Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.
 Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here: https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1210705 times)

#### profitis

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3952
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2265 on: February 25, 2014, 06:50:02 AM »
@sarkeizen.apologies.you have laid down exactly zero formal textbook proof whatsoever to combat the overbearing presence of the..last profitis statement..

#### sarkeizen

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1923
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2266 on: February 25, 2014, 07:46:48 AM »
@sarkeizen.apologies.you have laid down exactly zero formal textbook proof
My formal logical proof is has been posted several times now.  Do you need to see it again?  It demonstrates that the only statements you can make other than the True Profitis Statement are either not equivalent to it (and therefore irrelevant to the discussion) or provided with no cogent argument.

If you don't get it, just say so and I'll explain.   Loser.

#### profitis

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3952
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2267 on: February 25, 2014, 07:55:26 AM »
we,re not interested in 'logical' proof @sarkeizen.we just want you to topple my 2nd statement.if you cant topple my 2nd statement then sorry,no luck on toppling my 1st statement by default.

#### sarkeizen

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1923
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2268 on: February 25, 2014, 08:05:49 AM »
we,re not interested in 'logical' proof
Yes, logic is apparently not something that you have very much experience with.  I'm more than happy to step you through the proof.  I understand completely that your...inexperience...may be difficult for you to overcome.

Still, logic says that you have not yet provided anything to refute.  Only words irrelevant to the True Profitis Statement and words that are equally unsupported.

#### profitis

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3952
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2269 on: February 25, 2014, 08:17:17 AM »
no mr sarkeizen..you are to be badly,badly dissapointed if you think that my 2nd statement is irrelevant to my 1st statement.quit being lazy and show us that my textbook-worded statement is null and void then only can you prove scientificly to us that my casual-worded statement is null and void..

#### sarkeizen

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1923
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2270 on: February 25, 2014, 03:02:38 PM »
no mr sarkeizen..you are to be badly,badly dissapointed if you think that some made up and generally poorly defined statement is irrelevant to the  True Profitis Statement..
Fun We can prove you wrong again:
The True Profitis Statement is true IFF a formal logical argument reaches the conclusion "ordinary textbooks necessitate the existence of and ability to build a battery which would power an ipod-like device eternally and continually".  Clearly this requires ordinary textbooks.

By virtue of this,   any and every other statement you wish to make is either:

i) Not equivalent to the  True Profitis Statement (and therefore irrelevant) or...
ii) Unsupported (because the True Profitis Statement is unsupported because there is no ordinary textbook cite)

If you have a problem with this, then again I'm more than happy to give you a tutorial and walk you through it.  It might be good for you.  You probably think you have some valid objection but if you were to discuss it you would see that you are just very, very, very stupid.

#### TinselKoala

• Hero Member
• Posts: 13958
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2271 on: February 25, 2014, 04:37:46 PM »
Very persistent, though... that's got to count for something, right?

#### sarkeizen

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1923
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2272 on: February 25, 2014, 06:33:43 PM »
Very persistent, though... that's got to count for something, right?

Perhaps in the same way banging ones head against a wall counts towards a contusion.

#### profitis

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3952
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2273 on: February 25, 2014, 08:39:52 PM »
lol talk shit @sarkeizen.you can prove and have proved exactly zilch thusfar.even the karpen blueprint fits perfectly into my textbook statement and thus into textbooks lol.you dont think gold and platinum have 2 different oxygen overpotentials?you have to show us how their equilibrium over/underpotentials dont fuck the 2nd law straight in the ass by necessary cycling of gas.how the fuck are you going to do this?? A very difficult task lies ahead for you my friend because if you dont collapse my statement now then people will start to believe my ipod lingotrash..and we dont want that..

#### sarkeizen

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1923
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2274 on: February 25, 2014, 09:16:35 PM »
you can prove and have proved exactly zilch thusfar.
Can you point to a lemma in my proof that does not force the next step?  Nope. So my proof stands. Which means I've proved at least one thing.  That you have moved the discussion exactly nowhere from where it started four months ago.  It's kind of an achievement really.  To post so much and be able to say so incredibly close to nothing at all.

Quote
people will start to believe my
Sorry, not interested.  Everyone in the world could believe you or start believing you or start believing you directly as a result of my action or inaction and it wouldn't bother me.  That's one of the benefits of using logic.  It doesn't matter what people believe, accepting the True Profitis Statement would still be the irrational thing to do.

Reason can be an end unto itself and I'm content with having bested you.  No matter how much you're in denial about it.

#### profitis

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3952
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2275 on: February 25, 2014, 09:53:05 PM »
lol and you contradict yourself too! You say it doesnt matter what people believe then immediately after say that accepting my statement would be irrational?make up your mind @sarkeizen.Your lemmas force zip until you play the ball where it lies,and its jumped here> onto the last profitis statement..

#### sarkeizen

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1923
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2276 on: February 26, 2014, 12:59:38 AM »
you contradict yourself too! You say it doesnt matter what people believe then immediately after say that accepting my statement would be irrational?
Yawn.  Tell you what.  Ask someone who understands English better than you do.   Perhaps a six year old?  They'll explain it to you.
Quote
Can you show me a problem in the proof?  Nope.

#### profitis

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3952
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2277 on: February 26, 2014, 02:17:41 AM »
yes i can show you how you,re on a lone war against 3 fronts mr sarkeizen 1)a nernstian front coming from the south.2)a gaseous spillover front from the east.3)a polarization front from the west. Time for you to go awol dont you think mr sarkeizen.

#### sarkeizen

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1923
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2278 on: February 26, 2014, 02:44:32 AM »
Can you show me a problem with my proof?  Nope.

#### Hope

• Hero Member
• Posts: 701
##### Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2279 on: February 26, 2014, 10:54:57 AM »
Stop it, both of you are self servicing and this topic is not your personal battlefield.  Are you both just the same person trolling here?   Nothing to see of interest to you both,  move along.   We here are interested in the topic not your dribble.

Find a live chat room and discuss it or decide to drop it.

We here are not interested in digressing the topic into non productive banter.   Moderator please take control of this situation and apply the cure.   Thank you.

Richard Williams
"Hope"