Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 ... 219   Go Down

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1268309 times)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2190 on: February 19, 2014, 11:32:13 PM »
@mark E..if you can disprove my statement then no.if you cant...and i know you cant then...
Logged

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2191 on: February 19, 2014, 11:38:54 PM »
@sarkeizen..all equi-pressure gaseous electrode overpotential differential cells necessitate a kelvin bust..sound better now?
Logged

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2192 on: February 20, 2014, 12:55:56 AM »
Quote from: profitis on February 19, 2014, 11:38:54 PM
@sarkeizen..all equi-pressure gaseous electrode overpotential differential cells necessitate a kelvin bust..sound better now?
Are you no longer saying that: Ordinary textbooks necessitate the existence of and ability to build a battery which will power a ipod-like device eternally and continually?

If not, then I win.  If you are then please provide an ordinary textbook cite. :D :D

Let me guess...you will stall again.   Then draw a diagram.  Then demand I prove something irrelevant.  Then claim you don't need a cite.

Does this ever work with people you know?
Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2193 on: February 20, 2014, 03:26:47 AM »
Quote from: profitis on February 19, 2014, 11:32:13 PM
@mark E..if you can disprove my statement then no.if you cant...and i know you cant then...
The burden of proof is upon the person making the extraordinary claim.  You make the extraordinary claims.  You bear the burden of proof.

We are coming up on a week here and there is no sign that you will be coming up with that reference you promised.
Logged

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2194 on: February 20, 2014, 08:43:48 AM »
@mark E the burden of disproof is upon the person making extra-ordinary claims too. you claim theres no macroscopic kelvin violations,the evidence says otherwise.evidence by the book..
Logged

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2195 on: February 20, 2014, 08:46:48 AM »
@sarkeizen and just how does the profitis statement not grossly enforce an kelvin breach, by the book?we are waiting for your explanation because you are implying that the profitis statement does not totaly support my ipod statement.
Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2196 on: February 20, 2014, 01:34:36 PM »
Quote from: profitis on February 20, 2014, 08:43:48 AM
@mark E the burden of disproof is upon the person making extra-ordinary claims too. you claim theres no macroscopic kelvin violations,the evidence says otherwise.evidence by the book..
Profitis your claim of macroscopic violation of the Second Law of Energy is an extraordinary one.  Feel free to offer proof of your extraordinary claim.  Given that in a week you have failed to offer the reference you promised to me, and that it has been God only knows how many months you have failed to provide any cite supporting your extraordinary claims to sarkeizen it is reasonable to conclude that it will be a very long time before you offer any evidence, much less a proof for your extraordinary claim that you have a demonstrable case of a macroscopic Second Law of Energy violation. 

You seem to be intelligent.  Why do you intentionally play yourself as a fool?
Logged

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2197 on: February 20, 2014, 02:08:05 PM »
Quote from: profitis on February 20, 2014, 08:46:48 AM
you are implying that the profitis statement does not totaly support my ipod statement.
No, since the "ipod statement" which we will call "The *real* profitis statement" from now on is dependent on a textbook cite and a conclusion ending with the Real Profitis Statement and since whatever other thing you are blathering about does not provide these things.  You have provided nothing to demonstrate  the relevance of your other blather.

Hey, you proved me right.  You went straight to "irrelevant statement" phase of your gibberish.  Next you will confuse asserting with demonstrating or jump back to demanding to prove some other irrelevant statement.
Logged

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2198 on: February 20, 2014, 04:55:30 PM »
@mark E why dont you just take my twisted textbook statement and just show us how crappy it is?i mean it should be easy for you to do right? counter-attack the profitis statement @mark E instead of standing there and demanding a video of it.
Logged

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2199 on: February 20, 2014, 05:18:28 PM »
you,re saying i failed to show how textbooks help to power your ipod forever by declaring my textbook words null and void sarkeizen? Laughable.
Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2200 on: February 20, 2014, 05:23:39 PM »
Profitis, as Sarkeizen predicted, you are now on cue demanding that others disprove your extraordinary claims.  You must get some sort of reward out of portraying yourself as a fool.  It is difficult for me to imagine what that reward is.
Logged

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2201 on: February 20, 2014, 05:40:30 PM »
lol @ mark E.but if i were to plonk a working device on your desk you would be convinced, after a while right?
Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2202 on: February 20, 2014, 05:45:34 PM »
Quote from: profitis on February 20, 2014, 05:40:30 PM
lol @ mark E.but if i were to plonk a working device on your desk you would be convinced, after a while right?
Profitis, given that you haven't come up with promised references, I won't be holding my breath that you would come up a physical proof as a substitute.
Logged

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2203 on: February 20, 2014, 06:08:46 PM »
ok @mark E but if i ever do that and your totaly satisfied with what you see as supporting my statement i,d hope you,d stick to your end of the bargain by giving me a job in your lab :-)
Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2204 on: February 20, 2014, 06:14:31 PM »
Quote from: profitis on February 20, 2014, 06:08:46 PM
ok @mark E but if i ever do that and your totaly satisfied with what you see as supporting my statement i,d hope you,d stick to your end of the bargain by giving me a job in your lab :-)
That's a tall "if" in there.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 ... 219   Go Up
« previous next »