Thanks Hope.


Back to the topic of this thread,


www.quentron.com


I have posted a schematic, some plots, and an explanation of the breakthrough Sebby Ice design on the site.


Also I am posting details of the room temp Sebby experiment.


I will be working to add to the info on the site for some time to come.


We are encouraging groups from around the World to become manufacturers of this open technology.


Phil

@hope,a 2nd law destruction isnt ontopic? Sure we can take the argument to another place and make space for the ghostly activity here,but what for?this thread was dead for months before lumen lit the fire and sarkeizen fueled it.no-one is stopping you from having a say.

We here are interested in the topic not your dribble.   

No offense but what Phillip posts is just as repetitive and dull, the only difference is in frequency.  I could easy show this with post after vacuous post of his and his similar inability to argue his point.

Find a live chat room and discuss it or decide to drop it.

IMHO this is harmless fun which pretty much describes the vast majority of what goes on at Overunity.  Let's not kid ourselves, nobody here is doing serious research.  Almost nobody seems to, from where I stand  have the slightest idea as to how.

That said, I don't mind dropping this if to bothers you so much.  After all Profitis conceded my point a few days ago.

Since all I am arguing is that you can't support that statement strictly using textbooks and formal logic.

@sarkeizen.i cannot come to you with a textbook argument for a 2nd law breach using textbook words

Cheers.

exceptionaly formal.totaly logic.from textbooks.my statement @sarkeizen,collapse it, then you win.you wont because you cant

(snip)
IMHO this is harmless fun which pretty much describes the vast majority of what goes on at Overunity.  Let's not kid ourselves, nobody here is doing serious research.  Nobody seems to, from where I stand  have the slightest idea as to how.

(snip)
Cheers.

Aww... I'm crushed. 

 

Aww... I'm crushed. 

 

Edited the post...added "almost".

Thanks Hope.


Back to the topic of this thread,


www.quentron.com


I have posted a schematic, some plots, and an explanation of the breakthrough Sebby Ice design on the site.


Also I am posting details of the room temp Sebby experiment.


I will be working to add to the info on the site for some time to come.


We are encouraging groups from around the World to become manufacturers of this open technology.


Phil

Just read "Sebby Ice Theory". Mr. Hardcastle forgets that the electric field is a conservative field. The high negative voltage bias at the emitter means high electric field. In order to harvest energy from thermionic emission, electrons just ejected by the emitter (and pushed by the high negative voltage bias) should return to the emitter (no closed circuit - no power output), thus they have to overcome in the wrong direction the same potential they were pushed by. Nothing will happen, as usual...
 
The present message is my share of wasted time.


 

@hollander,

You are talking absolute rubbish.


You clearly know zip about thermionic emission and surface physics.


High negative bias to cathodes and the corresponding reduction of work function is peer reviewed science.


There are real world device based on such.

It is called Field Emission. I was talking of something else: electric field is a conservative field. The emitted electrons should close the loop and (spontaneously) return to the emitter for your device to have a chance to work (produce current an power).

Well, guess what? On the way back to the emitter they have to overcome the very same barrier they left after the emission.

CONSERVATIVE FIELD.

Bye

PS. By the way, I am an expert. But yes, I cannot have the honor to share you curriculum of (quenco) failures