Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1277312 times)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3225 on: April 25, 2015, 11:14:06 PM »
Sarkeizen:'Can you point me to where I was talking about an event?'

If two degrees of freedom of arrangement is 01 then how many degrees of freedom is represented by 0 1/2?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3226 on: April 25, 2015, 11:27:08 PM »
Here.you wrote this:O(X^1/2).what does this mean. You restricted quenco's ACTIONS to that.'The BBBV restricts the ability to create a machine
USING quantum effects which has a complexity class
of O(1) (for sorting EVENTS) because the BBBV states that the
greatest improvement you can get from quantum
EFFECTS is O(X^1/2).'

If 01 represents a sorting EVENT what kind of EVENT is O(X^1/2)
« Last Edit: April 26, 2015, 09:30:16 AM by profitis »

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3227 on: April 26, 2015, 06:34:49 AM »
Here.you wrote this:O(X^1/2).what does this mean
Uhm...you posted several times about O notation acting as if you knew what you were saying.  Doesn't that mean you were bullshitting?

O(1) means that resource consumption remains constant with input size (not including the resources required to represent the input).
O(X) means that resource consumption grows at a constant rate with input size.
O(X^1/2) means that the resource consumption grows at a rate of X^1/2 with input size.

Can you figure out the rest on your own?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3228 on: April 26, 2015, 02:50:19 PM »
Cumon mr sarkeizen if O1 is deterministicly time consuming due to two degrees of freedom and hence banned from quenco then what is O(X^1/2) and how much time does it consume(We doubt mr sarkeizen shall return to this thread)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3229 on: April 27, 2015, 08:03:52 AM »
'O(X^1/2) means that the resource consumption grows at a rate of X^1/2 with input size.'

Excellent. so a dead switch with only one degree of freedom of movement (o) is basicly that.since a single electron can be in one position and two positions at the same time we can allow for a 01 and 01/2 simultaneously.thus bbbv isnot violated because of heisenberg uncertainty where we can be technicly oo and o1 at same time


profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3230 on: April 27, 2015, 08:09:21 AM »
Your demon is bending not only space,but timeframes too.bbbv is not violated

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3231 on: April 27, 2015, 01:57:41 PM »
thus bbbv isnot violated because of heisenberg uncertainty where we can be technicly oo and o1 at same time
Yawn.  I've already addressed this, there's no dependency on implementation.  All the proof is concerned with is how you put the data in, how you read the data out, the way it scales with data size and if the outcome is deterministic.   Everything else is irrelevant.

You could try reading the paper instead of constantly making things up and pretending they have something to do with this.  Derive your argument from actual knowledge rather than ignorance for a change. :)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3232 on: April 27, 2015, 08:41:54 PM »
Sarkeizen'Yawn.  I've already addressed this, there's no dependency on implementation'

Big mistake gunzo.you already described how bbbv should implementationarily ban a 01 from quenco.this was your fuckup not mine.bbbv bans instantaneous 01 from implementation.heisenberg unbans instantaneous 01 from quenco via 01/2

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3233 on: April 27, 2015, 08:48:24 PM »
I would like to remind all children here that certain molecules in nature eg N2 molecule also posess one electron shared between two energy bands,at the same time

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3234 on: April 28, 2015, 12:22:13 AM »
Big mistake gunzo.you already described how bbbv should implementationarily ban a 01 from quenco.
Please cite where specifically I say that the BBBV depends on some aspect of implementation.

Again if you read the paper instead of making things up....

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3235 on: April 29, 2015, 07:26:25 PM »
You said that some aspect of implementation is banned by bbbv.how can some aspect of implementation be banned by bbbv if it has nothing to do with implementation.bbbv is not violated anyways regardless wether it has anything to do with implementation or not.heisenberg principle reigns supreme and you get a simultaneous 01 and 01/2 at the same time.what do you want to christen it then mr sarkeizen 011/2 sounds cool I leave it up to you

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3236 on: May 01, 2015, 03:25:16 AM »
You said that some aspect of implementation is banned by bbbv.
Please cite specifically where I said that some aspect of implementation is restricted by BBBV.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3237 on: May 02, 2015, 07:36:30 PM »
Quote sarkeizen'Please cite specifically where I said that some aspect of implementation is restricted by BBBV.'

Let it go its no longer important.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3238 on: May 02, 2015, 09:05:15 PM »
Let me tell you what is many miles more important.the fact that we're getting a cause and an effect,at the same time,blurring distinction between the two.this is more important than quenco itself.more important than you.more important than me

sаrkeizen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3239 on: June 19, 2015, 09:04:14 PM »
Let me tell you what is many miles more important.
More important than you retreating from your own argument?