Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 2007624 times)

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5280 on: December 15, 2012, 12:24:44 PM »
NOW... back to question you keep avoiding with your damned red herring logical fallacies...

top comment @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7zQdplnCA8
Quote from: TinselKoala
Rosemary, I strongly recommend that you drop this silly story and move on with your life. I have.


has he now? has he 'dropped this story and moved on with his life'?

A SIMPLE YES OR NO IS ALL THAT IS REQUIRED MONKEYBOY...  SO WHICH IS IT?  YES?  or  NO?

happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5281 on: December 15, 2012, 12:32:08 PM »
that's not what i said at all... ::) you LIAR.

True, that's not what you said.  It's what you did.

You know the old fable about the boy and wolf, yours could be called the boy who cried 'logical fallacy.'

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5282 on: December 15, 2012, 12:39:58 PM »
True, that's not what you said.  It's what you did.

You know that old fable about the boy and wolf, yours could be called the boy who cried 'logical fallacy.'
except, the boy who cried wolf didn't see any wolves... and yet when i cry logical fallacy there ALWAYS IS ONE...AND THE RECORD DEMONSTRATES THIS... just because you have no clue what a red herring is doesn't mean others don't... idiot.

so... tk has been on this forum for a YEAR prior the start of the ainslie thread and yet he claims he was "new" to the forum. LIES.

he claims to 'research' the things and people he 'gets involved with' and yet when someone on the internet who he don't know. someone who has called him a worthless bum says quite facetiously... "send me your address and i'll send you the part you worthless bum" he sends them his address? and then claims naivete? DAMNED LIES.  how stupid are you? and how stupid is he?

AS I HAVE MAINTAINED NUMEROUS TIMES... AND AS I HAVE SHOWN WITH EVIDENCES FROM THE RECORD... IT WAS, AND STILL IS, CRYSTAL CLEAR TO ANY SANE PERSON, THAT I NEVER INTENDED TO SEND HIM ANYTHING.



NOW... back to question you keep avoiding with your damned red herring logical fallacies...

top comment @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7zQdplnCA8
Quote from: TinselKoala
Rosemary, I strongly recommend that you drop this silly story and move on with your life. I have.


has he now? has he 'dropped this story and moved on with his life'?

A SIMPLE YES OR NO IS ALL THAT IS REQUIRED...  SO WHICH IS IT?  YES?  or  NO?

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5283 on: December 15, 2012, 01:00:37 PM »
TK has already answered you moron.

You have been around a long time haven't you Steve, never checked a word of that article before publishing it did you Steve, your scientific credibility is in the toilet isn't it Steve, you can be found in all the old Ainslie threads supporting her bogus claims can't you Steve, you sure sound like Steve to me... Steve.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Strange-Case-of-the-Ro-by-Steve-Windisch-ji-091219-425.html


I have watched you hunt down people for years, stalking them thread to thread, using your logical fallacy weapon to wear them down until they lose it and quit, a war of attrition waged on this community, by you. I have had enough of it, so, I have sent Stephan a PM formally requesting that you be permanently banned from this forum for your behaviour and level of scientific contribution to this community. If Stephan has not banned you by 25th December 2012, 10 days time, I will formally request that he ban me permanently instead. Either way a decision must be made, he is going to lose one of us, it will be up to the community to decide if Stephan's choice is the correct one, or not.
hey chickenhawk... i see you're still holding a grudge because i called out your logical fallacies and gross hyperbole in the "How do you make Money from an overunity device that can not be patented?" thread...  ::)

get over, move on with your life... i have. ;)


NOW... back to question you keep avoiding with your damned red herring and ad hominem logical fallacies...

top comment @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7zQdplnCA8
Quote from: TinselKoala
Rosemary, I strongly recommend that you drop this silly story and move on with your life. I have.


has he now? has he 'dropped this story and moved on with his life'?

A SIMPLE YES OR NO IS ALL THAT IS REQUIRED...  SO WHICH IS IT?  YES?  or  NO?

happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5284 on: December 15, 2012, 09:05:22 PM »
except, the boy who cried wolf didn't see any wolves... and yet when i cry logical fallacy there ALWAYS IS ONE...AND THE RECORD DEMONSTRATES THIS

The record demonstrates you constantly use the phrase 'logical fallacy,' and others, when there is none. It's quite absurd and you should stop.   

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5285 on: December 16, 2012, 03:38:29 AM »
The Thread is now closed, cause it has only gone into flamewars with no real content anymore.