Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1261125 times)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3195 on: April 24, 2015, 10:18:23 PM »
Sarkeizen:'Sure...in a separate thread'

..And mr sarkeizen backs out again.puk-puk-puuuuk (feathers fly allover the place :) ).chickenshit mr sarkeizen

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3196 on: April 24, 2015, 10:22:00 PM »
Sarkeizen:'ROFL!

If I was cornered it would be trivial to produce a proof that I'm incorrect about something.'

You won't allow it.you've banned switches,again :D

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3197 on: April 24, 2015, 10:24:06 PM »
..And mr sarkeizen backs out again.puk-puk-puuuuk (feathers fly allover the place :) ).chickenshit mr sarkeizen
Awww, it's so cute when you think you can bully people.  It's also slightly disturbing that you generally think bullying is an acceptable thing to do.  That said if you were some kind of worthwhile human being you probably wouldn't bullshit and lie so much. :)  But I guess you self-justify these things in some (very stupid) way. :)

So here's a question that you can't answer: What exactly am I backing out of?  I said I had something to say about Philip Hardcastle's Quenco.  You admitted that what you want to discuss is NOT a Phlip Hardcastle quenco.  You want to make up some other thing to argue about.  I say fine.  Just put it in a thread about that thing. 

The fact that you won't is pretty interesting.  It would take you two seconds to do that.  So why are you letting me control this argument?   Probably because you can't make your point and you would do ANYTHING to stall things.

Me I'm happy to talk about both - just not in the same thread.  You can go on bullying some more if you like. :)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3198 on: April 24, 2015, 10:45:21 PM »
Sarkeizen:'What exactly am I backing out of?'

I said that I can SHOW you how a quenco can work WITHOUT violating bbbv theorem by adding a simpleton switch (doesn't interfere with quenco funtions) then you said you don't want to see it.this after I told you I won't budge to another thread. i really thought you were maybe,ya'know, keen to see how :D

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3199 on: April 24, 2015, 10:47:43 PM »
Sarkeizen:'You admitted that what you want to discuss is NOT a Phlip Hardcastle quenco.'

Where did I admit such a thing don't be ridiculous

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3200 on: April 24, 2015, 11:07:14 PM »
Where did I admit such a thing don't be ridiculous
Hey English.  Congratulations.  Now try to stop speaking troll! :) :)

How can you add a switch to something that already possesses one?
You keep asking to ADD a switch.  Hence Philp's quenco has no switch.
You keep not wanting to discuss the Philip Hardcastle quenco and...almost BEGGING to add a switch. 
Hence you do not want to talk about Philip Hardcastle quenco.
If you do, by all means prove it by talking about it here. :)

QED.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3201 on: April 24, 2015, 11:15:57 PM »
Sarkeizen:'Hence you do not want to talk about Philip Hardcastle quenco.'

Lolololol heeeheeeheee :D imagine profitis not wanting to talk about quenco..g g giggle :)..wooooo mr sarkeizen's in such a fucking tight corner snicker snicker :D

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3202 on: April 24, 2015, 11:29:38 PM »
Sarkeizen:'How can you add a switch to something that already possesses one?'

Easy,you add another one

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3203 on: April 24, 2015, 11:33:28 PM »
imagine profitis not wanting to talk about quenco.
About Philip Hardcastles quenco.  Because you said it doesn't have a switch and you refuse to carry on your argument without a switch.  QED.
Quote
.g g giggle :)..wooooo mr sarkeizen's in such a fucking tight corner snicker snicker :D
Doesn't seem like it.  As...

a) You refuse to discuss Philip Hardcastle's Quenco here and
b) You refuse to discuss your own shit-for-brains ideas elsewhere

If I'm in some kind of corner it would be trivial to do either of those but since you refuse.  It seems like the thing you want most is to stall the conversation.  :) :)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3204 on: April 24, 2015, 11:37:26 PM »
Sarkeizen:'How can you add a switch to something that already possesses one?'

Easy,you add another one
Then you are still giving it something it does not possess.  Hence the thing you are wanting to discuss is not the thing I was talking about when I began this discussion.  I'm happy to discuss this idea of yours but you need to create a thread for it.

Well now you're stuck in a corner.  You can't talk about Philip Hardcastle Quenco without adding a switch and you refuse to talk about your shitty switched quenco somewhere else.

You lost. :)  I at least have an argument based on Philip Hardcastles Quenco - you only have pages of begging me to let you add a switch. :)  (and some posts where you clearly have no idea how complexity theory, computer science and mathematical proofs in general work)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3205 on: April 24, 2015, 11:43:29 PM »
Sarkeizen:'You refuse to discuss your own shit-for-brains ideas elsewhere'

Well according to you all claimed demons are a shit-for-brains-idea and since demons are pretty much what this whole threads is about then I don't see why its a problem for you to make one tiny addition to quenco,HERE ON THIS THREAD

??

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3206 on: April 24, 2015, 11:56:33 PM »
Sarkeizen:'You lost.

Not by miles no ways.


Sarkeizen:' you only have pages of begging me to let you add a switch. :)'

Which you for some reason will absolutely not allow.to the point of even throwing tantrums about it

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3207 on: April 25, 2015, 12:20:56 AM »
Quote from: me
You lost.
Not by miles no ways.
Yawn.  Another Profitis game of trying to bullshit his way through.  Look like it or not you can't provide an argument based on what I originally said.  I mean that's the absolute truth right.  If you could we would be discussing that right now.  Instead you're stuck trying to bullshit.
Quote from: me
you only have pages of begging me to let you add a switch. :)
Quote
Which you for some reason will absolutely not allow.
This is 100% wrong.  I completely allow it in another thread in fact I have a deep and burning desire to talk about it in another thread but it's simply not part of Philips Quenco so it seems reasonable to put it in another thread.   You were happy to talk about your Pile-of-shit idea in another thread.  Hence this should pose no problem for you. 
Quote
to the point of even throwing tantrums about it
Is calmly telling you to put your shitty idea in another thread is a "tantrum" in Profitis land?  Or is this you just bullshitting again.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3208 on: April 25, 2015, 12:23:35 AM »
Well according to you all claimed demons are a shit-for-brains-idea
Actually I think all the free-energy, vaccine denying, conspiracy mongering ideas discussed on OU are the shittiest shit that shit could shit if shit shat shit but that doesn't mean I want to have to read them all in one thread. 
Quote
and since demons are pretty much what this whole threads is about
Actually Phillip said the opposite.  So you've given another good reason for your "I will lose this argument if I can't add a switch" ideas to be separate. :)  Thanks!

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3209 on: April 25, 2015, 11:42:07 AM »
Sarkeizen:' I completely allow it in another
thread'

This reeks of fear of some sort.specificly, the fear of losing an argument over information and its direct logarithmic manipulation of disproportionate energy in front of large sections of demonology enthusiasts,without violating bbbv.