Author Topic: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity (Read 198495 times)

Khwartz · « **Reply #285 on:** February 26, 2014, 04:48:30 AM »

Quote from: tim123 on February 25, 2014, 12:47:27 PM

Hi Khwartz,
I don't know. It's a good question... Changing the tuning would decrease the magnetic field... It would be so useful to have my ZVS driver working - as it auto-tunes...

Wow! Selftuning

looks like the wonderful "seltrigging system" of the Youtuber (still a French) Selfonlypath

Quote

If it does change the resonance - and the bulb then lights up at a different frequency - what would that mean I wonder?

Imo that capacitive coupling could interfere, especially stray capacitance, but it isn't necessarily "the Why" of the possible overunity, "the Why" of the phenomenon.

Quote

No mate, it wasn't bad. I was just wondering if there was a way to cancel it out completely in the device itself - so I didn't have to try doing those calculations...

OK, great to know my translation are compressible :p and nice to see you have a plan here

Quote

I could do the alu-foil shield - but i believe what Pascal said - and I'm not sure if it helps...?

Could be good you try for yourself! Don't think it is what it will take you the most time to do it, dear tim.

Quote

I was also wondering if perhaps the cap-coupling might interfere with the desired effect - i mean - it's supposed to work because of the magnetic field - but maybe the electrostatic field is interfering with it... Just a thought.

Better to verpies to answer you that point :/ and/or check by yourself.

Quote

The best idea i can think of so far - but it's not perfect - is the 2-layer counterwound coil - fed with balanced + & - signals... That way the 2 counterwound coils would make the same magnetic field - but the electrostatic field would (more or less) cancel out.

If you say so, I am OK to believe you, tim, cause I don't know so much about coils

Quote

Maybe it would be possible with a normal bifilar coil...?

But verpies' additive one! :p

Quote

Regards, Tim

Best regards, K.

Khwartz · « **Reply #286 on:** February 26, 2014, 04:59:21 AM »

@ ATOMMIX

Care to show your objective results (like your saucer you will oviously finish very soon as sure as your are in your statements) and then we will care objectively of your objections...

tagor · « **Reply #287 on:** February 26, 2014, 10:44:49 AM »

Quote from: Atommix on February 26, 2014, 09:09:09 AM

I have been trying to up load attachments here there seems to be a block on them ?

ATOMMIX

can you send me your documents and I post them here ?

tagor · « **Reply #288 on:** February 26, 2014, 11:53:00 AM »

deleted by tagor

tagor · « **Reply #289 on:** February 26, 2014, 12:34:11 PM »

Quote from: tagor on February 26, 2014, 11:53:00 AM

i sent you my email

here it is

http://www.overunity.com/downloads/sa/view/down/556/

http://www.overunity.com/downloads/sa/view/down/557/

http://www.overunity.com/downloads/sa/view/down/558/

profitis · « **Reply #290 on:** February 27, 2014, 02:39:47 AM »

ionic displacement current with hydrogen @attomix?

Khwartz · « **Reply #291 on:** February 27, 2014, 03:21:03 AM »

@Atommix

I am not qualified at all to know the value of your work and you must be free to publish it in this website. But please, even if "negative mass" in the title of this thread, could you open a new thread about your own work so that it would not too much interfere with the continuity of the work done here?

Anyway, it is just my opinion and invite the other users to say if they prefer a new thread for or to mix the whole here.

Nevertheless, the work of Atommix looks huge enough to justify a new thread and to avoid the risk here of confusion.

Cheers,
K.

tim123 · « **Reply #292 on:** February 27, 2014, 09:43:26 AM »

I agree with Khwartz, Atommix, please start your own thread.

This thread is about the Vialle gen. Let's keep it on topic.

tim123 · « **Reply #293 on:** February 27, 2014, 07:43:58 PM »

Updates:

1) ZVS driver:

- I bought this ZVS driver but it failed. I replaced the mosfets - but it still doesn't work - so...
- I've ordered some parts and I'm going to re-use what I can from the board and build a new one.
- Likely Problem - it may not run at a high enough frequency. Will see...

2) Coil:
- I've wrapped a second layer on the coil (not yet tested) - for 2 reasons:

a) To equalise the voltage in the coil around each bar...
With a 1-layered coil, the voltage drop across the coil would be reflected in the bars - i.e. the bar nearest the +ve terminal would see a higher-voltage / larger electric field than the one near the -ve.
This provides a mechanism for capacitive coupling *between* the bars. (I'm pretty sure)

With a 2-layered coil - where the second layer comes back to the start, the voltage drop is equal all the way along the coil.
So this *should* eliminate cap-coupling between the 2 inner bars.
(It wouldn't eliminate it between the bars and GND though - but that doesn't matter)

b) Verpies said that a single layer winding acts like a single turn in a toroid coil (in a different plane) - and it seems logical that it should apply to a straight coil too, to an extent.
So it may have some bearing on this too.

3) Homopolar Generator similarities...

There are *may be* some similarities between the VG and the HPG...

If you re-arrange the HPG to be linear it comes out similar to the VG.
So the magnetic field may be inducing current flow by that mechanism too...
Just a thought.

Tim

Khwartz · « **Reply #294 on:** March 03, 2014, 11:04:19 AM »

Quote from: tim123 on February 27, 2014, 07:43:58 PM

Updates:

1) ZVS driver:

- I bought this ZVS driver but it failed. I replaced the mosfets - but it still doesn't work - so...
- I've ordered some parts and I'm going to re-use what I can from the board and build a new one.
- Likely Problem - it may not run at a high enough frequency. Will see...

2) Coil:
- I've wrapped a second layer on the coil (not yet tested) - for 2 reasons:

a) To equalise the voltage in the coil around each bar...
With a 1-layered coil, the voltage drop across the coil would be reflected in the bars - i.e. the bar nearest the +ve terminal would see a higher-voltage / larger electric field than the one near the -ve.
This provides a mechanism for capacitive coupling *between* the bars. (I'm pretty sure)

With a 2-layered coil - where the second layer comes back to the start, the voltage drop is equal all the way along the coil.
So this *should* eliminate cap-coupling between the 2 inner bars.
(It wouldn't eliminate it between the bars and GND though - but that doesn't matter)

b) Verpies said that a single layer winding acts like a single turn in a toroid coil (in a different plane) - and it seems logical that it should apply to a straight coil too, to an extent.
So it may have some bearing on this too.

3) Homopolar Generator similarities...

There are *may be* some similarities between the VG and the HPG...

If you re-arrange the HPG to be linear it comes out similar to the VG.
So the magnetic field may be inducing current flow by that mechanism too...
Just a thought.

Tim

Hi tim.

Just to say I thought you were about a capacitive coupling between the bars and the coil, which was indeed checked by Pascal. Between the bars themselves is very something else and even not sure it is something to be avoid to get better results.

Anyway, good to have a try

but remember you didn't obtain with standard setups the huge COPs we are supposed to obtain with the standard setups. So imho, hard to know if any setup will be better because you have not yet any true comparison base. So still I think that would be better methodology to first achieve what has been already achieved apparently as level of results, before to go on our own ideas.

Best regards,
K.

Khwartz · « **Reply #295 on:** March 03, 2014, 11:20:23 AM »

Quote from: Atommix on February 27, 2014, 07:54:00 PM

I do not wish to put a negative cloud on anything but this thread is about negative mass and it is very important .

The other point is the error of personal petty politics of the mind set that says this is mine and that is yours ? Knowledge is not owned or controlled and must never become a theory .

There is only one universe it is this one ! I except that humans want to find the truth and claim it as there's so to climb up the ladder and begin to glow like a light house
illuminated by self . mmmmmmmmm I have pondered along the threshold of truth and see only one truth .

When the one is made of the many it is then that the real truth becomes a bell that rings its vibrations in the minds of all that think .

Also many walk down the path and straight into a dark wood where the only light that shines is in there head and continue to get lost in the darkness of self . So no I will not follow your advice or your theory for it is already lost in the wood.

Dont take that personal just except that a theory is just a theory and fact is a reality ! If an angel were to find you in the dark wood and taped you on the shoulder and stop you are lost deep in the wood and said follow the light and you will find fact not fiction . You would say but it is not the light I see in my head and continue to follow it until the end of time.

I am that angel ! and your theory is taking you deeper into the dark wood ! so please continue and I will keep watch over you and from time to time I will hit you on the head with my magic feather and tel you the truth.

There are masters and time lords demons and angels Aliens ghosts dimensions and the fabric of space in these woods do you think you will re-invent its reality ? NO !

GOOD LUCK

Regards

Atommix

Indeed, this thread was about negative mass too but we focus on the VG and Richard's theories.

You looks like having deep understanding and large views. PLEASE, open a new thread, like "New Ideas On Negative Mass, by Atommix", so that other guys here could focus on your own ideas, work and test them.

Here we test Richard Vialle's ideas. You have differents, so that's VERY GREAT, but not here please, Atommix, so that visitor could follow easier the thread.

Best regards,
K.

Khwartz · « **Reply #296 on:** March 04, 2014, 12:16:08 PM »

Translation of the

4th Q&A of the present FAQ of the website on the work of Richard

*** HOW TO GET "NEGATIVE POWER"? (Power produced by the input itself of the device, feeding back the power supply system, batteries, etc.) ***

http://richard-vialle.info/

(In agreement to the licence terms of the website, already published and taking no liability for any error of translation or modifications in between of the original terms of licence or of the original terms I translate here. These warnings applies to any writting by me on this website. )

----

Q : A quel moment puis-je obtenir "de la puissance négative" ?
• Q: At what moment may I obtain "some negative power "?

R : La puissance négative s'obtient lorsque les éléments suivants sont réunis :
• R: The negative power is obtained when the following elements are combined:

1/ Le système est conçu suivant les caractéristiques calculés dans le fichier Excel :
Fichiers:
Feuille de calcul des paramètres pour l'autogénérateur de Richard Vialle Version:17.09.2012

http://richard-vialle.info/index.php/telechargement/finish/4-systemes-experimentaux/24-feuille-de-calcul-des-parametres-pour-l-autogenerateur-de-richard-vialle

• 1/ The system is designed according to the characteristics calculated in the Excel file :
Files:
Worksheet of the parameters for the autogenerator of Richard Vialle Version:17.09.2012

Ce document vous permettra de calculer les paramètres relatifs au générateur de Richard Vialle.
Licence Creative Commons Date 2012-09-22 Taille du fichier 35 KB Téléchargement 725
• This document will allow you to calculate the parameters relative to Richard Vialle's generator.
License Creative Commons Date 2012-09-22 Weight of the file 35 KB download 725

2/ Un signal alternatif est injecté dans les spires qui entourent le barreau de cuivre. Ce signal doit correspondre à une fréquence qui se situe aux alentours de la fréquence calculée dans le fichier mentionné plus haut
• 2/ An alternative signal is injected in the coil which surround the copper bar. This signal has to correspond to a frequency which is located near the frequency calculated in the higher mentioned file.

3/ La "sortie" (la sortie du barreau de cuivre) doit être accordée, c'est à dire qu'un circuit d'accord RLC est positionné en court circuit afin de relier les deux sorties du barreau. Celà permet alors de faire sortir la puissance suruniaire du barreau et de provoquer la génération de la puissance négative qui se propagera alors au travers des spires (et donc à l'entrée)
• 3/ The "output" (the output of the copper bar) has to be tuned, that means a RLC tuning circuit is positioned in short circuit to connect both outputs of the bar. This allows then to get out the overunity power of the bar and to cause the generation of the negative power which will propagate then through the coil (and thus in the input).

----

Wishing this could help,

Best regards,
K.

Khwartz · « **Reply #297 on:** March 16, 2014, 01:27:22 PM »

Hello tim, how it's going for you, did you get what you needed to go forward? Did you acheive o.u. on the bar? For my own concern I have achieved o.u. "global COP" on my own activity (see our MPs) the first week of March but need to be continued

Nice to see you soon back,

Bedt regards,
Khwartz.

PiCéd · « **Reply #298 on:** March 16, 2014, 01:36:34 PM »

They talk about negative energy (apparently) on a certain frequency and some other things, so it must be the primary changing of sign, if so when they use a good battery as a primary energy it must recharging.
It is like two batteries set in a circuit without other component, one in one sens (+ to -) the other in the other sens (- to +), the battery who have the highest voltage recharge more or less slowly the less charged.

Khwartz · « **Reply #299 on:** March 16, 2014, 01:44:49 PM »

Exactly, PiCéd: if you read the previous pages you will see infinite recharging batteries is reported having been achieved in a private and industrial electronics laboratory

and this, even feeding a load in o.u. two, at the output of the bar! :p

Thanks for your interest

B.R.
K.

Cookie	Origin	Persistency	Information and Usage
ecl_auth	overunity.com	Expires after 30 days	This cookie contains the text "EU Cookie Law - LiPF cookies authorised". Without this cookie, the Forums' software is prevented from setting other cookies.
SMFCookie648	overunity.com	Expires according to user-chosen session duration	If you log-in as a member of this site, this cookie contains your user name, an encrypted hash of your password and the time you logged-in. It is used by the site software to ensure that features such as indicating new Forum and Private messages are indicated to you. This cookie is essential for the site software to work correctly.
PHPSESSID	overunity.com	Current session only	This cookie contains a unique Session Identification value. It is set for both members and non-members (guests) and it is essential for the site software to work correctly. This cookie is not persistent and should be automatically removed when you close the browser window.
pmx_upshr{NAME}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records your display preferences for the site's Portal page if a panel or individual block is collapsed or expanded
pmx_pgidx_blk{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the page number for the site's Portal page if the page for a individual block is changed.
pmx_cbtstat{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the expand/collapse state for a CBT Navigator block content.
pmx_poll{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the id for the current poll in a multiple Poll block.
pmx_{fadername}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the state for a Opac-Fader block.
pmx_LSBsub{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the current category and the state for a static Category block.
pmx_shout{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the current state of a Shout box block.
pmx_php_ckeck	overunity.com	Page load time	This cookie will probably never see you. It is set, if a Syntax check on a PHP block is initiated and will be deleted if the function executed.
pmx_YOfs	overunity.com	Page load time	This cookie will probably never see you. It is set on portal actions like click on a page number. The cookie is evaluated on load the desired page and then deleted. It is used to restore the vertical screen position as before the click.

1	We are aware that Google uses additional cookies it stores on your PC and when you browse our site and all other sites. These are used to target advertising and Google currently does this without seeking your permission. Four of these cookies we know about are named "rememberme", "NID", "PREF" and "PP_TOS_ACK" and are stored in Google's cache on your computer.
2	If you are accessing this site using someone else's computer, please ask the owner's permission before accepting cookies.
3	Your browser provides you with the ability to inspect all cookies stored on your PC. In addition your browser is responsible for removing "current session only" cookies and those that have expired; if your browser is not doing this, you should report the matter to your browser's authors.
4	We regret and apologies for any inconvenience this causes to members and guests who are accessing our web site from outside the European Union. It is not currently possible for us to interrogate your browser and obtain geographic location information in order to decide whether or not to prompt you to accept cookies.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity (Read 198495 times)

Khwartz

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

Khwartz

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

tagor

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

tagor

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

tagor

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

profitis

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

Khwartz

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

tim123

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

tim123

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

Khwartz

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

Khwartz

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

Khwartz

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

Khwartz

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

PiCéd

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

Khwartz

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity