Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity  (Read 207305 times)

tim123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #240 on: February 15, 2014, 06:30:30 PM »
Despite the apparent physical impossibility of soldering the teeny bits together - it is done :)
It's not as hard as I thought - as long as you:
 a) take your time
 b) use plenty of flux
 c) balance a small drop of solder on the tip of the iron
 d) use both hands to steady the iron...

I've soldered the smoothing cap at the back. The 2 resistors are only low power - will see how they do... I just have to hook it up to the IRF450 now...

PS: It's so small, my camera can't get a decent pic - even in macro mode...

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #241 on: February 15, 2014, 09:23:15 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdlZ03-8MaA
R Vialle == Meyer/Mace
IF this is true, then the EM and/or acoustic frequency must coordinated with magnetic flux density and/or sound wavelength (like in a tuning fork).

Magic frequencies that are related only to the type of the gain medium (copper, brass, iron...) and that work for all devices, regardless of natural or artificial magnetic fields and sizes, are highly unlikely.

P.S.
French is a beautiful language but I can't understand what the author is saying in this video ;(

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #242 on: February 17, 2014, 10:27:00 AM »
Below are some sample applications of the UCC27511 drivers for a totem-pole digital power amplifier driving a large transformer.
Warning: These circuits are not current limited thus they will blow up in the absence of the square input waveform.
Hi verpies.

Just for my own education as I know nothing in electronics and such circuits myself: what is the use of the double wiring (I mean the orange one) in this transformer?  Is this to use back efm?

BTW, thanks for the data you provide here, thanks for your help. For my concern I do learn things with what you bring ♡♡ even completely null in electronics  :-\

Regards,
K.

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #243 on: February 17, 2014, 11:10:53 AM »
R Vialle revue et corrigé by anonymous

from this video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdlZ03-8MaA

R Vialle == Meyer/Mace


http://www.overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generator/#.Uv-UFKyweFA

@ verpies

This comment below could help you to understand more what it is was about in its main ideas.

For more specific I will study his website and see if anything would be relevant to be translated and shared here (if the author allows me, otherwise only "short excerpts for educational purpose" ;) ).

@ tagor

Hi  tagor for this very interesting input :)

I had made myself the parallel between both systems.

What the Anonimus obviously forgets is that the cutting has a specific purpose, according to the experimenters of Cos.com: to very limit the "hot current" in the bar itself.

Remember:

"hot current" => Joule losses;  "cold current" => no Joule losses.

BTW, the verification of the usefulness of the cut in the midle of the bar is very easy to do: just have a try without and with the cut!

One experimenter has made the opposite: testing with many cuts. Need to find it back to report you the results to know if more cuts increase or decrease the efficiency.

Don't think Richard changed Michel Mayer work and just "change the packaging" as this Anonymous supposes. Richard looks have his theory first and only then after found experiences to prove his theory. The proof for me is there is no true polarisation system in the Richard's Autogen, while he would easy inspiring himself to enhance his own device.

But good to have different approaches to be able to compare the results; isn't?  ;) So indeed: any relevant input is welcome!  :)

@ tim

Wow! So little!  Lol :)


Best regards,
K.

tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #244 on: February 17, 2014, 12:39:57 PM »
Hi  tagor for this very interesting input (http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)

I had made myself the parallel between both systems.

What the Anonimus obviously forgets is that the cutting has a specific purpose, according to the experimenters of Cos.com: to very limit the "hot current" in the bar itself.

Remember:

"hot current" => Joule losses;  "cold current" => no Joule losses.

BTW, the verification of the usefulness of the cut in the midle of the bar is very easy to do: just have a try without and with the cut!
K.

yess it is very important , see the MEg and the BITT

and on conspi the LABO work

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #245 on: February 17, 2014, 01:01:32 PM »
what is the use of the double wiring (I mean the orange one) in this transformer?  Is this to use back efm?
Yes, this additional winding collects the energy in "back emf" and feeds it back to the power supply.

In conventional power supply designs with totem-pole drive, the primary windings usually have clamps or snubber circuits across them.  Often realized as transient voltage suppression diodes ...or zener diodes ...or metal oxide varistors, etc....

The purpose of all of these snubbing/clamping components is to dissipate the energy in unwanted and dangerous switching spikes.   
As a result, this spike energy gets wasted as heat.  The justification for this is that it's better to dissipate those spikes than blow up transistors and other components ...and to create EMI.

This design does not dissipate this unwanted energy but captures it and feeds it back into the power supply.  That's why the caption under the diagram states "...with lossless clamps".

BTW: Those "back emf" collection windings should mirror the main windings (ideally should be wound bifilarly and parallelly with the main primary winding).  If space is an issue, then it is allowable to wind the "back emf"collection winding with a thinner wire than the main winding (but still mirroring it as closely as possible).
« Last Edit: February 17, 2014, 04:19:27 PM by verpies »

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #246 on: February 17, 2014, 04:25:39 PM »
As usual in any true transformer (e.g. T2), all of the primary and secondary windings should consist of even number of back-and-forth layers covering the full circumference of the core ...or the following flux leakage happens.
Flux leakage causes loss of energy transfer efficiency, non-linear characteristics and exacerbated switching spikes.

P.S.
The latter recommendation does not apply to "flyback transformers", since those are not true transformers anyway.

tim123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #247 on: February 17, 2014, 07:30:26 PM »
Hi Folks,
A quick update on progress:
 - Gate driver attached to IRF450.
 - 15v on the gate from power supply #1
 - 50-60v on the load / drain from power supply #2
 - Signal from USB sig-gen.

Tested with 'scope & a light-bulb load - it works perfectly. Thanks again Verpies & Itsu for your help... :)

Next stage is to test it with my Vialle gen coil & tubes. Maybe tomorrow.

I know I need to add a snubber first... I will probably just connect a diode in reverse across the coil to start off with...

Regards, Tim

tim123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #248 on: February 17, 2014, 07:38:04 PM »
As usual in any true transformer (e.g. T2), all of the primary and secondary windings should consist of even number of back-and-forth layers...

Hi Verpies. Why an even number of layers? Why would that make a difference?

tim123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #249 on: February 17, 2014, 08:19:26 PM »
Ok, it's not yet perfect... It's not giving me a clean square wave output above about 100KHz... Above 400KHz - there's no waveform - but there is still power going through...

I'm guessing that the resistors between the driver & gate are too high value at 48Ohms... (Verpies?)

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #250 on: February 18, 2014, 12:24:09 PM »
Hi Verpies. Why an even number of layers? Why would that make a difference?
To cancel the circumferential current.

Notice that as a toroidal winding advances along the circumference of the toroidal core, the current advances with it, eventually forming ONE LOOP of current around the core's major axis.  This current creates magnetic field that is perpendicular to the plane of the toroid, and as such it is not contained within the toroid (and it must close through air).
Quote from: JL Naudin
In a common toroidal coil, each layer is equal to a "one turn coil" whose axis is parallel to the axis of the toroid. So, one layer of toroidal coil is equal to a flat coil of one turn and thus it can tap or produce EMF outside the torus.

So if you have 100-turn classical winding that spans the entire circumference of the toroid, then this winding acts like 1 turn of wire along the circumference of the core, in addition to 100 turns of classic toroidal windings. 
There is even this patent that's centered around this issue.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #251 on: February 18, 2014, 12:36:58 PM »
- 15v on the gate from power supply #1
Is the 15V power supply to the gate driver stable?  Is it bypassed with close ceramic capacitor close to the driver?

I know I need to add a snubber first... I will probably just connect a diode in reverse across the coil to start off with...
Snubber is necessary only if you interrupt the current trough the coil.  If you do and if you do not snub the resulting voltage spike (or feed it back to the power supply with lossless clamps) then this spike will kill your transistor or interfere with its switching.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #252 on: February 18, 2014, 12:38:49 PM »
Ok, it's not yet perfect... It's not giving me a clean square wave output above about 100KHz... Above 400KHz - there's no waveform - but there is still power going through...
I'm guessing that the resistors between the driver & gate are too high value at 48Ohms... (Verpies?)
Maybe.  Show me the voltage waveform between the gate and the source of the MOSFET and I will be able to reply with certainty if that is the problem.

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #253 on: February 18, 2014, 01:04:19 PM »
yess it is very important , see the MEg and the BITT

and on conspi the LABO work
;)

But for the "conspi the LABO work": no more access since an argument with Pascuser ;)

tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #254 on: February 18, 2014, 01:16:52 PM »
;)

But for the "conspi the LABO work": no more access since an argument with Pascuser ;)
Oooooooooooh yessss
can you change your IP ?  (it is more than five years of works )