Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1060482 times)

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2220 on: February 21, 2014, 03:51:44 AM »
Quote from: A monumental asshole
be too tedious for me to cite and splain every single cause-and-effect
...and what did I say?
Since all I am arguing is that you can't support that statement strictly using textbooks and formal logic.
You just conceded my point loser-boy.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2221 on: February 21, 2014, 11:08:30 AM »
@sarkeizen you have to dismantle and destroy my statement number 2 before you can say loserboy loserboy

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2222 on: February 21, 2014, 01:05:57 PM »
@sarkeizen you have to
Show that the true profitis statement is unproven and that profitis can not support it.  Done. :D :D :D :D

Thanks for conceding my point loserboy. :D :D :D :D

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2223 on: February 21, 2014, 01:46:59 PM »
@sarkeizen: 'show that the new profitis statement is unproven and that the true profitis statement isnt supported by it' undone :D you concede my whole argument loserboy :D:D:D

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2224 on: February 21, 2014, 03:13:48 PM »
@sarkeizen: 'show that the fake profitis statement is unproven and that the true profitis statement isnt supported by it'
You have posted no formal logical argument.  The True Profitis Statement - requires a formal argument because it states that an ordinary textbook(s) and logic are all that are required for it's proof.

If the fake profitis statement can be demonstrated with a formal logical argument reaching an identical conclusion to the True Profits Statement and ordinary textbooks then please show me where this was done.  However we all know it has not been done which means either...

The fake profitis statement is:
a) Not equivalent to the True Profitis Statement
b) and/or Unproven and unsupported.

QED Loser. :D :D :D :D  Your ability to understand logic is about as bad as Philips

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2225 on: February 21, 2014, 03:42:25 PM »
Well, it has been a week and Profitis has not found a reference.  I think that a week was plenty of time for Profitis to find a reference to support his seemingly unusual idea.  I therefore conclude that Profitis couldn't find such a reference and his unusual idea is flawed.

Quote
Offline profitis

    Hero Member
    *****
    Posts: 1080
        View Profile
        Personal Message (Offline)

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2118 on: February 14, 2014, 03:25:30 PM »

    Quote

im going to have to hunt for one mark E. But dont you think that the o2 potential on the anode is diluted by the larger surface area of submerged electrode surface and the potential more concentrated on the cathode with less area for charge distribution?

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2226 on: February 21, 2014, 06:38:29 PM »
lol @sarkeizen.check your feeble attempts to derail the monster profitis statement! Lololololol! Giggle :D. While we,re waiting for you to disrupt that awesomely powerful iron-clad statement i think its time to move onto the next phase of our discussion: the ramifications that a text-book-strangled kelvin law will now have on other areas of science eg.electromagnetism,magnetism,electrostatics,semiconductors,quantum physics,steady-state-non-equilibrium physics,nuclear physics etc.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2227 on: February 21, 2014, 06:51:57 PM »
cmon mr superscientist mark E..we want you to put your money where your mouth is.we dont wana hear just talk.we want you to topple the monstrosity of a statement,the profitis statement.cmon,pull those formulas out clint-eastwood styles :D (giggle).you cant because that statement casts a huge dark shadow over your hero: captain pile-steamer-kelvin :D

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2228 on: February 21, 2014, 07:01:11 PM »
cmon mr superscientist mark E..we want you to put your money where your mouth is.we dont wana hear just talk.we want you to topple the monstrosity of a statement,the profitis statement.cmon,pull those formulas out clint-eastwood styles :D (giggle).you cant because that statement casts a huge dark shadow over your hero: captain pile-steamer-kelvin :D
Do you really think you are going to get somewhere with behavior like that?

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2229 on: February 21, 2014, 07:08:44 PM »
@mark E..unless you destroy my statement..yes (-: 

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2230 on: February 21, 2014, 07:39:21 PM »
lol @sarkeizen.check your feeble attempts to derail the monster profitis statement!
Your fake statements are simply irrelevant.  No cite, no formal argument.  So no equivalency to the True Profitis Statement.

I get that your ability to understand logic is at the Philip Hardcastle level but try to think...see if you can reach the high-school level. :D

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2231 on: February 21, 2014, 07:41:09 PM »
@mark E..unless you destroy my statement..yes (-:
Then you are badly mistaken.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2232 on: February 21, 2014, 07:50:20 PM »
rubbish @sarkeizen.the latest profitis statement is so overpowering that you cant a)de-stabilize it b)dismantle it or c)bring a scientist onboard to quash it.it annihilates anything standing inbetween profitis statement 1 and a kelvin breach and to the contrary,makes the hardcastle proposal look a whole lot shinier and sparkly by default.

Offline sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2233 on: February 21, 2014, 08:03:45 PM »
rubbish @sarkeizen.the latest profitis statement is
i) Demonstrated to be not equivalent to the True Profits Statement or
ii) Demonstrated to be unsupported and/or unproven.

See if you assert i) is not true (that they are equivalent) then ii) automatically is true and if you assert ii) is not true (that it is supported) then i) is automatically not true.

It's all up there.  You can read it for yourself.  Just telling yourself over and over again that you think you are right doesn't actually make you any less wrong.

Like I said try moving up from the Philip Hardcastle School of Logic to something actually taught somewhere. :D

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2234 on: February 21, 2014, 09:31:11 PM »
yawn @mark E.my statement still stands.getting taller by the second..