Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83995
  • *Latest: pelzer06

  • *Total Posts: 892891
  • *Total Topics: 15673
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 8
  • *Total: 8

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 968882 times)

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2475 on: June 05, 2014, 01:42:34 PM »
you come across as being arrogant and condescending.
Must...resist...comparison...to...darkly...colored...housewares
Quote
and you should perhaps ask yourself why I have spent years and piles on money if I did not have some extreme reason for my confidence. It beggars belief that your advice would be news to me,
It is apparently news to you that rich people, educated people and even rich/educated people all waste time and money on things that are moronic.  Are you sure you can't think of a single example of that? Or do you claim that every endeavor was "on to something".

Rossi?  Steorn?  Firepower International?
Quote
or that you would imagine I would suddenly shout out that I have wasted the time of dozens of people, years of research when I should have just asked you.
Well one could only hope but I agree it's not likely for you to change your mind.  It's far more likely that you will storm off in a huff based on some imagined slight.

Do I need to put a QED here?

I think I do.

QED.
Quote
I simply have nothing more to discuss with you, all I can show you is my success, and no doubt until 20th August you will continue to tell people that I am wrong
I, for one will be telling people that well after August 20th.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2475 on: June 05, 2014, 01:42:34 PM »

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2476 on: June 06, 2014, 02:49:41 AM »
you should perhaps ask yourself why I have spent years and piles on money if I did not have some extreme reason for my confidence.
Idea: Can someone give Miles Mathis a great deal of money to research Pi=4?  Thus convincing Philip that there is some extreme reason for his confidence?

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2477 on: June 06, 2014, 04:46:53 AM »
Mathis goes out of his way to promote what he knows is silly BS.  Mr. Hardcastle is on a quest.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2477 on: June 06, 2014, 04:46:53 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2478 on: June 06, 2014, 05:24:58 AM »
I don't know if Mathis is a con man or simply deluded.  A conman is more likely considering how ridiculous the claim.  Grading on the same scale I'm not sure about Philip.  He might be simply deluded but there are a few things which suggest the opposite to me.  For example he might really have the sensitivities of someone from 1837 London.  I simply find it hard to believe.  You could never operate in the real world that way.  Can someone, who isn't a dictator of a small country be more than five decades old, worked in all sorts of places and still be L'Enfant Terrible?  Seems less likely than the alternative.  It's just a way to avoid awkward questions.

Again Philip claims to be involved in all sorts of business activities but neither plans for the proper lead time or does any of the normal activities associated with said activities.  His website talked about a "launch" but no effort was put into advertisement (other than his website).  He has claimed to be producing a product but clearly has no clue about the amount of time it takes to tool up for a production run.  You might do a custom or hand-create products but the point of that would be if your product doesn't work.  Which would mean he's lying (to us, to himself?) about his confidence.

In these things, Philip looks like someone trolling the OU community. 

Such classifications aren't mutually exclusive either.  I suspect that lots of people perform "little cons" backed by considerable delusion because "I just know it will work this time".

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2479 on: June 06, 2014, 05:53:10 AM »
What you say could be correct.  It is not my interpretation of Mr. Hardcastle.  I don't think it is so hard to see where he gets his motivation.  The Second Law is a very frustrating thing.  As Dr. Sheehan notes, it's one of the few principles we have that has not seen any effective modification in over 100 years. So one might very well question why there is no exception out there someplace.  The trouble is  that as frustrating and unsatisfying as the Second Law may be:  It's here to stay until someone discovers solid evidence against it. 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2479 on: June 06, 2014, 05:53:10 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2480 on: June 07, 2014, 07:05:42 PM »
No @markE.Its more a case of 2lot re-arrangements being not quite the 'in' thing to do.its not in the elites interests to re-arrange such a law so it aint going to officialy happen regardless what evidence arises.for example,another 50years will go by with no official consensus over karpens lil battery even though it fits perfectly into college textbooks. 

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2481 on: June 07, 2014, 07:59:02 PM »
it fits perfectly into college textbooks.
An assertion you've never been able to demonstrate in any useful way.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2481 on: June 07, 2014, 07:59:02 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2482 on: June 07, 2014, 08:53:59 PM »
It wasn't me who asserted overpotential differences @sarkeizen.it was the textbooks.I only asserted that you could not escape a 2lot disgrace if you agreed with the textbooks and that that assertion had no alternative assertion in theory or practice.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2483 on: June 07, 2014, 08:59:13 PM »
it was the textbooks.
So far, no textbook cites mentioning violating 2LOT.  So far no textbook cites that provide the basis of a formal argument to violating 2LOT.  So far, you haven't substantiated your claim. :D

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2483 on: June 07, 2014, 08:59:13 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2484 on: June 07, 2014, 09:26:59 PM »
So why is it then impossible for you to point out how the textbook assertion does not end in a nightmare 2lot disgrace then @sarkeizen.the textbooks asserted that gas spillover will in fact take place.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2485 on: June 07, 2014, 09:44:42 PM »
So why is it then impossible for you to point out how the textbook assertion
It's not impossible.  It's just infeasible and it's infeasible because as it stands your assertion appears to be "Somewhere there exists a textbook from which a formal argument can be made for the violation of 2LOT".  You could equally argue that "Somewhere there exists a textbook from which a formal argument can be made for the existence of seventeen eyed fish".  Does that make the existence of seventeen eyed fish likely?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2485 on: June 07, 2014, 09:44:42 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2486 on: June 08, 2014, 12:41:50 AM »
It's not impossible.  It's just infeasible and it's infeasible because as it stands your assertion appears to be "Somewhere there exists a textbook from which a formal argument can be made for the violation of 2LOT".  You could equally argue that "Somewhere there exists a textbook from which a formal argument can be made for the existence of seventeen eyed fish".  Does that make the existence of seventeen eyed fish likely?
Maybe it was an eighteen eyed fish.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2487 on: June 08, 2014, 01:16:25 AM »
Lol but it is impossible.that's what I'm saying man.it is totaly impossible for you or anyone else to prevent the textbooks given spillover gradient from ending in a total anti-2lot nightmare.you are implying a net change of some sort in the system is taking place when abso-f*****g-lutely none is taking place.your 2nd law says change MUST take place.where is the change in this system taking place @sarkeizen.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2488 on: June 08, 2014, 01:34:25 AM »
Lol but it is impossible.that's what I'm saying man.
No.  You said "why is it impossible".  It isn't. It's just infeasible since your assertion is "somewhere (but profitis won't say) there exists a textbook cite and a formal argument (but profits can't tell you) which ends in a 2LOT violation".

If this *isn't* your argument then you can demonstrate by providing a textbook cite and a formal argument.  However since you can't. Even if this isn't your INTENDED argument.  It's still the STRONGEST reason why it's infeasible.  So until you refute that.  Your "It's impossible to refute because of _____" is an argument that you can simply not make.

Please feel free to try.  Since you have failed at so much in this thread might as well go for the trifecta.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2489 on: June 08, 2014, 01:56:54 AM »
Lol but it is impossible.that's what I'm saying man.it is totaly impossible for you or anyone else to prevent the textbooks given spillover gradient from ending in a total anti-2lot nightmare.you are implying a net change of some sort in the system is taking place when abso-f*****g-lutely none is taking place.your 2nd law says change MUST take place.where is the change in this system taking place @sarkeizen.
In order to support your position you need to show but one text book citation that states as you claim.  The burden of proving an extraordinary claim falls on the claimant, which in this case is you.  You have over many months of making your claim failed to show even one text book citation that supports your claim.  You present yourself as unable to substantiate your extraordinary claim.  Consequently, I and many others rightly dismiss your extraordinary claim.

 

OneLink