Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 524080
  • *Total Topics: 15602
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 11

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 951137 times)

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2250 on: February 22, 2014, 09:37:27 PM »
Both T and M can be demonstrated
Incorrect.  T as you have stated it.  Can not be demonstrated purely empirically, furthermore the only form of evidence which will satisfy T is a textbook cite.   Both these problems have been proved several times in this thread.

Again, you are simply wrong and are unable to believe that.  Interesting. :D

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2250 on: February 22, 2014, 09:37:27 PM »

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2251 on: February 22, 2014, 10:00:48 PM »
yawn @sarkeizen im sitting nice and lazy in my hammock here waiting for you to put the slightest dent on my latest terrorising statement,do me a fave and refill my glass esprit while you paw through the textbooks?:D 

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2252 on: February 23, 2014, 04:39:45 AM »
er
do me a fave and refill my glass esprit while you paw through the textbooks?:D
So in other words you can't support the True Profitis Statement.  Which means you lost. :D

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2252 on: February 23, 2014, 04:39:45 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2253 on: February 23, 2014, 09:03:15 AM »
your criteria isnt the only way to support textbooks @ sarkeizen.read my last statement carefully word for word and you,l see its disgustingly textbooktised.so much so that you have to ask yourself,'hey,why was i ever against the idea of 2 superimposed entropy states in one system?why was i? Why was i?dang!' Equilibrium potential differences can be evil.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2254 on: February 23, 2014, 09:52:27 PM »
your criteria isnt the only way to support textbooks
Nothing about my criteria.  It's your criteria in your True Statement of Profitis.  Which require an ordinary textbook.  Now if you were wrong about that, that's fine.  You can just say so.
Quote
l see its disgustingly textbooktised.
If you have a cite from an ordinary textbook which supports the True Statement of Profitis..  Then feel free to provide it, however before you said you couldn't do this.  Which is probably true and makes me right. :D

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2254 on: February 23, 2014, 09:52:27 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2255 on: February 23, 2014, 11:44:00 PM »
my statement @sarkeizen.the last one..tap-tap-tap(fingers tapping the desk) :D

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2256 on: February 23, 2014, 11:57:56 PM »
my statement @sarkeizen.the last one
...is either unrelated to the True Profitis Statement or unproved.  You can't have both.  This has been proved.

Either pretty much means I win.  Think about it for a change....

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2256 on: February 23, 2014, 11:57:56 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2257 on: February 24, 2014, 12:40:10 AM »
not until you destroy my statement @sarkeizen..the last one..clip..clip..clip(cutting my toenails now)

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2258 on: February 24, 2014, 01:19:28 AM »
not until you destroy my statement @sarkeizen..the last one
As you said it's either irrelevant to the True Profitis Statement or has no cogent argument.  Do you usually go around attempting to disprove irrelevant things or things which have no cogent argument?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2258 on: February 24, 2014, 01:19:28 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2259 on: February 24, 2014, 01:56:51 AM »
it is highly relevant and exceptionaly cogent in line with textbooks @sarkeizen.i cannot come to you with a textbook argument for a 2nd law breach using textbook words that can be destroyed instantly e.g. 'a oxygen concentration cell is a kelvin bust' (you would just show me a differential pressure o2 cell) but i can come to you with standard formality words:' a equi-pressure oxygen gas electrode overpotential differential cell necessitates an kelvin bust',because its impossible for it to not necessitate a kelvin bust.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2260 on: February 24, 2014, 03:11:15 AM »
it is highly relevant
Not to the True Profitis Statement which is what is being discussed or if it is then there's no cogent argument for it.
 
Quote
i cannot come to you with a textbook argument for a 2nd law breach using textbook words
Sounds like you're conceding my point concerning the True Profitis Statement.  If the True Profitis Statement is false.  That you can't simply use logic and textbooks alone to NECESSITATE the existence and ability to build a battery which will last eternally and continually.

Then say so, plainly.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2260 on: February 24, 2014, 03:11:15 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2261 on: February 24, 2014, 11:10:08 PM »
@sarkeizen i told you i can use textbooks and formality ALONE to substantiate all 2 of my statements in one shot: in the LAST PROFITIS STATEMENT.you can argue szilard or fenyman or loschmidt or trupp through the whole year but it is impossible to not breach kelvin laws with that last statement of mine.it will go down in history as the definitive kelvin-quencher(at least on this website).be glad @sarkeizen,you were part of this golden moment.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2262 on: February 25, 2014, 01:26:05 AM »
i told you i can use textbooks and formality ALONE to substantiate all 2 of my statements in one shot: in the LAST PROFITIS STATEMENT.
It can't.  In fact you said so yourself.

You said that some fake profitis statement could not be validated with ordinary textbooks...I can quote where you said this if you like.  Since ordinary textbooks are required by the True Profitis Statement for validation any statement which can not be validated by ordinary textbooks is, by your own words excluded from being able of validating the True Profitis Statement

Let me know when you figure it out.  Loser.


Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2263 on: February 25, 2014, 06:11:09 AM »
the ipod statement can be validated by working your way down the last profitis statement,which you can check out using just about any higher grade college physical chemistry textbook @sarkeizen so your above statement is false,null,and void until you prove the last profitis statement to be false,null,and void which you cannot possibly do.if i use standard formality textbook words to declare a kelvin breach you better be prepared to show me wrong or else confess defeat.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2264 on: February 25, 2014, 06:29:17 AM »
the ipod statement can be validated by working your way down the last profitis statement
Sorry, I've laid out a formal logical proof showing you to be incorrect.  If you have a problem with that then you should probably consult the proof.

 

OneLink