I spoke yesterday with my friend Arunas. T1000
I do thank you guys for recent links: however prior to that discussion I did find that there is certain inconsistency in the text of E Bayeles.
http://www.electrogravity.com/EnergyPipeProof/EnergyPipeProof.pdfWhile I was looking at his video it stroked me something unusual.
And that unusual part was  nothing you could think of it in a critical manner. Thus
video was sexless. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OR47w8Acd4Only a while later I start to see the smartens of the guy forming delusion to himself as well.
The simplicity of measurement usually indicates ongoing processes,
but that simplicity do not make certain for the perception of an individual that resulting interpretation is correct.( not enough data no words about permeability and so on.)
Illusion created by Illusionist is based on the same principals. But the interesting here is that we know about his intention prior to the trick.
The hardest part for perception is when The guy believes by himself in phenomena he presents to the crowd.
Than crowd might fall into the same rabbit hole and that is being called
RELIGION... if phenomena is never explained, and some people still intend to accept it as value to fallow.
Bullshit …. if phenomena was found contradicting to its claimed origin .( explanation) vs, known proven one.

Discovery if phenomena was found explained as novel form of processing or existence.
Known if phenomena was found conforming presence of known mechanism
So As always
_{I turn for help to Dr Roy the friend of mine}.
Please remember that there are only opinions expressed and ultimate truth is yet to be found and confirmed if any.Usually there is a need for significance of aftershock following certain events( videos, scientific paper) that keeps the story flowing.
Yesterday I spoke to my Wife Ania.( psychologist)
She gave me an example of hoe the perception can be redirected:
if one person says
that is right
and for other people says
that is wrong
The first person is less likely to fallow his/her path of thinking and is being discouraged or start to put it in doubt.
The problem we may have with E Bayeles. is that he believes in his thinking patterns. He was not exposed to criticism in sufficient form.
The good of Mr. E Bayeles. is that he opens the door for us  for digging around.
AND THAT IS THE NATURE OF PROGRESS.So at least that is what I can credit him for.
Here is what
Dr Roy thinks:I think that we have explored this kind of 'Rabbit Hole' before, but what the heck.
(This all seems reminiscent of Tom Bearden's 'pseudodiscoveries'
Mr. Bayles has numerous dubious belief/theories. He seems to believe that the designers of the Ancient Great Pyramid of Giza "understood quantum structure and incorporated the fact into pyramid design". Apparently he believes Giza acted as an enormous energy generating device to power heavy stone levitation as well as mysterious, amazing machines which are no where to be found (perhaps the 'mole men' occupying the hollow Earth have secreted them away to their catacombs, or it could be invisible Martians...).
I offer you this single paragraph to highlight the meaningless drivel that Jerry E. Bayles shoves together
in his game of pseudophysics madlibs:http://www.electrogravity.com/"The first part, "Particle Field Energy DownScaling Via A new Complex Fine Structure Constant", pages 126, introduces a new complex fine structure constant which is used to create 10 downscaled energy dimensions which further arrives at the least quantum electrogravitational velocity equal to the square root of the ordinary fine structure constant in meter/second units. The new complex fine structure constant is based on an imaginary value for the square root of the Golden Ratio used as a power series with the fine structure constant. The fine structure constant is derived from the slight difference at 90 degrees between the Natural Spiral based on (e) and the square root of the golden ratio. Also, independent of proton mass calculations, connects the first complex energy reduction to the geometry of the proton's necessary field velocity and mass ratio above the electron mass. Finally, derives the necessary field considerations for justifying that the Great Pyramid at Giza was most likely a giant acoustical/electric power generator based on the square root of the Golden Ratio. Paper is a significant extension of "The Golden Ratio And The Fine Structure Constant" which is listed below."
Humbug, pure humbug!
Back to 'real science': The Magnetic Vector Potential A, is another way of expressing a fundamental concept  in this case the 'curl' of the Magnetic Vector Potential A is the Magnetic Field Vector B. Maxwell's equations can be written in the form of the Magnetic Field Vector B OR the Magnetic Vector Potential A
(
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/eDpZ0lB5m0hWQ94fAdMVaeFmh5aCPJvmdy0dHV16ZnQHM4QBEB7Chvz3FakRM_siHtrQ5j6tjfCi10nXhefNMrWZOI0Xfooa82437RbmOmL_rYSuEy_BQYEhKTJRC8Hc=s0de1ft#https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/6/d/4/6d4db10348ec9698eafd3b26a37c557b.png)
The Magnetic Vector Potential A is used in classical mechanics in Lagrangian equations and in Quantum Mechanics. Vector A is just the 'other side of the coin' when it comes to Vector B.
I have no idea why Mr. Bayles believes that his experiment would indicate a more fundamental basis for Magnetic Vector Potential over Magnetic Vector Field. I am not even sure what his YouTube is supposed to show. Transformers couple inductively by magnetic fields, and Mr. Bayles hasn't proven that his 'iron pipe' offers any magnetic shielding (what is its permeability?
??).
This is like showing that water passes through a piece of cheesecloth, and announcing that this is the 'proof' that anti gravity devices are feasible.
Gravity is NOT an aspect of electromagneticdynamic theory, not a classical one from Maxwell's Equation, nor a Quantum Electrodynamic one. Mr. Bayles will not be visiting Stockholm to pick up his Nobel Prize any time soon.
Mr. Bayles' 'Rabbit Hole' would appear to be very deep and very narrow, and yet not supported by anything real... It is surprising that it hasn't 'buried him' yet.
The Grand Unified Theory is still out there to be discovered!
As my wise old Filipino Cardiology instructor said when she detected a normal EKG with meaningless technical artifacts:
"Gornishtmitgornisht"
Thank you Dr Roy for expressing your opinion
Wesley