I beleive his work had merit and when an inventor is killed on the brink of discovery well he must have been on to something.
I am continuing work on his tube with dramaticly radical concepts and hope to achieve spectacular results.

of course Ed Gray and Nikola Tesla are my heroes I just hope I dont end up with their fate

The key to the conversion tube is with T. H. Moray's design.

                       -B.A. Perreault

I believe Ed's motor worked.  He was on the scene long enough to indicate this.  I think alot of his problems came from the lack of knowledge as to how his machine actually worked.  But this was also a blessing.  Stating that his motor was actually a high efficiency design (99% efficiant)  was probably what enabled him to get a patent.  If he has stated his motor ran off the cosmos, he would have been denied. 

The key here (opinion) is in the power supply.  I got the feeling the motor was just designed to run off the specific pulse signature produced by Ed's power supply.  There fore, it is of little importants until the power supply is developed. 

Has anyone else noticed the similarities between the Ed Gray power supply, Tesla's magnifying transmitter, Moray's device.  Tesla's is the most simple becuase he was broadcasting the radiant energy and there wasn't much discussion about recieving it.  Ed's design takes this to a new level by including the recieving protion in his design so effectively he was only broadcasting his radiant energy across his tube.  The Moray design is the best in my opinion.  He has all the components that appear in Tesla and Gray's designs but with the added complexity that comes with making his circuit occilate instead just pulsed DC.  I think the confusion comes from Moray's "fission material" which is probably helpful and makes the circuit simpler, but I believe a hybrid between the three can be made with out the need for the "detector" substance.

any thoughts?

Hi Mark,

   the skeptic in all of us comes out...and it should. But I believe as you that there are common threads between many of the articles on the web and books to be purchased. If you have not read Moray King's lastest work regarding potential ZPE harnessing, I would suggest you do. Also Peter Lindemann's book, "the sectrets of cold electricity." Lately, I have read Bruce A. Perreault's book as well, "Harnessing Cosmic Energy." I've compiled a little reference library which I constantly refer to. Also books on theory can be useful as well, Milo Wolff, "Exploring the Unknown universe." What I've tried to do is gather in as much information as possible, reread, and cross-reference, without becoming to skeptical at first. A basic understanding of presently established scientific theory (I believe) is a must. It's the underpinnings of these theory's that seem to be in question (for example. what is a photon?). These are not just philosophical questions but may have real world applications. Most of all though, is not to go spouting theory until you have done your own homework and experimentation. This, in my humble opinion, is how best not to waste other people's time.

-John   

I get the feeling the whole point in Cold electricity is ZERO amps.

I get the feeling the whole point in Cold electricity is ZERO amps.

I've been studing a design based on his ideas.  Actually your not too far from it.  The design runs at 1000v and 25ma.  IMO from reading off of it you can't really directly pull too much energy out.  Maybe enough to keep the battery charged or at least running for a few days/weeks.  But it runs about 2550 of RPM with very high torque.  It wouldn't be that hard to indirectly get power from it.  I'm modifying the design with a slightly longer shaft and putting a windmill alternator at the back end.  The windmill alternator will be whats used for power.

Eric

in eds early experiments he did not use a motor.the circit is the the key.you can power your whole house on just the circit.he would use a car battery to charge a cap to 3000 volts then would create a spark across a spark gap with a timming or control circit which goes back to the neg of the battery.(no free energy here).near the spark gap were just two peices of copper tubing which picked up the raidient event or as found by tesla the spark actually some how manufactures electrons.this is how he charged his battery and ran his motor nothing special about the motor.sorry for this very short explination but this is the jest of it.all ed did was copy teslas work.when he worked at nasa he worked with teslas assittant.this is probobly where he got his info from or the idea.tesla had a peirce arrow(car) running with this circit and an electric motor(80 hp).cant type that well as everyone now knows,so i will leave you peeps with some reading material on the subject.the free energy secrets of cold electricity by peter lindemann.this guy sells a book and video,with som other good books on his web site like the secrets of cold war tecnology all required reading if you peeps want to build the circit and or motor.i would attach a pdf of the book but im on dial up and its 20 or so megs.hope this helps you guys and girls.