Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1061166 times)

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2445 on: June 03, 2014, 04:20:14 AM »
Rossi did this and even sold one.
I am a big fan of Andrea "you must be a clown snake" Rossi and his now you see it now you don't million unit per year fully robotic factory.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2446 on: June 03, 2014, 04:21:08 AM »
So if you were the labchief and some random stranger told you that he could build a magical unicorn in your lab you wouldn't give him a chance @sarkeizen?just to humour him?
I'd give him some thorazine and call security.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2447 on: June 03, 2014, 04:36:43 AM »
 years ago, by me,documented here @markE.your not a gambler? you sounded like  a roulette numbers expert a few posts ago.what would you have to lose?nothing,because either the guy would build a magical unicorn or you'd get a good laugh at his own humiliation.both ways you gain something.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2448 on: June 03, 2014, 04:49:27 AM »
you'd get a good laugh at his own humiliation.both ways you gain something.
You are stating that I'd gain something.  However clearly you humiliate yourself here pretty much all the time.  So we don't get that benefit and it costs us in labspace and materials.  Those things could be put to work for people who have work which can be usefully judged as likely to be successful.  Your work, by your own admission can't be.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2449 on: June 03, 2014, 05:30:41 AM »
@sarkeizen a)be careful.some strangers carry pepper spray. b)if a gambler turns me down its because he,s stupid.c)this is improbable.d) 1)so what 2)so what 3)not if you understand the laws of diffusion.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2450 on: June 03, 2014, 07:21:40 AM »
years ago, by me,documented here @markE.your not a gambler? you sounded like  a roulette numbers expert a few posts ago.what would you have to lose?nothing,because either the guy would build a magical unicorn or you'd get a good laugh at his own humiliation.both ways you gain something.
Or he's a psychotic nutter who presents a danger to himself and others.  I think the thorazine and security approach is safest.  As for you, you should conduct your experiments before you offer conclusions on their results.

Offline Philip Hardcastle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2451 on: June 03, 2014, 08:22:01 AM »
Troll all you want to pointless and Sarcastic, but on 20th August I will reclaim this thread with a World shattering announcement.


To be perfectly frank you are both without manners or respect of others, this inane to and fro should be done on a thread for your topic.


@profitis, I asked you in the other thread to answer a simple question about the device you have been ranting on about for months, you ignored my question and came here to continue stupid bating of Sarkeizen (aka E-man). If you go back to that thread and answer my question I will respond.


No more until 20th August here.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2452 on: June 03, 2014, 08:32:19 AM »
Troll all you want to pointless and Sarcastic, but on 20th August I will reclaim this thread with a World shattering announcement.
Yawn.  Go home Philip.  You are drunk.
Quote
To be perfectly frank you are both without manners or respect of others, this inane to and fro should be done on a thread for your topic.
Next time call it "quentron propaganda".  I'll be sure to keep my comments in the non-propaganda threads.  Deal?
Quote
No more until 20th August here.
or after.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2453 on: June 03, 2014, 08:39:20 AM »
Troll all you want to pointless and Sarcastic, but on 20th August I will reclaim this thread with a World shattering announcement.


To be perfectly frank you are both without manners or respect of others, this inane to and fro should be done on a thread for your topic.


@profitis, I asked you in the other thread to answer a simple question about the device you have been ranting on about for months, you ignored my question and came here to continue stupid bating of Sarkeizen (aka E-man). If you go back to that thread and answer my question I will respond.


No more until 20th August here.
Mr. Hardcastle, you have made a number of announcements, and announced announcements.  What you have not done is produced evidence that supports your claims.  The spinny things from around 2008 never panned out.  The vacuum tube thing from around 2011 did not pan out.  The thin layers concept from 2012 did not pan out.  If you were ever to come up with solid evidence that backs your extraordinary claims, then those claims would get much better notice.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2454 on: June 03, 2014, 12:50:13 PM »
A working replicated karpen pile or relative of a working replicated karpen pile with zero political consensus about its fuel is highly likely to be successful mr sarkeizen.your an idiot.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2455 on: June 03, 2014, 02:26:58 PM »
A working replicated karpen pile or relative of a working replicated karpen pile
i) A device of the kind you describe must be "capable of running an ipod-like device eternally"
ii) Any claim of something running eternally can not be validated through pure empiricism.
iii) You claim that you can not create a formal argument to make your point.
iv) Therefore, no device of this kind can be ever said to be "working".

QED.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2456 on: June 03, 2014, 08:21:34 PM »
Phillip? Where's your response??

Offline Philip Hardcastle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2457 on: June 04, 2014, 05:17:31 AM »
@profitis, I have answered you on the Karpen thread.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2458 on: June 04, 2014, 02:35:04 PM »
Philip, where are my car keys and do you think you can pick up some milk on the way home?

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2459 on: June 05, 2014, 12:35:15 AM »
Just putting this back in the proper thread...
I agree that there are some 2lot violating ideas that do not fit with the classic demon, I say sebithenco is one as it does not require energy to be expended to do the sorting of kinetic energies
...and somehow it sorts without requiring information either. :D