Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1261360 times)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1485 on: October 09, 2013, 05:45:18 PM »
@sarkeizen so you  endorse that citation too,niiicccee
It's not a cite.

I get how it feels good to put words in someones mouth but all that does is communicate that you're frustrated.  I understand that.  You are being asked to argue logically, cite sources and think rationally.  Things you probably are not required to do while at the deep fryer.

Also didn't you "promise" a textbook cite?  Didn't you promise it "quick"? About four or so hours ago?  What is your word worth again?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1486 on: October 09, 2013, 05:51:34 PM »
@sarkeizen citation sitesmation,who cares what its called you agreed with it thats all that matters buddy.i just wanted you to agree with it thats all (-:

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1487 on: October 09, 2013, 05:53:41 PM »
@sarkeizen citation sitesmation,who cares what its called you agreed with it thats all that matters buddy.i just wanted you to agree with it thats all (-:
Again your frustration is showing here.  It's not what it's called it's what it is and what it is not.  It's no different than anything else you've written.  Clearly you don't think I agreed with everything else you wrote right?  If you did, why bother writing post after post of blather?  Why didn't you stop at post #1?

Hence by your own logic you can't believe that I agree with this. :D :D

Oh...and what about your promise?  Almost five hours now for the "quick" textbook cite you promised.  Are you having trouble hiring specialists in "looking things up in books"?  That can be tricky.

Keep on posting this kind of material...

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1488 on: October 09, 2013, 06:05:23 PM »
@sarkeizen whatever its called whatever it is you agreed with it thats all that matters and its completely different to my other citations btw(they were just formulas).dont get all mad about it @sarkeizen it was the right thing for you to do buds (-:. Thers no need for further citations,you agreed with the one citation you needed to agree with buds ..

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1489 on: October 09, 2013, 06:09:44 PM »
@sarkeizen whatever its called whatever it is
What it is, is not something that can be agreed with in the context of the discussion.  You just refuted yourself.  Good job.
Quote
and its completely different to my other citations
You haven't made any at all. :D :D :D :D
Quote
dont get all mad about it
Dude.  I asked you to keep posting this stuff.  Are you sure you aren't listening to the voices in your head?  Please keep going.  My friends love stories about people like you.

..and for the record...are you going to keep your promise?

lumen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1388
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1490 on: October 09, 2013, 06:20:40 PM »
@profitis
Sarky does not care about the math, or the theory, or even a working device, he only cares if the information was in (or could be derived from) a book, because if it's in a book then it must be true. (yea right)
 
He makes his money by writing books that are mostly cites or quotes from other books. That's why it's so important to him.
 
 
 

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1491 on: October 09, 2013, 06:24:34 PM »
@sarkeizen yeah you asked me to post em but i asked you to agree with em and you didnt,until today that is :-).dont be ashamed @sarkeizen its ok to agree with the frikkn textbook once in a while geez,youre acting like its against the law or something.yes i promised to quote a cite but realy,thers no need after today mate.whats the point now,that last citation summed it all up :-)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1492 on: October 09, 2013, 06:32:54 PM »
@lumen yes i know but he finaly agreed with my last citation,miracles happen :-)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1493 on: October 09, 2013, 06:49:40 PM »
@sarkeizen yeah you asked me to post em but i asked you to agree with em and you didnt,until today that is :-).
As far as I can tell you are just pretending that I said something because you are frustrated.  That may work among the weak minded but not with most people...Ok it probably works with Lumen.
Quote from: An Enormous Obstructionist Asshole
dont be ashamed @sarkeizen its ok to agree with the frikkn textbook
Ashamed of what?  What textbook?  So far all I've seen is you blathering and then you suddenly act like I've agreed with something which you can't seem to specify.
Quote from: An Enormous Obstructionist Asshole
yes i promised to quote a cite but realy,thers no need after today mate.whats the point now
Hmmmm...what would be the point?  Oh I know...how about keeping your word?  Not sure if that's important to you.  Might not be, after all haven't you just made up a position for me right now?

But please don't stop posting.  Like I said, this story is amazing.

Quote from: An Enormous Obstructionist Asshole
,that last citation summed it all up :-)
Again, you haven't posted any citations.  You even appeared to agree with this.  So again, not possible.

and now on to...
Quote from: Lumen the moronic
Sarky does not care about the math
What math?  Profitis posted some strings of symbols that he claimed were formulae and when I asked him what a particular symbol meant.  He wouldn't answer, no matter how many times he was asked.
Quote from: Lumen the moronic
, or the theory
What theory?  His theory is essentially *poof* magic.  I have been consistently requesting cites from reputable texts on theory but he keeps refusing.  He even promised to give one but now he's saying that he would break that promise.
Quote from: Lumen the moronic
, or even a working device
Sure a device that clearly and consistently violates 2LOT would be exceptionally interesting but anything that appeared to be something like that would very likely be wrong.
Quote from: Lumen the moronic
he only cares if the information was in (or could be derived from) a book, because if it's in a book then it must be true. (yea right)
Wow, way to miss the point.  Profits's main point was "All textbooks agree that X is true"
Quote from: Lumen the moronic
He makes his money by writing books that are mostly cites or quotes from other books. That's why it's so important to him.
Awesome Lumen the conspiracy theorist is back.  I love it.   For a second back there were you posted an actual argument I thought you were going all rational on me but nope....you're just as unhinged as you were when we first met.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1494 on: October 09, 2013, 08:01:18 PM »
@lumen yes i know but he finaly agreed with my last citation,miracles happen :-)

@Lumen This is an interesting question.   Do you think I agreed with some statement of Profitis's?  If so you can point out where I agreed.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1495 on: October 09, 2013, 08:50:18 PM »
@lumen he,s trying to crawl out of it now to rescue his stupidity lol. He,s trying to trick you into thinking i said that he agrees with me when i said he agreed with the textbook quote ayayayay.

lumen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1388
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1496 on: October 09, 2013, 09:07:21 PM »
@profitis , sarky doesn't want the quote, he wants the name of the book and where you found the information. Then, he can look it up and determine if what you claim is valid in his own mind.
 
 

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1497 on: October 09, 2013, 09:15:00 PM »
@lumen he,s trying to crawl out of it now
Crawl out of what exactly crazy man?
Quote
to rescue his stupidity
You are the only person I've ever met who would think about rescuing ones stupidity.
Quote
i said that he agrees with me
I said a you are claiming I agree with "a statement of profitis" if you post something here, all we know is it's a statement of yours.  It may in fact be from somewhere else but you know what would tell us one way or the other...a cite.  I could then go to the source and read it.

Funny how time and time again you make the argument against your own actions.  Citing is useful.  Start doing it someday.
Quote
when i said he agreed with the textbook quote
Well at least you finally realize it's not a cite.  I haven't agreed with anything...yet anyway.  I don't have a cite.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1498 on: October 09, 2013, 09:16:11 PM »
@lumen i gave sarkeizen the mail address and the quote he can look it up instantly.from the highest institution of electrochem in the states i believe.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1499 on: October 09, 2013, 09:21:19 PM »
@lumen i gave sarkeizen the mail address
Mail address?  So I'm supposed to send them a letter? :D
Quote
he can look it up instantly
A cite needs to point to a specific document and if it is large you need to provide information stating the position in the document.

I gave you an example, if you stubbornly refuse to follow it. Doesn't that make you the person with the problem?
Quote
highest institution of electrochem
You mean it's on a mountain?  Seriously how would you even evaluate this unless the field was ridiculously small.