Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  (Read 11719653 times)

Black_Bird

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #885 on: November 29, 2012, 03:23:04 PM »
verpies:

I sure do!

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #886 on: November 29, 2012, 10:44:21 PM »
Any DC Component of the current waveform in L1 or L2 or L4 or an additional winding powered by direct current or a permanent magnet, will bias the Gain Medium in one dimension, making it possible to achieve its microscopic rotation or oscillation, when stimulated by perpendicular components of periodic fields created by other windings.

In an analogy to a macroscopic motion of a swing or a pendulum - notice that they do not work when the constant force of gravity is not acting on them in one direction or at least a force with a perpendicular component to the other force, is not present for a moment.



verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #887 on: November 29, 2012, 10:55:16 PM »
I admit that Dally's device does not have any overtly defined Gain Medium.

I remember reading arguments from someone who reads this thread, that the plastic tubular coil former, or air, or the copper in thick solid wires constitute an inadvertent Gain Medium.

It is my opinion, that a deliberate Gain Medium would be preferable to an inadvertent one.

Black_Bird

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #888 on: November 29, 2012, 11:45:45 PM »
@verpies|
So the dc magnetic field has to be perpendicular to the field of the coils, it that what you mean?
Doesn't the operating frequency of L1/L2/L3 have to have a determined value that relates to the Gain Media material or size, or volume?

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #889 on: November 30, 2012, 12:59:48 AM »
So the DC magnetic field has to be perpendicular to the field of the coils, it that what you mean?
Ideally yes, but any perpendicular component will suffice, even the perpendicular components of two bucking fields, such as created by two parallel coaxial coils (in bucking mode) or two repelling magnets.

Doesn't the operating frequency of L1/L2/L3 have to have a determined value that relates to the Gain Media material or size, or volume?
Unfortunately yes, and don't forget about the requirement for field homogeneity, too. The latter is needed to keep the same operating frequency throughout the whole volume of the Gain Medium :(

Fortunately the nanopulses come to the rescue with the "Shotgun Approach", because short pulses are composed of multiple frequencies that can stimulate the Gain Medium at different frequencies simultaneously. Multiple operating frequencies are the result of inhomogeneities in the perpendicular components of the field occuring throughout the volume of the Gain Media.

Because of Mr. Fourier - the narrower the pulse is, the higher the probability that it will hit the bullseye.

Black_Bird

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #890 on: November 30, 2012, 01:21:32 AM »
Ok. I'll make some experiments on this, and let you know if I get some different effects.
Thanks for the clues...

yfree

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #891 on: November 30, 2012, 01:45:12 AM »
Ideally yes, but any perpendicular component will suffice, even the perpendicular components of two bucking fields, such as created by two parallel coaxial coils (in bucking mode) or two repelling magnets.
Unfortunately yes, and don't forget about the requirement for field homogeneity, too. The latter is needed to keep the same operating frequency throughout the whole volume of the Gain Medium :(

Fortunately the nanopulses come to the rescue with the "Shotgun Approach", because short pulses are composed of multiple frequencies that can stimulate the Gain Medium at different frequencies simultaneously. Multiple operating frequencies are the result of inhomogeneities in the perpendicular components of the field occuring throughout the volume of the Gain Media.

Because of Mr. Fourier - the narrower the pulse is, the higher the probability that it will hit the bullseye.


To stimulate the Gain Medium at different frequencies simultaneously, one needs not only short pulses but also a low repetition rate of these pulses. Alternatively, the short pulses at higher repetition rate have to be frequency modulated. All this is explained in the invaluable resource provided to the community by William J. McFreey (PJKBook, chapter 3, page 3-135).

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #892 on: November 30, 2012, 02:12:22 AM »
Notice that the Shotgun Approach is very inefficient.

If you ever hit the bullseye then you might want to switch to a Machine Gun Approach, such as the HF Frequency Modulation around the frequency of interest or LF Amplitude Modulation of the perpendicular bias field.

A Sniper Approach would require a perfectly homogeneous field and a single stimulation frequency, but it would be extremely hard to tune and maintain. Next to impossible if intermodulation effects are considered.

There is also the issue of confinement which is supposed to prevent the decay of the reaction in the Gain Medium.  This confinement is analogous to the reflectors (silvered mirrors) at the ends of laser tubes, which confine the internally generated photons.
The ideal case of magnetic confinement requires a perpendicular field inside of the Gain Medium and parallel field outside of it (at least on one side - ideally both).

Somebody in the long TK thread suggested that the easiest way to accomplish that field geometry is to put permeable disks for flux guiding, at the end of the stimulating coils/magnets, and the Gain Media adjacent to those disks.
...and conceal those disks in a green can, of course ;)

This confinement strategy forms a spool-like shape, which is illustrated below (BTW: the simulation program has a bug regarding the arrow directions)

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #893 on: November 30, 2012, 02:42:47 AM »
To stimulate the Gain Medium at different frequencies simultaneously, one needs not only short pulses but also a low repetition rate of these pulses.
Yes, of course.
The Fourier analysis illustrated somewhere at the beginning of this thread nicely illustrates that low duty cycles (low pulse repetition frequencies) yield the broadest spectrum of component frequencies for the same pulse widths.

yfree

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #894 on: November 30, 2012, 03:00:27 AM »
Yes, of course.
The Fourier analysis illustrated somewhere at the beginning of this thread nicely illustrates that low duty cycles (low pulse repetition frequencies) yield the broadest spectrum of component frequencies.


Low duty cycle is not the same as low pulse repetition frequency. :)
The broadest spectrum of component frequencies is not what is necessarily needed, but rather a dense spectrum of frequencies in a band of frequencies. However, frequency modulated sine-wave, not the sharpest pulses, is always more efficient.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #895 on: November 30, 2012, 03:20:09 AM »
Low duty cycle is not the same as low pulse repetition frequency. :)
It is if you consider the condition, I imposed: "for the same pulse widths" :)

The broadest spectrum of component frequencies is not what is necessarily needed, but rather a dense spectrum of frequencies in a band of frequencies.
Yes, a dense spectrum is the goal - not a broad spectrum.
A careless choice of words on my part :(


P.S.
On this diagram, the Gain Medium should extend further away from the axis of the Spool.  I drew it this was only to avoid obscuring the white iso-B contour. 
Here is a interesting task: Design a practical confinement system in which the outside magnetic field is parallel on both sides of the Gain Medium yet perpendicular inside it.

Сергей В.

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #896 on: December 02, 2012, 10:11:10 AM »
Привет Itsunadze and all

Before experiment look carefully this OU video by Tigar2007. It's parametric excitation LF contour with HF pulses. As you can see or calculate he catch the goal. On oscillograph screen you clearly see Over-Unity !!. He got it. He made excitation only on positive half-cycle of sin(x) contour. To doing this you need precise synchronization your VCO Nano-Pulser on Master Oscillator which give 110Volts (Frequency unknown). In video Dally said his ГНСИ or Nano-Pulser working on 12KHz. Still wainting answers from him and his oscillograms. I don't know what happened with him!

OU 200Vsin pump on 400Vsin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um7J_5FwVq0

Try excitation on positive and negative half-cycle of Sin wave !!

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #897 on: December 02, 2012, 11:43:31 AM »
OU 200Vsin pump on 400Vsin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um7J_5FwVq0
That's an encouraging video but on the oscilloscope I cannot see the nanopulses superimposed on the peaks of the low frequency signal (310kHz 200VP-P) as shown on the hand drawn diagram, appearing at the beginning of that video. 
I can only see the low frequency signal increasing to 400VP-P after the application of the second signal (allegedly high frequency). 
I like the way the effect spontaneously drifts away and disappears.

I am sure that Itsu is hitting the peak of the sinewave with his nanopulses, from time to time, but his indicator (light bulb) is too slow to react to rare anomalous events.


P.S.
What does Tiger2009ify say about the magnetostriction in that video?

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #898 on: December 02, 2012, 01:46:29 PM »
That's an encouraging video but on the oscilloscope I cannot see the nanopulses superimposed on the peaks of the low frequency signal (310kHz 200VP-P) as shown on the hand drawn diagram, appearing at the beginning of that video. 
I can only see the low frequency signal increasing to 400VP-P after the application of the second signal (allegedly high frequency). 
I like the way the effect spontaneously drifts away and disappears.

I am sure that Itsu is hitting the peak of the sinewave with his nanopulses, from time to time, but his indicator (light bulb) is too slow to react to rare anomalous events.


P.S.
What does Tiger2009ify say about the magnetostriction in that video?

The nanopulses from secondary synchronized generator are in wrong direction there. Also ampmeter shows more drawn of energy when nanopulser are connected. Any attempt to take energy out of that system would ruin resonant conditions...

Also tiger was attempting to get away from magnetostriction. This is what ruined Itsus's small toroid when magnetostriction gone into mechanical resonance.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #899 on: December 02, 2012, 04:25:18 PM »
The nanopulses from secondary synchronized generator are in wrong direction there.
The polarity of the nanopulses is in the wrong direction or the direction of oscillator synchronization is in the wrong direction (LF->HF) ?

Also ampmeter shows more drawn of energy when nanopulser are connected. Any attempt to take energy out of that system would ruin resonant conditions...
You think so?
BTW: Ammeters do not measure energy.

Also tiger was attempting to get away from magnetostriction. This is what ruined Itsus's small toroid when magnetostriction gone into mechanical resonance.
Magnetostriction is not always bad.
For example: Graham Gunderson has a patent of a device that relies on magnetostriction and acoustic standing waves in ferromagnetic cores to generate energy.

In your opinion, what is responsible for the increase of the amplitude from 200VP-P to 400VP-P ?