rule of thumb for winding  3rd coil that is output coil

start from left hand and wind clock wise first layer

when  you reach the right end  change winding from cw to ccw and keep winding till you come from where you started. and wind 3 rd layer cw and come back cw to complete 4th layer then again wind 5th layer cw and come back winding cw
 remember the base coil that first layer winding direction cw or ccw as the case may be must be repeated in 3rd and 4th layer as well as 5th and 6th layer

this is right patter

00

Nevermind, tomato, tomahto *deleted*

Something went wrong with my TL494 board; it skips cycles... like I get signal A BAAAABABABAAAABABAB.... yay get to debug hardware :/

to fetch energy from ground we must have a non inductive coil that is cw first layer and ccw 2nd layer or ccw first layer and cw 2nd layer. the 3rd and 4th and 5 th and 6 th layers must be inductive so they convert the ground charges into amperes under the influence of magnetic primary coil. the coaxial fucnction is  just to pump charges from ground and accumulate in non inductive first two layers of output coil. since we know rule of transformer with more load  more input is required. this input is provided with ground and the ions  gets accelerated due to magnetic field effect from the primary inductive coil. thats how it works.

00

This description fits to me better until now. My opinion is that first we have to find the working principal and then to calculate the coils and everything else. If we just try to copy paste the output coil without taking in account the frequencies involved then for sure we are going to fail. As you know from your Tesla coil builds the length of the secondary is what counts more in relation of course with the involved frequency.
Well, my point of view is that we treat the whole construction like we build a common Tesla coil. Instead of capacitor discharging through a Tesla coil, we introduce a current pulse straight to the coil, and then we force it to oscillate to the induced frequency. If we just let a low frequency current pulse to load the output coil then after each pulse the field of the coil will collapse giving back a peak. But if we introduce a frequency to this positive current pulse, then the collapsing energy will repeat itself again and again until the current pulse cease down. Our first aim should be how to create a current pulse loaded with high frequency fluctuations. These loaded fluctuations have to reach zero in every cycle for better efficiency. (look tinsel's oscilloscope waveform) After we do this, then output coil will be constructed according to this frequency, and our aim then will be to build it in a way that its output will be high frequency current pulses instead ivoltage ones! At least this is the theory that I walk on, and my build is following these rules.

If you have any argues on this please express it so to make a constructive conversation.

Hi 00,

please, you want to confirm that the Chubinidze resonator is make so?

Thanks

  T-1000:  Which Akula circuit are you talking about, which has several Kw of output?
 Also which Akula circuit schematic were you thinking of, which the insider has commented as using the correct windings.

This is the schematic asked about, which he responded to...
http://www.overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/msg407232/#msg407232

http://realstrannik.ru/forum/39-kapanadze/134930-ustanovka-ruslana-kulabuxova.html?start=54#223172


So... nothing of interest, eh?


Ya...definatly of no interst; I see in the Kacher/brovin video (finallly finished watching it) has the same schematic including part values.
I think TOPRuslan may not be the right person... might be just user "Ruslan" Or might be general trolls taking the name... Whoever it is they said they were not at home for a while but would work on a more accurate schematic.  Because really they're just saying very general things....


He said 'like all they are general guidelines' so... ya...


 *damnit all*


---
@anyone not reading this thread


deliberately ignoring, overlooking and excluding from the chain of conversation is also not constructive. 
If the math is too hard for you, then don't dismiss it as a possible MO; although I guess if you can't say anything positive don't say anything at all?


Yes my world revolves around me; much like yours does to you.

  The reason that I asked which circuit is the several Kw device mentioned, is because I thought that I may have missed something. The posted schematic which I've seen several times is not Akulas device, nor several Kw. Therefore my confusion.
  The Kacher written on top of the Ruslan schematic is the HV Exciter type pulser circuit, and is only one part of the whole circuit, which does not include any duty cycle controls.

  The name kacher originates from the Brovin Kacher circuit. Although some may use it is a misnomer like a the word catcher. Which was the reason the link was posted to that video.

  I had thought that T-1000 had mentioned that the insider confirmed the winding on Akula's last video which had witnesses confirming the validity of Akulas self running circuit. Whether it it is a 1150w as shown on the second Akula video, or it is now also a 1500w output unit as mentioned by Wesley. I did not know that he may be talking about another circuit.

  The issue of which windings scheme to work is still the question, as well as which circuit to replicate, IF any of them. As there does not seam to be any accurate schematics to follow. 

  The reason that I asked which circuit is the several Kw device mentioned, is because I thought that I may have missed something. The posted schematic which I've seen several times is not Akulas device, nor several Kw. Therefore my confusion.

I'm sorry; I am still feeling animostic...
So you're saying stivep1 is mislabeling his devices???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-04V_NIrC0k
Isn't that the same carpet?  Isn't that the same device?

  The Kacher written on top of the Ruslan schematic is the HV Exciter type pulser circuit, and is only one part of the whole circuit, which does not include any duty cycle controls.

  The name kacher originates from the Brovin Kacher circuit. Although some may use it is a misnomer like a the word catcher. Which was the reason the link was posted to that video.

YEs, Much like all mazilli are royer but not all royer are mazilli (or something like that)

  I had thought that T-1000 had mentioned that the insider confirmed the winding on Akula's last video which had witnesses confirming the validity of Akulas self running circuit. Whether it it is a 1150w as shown on the second Akula video, or it is now also a 1500w output unit as mentioned by Wesley. I did not know that he may be talking about another circuit.

  The issue of which windings scheme to work is still the question, as well as which circuit to replicate, IF any of them. As there does not seam to be any accurate schematics to follow.

Edit: Okay maybe I misread; which schematic did you see floating that isn't KW?  are you referring to the same schematic I keep pointing to?