To be honest we already have 1/2 the model of this process
it is called an endothermic chemical reaction which absorbs
environmental heat and produces chemical reactants. But none
so far that can reprocess the reactants to upgraded energy
and then keep themselves going that way. They all stop. Also
practically, impurities will build up in a chemical reactor and these
eventually deplete or block the reaction.
 
:S:MarkSCoffman

The Seebeck effect is almost like the Quenco device except I think it's probably closer to a charge polarized material. Where electrons with higher kinetic energy migrate through a barrier because of the polarization. Mainly because the Quenco chip does not require a cold side to force electron migration.

I don't get it, now the website doesn't show anything.

If this thing does anything close to what he is talking about there are so many companies that would be fighting over the rights to this thing.

Would have loved to get my hands on one just to see how efficient it is.

@vrstud
 
Your right...Maybe he ran into some "technical" difficulties?
 

Bump for a very very hopeful technology.   Are you still with us Philip?    I see quentron.com now has a brief summary of the Quenco and a wonderful statement of intentions for it. 

........................,,-~*~,,
......................./:.:.:.:.:.|
......................|;.;.;.;.;./
......................|.;.;.;.;.|
............._,,,,,_.).;.;.;.;.|
.........,,-":.:.:.:."~-,;.;.;.|
........(_,,,,---,,_:.:.);.;.;..",,
......,-":.:.:.:.:.""-,,/;.;.;.;.;.",
.....(:.__,,,,,,,,,___);.;.;.;.;.;|
...../"":.:.:.:.:.:.:¯""\;.;.;.;.;.,"
....\",__,,,,,,,,,,,__/;;;;;;;;;/\
.....\.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.);;;;;;;;;/:\
.......\,,,,,---~~~~;;;;;;;;,"::::\
.........."""~~--,,,,,,,,,,-"::::::::::\
...................\::::::::::::::::::::::\

Just in case this doesn't come across right that's a big Thumb's up in ascii art  (old school Internet   )

Good to hear from you again and yes sometimes you're at the mercy of others or even fate, I hope you'll pull through. But I'm sure you will if the technology is the real deal. And in my opinion, be VERY careful if/when you set foot in the USA, even weirder things tend to happen there. But as always I wish you good luck.

 @hollander, Well then you would be a fan of Mylow and Co.

If you read the posts my problem is not about getting investors, and in fact some of the people from here have made offers that I have not taken up.
The only proof that counts is either an openly sold product or a quenco in the hands of a totally independent tester(s). I am not going to go down the road of doing what you ask.

I can tell from your choice of words that you are merely being provocative, I suspect the fact that your first post is to me that you are just another of the moles from the mindless moletrap.

What you are trying to say, is that if I do not post a video here when you ask me to, then I am a scam.

If I have read you wrong then I apologize, but if you are genuine you would respect my rights to do it my way, your way (if I chose to do it) would get me absolutely nowhere, it would attract people who would accuse me of smoke and mirrors.

So I continue without wasting my time, and the time of others, to get it done in the lab and then out to the testers, if that leads people to call me a liar or a scammer, then that is their choice.


I posted here, after making a public apology for not making the launch date, simply because I was being courteous to those that posted a comment. You are welcome to make contact with me on the quentron page so that you can give me your actual name if you wish to talk further.


If people want me to give updates here, I will, but if people are going to be rude and cast aspersions, I will not.

Philip Hardcastle, is an inventor, well known in this forum of alternative energies. His work is based on the search for direct conversion of heat into electricity.


Quenco is the third design, and previous designs have been very well received in the community for its sound engineering, physical mechanisms used are pretty solid, and their designs are quite innovative.


We know that Quenco requires a series of expensive laboratory equipment, although accessible in any semiconductor company, but not something that can be done in the workshop of a house.


So be patient, as the best strategy for a device as disruptive, is irrefutable proof, and there is nothing more irrefutable proof that an independent third party test, this is what Phillip want and we support him the necessary time.

The force of the nature will help us !

Hollander,  Does it not seem foolish to come on here saying your are new and yet in the same post to say it seems so simple?  If it does not then I think most people would assume you are here to stir the pot (agitate).   In light of that I don't think you have any reason to be upset.  I fully agree with Philip's reply to your post and he even apologized up front if he was wrong.  While videos have become a popular way for backyard experimenters to show how they built something or to simply show they actually did build something it is a great way to open up hundreds of pages of debate and questions on how you faked a video if you are claiming overunity or some new power source.   But for a known physicist it would be an exercise if frustration and a waste of time.  Philip is going about this the right way.  If you think this is simple I would strongly suggest you read over this page thoroughly:
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/howtheywentwrong.htm