how it could generate high voltage anywhere. The high voltage supplying Kapanadze's spark gap is just a decoy, though.

Quote from: yfree on April 20, 2016, 04:25:10 AM

This very effect is used in DALLY FREE ENERGY device ...

Then likewise you do suggest that there is more than one Modus Operandi for such devices?

I'm not convinced that DALLY is real because I'm very suspicious about such one-man (or even two-men) videos showing self-runners, as I mentioned before. So what tells you that the DALLY device is real?

AlienGrey · « **Reply #13780 on:** April 20, 2016, 11:32:46 AM »

a.king21 · « **Reply #13781 on:** April 20, 2016, 12:41:17 PM »

Thank you Nelson. You are a gentleman.

Re Barbosa: Well, Clarence on the energetic forum is supposed to have replicated it, so you can ask him for his advice.
I personally think that the Barbosa - Leal is picking up SWER.
Re Welders: I have not seen the effect, just lots of stories.
Re Kapanadze: At last Nelson has given us a handle on the technology. It is a breakthrough.
You can see the radiant components in the Kapanadze device. You can see the anti-static shielding. In Aquarium 1 you can see the Caduceus coil which is designed to contain RF.
Re 3 phase: In almost every discussion I had with Kapanadze - he offered us 3 phase. Maybe we should also investigate
how easy it is to obtain 3 phase in solid state form. Any clues Verpies or other EEs?

AlienGrey · « **Reply #13782 on:** April 20, 2016, 01:16:41 PM »

Imagine a scenario where we have a power charger accelerator that charges a C, when C is charged it takes T time, C is then fired into a coil L , ...... T and C and L are resanat circuit, wouldn't that create free energy ? Like kicking a football with the wind

AlienGrey · « **Reply #13783 on:** April 20, 2016, 01:33:00 PM »

Not everything we know is true Eric Dollard said himself the physicists are full of shit and we need to for get every thing we know and start again or we are going round in circles, we are filling up the filing cabinet when it should go in the waste bin.

If you go to Nelsons youtube page their are plenty of experiments that you can work your way through by back engineering, I would suggest you have a look through them all and see if you can get one to work, Some of the techniques must be of use only back engineer them.
Nelson Permitting

AG

Zeitmaschine · « **Reply #13784 on:** April 20, 2016, 01:40:17 PM »

Quote from: a.king21 on April 20, 2016, 12:41:17 PM

Re Barbosa: Well, Clarence on the energetic forum is supposed to have replicated it, so you can ask him for his advice.

Clarence: »my name is just a DIRTY WORD to the majority of the members so I just took my success and left and quit posting.«

I wonder what the reason for that could be?

short I knew how to build their unit AND DID! no one else could or did!

Because - if he did it - he does not supply enough information to others for replication?

Quote from: a.king21 on April 20, 2016, 12:41:17 PM

I personally think that the Barbosa - Leal is picking up SWER.

Then their device is a scam or just a simple measurement error?

Quote from: a.king21 on April 20, 2016, 12:41:17 PM

Re Welders: I have not seen the effect, just lots of stories.

I have posted three times the video link already.

Quote from: a.king21 on April 20, 2016, 12:41:17 PM

Re Kapanadze: At last Nelson has given us a handle on the technology. It is a breakthrough.

Then why just a »handle«? Why not the schematics and we are done? Because there is again something mysterious going on that cannot be revealed?

Quote from: a.king21 on April 20, 2016, 12:41:17 PM

You can see the radiant components in the Kapanadze device. You can see the anti-static shielding. In Aquarium 1 you can see the Caduceus coil which is designed to contain RF.

Seeing does not mean that those components doing something useful.

Quote from: a.king21 on April 20, 2016, 12:41:17 PM

Re 3 phase: In almost every discussion I had with Kapanadze - he offered us 3 phase. Maybe we should also investigate
how easy it is to obtain 3 phase in solid state form. Any clues Verpies or other EEs?

The forums are full of such clues. Stepanov presents a 3-phase device in plain view. Just the video is a bit blurry.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11802454 times)

Dog-One

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

verpies

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

verpies

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

yfree

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Dog-One

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

nelsonrochaa

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

nelsonrochaa

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

seychelles

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Zeitmaschine

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

AlienGrey

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

a.king21

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

AlienGrey

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

AlienGrey

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Zeitmaschine

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY