Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1261595 times)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1545 on: October 23, 2013, 09:22:41 PM »
@sarkeizen  not my totalitarianism, natures totalitarianism
Please, lie to someone else.  If that's what you meant then you accidentally misspelled 'nature' as the most popular word in the English language.
Quote
if you dont get off your exceedingly lazy ass and build it or have somebody build it for you
Yawn.  Again there would be no test to satisfy your assertion.   
Quote
the internals dont change
Again, you're not qualified to make that statement.  Like many dictators you will, at some point learn that you may do all the violence you wish to those who question you but it doesn't stop you from being wrong.

Again...textbook cite please....:D Only 198 more posts to go...

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1546 on: October 23, 2013, 09:33:06 PM »
 @sarkeizen,,yawn,,youre basicly saying that platinum reacts with water beyond its equilibrium constant of reaction which,buddy-bro, is TOTALITARIANISTICALY forbidden by the rules of any chemistry textbook.i shouldnt have to cite this as you ought to know it from your schooldays (-:.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1547 on: October 23, 2013, 09:44:09 PM »
@sarkeizen,,yawn,,youre basicly saying
Not necessarily.  Again logic appears to be the thing you were terribly deprived of.

Texbook cite again...please.

Try to honor your promise once.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1548 on: October 23, 2013, 11:05:17 PM »
@sarkeizen try? Im using info from schoolbooks to honour my word.seriously dude,what more basic support could you want.im not trying to trick you when i say,follow the rules with this thing.its a schoolbook mind-perception-f@!&k actualy as schoolbooks teach us what happens when we throw the switch,and  it also teaches us what happens after we switch it off.what it forgot to do was combine the before and after together,thats all. combination of the before and after rules get us to the 'forever' bit.rules @sarkeizen,were made to be obeyed.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1549 on: October 24, 2013, 05:09:29 PM »
try?
Nope, so far no textbook cites.  Your promise, multiple times over was to cite a textbook, in fact your whole thesis is "the textbooks say/predict...". Without a textbook cite, from now on I just quote your first word, and ask for a cite. :D  Since the conversation moving forward does not matter to you this won't change your behavior but it will illustrate that you are not interested in moving your own argument forward.  Which is pretty close to the formal definition of a troll. :D

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1550 on: October 24, 2013, 06:59:19 PM »
@sarkeizen yawn my argument already moved forward long ago and concluded successfully on nature,s terms when i said to you to build it and bear witness to it.its you dragging on behind with citations paraphanalia while im 3 steps ahead into practical application already so its you looking pretty bad right now not me.theres no proofs better than replicability in any frei-energie courtroom threads so nature wins hands down.if you want to be defence attorney for the 2nd law you should be prepared for thread courtrooms and be able to pinpoint exactly how the exhibit runs out of juice,given the fullblown internal layout of the exhibit ontop of it.you havent and you wont.this does dramatic damage to your reputation here as you provide no deadly counter-argument  thus there is no argument,just a discussion going on with mediocre 2star entertainment value.its not even a discussion when the guy says the words,'build it' and 'check it with the schoolbooks' in the same sentence,its a lesson.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1551 on: October 24, 2013, 08:06:00 PM »
yawn
Your promise, multiple times over was to cite a textbook, in fact your whole thesis is "the textbooks say/predict...". Your words to this effect have been quoted by me countless times.  Technically speaking you haven't even made an argument to be refuted but please don't stop avoiding your argument on my account. Keep on demonstrating your trollishness and lack of concern about progressing to your stated point. :D :D I've got plenty of time before I reach "hero".

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1552 on: October 24, 2013, 08:29:10 PM »
@sarkeizen ho-hum now youre a even more lousy attorney for the 2nd law  than you were a minute ago.i said to use the textbook to help you build a perpetual motion device and you still demand yet another citation :-)

Madebymonkeys

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 164
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1553 on: October 25, 2013, 12:45:14 AM »
Hi Profitis,

How about you just quote a few textbooks or demonstrate your own practical experience of the everlasting power source?
If its so incredibly easy and well documented, it should be a piece of p&ss to replicate - lots of people here would love to know how.

Better still, make one (from the textbooks which show you how) and I will give you a £5000 if you can demonstrate it powering something common like an iPod for, say, a week running video constantly (there are caveats of course, I can explain if you are serious about the prize).

You know what, if its well documented (which you haven't proven thus far - correct me if I am wrong of course (by citing a peer-reviewed publication)) then I doubt it works - the amount of people looking for a 'perpetual' battery are in the millions and the chances of them missing an 'all textbooks' instruction-guide are slim.

Again, I would love to see this working but I cannot find any textbook or online source showing how!
Can you?

I am not siding with either of you in this argument (I am happy to sit on the fence and watch - as are a lot of people....it's entertaining!!!!) but I have to admit that Sarkeizen has a point - you aren't providing what you said was readily available and you aren't providing any practical proof. Instead, you are forcing Sarkeizen to disprove you when you haven't actually proven anything...pretty lame.

Why not put your theory where your mouth is and show us all how to do it or at least provide that fu:;ing cite - I cannot find it and I have tried, throw this dog a bone won't ya!

Thanks!

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1554 on: October 25, 2013, 12:48:44 AM »
ho-hum
So far no textbook cites.  Your promise, multiple times over was to cite a textbook, in fact your whole thesis was "the textbooks say/predict you can make a battery which will run and ipod like device forever".  As demonstrated earlier it's pretty doubtful that textbooks say any such thing.  Without a textbook cite, you don't have an argument to refute.  Which I suppose helps you keep your self-esteem since there is no argument to destroy as long as you keep hiding it. So I guess I can understand that. :D

Keep on trolling, EOA don't let thinking people lure you out into the open.  Keep on hiding.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1555 on: October 25, 2013, 04:42:56 PM »
hey @ maybemade if youre prepared to up the prize to £150000 i,l do exactly that with the ipod no problemo :-).i can do it publicly or privately for you its up to you.if i tell sarkeizen to go consult a college textbook and build a zinc-electrode concentration cell at standard or ambient pressure and temperature he has no problem with it.if i tell sarkeizen to go consult a college textbook and build an oxygen-electrode concentration cell at standard or ambient pressure and temperature he has a problem with it,i dont know why sir,he keeps demanding citations when i already cited the rules applicable to all such type of cells.he is behaving in an unusualy rebellious manner.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1556 on: October 25, 2013, 04:55:47 PM »
@sarkeizen im still waiting for you to get off your butt and build an oxygen-electrode concentration cell in line with the rules..im waiting..

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1557 on: October 25, 2013, 05:04:38 PM »
im
So far no textbook cites.  Your promise, multiple times over was to cite a textbook, in fact your whole thesis was "the textbooks say/predict you can make a battery which will run and ipod like device forever".  Yet nothing from a textbook has been cited.  As demonstrated earlier it's pretty doubtful that textbooks say any such thing.  Without a textbook cite, you don't have an argument to refute.  Which I suppose helps you keep your self-esteem since there is no argument to destroy as long as you keep hiding it. So I guess I can understand that. :D

Keep on trolling, EOA don't let thinking people lure you out into the open.  Keep on hiding.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1558 on: October 25, 2013, 05:12:35 PM »
@sarkeizen i already cited the rules now go and build,im still waiting.@sarkeizen i already cited the rules now go and build on paper,im still waiting..

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1559 on: October 25, 2013, 09:46:40 PM »
i
So far no textbook cites.  Your promise, multiple times over was to cite a textbook, in fact your whole thesis was "the textbooks say/predict you can make a battery which will run and ipod like device forever".  Yet nothing from a textbook has been cited.  As demonstrated earlier it's pretty doubtful that textbooks say any such thing.  Without a textbook cite, you don't have an argument to refute.  Which I suppose helps you keep your self-esteem since there is no argument to destroy as long as you keep hiding it. So I guess I can understand that. :D

Keep on trolling, EOA don't let thinking people lure you out into the open.  Keep on hiding.